DUBROVNIK, REFUGE OF THE ARTS

The intellectual life of the Yugoslavs would, but for Dubrovnik, have

died out altogether. And even at Dubrovnik, of which the Southern Slav

thinks always with pride and gratitude, there was a movement to turn

away from the Slav world. This was certainly one of the periods, which

reappear not seldom in the story of Dubrovnik, when it seemed that

miracles of wisdom would be wanted for the steering of the ship of

State. Venice and the Turkish Empire were as two tremendous waves that

rose on either side. By a very clever show of yielding, the little

Republic had for a time disarmed the Turks, and, later on, when the

Venetians declared that all the commercial treaties existing between

the Dalmatian towns and Turkey were void, it was necessary for

Dubrovnik also to accommodate herself to this enactment and to

restrict her trade to Spain and the African coast. It would under

these circumstances be most imprudent, so urged some of the citizens

of Dubrovnik, if they were officiously to advertise their relationship

to the hapless Slavs, who were enslaved to the Republic's mighty

neighbours. And in 1472 the Senate had directed that within its walls

no speeches should henceforth be made in Slav. But as the Senate

consisted of forty-five nobles, and these were obliged to be over

forty years of age, one may say that they did not represent what was

most virile in the State; at all events, this isolated tribute to

expediency may for a time have been observed in that assemblage, in

the world of letters it was disregarded. And this is the more

wonderful when we remember that Dubrovnik had from Italy a language

that was already formed, she had Italian models and printers and even

their literary taste. But [vS]i[vs]ko Men[vc]etic and D[vz]ore

Dr[vz]i['c]--both of them nobles, by the way--started at once to write

verses in Slav; not very sublime verses, as they were principally

love-songs of the school that imitated Petrarch, but it is pleasing to

recall that they were written in spite of the thunders of Elias

Crijevi['c], a contemporary renegade. Under the name of Elias di Cerva

this gentleman travelled to Rome, where he made himself a disciple of

Pomponius Laetus and once more modified his good Slav name into AElius

Lampridius Cerva, and received at the Quirinal Academy the crown of

Latin poetry. Having thus qualified himself to be a schoolmaster, he

went back to Dubrovnik and settled down to that profession. He was

likewise very active as a publicist on the "barbaric" Slav language,

which, as he was never tired of screaming, was a menace both to Latin

and Italian. One is apt to call those persons reasonable, among other

things, whose opinions coincide with one's own; but is there anybody

willing to assert that because the Slav culture of that epoch was,

like many another culture, inferior to the Italian; because the

Italian towns were in the rays of artistic glory, whereas the Slav

world was not; because on that account the Slavs were wise enough to

profit from the Italian masters; is there anyone who, because some of

the Slavs were and are unwise enough to be more Italian than the

Italians, will assert that the Slav has no right to develop a national

art, a national State?

It is superfluous to make a catalogue of those Ragusan writers who

were more or less successful in purging their Slav language of

Italianisms. Luckily they had at their doors the language of

Herzegovina, which is unanimously considered by philologists to be the

purest of the Serbo-Croat dialects. The most considerable of these

writers was Gunduli['c], although he never could forget that his

productions must be pious, and, beyond all other aims, present a

moral. It was in Poland that he saw the liberator of the Southern

Slavs, and what he sings in Osman, his chief work, is the overthrow of

Sultan Osman II. by Vladislav, heir to the Polish throne. As this poem

of the seventeenth century, this flowering of the Slav spirit, might

be looked upon as assailing "the integrity of the Turkish Empire," it

was only allowed to circulate in MS. until 1830. According to Dr.

Murko,[26] Professor of Slav Language and Literature at the

University of Leipzig, this work surpasses Tasso's _Jerusalem

Delivered_; but it is commonly thought that there is more literary

merit in Gunduli['c]'s _Dubravka_, a lovely, patriotic pastoral. The

worthy Franciscan Ka[vc]i['c],[27] who followed him with a

work--_Familiar Conversations on the Slovene Nation_--would perhaps be

regarded by us as more remarkable for his originality; but this

patriotic production, in verse and in prose, didactic, chronological,

allegorical and epic, has made him immortal. Beginning with Teuta, the

first king of the Slovene nation, who flourished, says the author,

about the year 3732 B.C., he proceeds imperturbably and sometimes in

moving numbers to relate the lives and virtues of all the other

Slovene kings, be they Bosnian, Croat, Serbian, Bulgarian; it may well

be that the secret of his vogue is, in the words of the critic

Lucianovi['c], that "he was less a minstrel of the past than of the

future." On the fruitful island of Hvar (Lesina) there arose an

exquisite lyric poet, Luci['c], whose romantic drama _Robinja_ (The

Female Slave) is said to have great importance in the history of the

modern theatre; but the most famous of Hvar's poets was Hektorovi['c]

(1487-1572). "This nobleman with his democratic ideas," says the

Russian savant Petrovski in speaking of his _Ribanje_ (Fishing), "is

the intimate friend of his fisher-folk, the singers of national songs,

and with his remarkable realism he was three centuries before his

time." When we finally note that at Zadar in the sixteenth century

there was written _Planine_ (The Mountains), in which Zorani['c] gave

us the most patriotic work of mediaeval Yugoslav literature, we may say

at least that the Dalmatian Yugoslavs did not abandon hope.

By the way, these remarks on the Slav literature of Dalmatia may be

thought otiose, for the national aspirations would not have been less

fervent if they had been expressed in Italian. One is reminded by the

well-known Italian writer, Giuseppe Prezzolini,[28] that until last

century the ruling classes of Piedmont spoke French; Alfieri and

Cavour had to "learn Italian," but who would on this account pretend

that Piedmont is a French province? There is really nothing strange

in the fact that the Pan-Slavist newspaper _L'Avenire_, published at

Dubrovnik from August 1848 until March 1849 by Dr. Casna[vc]i['c], was

written in Italian, or that those Irish who desire to be free from

their hated oppressor have not completely given up the use of his

language.

The Birth of Yugoslavia, Volume 1 · 第 47 / 193 题