RESULTS OF BURNING OVER PEELED STUMPS.

==========+========+========+===========+========+========+=========

| Number |Average | Number | Point |Diseased| Pycnidia

| of | height | of | of | bark | on

|vigorous| of | diseased |disease | on | wood

Number. |sprouts.|vigorous| sprouts. | on | stump. | of

| |sprouts | |sprouts.| | stump.

| |(feet). | | | |

----------+--------+--------+-----------+--------+--------+--------

1, | 4 | 3 | 0 | | |

2, | 8 | 6 | 3 | Base | Yes |

3, | 2 | 2 | 0 | | Yes |

4, | 4 | 4 | 0 | | |

5, | 6 | 6 | 1 | Base | Yes | Yes

6, | 7 | 4 | 0 | | | Yes

7, | 3 | 3 | 0 | | |

8, | 2 | 4 | 0 | | |

9, | 5 | 4 | 0 | | |

10, | 0 | 0 | 0 | | |

11, | 3 | 4 | 0 | | |

12, | 4 | 3 | 0 | | |

13, | 1 | 1 | 0 | | |

14, | 4 | 3 | 0 | | |

15, | 4 | 7 | 0 | | |

16, | 3 | 6 | 0 | | |

17, | 4 | 4 | 1 | Base | Yes | Yes

18, | 4 | 4 | 0 | | |

19, | 4 | 5 | 0 | | |

20, | 1 | 6 | 0 | | |

21, | 3 | 5 | 0 | | |

22, | 2 | 3 | 0 | | |

23, | 4 | 4 | 0 | | |

24, | 2 | 2 | 0 | | |

25, | 3 | 5 | 0 | | |

26, | 0 | 0 | 0 | | |

27, | 2 | 4 | 1 | Base | Yes |

28, | 6 | 4 | 0 | | |

29, | 6 | 6 | 2 | Base | Yes | Yes

+--------+--------+-----------+--------+--------+--------

Average, | 3.5 | 3.9 | [10]0.078 | | |

| | | | | |

| | | [11]0.17 | | |

----------+--------+--------+-----------+--------+--------+--------

[10] Sanitation well done—stumps well peeled, well burned or creosoted,

and refuse burned.

[11] Sanitation fairly well done, but stumps not thoroughly peeled or

burned.

One very heavily burned stump, cut close to ground, had an area of

diseased bark at crotch between roots, and a diseased sprout (No. 27).

The least charring was always in crotches between roots at or near

the soil line. Heavily burned stumps have weak sprouts or none, as a

rule, about one stump out of twenty having no sprouts. Creosoted stumps

usually have more and stronger sprouts than burned stumps.

Creosoting is cheaper than burning over the stump, on account of the

labor saved. While it is apparently effective where the peeling and

creosoting are well done, burning is safer, although more expensive. A

gallon of creosote costs about 15 cents and will treat from 50 to 100

medium sized (10”-15”) stumps, varying with the height of the stump and

the temperature of the air and creosote. The creosote may be profitably

used where other trees will be injured by fire or where there is great

danger of starting forest fires. Other methods of treating the stump

have been tried, such as spraying the stumps with crude oil or kerosene

and then burning them, after peeling. The stumps have also been buried

under a mound of soil through which the sprouts had to penetrate. These

treatments are less efficient and more expensive than creosote and

cannot be recommended.

[Illustration: Heavily burned stump showing very few sprouts; also

shows remnants of improperly burned tops, bearing growth of blight

fungus, (on right).]

[Illustration: Improper piling and burning of parts of an infected

tree. The brush from the tops must be piled, and the edges of the pile

pushed on the fire from time to time.]

Final report of the Pennsylvania Chestnut Tree Blight Commission · 第 126 / 145 题