RESULTS OF CREOSOTING PEELED STUMPS.

=========+========+=========+==========+========+========+==========

| Number | Average | Number | Point |Diseased| Pycnidia

| of |height of| of | of |bark on | on wood

Number. |vigorous|vigorous | diseased |disease | stump. | of stump

|sprouts.| sprouts | sprouts. | on | |(creosoted

| | (feet). | |sprouts.| | portion).

---------+--------+---------+----------+--------+--------+----------

1, | 14 | 5 | | | Yes |

2, | 8 | 5 | 1 | Base | Yes |

3, | 8 | 5 | | | |

4, | 6 | 6 | | | |

5, | 4 | 4 | | | |

6, | 4 | 5 | | | |

7, | 5 | 6 | | | |

8, | 3 | 3 | | | |

9, | 12 | 5 | 1 | Base | Yes |

10, | 7 | 7 | | | |

11, | 4 | 6 | | | |

12, | 3 | 5 | | | |

13, | 1 | 3 | | | |

14, | 6 | 6 | | | |

15, | 2 | 5 | | | |

16, | 5 | 3 | | | |

17, | 2 | 4 | | | |

18, | 6 | 5 | | | Yes |

19, | 2 | 4 | | | |

20, | 4 | 3 | | | |

21, | 4 | 6 | | | |

22, | 6 | 7 | | | |

23, | 10 | 7 | | | Yes | Yes

24, | 3 | 5 | 2 | Base | Yes |

25, | 1 | 4 | | | |

26, | 3 | 4 | 1 | Base | Yes |

27, | 8 | 5 | | | |

+--------+---------+----------+--------+--------+----------

Average, | 5.2 | 5.2 | 0.035 | | |

| | |of sprouts| | |

| | | | | |

| | | 0.148 | | |

| | | of stumps| | |

---------+--------+---------+----------+--------+--------+----------

No pycnidia were found on wood of peeled stumps after creosoting,

except in one case, where a large area of inner bark adhered to the

stump at time of creosoting, and later raised up, exposing an untreated

wood surface. The inner side of this bark and the uncreosoted area of

wood were covered with pycnidia. Creosote painted on thick bark at the

base of stumps or on an exposed root does not appear to hinder the

growth of the fungus. Hence, since stumps can be peeled but a very

short distance below the soil, especially in winter, it is believed

that creosoted stumps are more apt to have infected sprouts after a

few years than burned stumps. The danger point is at the ground line,

and exposed roots and the crotches at the collar between roots are

especially liable to have areas of bark that are missed in peeling. If

this bark becomes affected, it brings the disease very close to the

young sprouts that spring up around the stumps, and sooner or later

causes infection.

The stumps in Table III were burned in December, 1912. The data given

below are the result of an inspection made December 12, 1913.

Final report of the Pennsylvania Chestnut Tree Blight Commission · 第 124 / 145 题