SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS.

Three months previous to the date when the ashes of Sir Godfrey Kneller

mingled with kindred dust, the first Englishman who, according to

the eloquent eulogium of Burke, added the praise of the elegant arts

to the other glories of his country, was cradled, with time-honored

formalities, in a borough town of Devonshire.

Joshua Reynolds was the tenth of the numerous family with which his

parents――a worthy and old-fashioned couple――were blessed. His father

was a scholar and divine, known and valued in the province for the

respectability of his learning, the innocence of his heart, and the

simplicity of his mind. Besides, he is stated to have been of so

singularly absent a tendency, that once, while performing a journey

on horseback, he dropped one of his top-boots by the way, without

perceiving the unusual and inconvenient loss he had met with. Doubtless

when he arrived at home, this laughable and disastrous incident would

furnish his fruitful dame, Theophila, with the text of a diffuse and

impassioned curtain-lecture, and, perhaps, make the reverend personage

considerably more careful when in future he escaped for a while

from his toils and fatigues as head-master of the grammar-school of

Plympton. There his distinguished son was born on the 16th of July,

1723; and there he was ere long inspired with the ambition of linking

his name indestructibly with that glorious art of which he became so

successful a cultivator.

The occasion of the high-fated infant’s presentation at the baptismal

font was rendered memorable by a mistake so awkward and peculiar, as

to furnish reasonable grounds for believing the mental characteristics

of the elder Reynolds to have been then at work. In any case, the

officiating clergyman was led by some process to pronounce the

Christian name of Joseph instead of that by which the child then

presented has since been known to the world, as well as registered in

the records of fortune and the rolls of fame. On the education of young

Reynolds much less attention was bestowed than might have been expected

from the circumstances of his birth; and he did not profit to any large

extent by such instruction as he received. He did not obtain any great

stock of classical knowledge; but his deficiency in this important

respect, though never supplied, was, in after days, countervailed and

thrown into the background by the information which he had acquired

in untiring study of Nature and perseverance in Art, in that commerce

with the most refined portion of the British public, of which, for many

long years, he had the advantage, and in the constant and familiar

intercourse which, during prosperous manhood, he maintained with men

of genius, intellect, and erudition. But, however little inclined to

pore over Latin and Greek books, his heart was, without loss of time,

turned toward an accomplishment which he afterward found of infinitely

greater value. Almost in infancy he began to show signs of his vocation

for the pursuit which made him one of the most remarkable men, and the

greatest painter, of his age; and his first effort was the copying of

some drawings made by his sisters. He was then in early boyhood, and he

next applied the artistic skill he possessed to the imitation of such

prints as illustrated the volumes in his father’s library; particularly

those in an old Book of Emblems, which was inherited, along with

her Dutch blood, from a grandmother, who had come from Holland. The

clerical pedagogue did not smile on these juvenile attempts, nor did

he look with a propitious eye on the direction his son’s talents were

taking. However absent scholars may be in regard to other matters,

especially those which chiefly concern themselves, they are usually

observant enough when the welfare and interests of their children are

at stake. Even Adam Warner awoke from day-dreams about the Eureka when

he saw the lordly chamberlain whispering soft tales in the ear of his

beauteous daughter; and Parson Reynolds, though so much occupied with

sage reflections that he could only find time to indicate to his wife

by monosyllables whether he would have tea or coffee on an afternoon,

opened his eyes to the fact, that Joshua’s industry in drawing and

coloring, with the rude materials within his reach, contrasted

disagreeably with his remissness in attending to the lessons of the

school over which he presided. Thus he denounced the boyish essays as

the offspring of pure idleness, and the author of them was destined

for the medical profession. Though, perhaps, this was decided on with

little consideration for his own wishes, Reynolds stated in after life,

that if such had been his fortune, he would have exerted himself as

strenuously to become an eminent physician as he strove with success

to be a great painter. However, the paternal views were suddenly and

fortunately changed.

Having, about his eighth year, met with the “Jesuit’s Perspective,”

young Reynolds read and digested its contents with so much earnestness,

that he was enabled to execute a drawing of the school-house on the

principles asserted in the treatise. This, when exhibited in the family

circle, quite astonished the anxious father, who, with gratified

pride, pronounced the execution wonderful; and he began to regard the

juvenile artist’s predilections with comparative complacency. Upon

this, Reynolds devoted himself more arduously to his chosen studies,

took likenesses of the inmates of the house, improved perceptibly in

execution, and quite neglected his school exercises. He was confirmed

in his love of art by reading Richardson’s “Treatise on Painting,”

which so captivated and inspired his mind and imagination, that

Raphael seemed to him the most marvelous name in ancient or modern

annals. Thus charmed and stimulated, he continued to make numerous

sketches and portraits, which were recognized by his friends as

evidencing progressive improvement. Nothing was now wanting but a field

in which to practice and bring to perfection the talents with which he

had been bountifully endowed, to confer pleasure on his fellow men, and

to refine their tastes.

While Reynolds was in his nineteenth year, a neighbor and acquaintance

of the family, observing that a provincial place was too limited a

sphere for the proper cultivation of such powers, recommended that

the aspiring lad should be placed under proper tuition in London.

Accordingly, in the autumn, the future knightly President of the Royal

Academy was on his way to the metropolis, and consigned to the care

and superintendence of Hudson, who, though at the period much employed

in the manufacture of portraits, was not possessed of any surpassing

skill or taste in art. A contract was entered into, that if the veteran

approved of his pupil’s conduct, he was to retain the latter’s services

for a term of four years; but he reserved the power of discharging the

assistant at pleasure. Perhaps, in this position Reynolds was merry

enough; for there were other youths in Hudson’s studio, and on warm

summer days they had opportunities of making agreeable excursions,

rambling about the country and admiring the scenery.

While thus situated, Reynolds had the gratification of exchanging

courtesies with a famous poet, who had aspired, without any particular

success, to excellence in the kindred art of painting. He was attending

a public sale of pictures; and just before the hero of the hour raised

his voice and brandished his hammer, the name of Pope was passed

round, and all respectfully made way for the friend of Bolingbroke.

Those who were near held out their hands; and Reynolds being among the

number, had the distinction of a gentle shake from those bony fingers

which had so often been made the instruments of bitter and brilliant

sarcasm. The wheel of time rolled round; the painter, seated among the

literary magnates of another generation, still felt pride in relating

this interesting little incident; his admiration of the crooked bard

was unabated; he was at great pains to procure a fan on which was one

of Pope’s efforts in painting; and the recollection of their meeting

filled him with satisfaction, even when youths, as in the case of

Northcote, were pressing forward, through crowds, to indulge in the

luxury of touching his own skirt.

Reynolds continued to pursue his artistic career under Hudson’s

inspection for two years, during which he drew many heads with so

unquestionable a success, that he thereby excited and inflamed the

jealousy of his instructor, who foretold, with a pang, that his pupil

would yet arrive at rare celebrity. At length he executed the portrait

of an elderly domestic, who acted as cook in the establishment, which,

on being exhibited in the gallery, was immensely applauded for its

superiority of style. The praise was by no means grateful to Hudson’s

ear. Perhaps it was more than flesh and blood could reasonably be

expected to bear with patience. In any case, he seized upon the first

decent pretext to pick a quarrel with the ambitious juvenile.

The latter had been one day requested to convey a picture to a certain

drapery-painter; but as the weather happened to be rainy, he concluded

that there would be no harm in delaying its delivery till next morning.

At breakfast, Hudson querulously inquired why it had not been taken the

evening before, and was informed that the rain had been the cause of

the delay.

“Well,” he exclaimed, “since you have not obeyed my orders, you must

leave my house.”

Reynolds pleaded for a brief reprieve, but in vain. He asked to be

allowed to write an explanation of the matter, and obtain his father’s

advice. But Hudson was inexorable; he adhered sternly to his harsh

mandate, and Reynolds, going to an uncle who resided at the Temple,

thence wrote to his father that he had been dismissed. The latter took

the affair into grave consideration, held a sage consultation with his

neighbor, Lord Edgecumbe, and directed the young artist to return home.

Retirement to the obscurity of Devonshire might delay the progress, but

could not altogether conceal the reality, of the talents which were to

establish for their possessor so splendid a reputation. His father’s

limited means rendered some effort for independence imperative; and

during the next three years he executed several portraits of much

merit, particularly one of a boy reading by a reflected light. When

viewing these pieces thirty years afterward, he is said to have

lamented that he had made so little progress in art; just as Canova did

a few months before his death, when gazing mournfully on his marble

statue of Esculapius in a villa near Venice.

Somewhere about 1745, Reynolds took up his quarters for a while at

Plymouth Dock, and employed his time in taking portraits of naval

officers and other persons in the vicinity. Most of the likenesses

then produced were good; but the example of Hudson had placed him at

a disadvantage. His sitters were generally represented with one hand

inserted in a waistcoat pocket, and the other stiffly holding a hat.

One gentleman did, indeed, request to be drawn with his headpiece

on, and his desire was complied with; but――alas for the vanity of

human wishes!――when the portrait was sent home, and scrutinized by

the capricious individual’s dame, she discovered, with inexpressible

horror, that the artist, true to habit, had placed a hat under the arm

in addition to that on the head!

Among those whose features he now transferred to canvas was Miss

Chudleigh, afterward the celebrated Duchess of Kingston, a young lady

of surpassing beauty, then on a visit in the neighborhood, and a

Captain Hamilton, of the Abercorn family, whose portrait was considered

admirable. Besides, he made the acquaintance of the future Lord

Keppel, and when that gallant personage was appointed Commodore on the

Mediterranean Station, the artist was invited to accompany him in the

“Centurion.”

Reynolds had, some time before, lost his venerable father; and he had

now to act entirely on his own judgment and discretion. But having

been long and enthusiastically eager to visit Italy, and being in

possession of funds sufficient to defray the expense, he availed

himself of the friendly proposal, and sailed in May, 1749. Having

visited various places of interest, and been introduced, at Algiers,

to the Dey, he landed at Port Mahon, in Minorca, where he was treated

with much courtesy, and entertained with great hospitality, by the

governor. There he added to his skill and means by painting portraits

of many officers on the station; but at the same time encountered, and

suffered from, an accident of considerable severity. One day as he

was refreshing himself with a ride, his horse suddenly took fright,

ran off, and rushed wildly over a precipice. The rider was not unhurt

by the fall; and indeed his upper lip was so sadly bruised that part

of it had to be cut away; so that a scar, which remained visible to

the close of his life, was the consequence. Meantime he proceeded to

Rome, where he had been advised to place himself under the tuition of

Battoni; but on examining the works of that master he deemed it most

judicious to trust to his own perception, and concentrate his study on

the paintings that had stood the test of time and criticism. In this

resolution he persevered, with so little reference to the inclemency

of seasons that he was attacked, while pursuing his investigations,

with a serious cold. The effect of this mishap was permanent. It

brought on the deafness which reduced him to the necessity of using

an ear-trumpet while engaged in conversation, and furnished his

acquaintance (Goldsmith) with the well-known and oft-quoted lines in

the “Retaliation,”――

“When they talked of their Raphaels, Corregios, and stuff,

He shifted his trumpet and only took snuff.”

While at Rome, Reynolds was less employed by English travelers than

might have been anticipated; and he seems to have considered the time

so occupied as being almost lost. Before leaving, however, he executed

an approved likeness of himself, and an interesting parody on Raphael’s

“School of Athens.” He remained as long as the state of his finances

rendered prudent, and afterward gave it as his mature opinion, that any

artist, with large views, should rather live on bread and water than

forego advantages never enjoyed a second time, and not to be found but

in the Vatican. Michael Angelo he regarded as “the Homer of Painting.”

On his way home, at the foot of Mont Cenis, he encountered his old

master, Hudson, in company with Roubiliac the sculptor. The former

hurried on, with hot speed, to gratify his eyes with a sight of the

“Eternal City;” and accomplished his purpose so hastily that he arrived

at Calais in time to cross in the same packet with the pupil, whose

excellence had excited his apprehensions and kindled his ire.

Reynolds had been absent for about three years from England when, in

the autumn of 1752, he had the gratification of setting foot on her

sacred soil. He immediately went to Devonshire, to recruit his health

and inspire vigor from fresh breezes and his native air. Early in

the next year he returned to London, and, quartering himself in St.

Martin’s Lane, commenced his professional career with earnestness

and resolution. His talents were such as, if properly exerted, could

hardly fail to meet with encouragement and lead on to fortune; and

their possessor not only recognized the great fact that unflinching

perseverance was essential to success, but maintained the opinion

that any one aspiring to excel in art must make it the subject of his

thoughts from the time he rises till he goes to bed. Nay, more; he

said that those aiming at distinction must work, whether willingly

or with reluctance, morning, noon, and night, and expect to find

their occupation no pastime, but hard labor. Undoubtedly during youth

he carried this wholesome doctrine too far, in asserting that the

man would never make a great painter who looked for the Sunday with

pleasure, as a day of rest. But it is satisfactory, and ought to be

instructive, to understand――thanks, perhaps, to the dying precept of

Johnson――that he did not act on the pernicious doctrine to the end of

his career.

With all his taste, ease, felicity of invention, and power of rich,

harmonious coloring, Reynolds did not acquire his legitimate position

without a salutary struggle. His boldness, freedom, and brilliancy were

regarded as strange and objectionable novelties. The old dogs began

to bark. The portrait of a pupil whom he had brought from Rome, in a

Turkish dress, and known as “a boy with a turban,” gained notice and

excited observation. Hudson, perhaps nourishing the old wound in his

breast, declared that the youth’s painting was not so good as when he

left England; an eminent disciple of Kneller denounced it, as not the

least like Sir Godfrey’s――it would never answer; and others were by

no means sparing in sharp and invidious strictures. The artist was as

little guided by such remarks as was the disinherited knight by the

well-meant hints of the crowd around the lists at Ashby; but, moving

onward undismayed, he soon convinced the public that he would pursue

his chosen course and win high renown in doing so. He painted the

second Duke of Devonshire with a success which extended his reputation

in patrician circles; and universal attention was attracted by the

noble picture which he executed of his friend and patron, Lord Keppel.

But still his celebrity was too recent to be secure against the winds

and tides of capricious fashion, and a rival artist entered the field.

This was a Genevan, named Liotard, described as having little skill and

no genius, but who, by the patronage of persons of rank, was elevated

to an ephemeral and unmerited position. His works were wanting in

vigor――in fact, such as ladies paint for amusement; and they might have

passed with credit in an amateur exhibition. Such was the man before

whom the star of Reynolds, for a moment, paled, ere it shone fully and

inextinguishably forth. This unequal competitor had his little day; and

then, deserted by those who had mistakenly supported his pretensions,

he sank into the obscurity for which nature had intended him, and

retreated to the Continent.

Reynolds was a thorough Englishman. In other lands he had, with all his

outward coldness, shed tears on hearing the ancient ballad tunes of his

country played in the theatre; and his heart must now have swelled with

no small pride at the reflection that it was the first time a native of

England had been victorious in such a contest. The aspirations which,

for years, he had fondly cherished, were now to be gratified; and he

could rejoice in the thought that future generations would gaze with

wonder on his paintings, and hold his name in veneration. To pursue his

career with befitting dignity, he took an advantageous house in Great

Newport Street, where he lived for eight years. The grace and felicity

of his former efforts brought him abundant employment; his rooms were

filled with noble ladies and famous men; and his popularity rapidly

grew and increased. He was a diligent observer and student of life and

manners, had amassed a large store of general information, and could

appreciate the taste and capacity of his sitters sufficiently to speak

the appropriate word to each. He ever seized on the happiest attitude,

and thus transferred to his canvas the most fascinating glance of the

beauty, the liveliest expression of the wit, and the most thoughtful

look of the judge or statesman. His confidence in his own powers

strengthened with experience; and every new effort was hailed with

encouraging applause.

On the occasion of a visit to his native county, Reynolds accidentally

laid his hand on Johnson’s “Life of Savage;” and standing by the fire,

he leant his arm against the mantle-piece, opened the book, and began

to look through it. Gradually he became so completely absorbed with

the contents, that he continued in this position till he had perused

the volume; and then found his arm quite benumbed, his heart almost

enchanted, and his curiosity raised to be acquainted with the author.

This satisfaction was not long denied him. They met at the house of the

daughters of Admiral Cotterell, and Reynolds was as much delighted

with the conversation of his great contemporary as he had formerly been

interested in his pages. Moreover, he had the good fortune to make a

remark which won, with irresistible effect, on the heart of the sage.

The ladies were mournfully deploring the death of a friend to whom

they were under many obligations; “You have, however, the comfort,”

suggested Reynolds, with grave politeness, “of being relieved from the

burden of gratitude.”

“Oh, how shocking and selfish!” exclaimed the sisterhood; but the man

who had lived on a groat a day, and stood behind greasy screens to

conceal his worn-out clothes, appreciated this remark as being that of

a person who thought and decided for himself. He therefore defended

its justice in a clear and forcible manner, though, perhaps, without

conveying conviction to the minds of the decorous spinsters. At all

events, he was so pleased with his new friend that they left the party

together. Johnson went and supped at Reynold’s house; and thus was

commenced an intimacy which was only terminated by death. Johnson

became a frequent visitor, and went without ceremony to enjoy the great

painter’s society, who, on his part, declared that no one had, like his

illustrious friend, the faculty of teaching inferior minds the art of

thinking.

There is not, perhaps, in the wide world, so full of guile and

selfishness, a fairer field for the cultivation of friendship than that

which lies between the studio of the painter and the desk of the man

of letters. There is little ground for envy, but many incitements to a

generous rivalry; and the intercourse must be peculiarly advantageous

if the artist is endowed with poetic perception, and the author gifted

with an artistic eye. Reynolds and Johnson no doubt experienced, in

their respective pursuits, the benefit of their familiar meetings,

altogether independently of the pleasure derived from those hours of

social enjoyment which were irradiated by the matchless discourse

of Burke, and enlivened by the ludicrous displays of Goldsmith. His

friendship with Johnson led to Reynolds furnishing three papers for the

“Idler”――his first essay in literary composition, and in which may be

traced the ideas which grew into his lectures. The effort cost him much

thought and trouble: he sat up writing them all night, and had a sharp

illness in consequence. Besides this contribution to the “Idler,” he

supplied some notes to Johnson’s “Shakspeare,” published in 1705.

The year 1758 was, in a pecuniary point of view, one of the most

fortunate that Reynolds ever experienced; and he soon gave signs of

his prosperity by purchasing a mansion in Leicester Square, which he

inhabited ever after. It was a maxim with him, that an artist who

marries is ruined for life; and he seems to have guarded the passes

to his heart with singular vigilance, as we do not read of any fair

damsel making havoc in its chambers, though it is quite possible

that some early disappointment may have created this rare aversion

to matrimony. But whatever the origin of his prejudice on this point,

there is no question that a sensible woman who, without being ambitious

of prematurely dissipating her natural roses at midnight parties,

can take a becoming part in the innocent gayeties which brighten the

human heart, is a pearl of price; and why the artist should be the

worse of such an enviable companion any more than a poet or orator, is

a question which does stagger plain men, as it would, perhaps, have

puzzled the most philosophic of British painters. He acted on his

principle by living and dying a bachelor; but, in accordance with the

custom at that period pursued by men of the middle class, he placed one

of his sisters at the end of his board and in charge of his domestic

concerns: thus attempting to secure the comforts of a home without

being subject to connubial responsibility. Miss Reynolds, it appears,

scarcely realized or sustained the character of a perfect spinster. She

was possessed of great wit and talent; and though remarkable for her

good sense, she was too much given to essays of her skill in poetry and

painting to make a model housekeeper. Thus the internal affairs were

not conducted with any excessive taste or regularity; and the table

was distinguished chiefly by a rough plenty; little regard being paid

to order or arrangement. The dinner was generally a scramble, in which

the host took little or no concern; and the guests looked sharply

after their own interests. There was no splendor but great abundance.

Ease was more valued than comfort or elegance. Nevertheless, Reynolds

had furnished his new residence with much propriety, besides adding a

handsome gallery for the exhibition of his paintings, and an elegant

dining-room, often the scene of “the feast of reason and the flow of

soul.” There the literary giant of the day rolled his unwieldy body,

bit his dirty nails, and poured out his copious talk; though often a

little cowed by being face to face with that profound political sage

and prophet who alone could encounter the huge author of “Rasselas”

with advantage. Side by side were the greatest actor of the day,

and the restorer of that English ballad-poetry which fascinated the

young genius of the mightiest of dead and the most accomplished of

living novelists. In an uneasy posture, “staring right on,” was that

extraordinary being “who could write like an angel, but talk like

poor Poll.” With eyes reverentially fixed on men whom he could admire

without comprehending, stood Boswell, the minute chronicler of their

sayings and doings; while the master of the house――mild, gentle, and

unassuming, round in feature, florid in complexion, and of middle

stature――listened with lively, but calm and refined intelligence,

to the colloquial conflict of the wonderful specimens of the human

race whose features his easel has, in immortal colors, transmitted to

posterity.

It is doubtless a proud day with most persons who have struggled into

affluence, when they can set up an equipage of their own. Pepys, in his

gossiping diary, relates the mighty pleasure he felt when that joyous

day arrived for him; when he could disdain the humble shelter of a

hackney-coach, and drive about the park in his own chariot, even at the

disadvantage of having his pretty wife eyed with menacing admiration

by a royal duke. Reynolds conceived that the time had now arrived when

he might decorously indulge in a carriage, which he had magnificently

carved and gilded, the four seasons being emblazoned on its panels. The

pride and propriety of Miss Reynolds were shocked at this display. “It

is far too showy,” she complained with good reason. “What!” exclaimed

the owner, as he regarded his purchase with calm complacency――“would

you have a carriage like an apothecary’s?”

In 1762, the health of Reynolds rendering relaxation and a rural

excursion necessary, he repaired to Devonshire, accompanied by Dr.

Johnson, who thus had a favorable opportunity of seeing Plymouth, in

which he expressed particular interest. Falstaff regaling himself

with cheese and carraway pippins in Justice Shallow’s orchard, or

the Spectator enjoying the ancient hospitality of Coverley Hall, are

hardly more than equal in interest to the sage of Bolt Court, who knew

human nature only as exhibited in the streets and suburbs of London,

being refreshed with an adventure in the country. The two friends

were received with no small respect by men of rank, learning, and

distinction; and entertained at the seats of several noblemen in the

west of England. One of their hosts indulged Johnson with a feast on

new honey and clouted cream, of which the moralist partook in such

quantities, that the hospitable individual grew exceedingly alarmed for

the consequences. Reynolds bore off a prize of another kind――a large

jar of old nut-oil, which was carried home in his coach as a valuable

trophy. The change of air had a most beneficial effect on his health,

and he returned to town in a condition to pursue his labors without

interruption.

Reynolds was an ardent lover of his profession; his pride in art was

high, and he was ever ready, when there was occasion, to stand forward

in its defense. But his character was cold and stately; he deemed it

impossible for two artists in the same line to associate in friendship:

he thought Poetry the twin-sister of Painting, and found his companions

chiefly among literary men. It was natural, therefore, that when the

Literary Club was established in 1764, he should have been one of its

members. A man, however, is known by the company he keeps; and Reynolds

was disagreeably surprised to hear himself spoken of as “one of the

wits.” Perhaps the term did not convey the most pleasing sensation

to a person with a coach of his own and six thousand a year; and he

exclaimed, in alarm, “Why do they call me a wit? I never was a wit in

my life!”

His commissions had gradually become so numerous, that he found it

necessary to have several assistants to work out the minor details: he

had arrived on an enviable eminence; and though artists of ability made

their appearance, he still maintained his supremacy, and constantly

struck out wonders to vindicate his claim to the favor of the public.

In 1766 he painted the Queen of Denmark, before she sailed on her

ill-fated voyage. Coming events cast their shadows before; and he never

went without finding the hapless princess in tears. Reynolds increased

in wealth and reputation; his enthusiasm for art never cooled into

indifference, and he was never so happy as when putting life into

canvas. He rose betimes, and commenced operations; he spoke little when

occupied, but painted rapidly for six hours, and devoted the remainder

to society. He was animated by warm affections, and had a strong love

for children.

Reynolds was not one of the originators of the Royal Academy; but in

1768, when it was instituted, he was waited on by West, and requested

to give his aid in promoting the objects which the undertaking was

intended to serve. He was rather doubtful whether the scheme was likely

to be favored by Fortune; and he was one of those who had no relish for

engaging in an enterprise,

“Save when her humorous ladyship was by

To teach him safety.”

It was, therefore, after considerable hesitation, and a conference

of two hours, that he was persuaded to accompany the American artist.

Then ordering his carriage, he drove to the place where the promoters

were assembled. On entering the room he was saluted by all present as

“President;” but being still convinced that the scheme would prove

a delusion, he declined to accept the honor thus voted to him by

acclamation, till he had consulted Burke and Johnson, who advised

him to consent. The king, whose aid had at first been regarded as

doubtful, came forward to offer the Academy his royal patronage; and

that it might have the semblance of greater dignity, its president was

forthwith invested with the rank of knighthood. The latter was, by no

means, backward in fulfilling the functions with which he had been so

cautious in burdening himself. Of his own accord he undertook the duty

of preparing and reading discourses on the principles and practice of

art, for the instruction and guidance of the students. Of these he

wrote fifteen; the delivery of which extended over several years. They

were pronounced by Sir Thomas Lawrence to be “golden precepts, which

are now acknowledged as canons of universal taste.”

In 1773 Reynolds paid visits to Paris and Oxford. At the latter place

he received, amidst much applause, the honorary degree of Doctor of

Laws, in company with Dr. Beattie, of whom he produced a celebrated

picture on returning to London. About the same date he went to his

native district, and was elected mayor of Plympton. This mark of

esteem from his townsmen seems to have given him particular pleasure.

Accidentally meeting with the king shortly after, at Hampton Court, he

stated that it had afforded him more satisfaction than any distinction

he had met with: “Always,” he added, with the skill of a courtier,

“excepting that which your majesty graciously conferred on me――the

honor of knighthood.”

Sir Joshua was chosen a member of the Academy of Florence, and, in

accordance with its rules, required to furnish a portrait of himself.

This he accomplished with his wonted success; and it was added with

pride to their interesting collection.

In 1780 he commenced a series of allegorical figures for the window

of the New College chapel at Oxford. These were followed by the

“Nativity,” which being sold to the Duke of Rutland, perished in a

fire at Belvoir Castle. About this time he made a tour to inspect the

Continental galleries. On returning, he sustained a paralytic attack,

which much alarmed his friends, but his recovery was speedy; and he

quickly proved that his powers had suffered no decay, by the production

of his “Fortune-teller,” his portrait of Miss Kemble, and that of Mrs.

Siddons, in the full might of her beauty and power, as the Tragic Muse.

While engaged with the latter, he wrote his name on the border of her

robe; and on the great actress looking at the words, and smiling, he

remarked, with one of his most courtly bows, that he could not lose

such an opportunity of sending his name down to posterity on the hem

of her garment. When at work, he is said to have been in the habit

of using enormous quantities of snuff. Thus, while occupied with the

large picture of the Marlborough family at Blenheim, a servant was

ordered by the duchess to sweep up the snuff that he had let fall on

the carpet. However, when the man entered with a broom, Sir Joshua

quietly requested him to let it remain till he had finished; observing,

that the dust would do more harm to his painting, than the snuff could

possibly do to the carpet.

On the death of Allan Ramsay, the king’s painter, Reynolds was, at the

request of his majesty, induced to accept the vacant office. He soon

after produced “Love unloosing the Zone of Beauty,” and a portrait of

the notorious Duke of Orleans. Then he gave his time and attention to

painting the “Infant Hercules Strangling the Serpents,” for the Empress

of Russia; who acknowledged his attention by a note of thanks from her

own imperial hand, a gold snuff-box, on which was her likeness, and a

purse of fifteen hundred guineas.

[Illustration: SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS AT BLENHEIM.]

Sir Joshua had now reached his sixty-sixth year; his fame was high; his

influence on the taste and refinement of the country was not disputed;

and his artistic powers remained unimpaired. His career had indeed

been characterized by the strictness and temperance essential to the

possession of “a healthy body and a vigorous mind;” he had realized a

fortune; he had associated with the noble and beautiful of the land;

and his wealth, his heavy purse, and hospitable table, gave him dignity

in the eyes not only of many who were incapable of appreciating his

merits, but of others to whom his fine abilities were no mystery. But

his days were numbered. In the month of July, 1789, while finishing a

portrait of Lady Hertford, he was aware of a sudden loss of sight in

his left eye; and, laying down his pencil for the last time, he sat

for a while in sad and pensive reflection. Goldsmith had already been

laid at rest in the Temple Church; the eyes of Burke had overflowed

with tears, and his voice faltered by the death-bed of Johnson; and the

immortal painter was ere long to follow. He in a short time altogether

lost the sight of his left eye, and determined to paint no more;

yet under this affliction he strove to appear happy, cheerful, and

resigned. His illness was borne with much fortitude, and whatever he

had to suffer was endured without complaint or irritability. He amused

and diverted himself in his drawing-room by changing the position of

his pictures, and exhibiting them to his friends. Besides, like some

imprisoned knight of old, he took a fanciful liking for a little bird,

which became so tame and docile that it perched on his hand, while he

fed and talked to it almost as he would have done to a human being.

At length, one bright summer morning, the feathered warbler made its

escape by an open window; and Sir Joshua was so inconsolable for the

loss, that he roamed for hours about Leicester Square in the hope of

seeing and recovering so harmless and cheerful a companion.

On the occasion of the gold medals being bestowed on the students of

the Academy in 1790, Sir Joshua went thither for the last time, with

all due pomp and circumstance, to deliver an address. With unabated

admiration, he recalled to their memory the triumphs achieved by the

genius of his great idol, and concluded by earnestly desiring that the

last words he should pronounce from the presidential chair might be the

name of Michael Angelo. The crowd being unusually large, a beam in the

floor gave way with a loud crash. All rushed to the door, stumbling

over each other, except the venerable president, who remained silent,

composed, and dignified. Fortunately no damage was done, and the

proceedings were resumed.

Sir Joshua offered to the Royal Academy his collection of paintings by

the great masters at a low price. But, much to his mortification and

amazement, his proposal was declined; and he exhibited them publicly in

the Haymarket for the benefit of his servant Ralph. This transaction

gave rise to the suspicion that Reynolds shared in the profits; and two

lines of Butler――

“A squire he had whose name was Ralph,

Who in the adventure went one-half,”――

were applied with audacious and merciless malevolence. He was soon

beyond the reach of such assailants and their weapons of offense. After

a visit to Beaconsfield, the residence of his mighty friend Burke, his

health and spirits sunk with the rapidity which frequently heralds

a speedy dissolution; and on the 23d of February, 1792, he expired,

with little apparent pain, in the sixty-ninth year of his prosperous

life. His body was laid in St. Paul’s Cathedral, by the side of Sir

Christopher Wren; and a monument, graven by Flaxman, has since been

erected to his memory.

Footprints of Famous Men: Designed as Incitements to Intellectual Industry · 第 28 / 37 题