DAVID HUME.

Though any attempt to excuse or palliate Hume’s erroneous views and

opinions in regard to religion――the dissemination of which he is said

to have regretted――would be little less than high treason against

Christianity and civilization, his example, in other respects, is

of infinite value. His career was characterized by resolution,

independence, and self-command, at a time when these qualities were

not much in fashion; and his life is a lasting protest against the

idea, that the habits of a literary man are necessarily lax in respect

to pecuniary affairs. Moreover, he must be acknowledged as prince

among the historians of England. He still retains his ascendency after

the lapse of an eventful century; and his great work is looked to as

the natural source of information on the subject of which it treats.

The intelligent reader is animated by feelings of admiration after

perusing its inimitable pages; while the less informed goes to it for

guidance and instruction. Yet much of this mighty memorial of his great

intellect was composed in the face of a reception so galling to a proud

spirit, and so discouraging to a heart panting for fame, that most men

would, under the circumstances, have thrown down the pen in blank

dismay; but Hume, notwithstanding his temporary disgust, had courage

and genius fully equal to the occasion. He felt how glorious was the

prize at stake, and pushed bravely forward to snatch it. And it is,

indeed, impossible too highly to admire the calm, intrepid, unshrinking

perseverance he displayed in thus consummating, in spite of all the

clamor that the earliest volumes elicited, a work which he ere long had

the consolation of knowing the world would not willingly let die. Such,

doubtless, has often been the lot of those who write for immortality!

The pedigree of this illustrious personage, who frankly confessed

to the charm of an ancient name, was such as might satisfy the most

exacting genealogist. Indeed, it is traced in the books of heralds,

through potent barons and mighty earls, to the Saxon conquerors of

Britain; though it does not appear that he was fully aware of a fact,

which, to say the least, would have been reflected on with complacency.

But as the subject is not altogether uninteresting to many, it may be

here adverted to with brevity.

When the Norman Conquest took place, a Northumbrian prince――whose

grandmother was daughter of an English king, and whose brother became,

by marriage with the heiress of the Nevilles, progenitor of those

barons slain on the field of Barnet――was driven to seek refuge on

the north side of the Tweed, where he founded that powerful feudal

connection known as the house of Dunbar, which fell in the fifteenth

century. One of its branches, and the inheritor of much of its power,

was the baronial family of Home, whose chiefs bestowed such lands

as came into their possession on their younger sons. One of these

cadets――the historian’s ancestor――was thus gifted with Tyninghame, a

fertile estate in Lothian; but being, unlike his remote descendant, an

irreclaimable spendthrift, he totally dissipated this paternal grant.

It happened, however, that his son, a youth of promise, was received

into favor by the head of the clan, and planted at the Ninewells, on

the pleasant banks of the Whitadder, where his successors, whose names

no minstrel has sung, vegetated for three hundred years. In fact,

though residing close to the Border, they do not appear to have fought

in the wars which desolated the vicinity, nor even to have speculated

in the precarious trade of cattle-lifting. They seem neither to have

been puissant knights nor “rank reivers;” nor were they in request

when a charter was to be attested, or an eldest son served heir to his

father. But they paid a species of “black mail” to the English captain

of Berwick, received protection, lived in peace, speared salmon, and

cultivated their fruitful lands. In the reign of Queen Anne, one of

these lairds, whose sire’s heart’s blood seems to have stained the

blade of an exasperated sheriff, went in youth to the Scottish capital,

and was in due time called to the bar; but without pursuing the legal

profession further. He was considered a man of attainments, and took to

wife, in 1708, the daughter of Sir David Falconer, Lord President of

the College of Justice. By this lady he had two sons and a daughter, of

whom David Hume was born, at Edinburgh, on the 26th of April, 1711.

The consideration of a distinguished lineage certainly imparted to

Hume’s heart a calm satisfaction and colored, though in the slightest

degree, his writings; but as he was deficient in sympathy with the

past, it could not infringe on his philosophic mind, perplex his

clear intelligence, or influence his serene judgment. The political

sentiments in which he was nurtured were destined to exercise a much

greater effect on his life and works. His father’s residence was

situated in a district where the lords of the soil were, with rare

exceptions, deeply tinged with Jacobite principles. Their interest and

inclination alike prompted an adherence to the cause of the ancient

line of kings; and at the very time when the future historian first

saw the light, the accession to power of a Tory ministry had conveyed

hope and animation to their breasts. Thus when he began to creep about

and lisp forth inarticulate sounds, complaints of real injuries and

imaginary insults sustained by his relatives since the Revolution

would greet his childish ears, and perhaps enter into his young soul.

In his fourth year, these restless worthies proposed to hold a public

meeting with a view of obtaining a redress of their grievances; but as

the authorities deemed that it might prove a cause of embarrassment

to the newly-established government, it was sternly interdicted,

and precautions were taken to repress any attempt to disobey the

official mandate. David’s fierce clansmen bit their gloves, shook their

heads, and vowed revenge. Several of them risked and lost all in the

insurrection of 1715; his chief and a near kinsman were committed to

the Castle of Edinburgh for their devotion to the house of Stuart;

and amidst scenes of tumult, disorder, and confiscation, the first

few years of Hume’s life passed over. Perhaps, indeed, to his brother

and himself having been minors at the time may be ascribed their not

having assumed the white cockade, and that the acres held for centuries

by their ancestors were not appropriated by some intriguing agent

for forfeited estates, or seized by a factor with few scruples of

conscience and sufficient dexterity in arithmetical mystification.

At an early age――indeed almost in infancy――Hume lost his father; and

his widowed mother, though young and handsome enough to have aspired

with success to a second husband, devoted her whole time and attention

to the rearing and education of her children. David soon began to

manifest an ardent love for his books. As a boy he was particularly

docile, well behaved, and attentive to his studies, without being

remarkable for the display of precocious talents. The family property

had, of course, gone to his elder brother; and as the portion of a

second son was not such as to encourage for a moment the idea of

passing his life without labor, he felt under the necessity of

bringing his abilities into active operation. With this view he was

sent to fit himself for exertion by completing his education at the

university of his native city, where he went through the usual academic

course with comparative credit and success.

His extraordinary ability at this period is beyond all question, for a

letter written to a youthful intimate at the age of sixteen proves that

his marvelous talent was then exhibiting itself. Having been fired with

that enthusiasm for literature which continued to be his ruling passion

and chief delight, he impressed his guardians with a high opinion of

his studious disposition; and they, taking into account his steadiness

of conduct and sobriety of demeanor, arrived at the conclusion, that

the Scottish bar would be a proper sphere for the exercise of that

intellectual industry of which he daily gave signal proofs. His tastes,

however, were rather unsuited to pursuing the profession successfully;

and he states that he was generally engaged in devouring Cicero and

Virgil while he was supposed to be occupied with the more practical

studies of Voet and Vinnius. At eighteen the law appeared utterly

nauseous to him, and his aversion to it as the business of life became

extreme. He pondered and reflected; he could think of no other method

to push his way in the world than as a scholar and philosopher, and

this prospect pleased him infinitely for a season; but his health

giving way under the pressure of severe mental application, a reaction

came, and his ardor quite expired. He abandoned all thoughts of the

law as a profession, and removed to the residence of his brother. The

change of air and scene had a beneficial influence, and the young

philosopher applied to the family doctor to restore his health and

spirits. The latter laughed at his patient’s imaginary ailments; but,

at the same time, accompanied his unwelcome raillery by the extremely

palatable advice to drink a pint of claret a day, and take plenty of

equestrian exercise. Hume attended to the prescription, daily swallowed

a proper quantity of the grateful beverage, and rode some ten or twelve

miles on horseback. Though caring little for rural pleasures, pursuits,

or recreations, he seems to have really enjoyed himself at this period:

he soon gathered strength from his exercise in the open air; and,

from being a tall, lean, and raw-boned lad, he passed to the other

extreme――his complexion became ruddy and his countenance cheerful. His

pursuits seem to have been diversified. He studied Latin, English,

French, and Italian. He read books of morality, and was captivated

with their beautiful representations of virtue and philosophy; and he

listened, not without gratification, to stories about the fortunes

of their race from some knightly clansman or old freeholder. The

traditionary lore and local associations were apparently, it must be

confessed, quite lost upon him: he was without local ambition; and

the scenes of his boyhood, when he has occasion to mention them, are

alluded to with the same cold dignity with which he writes of places

which he had never seen. His intellect was so severely original, that

it disdained to draw one particle of inspiration from buildings and

battle-plains which have since been invested with so pleasing a charm,

and made the subject of glowing verse. There is no sign of his having

viewed Norham Castle, Flodden Field, and Halidon Hill, or ridden

through “the rich Merse,” and perambulated the ancient capital of the

eastern marshes, or gazed on the “desolate grandeur” of Home, with

romantic enthusiasm, poetic perception, or provincial pride. While

accumulating information in regard to distant countries with industry

and rapidity, he altogether neglected or scorned the precious metals

which lay in his way; and while contemplating the perfections of Roman

poets, he had not a thought to spare to the Border ballad-makers, whose

verses Scott toiled to preserve and restore. He had therefore small

temptation to linger amidst the fields, meadows, and woods through

which he had roamed in his thoughtful childhood. He felt, indeed,

that such an expenditure of time was by no means in harmony with his

circumstances; and, believing that business and diversion would give

him peace of mind and relief from anxiety, he resolved to betake

himself to a more active life, and entered on a course, of all others,

at variance with his natural bent toward studious retirement and

philosophic reflection――that of commerce. In doing so, he confessed

that he could never wholly give up his pretensions in learning but with

his latest breath. He merely laid them aside for the time, with a view

of resuming them to greater advantage. In reality, he was actuated by

an ardent and consuming passion to achieve literary fame and found

a philosophical reputation when he formed his determination――a most

inauspicious frame of mind, assuredly, with which to enter upon the

harsh duties of mercantile existence!

About the beginning of March, 1734, Hume started for Bristol. He

visited London in his way, and then traveled onward. He had obtained

introductions to several leading merchants in the place; and on

reaching his destination established himself in the counting-house of

one of them, in the hope of forgetting the past, preparing for the

future, and enriching himself by commerce. But the petty cares, the

perpetual bustle, and the perennial annoyances of such a career, were

found, as might have been anticipated, utterly intolerable to a person

to whom legal studies had appeared irksome and unattractive; and, after

a few months’ trial, he relinquished his new situation, with all its

coarse, uncongenial duties, and those prospects of remuneration which

are so seldom realized.

Hume had already, according to his own statement, collected materials

for many volumes. He, therefore, passed over to France, with the

view of prosecuting his studies in some rural retreat. No doubt he

could have done so at the time-honored mansion of his fathers, but

circumstances had occurred since he left which rendered it impossible

to return there with any feeling of comfort; so he made a short stay

in Paris, and then repaired to Rheims, in the north of France, where

he spent some months in literary retirement. “I there,” he writes,

“laid that plan of life which I have steadily and successfully pursued.

I resolved to make a very rigid frugality supply my deficiency of

fortune, to maintain unimpaired my independency, and to regard every

object as contemptible except the improvement of my talents in

literature.”

Having formed this wise and prudent determination, he removed to La

Flèche, in Anjou, where he prepared his “Treatise on Human Nature;”

and then he returned to London, to superintend the publication, and

endure the suspense. Being issued in 1738, the work, to use his own

expression, fell still-born from the press; though when subsequently

published in separate essays, it was a little more successful.

Having thus, at the age of twenty-seven, embarked and made an

inauspicious voyage on the uncertain sea of literature, Hume, without

even waiting to know the fate of his work――for which a publisher had

given the sum of fifty pounds――turned his face northward; and, perhaps,

with some slight regret that he had relinquished the profession of the

law, and deserted the merchant’s desk, sought the agreeable seclusion

of his family’s fair domain, which he found his brother laudably

occupied in improving and enhancing in value. Among its old trees,

pleasantly shading the gentle acclivity whence burst the nine fountains

which gave a name to the place, and with which the argent lion on his

ancestral shield was charged, Hume experienced so much satisfactory

enjoyment in “retirement, rural quiet, friendship, books,” that, though

the ideas and tastes of his relatives could not have harmonized very

readily or easily with his own, he would, in all probability, had

other matters been equal, have chosen to pass his life there. But the

ambition for literary fame continued strongly to animate and influence

him; and his time was chiefly spent in grave reading, deep meditation,

in restoring his knowledge of the Greek language, and in corresponding,

among others, with his friend Henry Home, afterward celebrated as Lord

Kames.

Such was his position, when the last Marquis of Annandale, a Scottish

nobleman, whose eccentricity took the form of lunacy, having read some

of the hapless essays, was so charmed with something he saw in them,

that he conceived a passionate wish to obtain the services of the

learned author as his tutor. Hume was induced, by the temptation of an

ample salary, to accept the office of companion to this weak-minded

man, and had his temper severely tested in consequence. After holding

the luckless and invidious post for a year, during which the marquis

seems to have written a novel, relating to some events and love

affairs in his own life, Hume’s patience and placidity gave way, and,

throwing up the situation, he became candidate for the Professorship of

Moral Philosophy at Edinburgh, which, although powerfully supported,

he was unable to obtain, on account of his well-known sentiments on

religious subjects.

Matters, however, ere long, began to assume a pleasanter aspect. An

honorable appointment, as private secretary to General St. Clair, uncle

of Lord-chancellor Loughborough, was almost immediately bestowed on

him, as if by way of solace for his depressing defeat. The General had

originally been destined for an important expedition to Canada, which

somehow ended――or, rather was metamorphosed――into an incursion on the

coast of France. On returning, Hume retreated to country quarters, and

wrote a defense of the expedition, which has since been printed; and

shortly afterward he accompanied General St. Clair on an embassy to the

courts of Turin and Vienna, in the double capacity of secretary and

aid-de-camp, wearing the uniform of an officer. His time, while in this

position, was passed agreeably, in good company, and with considerable

profit in a pecuniary point of view.

Meantime his “Inquiry concerning the Human Understanding,” being

the substance of his former work in a new shape, was published in

London, but with scarcely greater success than the original; any

interest it excited being merely of a temporary character. However,

his natural cheerfulness bore him up against his repeated literary

disappointments; and he returned to Scotland to delight his kinsfolk

and acquaintances with narrations of his adventures in lands beyond the

sea, and to digest the frustration of his hopes as well as he could.

Still resolute of purpose, he wrote, during a two-years’ retirement,

his “Political Discourses,” which were given to the world in 1752,

and excited interest and attention both at home and abroad. Indeed,

though in some measure overshadowed by the celebrated work which his

friend Adam Smith produced fourteen years later, they unfold and

enforce those views of economical science which are now recognized and

adopted, for better or for worse, by all English statesmen. Moreover,

they have, in the highest degree, the merit of originality; and their

style is so admirable, that they can be perused by general readers

at once with profit and pleasure. At the same time he composed his

“Inquiry concerning the Principles of Morals,” which, notwithstanding

his own high estimate of its comparative merits, was little noticed

or regarded. The former emanations of his great intellect were now

beginning to attract observation, and he was gratified by finding

that answers antagonistic to the views they maintained were gradually

appearing; but he discreetly formed the resolution of not being drawn

into controversy by such effusions, and inflexibly kept his purpose in

this respect.

Hume had now attained the age of forty, and, though there certainly

exists evidence which makes one suspect that he had not always proved

that rare impenetrability to female blandishments for which his

biographers have given him credit, there was, at this time of life,

small chance of his being betrayed into a matrimonial alliance. His

brother, therefore, aroused himself to the duty of transmitting the

name, and continuing the succession, and, in 1751, wedded the daughter

of a neighboring family. This country gentleman was a person of retired

habits; he had a strong aversion to every thing savoring, or even

having the appearance, of vanity; and he was so extremely prudent in

his actions, that, with the exception of his marriage, he never took

any step without having previously calculated the consequences to his

satisfaction. When the latter momentous event occurred, the philosopher

felt a natural longing to have a tenement of his own. His mother, whom

he describes as a woman of singular merit, and whom he had in her

lifetime treated with much filial kindness and affection, had been in

her grave for years; and he proposed “to take up house in Berwickshire”

with his sister; but duly weighing and deliberately considering the

matter, he came to the conclusion that a town was “the true scene

for a man of letters;” and, removing to Edinburgh, he exercised so

much frugality in disposing of his slender income that he was enabled

to live in comfort and contentment. Yet he was not, by any means,

parsimonious, and ever was ready, on fitting occasions, to prove his

generosity by charitable and beneficent actions.

The year 1752 was an important one in Hume’s life. He was then

appointed Librarian to the Faculty of Advocates, after a severe and

spirited contest, in which, besides the junior members of the bar, his

chief allies were the ladies of “modern Athens,” who made strenuous

efforts and exerted their utmost fascinations in his behalf. When the

triumph was achieved he found himself in a most advantageous position

in regard to an excellent and well-stocked library, which fortunately

suggested to his brain the scheme of furnishing the world with a

classical history of England, then a serious desideratum in national

literature. “Being frightened,” he states in his autobiography, “with

the notion of continuing a narrative through a period of seventeen

hundred years, I commenced with the House of Stuart, an epoch where I

thought the misrepresentation of faction began chiefly to take place.”

When the first volume, recording the events in the reigns of James

I. and Charles I., was issued, in 1754, the effects of the author’s

earlier training were sufficiently apparent to kindle the wrath of one

party without flattering the prejudices of the other. Accordingly, it

was assailed by one cry of reproach and disapprobation; the sale was

quite inconsiderable, and almost the only token of encouragement worth

having came from the Primates of England and Ireland, who advised him

to take heart, and proceed in his undertaking. But, whatever may be

thought of Hume’s historic leanings and political sympathies, it must

be admitted that he acted courageously, conscientiously, and without

fishing for the favor of those who had in their hands all the patronage

and disposal of such places and rewards as he could have aspired to. He

followed what appeared to him the true and just course, notwithstanding

the storms to which he felt he would on that account be exposed; and

his genius, more potent than had been the swords of his insurgent

kinsmen, threw a wall of defense around the memory of the exiled race

which, with all its defects, succeeding writers, whatever their ability

and energy, have never been skillful and vigorous enough to scale or

break down. Nevertheless, the reception of his work inspired him with

feelings of such dislike for the British public, that he resolved upon

leaving the country, renouncing his name, and passing the remainder of

his days on the Continent; but a French war luckily put an end to his

scheme of self-expatriation, and he determined to persevere with his

laborious and ungrateful task. In 1756 his second volume appeared, and

proved not less obnoxious than the first; but by that he had, as he

says, “grown callous against the impressions of public folly.” It was

fortunate, in any case, that he did not succumb till the tyranny was

overpast. His victory was secure, slowly as it might approach.

He had already published the “Natural History of Religion,” which was

severely censured; and when the author had arrived at his fiftieth

year, his matchless and magnificent “History of England” was completed

in six volumes. His easy, elegant, and interesting style ere long

rendered the work highly popular. Hume was by universal consent,

placed on a lofty pedestal of fame; and, though its reception had

originally been so disheartening, the sum obtained for the copyright,

and for his former productions, together with his economical habits,

had made him not only independent but, as he considered it, opulent.

He, therefore, looked forward to passing the remainder of his days in

peace, and in his native land, congratulating himself on having never,

in his struggle for fortune, courted the smiles of any great man, or

treated the humble with discourtesy. He was, though plain and careless

in manner, eminently qualified, by his frank and social humor, to

enjoy the company of his chosen friends, with whom, in spite of their

wide differences of opinion on the most serious subjects, he was ever

on terms of affectionate intercourse and uninterrupted friendship.

Nevertheless, within two years, he consented to forego his cherished

plans, at the earnest and repeated solicitations of Lord Hertford,

who was going as Embassador to Paris. Thither Hume accompanied that

nobleman, and was shortly after appointed Secretary of Embassy. In

1765, when Lord Hertford departed to undertake the government of

Ireland, the historian remained in the French capital as Chargé

d’Affaires, and performed the functions pertaining to the office in a

manner highly creditable to his clearness of judgment, his talent for

business, and capacity for state affairs. In the gay and fashionable

circles of Paris his fame, station, and agreeable bearing, secured him

so hearty a welcome that ladies and princes, wits and philosophers,

vied in their attentions. It was there that, in an evil hour, he

consented, in a spirit of excessive amiability, to take under his wing

the frantic and erratic Rousseau, whose connection afterward involved

him in much trouble, and caused him infinite annoyance.

Hume returned to this country in 1766, and was, the next year appointed

Under-secretary of State for the department presided over by Marshal

Conway, an office which he retained for more than twelve months. His

annual income, the fruits of real industry, now amounted to a thousand

pounds a year; and, taking a house in the new town of Edinburgh, he

settled to spend his remaining days among his old and most attached

friends. For some time his peaceful existence was uninterrupted, but in

1766 his health became so precarious that he was under the necessity of

undertaking a journey to Bath, when he was attended by his friend and

remote relative, John Home, the author of “Douglas,” with whom he had

many a jocular debate about the correct orthography of their name, and

the comparative merits of port and claret. The illustrious historian

was fond of relieving his sinking spirits by a playful jest at the

expense of his clansman’s warlike propensities, and did not omit so

favorable an opportunity as that presented by the poet’s pistols being

handed, with much ceremony, into the traveling-carriage:

“You shall have your humor, John,” he said, “and shoot as many

highwaymen as you like; for,” he added, with as much melancholy,

perhaps, as a philosopher could well feel, “there’s too little life

left in me to be worth fighting about.”

It appears that the martial predilections alluded to were shortly

afterward gratified by a commission in the “Buccleuch Fencibles,”

though on this occasion they were not in requisition; unless, indeed,

to inspire the young soul of Walter Scott, who was then exercising

his precocious imagination at Bath, where he made the acquaintance of

the bard, soldier, and divine, whose fame his pen, more than fifty

years later, did something to extend and perpetuate. If the eye of the

great historian, from which the world and all its vanities were fast

vanishing, lighted on that lame boy, vigilantly guarded by a sarcastic

and high-spirited female, how little could he have supposed that there

was the being destined to invest with the charms of romance and the

glow of chivalry that old royal cause, which he had employed all his

wisdom and all his intellect to restore to public favor and render

permanently attractive!

Meantime the veteran philosopher and historian, deriving little or no

benefit from his visit to Bath, returned to die under his own roof. His

decline was gradual; and, to the last, his most ultimate associates

could not observe any diminution of gayety. He talked familiarly with

them during their calls, and alluded to his approaching dissolution in

a tone of whose levity even Dr. Smith, his most ardent admirer, could

not approve. Whatever twinges of doubt or dread in regard to the future

he might in his last hours experience, were encountered and borne with

the semblance of indifference and tranquillity. He could not, indeed,

feel the blessedness of those who have fought a good fight and kept

the faith; nor could he, like Addison, exclaim with hopeful and serene

resignation, “You see how a Christian can die:” but, five days before

his last, he wrote, “I see death approaching gradually without anxiety

or regret.” On the 25th of August, 1776, he breathed his last; and was

buried in a cemetery on the Calton Hill, where a monument to his memory

has since been erected.

Footprints of Famous Men: Designed as Incitements to Intellectual Industry · 第 25 / 37 题