II

In the words of the summary prefixed to the report:

"The first chapters of the report deal with India as an industrial

country, her present position, and her potentialities. They show how

little the march of modern industry has affected the great bulk of the

Indian population, which remains engrossed in agriculture, winning a

bare subsistence from the soil by antiquated methods of cultivation.

Such changes as have been wrought in rural areas are the effects of

economic rather than of industrial evolution. In certain centers the

progress of Western industrial methods is discernible; and a number of

these are described in order to present a picture of the conditions

under which industries are carried on, attention being drawn to the

shortage and to the general inefficiency of Indian labor and to the lack

of an indigenous supervising agency. Proposals are made for the better

exploitation of the forests and fisheries. In discussing the industrial

deficiencies of India, the report shows how unequal the industrial

development of our industries has been. Money has been invested in

commerce rather than industries, and only those industries have been

taken up which appeared to offer safe and easy profits. Previous to the

war, too ready reliance was placed on imports from overseas, and this

habit was fostered by the Government practice of purchasing stores in

England. India produces nearly all the raw materials necessary for the

requirements of a modern community; but is unable to manufacture many of

the articles and materials necessary alike in times of peace and war.

For instance, her great textile industries are dependent upon supplies

of imported machinery and would have to shut down if command of the seas

were lost. It is vital, therefore, for the Government to ensure the

establishment of those industries in India whose absence exposes us to

grave danger in event of war. The report advocates the introduction of

modern methods of agriculture and in particular of labor-saving devices.

Greater efficiency in cultivation, and in the preparation of produce for

the market would follow; labor now wastefully employed would be set free

for industries and the establishment of shops for the manufacture and

repair of machinery would lead to the growth of a huge engineering

industry."

The summarized statements will be made more clear by the following

extracts from Chapter I on rural India.

"Famine connotes not so much a scarcity or entire absence of food as

high prices and a lack of employment in the affected areas.... The

capital in the hands of the country traders has proved insufficient to

finance the ordinary movements of crops and the seasonal calls for

accommodations from the main financial centers are constantly

increasing. This lack of available capital is one cause of the high

rates that the ryot has to pay for the ready money which he needs to buy

seed and to meet the expenses of cultivation. On the other hand, money

is largely invested in the purchase of landed property, the price of

which has risen to very high figures in many parts of the country....

But the no less urgent necessity of relieving the ryot from the enormous

load of debt with which he has been burdened by the dearness of

agricultural capital, the necessity of meeting periodic demands for rent

and his social habits, has hitherto been met only to a very small extent

by co-operative organization. The farmer, owing partly to poverty and

partly to the extreme sub-division of the land, is very often a producer

on so small a scale that it is practically impossible for him to take

his crops to the larger markets where he can sell at current rates to

the agents of the bigger firms.... A better market system, co-operative

selling, and education are the promising remedies."

Coming to the industrial centers of the country apart from the rural

areas, the report says:

"A characteristic feature of organised industry and commerce in all the

chief Indian centers is the presence of large agency firms which, except

in the case of Bombay, are mainly European. In addition to participating

in the export and import trade, they finance and manage industrial

ventures all over the country, and often have several branches in the

large towns. The importance of these agency houses may be gauged by the

fact that they are in control of the majority of the cotton, jute and

other mills as well as of the tea gardens and the coal mines."

The general remarks about the industrial deficiency of the country will

be better understood from the following extracts:

"We have already referred to the dependence of India on outside sources

of sulphur and the necessity for insisting on the local smelting of her

sulphide ores. In the absence of any means for producing from purely

Indian sources sulphuric, nitric, and hydrochloric acids, and alkalis,

our manufactures, actual or prospective, of paper, drugs, matches, oils,

explosives, disinfectants, dyes and textiles are dependent upon imports

which under war conditions, might be cut off. Sources of raw materials

for heavy chemicals are deficient. The output of saltpeter could be

raised to 40,000 tons per annum and supplementary supplies of nitrates

could be produced, if necessary, from atmospheric nitrogen; but for this

again, cheap electric power is needed. Salt occurs in abundance and the

establishment of caustic soda manufacture, preferably by an electric

process, that would also yield chlorine, is a necessary part of our

chemical programme. There are available in the country, in fair

quantity, many other raw materials necessary for heavy chemical

manufacture, in addition to those referred to under other heads; among

them may be mentioned alum, salts, barytes, borax, gypsum, limestone,

magnesia, phosphates of lime and ochres. The installation of plants for

the recovery of by-products in coking has recently been undertaken, but

for the recovery of tar and ammonia only. The recovery of benzol and

related products has so far not been attempted nor has anything been

done to utilise the tar by re-distillation or other chemical treatment.

"Although India exported raw rubber valued in 1917-1918 at 162 lakhs,

rubber manufacture has not been started in the country and goods to the

value of 116 lakhs were imported in 1917-1918. This industry is one of

those that are essential in the national interest and should be

inaugurated, if necessary, by special measures.

"Though textile industries exist on a large scale, the range of goods

produced is still narrow, and we are dependent upon foreign sources for

nearly all of our miscellaneous textile requirements. In addition to

these, the ordinary demands of Indian consumers necessitate the import

of some Rs. 66 crores worth of cotton piece-goods, and interference with

this source of supply has caused serious hardship. Flax is not yet grown

in appreciable quantities and the indigenous species of so-called hemp,

though abundantly grown, are not at present used in any organized Indian

industry.

"Our ability to produce and to preserve many of our foodstuffs in

transportable forms or to provide receptacles for mineral or vegetable

oils depends upon the supply of tin plates which India at present

imports in the absence of local manufactures.

"Our few paper factories before the war stood on an uncertain basis and

we are still dependent upon foreign manufacture for most of the higher

qualities."

India produces enormous quantities of leather on a relatively small

scale by modern processes; and the village tanner supplies the local

needs only, and with a very inferior material. To obtain the quantities

and standards of finished leather which the country requires, it will be

necessary to stimulate industries by the institution of technical

training and by the experimental work on a considerable scale.

"Large quantities of vegetable products are exported for the manufacture

of drugs, dyes and essential oils, which in many cases are re-imported

into India.

"The blanks in our industrial catalog are of a kind most surprising to

one familiar only with the European conditions. We have already alluded

generally to the basic deficiencies in our iron and steel industries

and have explained how, as a result, the many engineering shops in India

are mainly devoted to the repair or to the manufacture of, hitherto

mainly from imported materials, comparatively simple structures, such as

roofs, bridges, wagons and tanks. India can build a small marine engine

and turn out a locomotive provided certain essential parts are obtained

from abroad but _she has not a machine to make nails or screws, nor can

she manufacture some of the essential parts of electrical machinery_.[1]

"Electrical plant and equipment are still, therefore, imported, in spite

of the fact that incandescent lamps are used by the millions and

electric fans by the tens of thousands. India relies on foreign supplies

of steel springs and iron chains and for wire ropes, a vital necessity

of her mining industry. We have already pointed out the absence of any

manufacture of textile mill accessories. The same may be said of the

equipment of nearly all industrial concerns. The list of deficiencies

includes all kinds of machine tools, steam engines, boilers and gas and

oil engines, hydraulic presses and heavy cranes. Simple lathes, small

sugar mills, small pumps, and a variety of odds and ends are made in

some shops, but the basis of their manufacture and the limited scale of

production do not enable them to compete with imported goods of similar

character to the extent of excluding the latter. Agriculturists' and

planters' tools such as ploughs, _mamooties_, spades, shovels and

pickaxes are mainly imported as well as the hand tools of improved

character used in most cottage industries, including wood-working tools,

healds and reeds, shuttles and pickers. Bicycles, motor cycles and motor

cars cannot at present be made in India though the imports under these

heads were valued at Rs. 187 lakhs in 1913-1914. The manufacture of

common glass is carried on in various localities, and some works have

turned out ordinary domestic utensils and bottles of fair quality, but

no attempt has been made to produce plate or sheet glass or indeed any

of the harder kinds of commercial glass, while optical glass manufacture

has never even been mooted. The extent of our dependence on imported

glass is evidenced by the fact that in 1913-1914 this was valued at Rs.

164 lakhs. Porcelain insulators, good enough for low tension currents,

are manufactured, but India does not produce the higher qualities of

either porcelain or china....

"The list of industries which, though their products are essential alike

in peace and war, are lacking in this country, _is lengthy and almost

ominous_.[2] Until they are brought into existence on an adequate scale,

Indian capitalists will, in times of peace, be deprived of a number of

profitable enterprises; whilst in the event of war which renders the sea

transport impossible, India's all-important existing industries will be

exposed to the risk of stoppage, her consumers to great hardship, and

her armed forces to the gravest danger."

In discussing the part played by Indians of all classes in the

industrial development of the Country the Commission observes:

"It is obvious that the great obstacles are the lack of even vernacular

education and the low standard of comfort. The higher grade of worker,

the mechanical artisan, in the absence of adequate education has been

prevented from attaining a greater degree of skill. He finds himself

where he is, less by deliberate choice than by the accident of his

obtaining work at some railway or other engineering shop, or by the

possession of a somewhat more enterprising spirit than his fellows.

There is at present only very inadequate provision for any form of

technical training to supplement the experience that he can gain by

actual work in an engineering shop, while the generally admitted need

for a more trustworthy and skillful type of man is at present met by

importing charge-men and foremen from abroad."

The Political Future of India · 第 102 / 132 题