NO. 24

Whereas I deem it expedient to make provision for the preservation

of health and the greater comfort of British troops stationed in

the area under my command,

And whereas a number of electric fans and lights are required in

the buildings in which some of such troops are quartered,

Now therefore by virtue of the powers vested in me by martial law

I authorize any officer appointed by me for that purpose to enter

any college, public building, hostel, hotel, private or other

residence or building and remove such number of electric lights

and fans required for the purpose aforesaid,

And any attempt to obstruct such removal, or to hide, or to damage

or to impair the immediate efficiency of any such fans or lights,

will be summarily dealt with under martial law,

But nothing in this order shall authorize the removal of any fan

or light from a room usually inhabited by a woman.

These are only a few of the orders we have been able to obtain.

For weeks the Punjab was in a state of terror. Almost all of the

Native papers were either directly or indirectly suppressed or

terrorized into silence. Numerous persons were arrested and placed

for trial before military commissioners. Among them were a large

number of the most honored men in the province. Legal counsel from

outside the province was denied to them, and admission of

newspapermen into the province barred. In punishing the persons

found guilty the military commissioners have awarded sentences,

the parallel of which can only be found in the history of Czarism

in Russia. Flogging in the public was resorted to in more than one

place. In short, a complete reign of terror was established. So

great was the terrorism that the whole country was thrown into

such a paroxysm of rage, anger and despair as to make the people

forget the desire for a political constitution at this terrible

price.

Just as I am writing these lines I learn from the London _Times_ that

the reports of the two committees that were sent to India to inquire

into (_a_) questions connected with the franchise and (_b_) the division

of functions between the Government of India and local governments, and

between the official and the popular elements in the local governments,

have been published in Great Britain. In one of the Appendices is given

a rather brief and inadequate summary of the recommendations of these

committees published by the London _Times_. At this stage it is

impossible to make any comments except that the franchise is by no

means as broad as it could have been, the restriction of local residence

on candidates for the provincial Legislative Councils extremely

unreasonable, and the strength of the Provincial Councils very meagre.

The recommendations are unsatisfactory in other respects also, specially

the power granted to the Governor to dismiss ministers.

The question, however, is, "Will the Cabinet stand by these

recommendations or will they allow them to be whittled down?" Mr.

Montagu's bill, which is promised to be introduced in the House of

Commons early in June, will answer the question.

In conclusion, I have to tender my thanks to my friend Dr. J. T.

Sunderland for having read my proofs.

_June 2, 1919._

The Political Future of India · 第 25 / 132 题