THE CHALLENGE OF INTOLERANCE

The old liberal principles of free speech, religious liberty, racial

equality before the law and obedience to the law itself until it is

altered by the will of the majority, is being attacked from both

wings on the Left and Right. The Swastika or “Hackenkreuz” societies

in Germany and Austria, becoming very powerful and aggressive, have

declared war against the Jews, and vengeance against France. In Hungary

the persecution of Jews is a passionate article of faith among those

who support the present dictatorship. In the United States of America

the Ku Klux Klan defies the very spirit of liberty and law which

inspired the American constitution and preaches Intolerance as its

creed—intolerance of Jews, intolerance of the Negro Race, intolerance

of Catholics, intolerance of political labour. It is a secret society

which seems to me in violent conflict with all the idealism stirring

in the soul of America. If it is not checked or killed by public

opinion it will certainly lead to social conflict in the United States

of very grave consequences. The argument of the Ku Klux Klansmen that

they stand for purity in politics, the old traditions of American

character menaced by the tyranny and corruption of Irish politicians,

Jewish financiers and Labour revolutionaries, seems to me no defence

of their methods or their principles. It is not by defiance of the law

that they will exact obedience to the law. It is not by setting up a

secret government that they will destroy Tammany which is also a secret

government. It is not by spreading a propaganda of hate against the

Jewish race—which has been greatly loyal to American ideals and by its

genius has brought great wealth in art, music and literature as well as

in dollars to the United States—that the gospel of Christianity will

be more faithfully observed. It is not by burning Catholic Churches

that Christ will be served. It is not by lynch law against negroes or

any other class of American citizens that the United States is going

to give a spiritual lead to the world or improve its own state of

civilisation. All that is a hark-back to barbarity and not a stride

forward to a more civilised world. It is the revival of cruelty which

we want to slay with other qualities of the beast in us. It is the

spirit of “Prussianism” against which we were supposed to be fighting

in the great war.

It is true of course that tolerance cannot be carried to extreme

limits. One cannot tolerate obscenity, incitements to murder, or to

“orgies of blood” in the cause of “liberty,” or revolutionary attacks

upon the ordinary rights of citizenship and the common law of the land.

There comes a point when tolerance must become intolerance unless it

makes an abject surrender to the forces of evil and anarchy. That

is the argument of those who justify Mussolini and his Fascisti, the

Ku Klux Klan, the Swastika societies in Germany, and the “Die-hards”

in England. It is a sound argument when that point of conscience is

reached. But the danger of intolerance is far greater than that of

tolerance, and it is apt to encourage and inflame the very evils which

it is opposing. Free speech is a great safety valve for overheated air

as the English people have found through centuries of history, and are

finding now. Revolution is most dangerous when it is driven underground

by autocracy and tyranny. Above all, religious and racial equality

before the law is the foundation of all civilised states. Without that

a state is not only uncivilised but its form of government is doomed to

destruction, as history has shewn a thousand times.

Ten years after · 第 88 / 93 题