THE MACHINERY OF DESTRUCTION

They are, after all, details. The spirit matters more than the letter.

I think that in the spirit of the world, almost everywhere, there

is a growing consciousness that the perils of new conflict are so

frightful that civilisation might actually go down in chaos if the

forces of evil are not subdued. At the back of many minds is the awful

thought that machinery threatens to become the master of men and that

science threatens to destroy humanity unless it is controlled. What

were human valour, spiritual courage, superb physique, in that last

war, up against long-range guns, aerial torpedoes, high explosives

in concentrated fire, poison gas? At a distance of forty miles a

platoon of men might be wiped out by a casual shell loosed from a

fifteen-inch howitzer. What was the value of discipline, ardour, human

strength, centuries of character building to produce the fine flower

of civilisation, in the face of that explosive force which tore men’s

bodies to bits far from the sight of their enemy, without means of

resistance on their part, with no more defence than if a thunderbolt

had struck them? That is not war between human forces. It is war with

engines constructed by men but overpowering. Or, of what use were fair

physique, athletic youth, soldierly qualities, heroic human stuff, when

suddenly they were enveloped in a vapour which choked them, burnt their

lungs, blinded them, stupefied them? All the discoveries of science

which made men proud of the knowledge they had wrested from nature’s

most hidden secrets, like gods, were used for this devilish purpose

of increasing the efficiency of human slaughter. Even the victory of

flight which had baffled humanity since men first walked on earth and

envied the birds for their liberty of the sky was achieved in time to

increase the terrors and range of war.

Yet we know that if there is a next war it will be worse than the last

because the poison gases are more deadly, the guns have longer range,

the aeroplanes will be more crowded in the sky, the cities will be

more at the mercy of falling bombs. In many laboratories scientists

are searching for new forms of destruction which may even make those

weapons obsolete because so limited in their power of slaughter. It is

not only possible but likely that some “death ray” projecting wireless

force may sweep a countryside with a heat that would turn everything

to flame and then to dust and ashes. Is mankind going to risk such an

infernal ending to all its dreams of beauty and order and more perfect

life? Is it going to allow its stupid brawls, its national ambitions,

its little points of honour and argument, to be settled by this latest

type of warfare which does not spare women or children, but, indeed,

makes them the victims of its worst cruelties? With all its passionate

follies, humanity can hardly be as mad as that.

Ten years after · 第 85 / 93 题