GERMAN COMPETITION

It is uncertain yet whether the London Agreement embodying the Dawes

Report will actually be fulfilled by Germany. In my belief it will

not be fulfilled. It is impossible for me to believe that Germany is

capable of paying a hundred and twenty-five million pounds sterling

and more in a rising scale for an indefinite number of years. England

could not do so, and England is richer than Germany. The American

debt, which is being paid off at the rate of £35,000,000 a year, is

a burden which makes Great Britain breathe hard. That is hardly more

than one quarter of what the German people are expected to pay, and I

do not think they can do so for more than a few years. They can only

do so, as I have pointed out, in one way: by creating a trade balance

in their favour which would enable them to transfer that sum to their

creditors after paying for the essential services of their own nation.

If they are able to get such a trade balance it will mean that they

are overwhelming the world markets with German goods. Who is going to

let them do so? The United States would surely put up barriers against

their manufactured articles. Great Britain will not admit them in such

an overpowering quantity, whatever her theoretical allegiance to Free

Trade. In other markets these cheap German goods will oust British and

American competitors. The factories of Great Britain will be producing

articles at a price which other nations will refuse to pay when

Germany is canvassing for contracts. Germany will default again, I am

certain, unless by a miracle of industry her people, on slave wages,

capture the world’s trade, which would be worse than default to British

manufacturers and in a less degree to those in America.

Whatever happens it is a serious outlook, because default would mean

a new political crisis in Europe—all the old wounds open again—and

success would ruin those who have imposed the Agreement. The horns of

that dilemma were seen years ago by M. Loucheur, the greatest expert

of economics in France. Speaking before the Senate he said: “Germany

cannot pay these indemnities. If she were able to pay it would make her

master of the world’s trade. Let us therefore insist on security rather

than on reparations.”

The revival of Germany, limited by these enormous reparations, will

undoubtedly increase the general prosperity of all European nations.

The restoration of German purchasing power by a loan of £40,000,000

from Great Britain and the United States, stabilising her monetary

system, will help world trade everywhere to the extent that Germany

buys raw material for her industries and additional luxuries and

comforts in foreign countries. Australia and Canada will benefit

by purchases of wool and meat. They will buy more from the Mother

Country in consequence. Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Italy and France

will exchange more products. The wheel of world trade will turn more

rapidly. Great Britain and the United States will find Germany a

better customer. But Great Britain will also find Germany a stronger

competitor, and the advantages which may come to the British people

by the recovery of prosperity in Europe may be outweighed by that

competition owing to the difference between dear labour and cheap

labour. Already, ten years after the beginning of the war, Germany

is able to offer steel to Middlesbrough at thirty shillings a ton

less than it costs to manufacture steel in Middlesbrough itself! I

have the greatest sympathy with organised labour in England which

is endeavouring to maintain its standard of life and wages and even

to improve them. But the Socialists who are legislating for shorter

hours, more pay, larger doles for unemployed, national subsidies in the

building trade, and national money for providing work, are up against

the industry of German labour which is working nine and ten hours a

day, instead of the eight hours in England, at less than half the rate

of pay. In great industrial cities like Sheffield something like a

third of the working population is living on charity or the official

dole. It is impossible for a nation to maintain its economic life on

such a tragic basis. It must be put upon sounder foundations or come

down with a crash.

Ten years after · 第 78 / 93 题