THE DEFEAT OF POINCARÉ

I was one of the few who had some inkling of the change of view in

France and foretold the peril of Poincaré. In conversation with French

people, and especially the ordinary working folk, I gathered that

Poincaré no longer held their confidence. They had backed him when he

ordered the occupation of the Ruhr, but only because they believed

that he would “deliver the goods.” Now they saw that the “goods” were

not forthcoming, and that, instead of receiving large reparations from

Germany, the franc was dropping, abruptly and perilously. They believed

that M. Poincaré was a little too “rigid,” too much of a lawyer, and

too little of a business man. They were aware of all the hate that was

being built up against them in Germany. They said—many of them—“We are

afraid of the future.”

It was above all that fear of the future, the terrifying spectre of

a new war, when not the great Black Army of Africa, nor all their

submarines, nor all their aeroplanes, would save France from another

struggle in which the last of her youth would perish, which overthrew

Poincaré and his “rigid” methods. France, by a majority, desired peace,

if that could be gained by some new policy, not surrendering security,

not weak, but more in accord with the spirit of Liberalism.

There is no doubt in my mind that the result of the elections in Great

Britain and the rise of Labour in that country had a powerful influence

on the French election. It was a call back to democratic ideals in

Europe, against the militarists and Imperialists.

Anyhow it gave Ramsay MacDonald a wonderful, an amazing chance. With

Herriot, ex-Mayor of Lyons, advanced Liberal, leader of Labour in

France, he could speak on equal terms. They understood each other’s

ideas. They knew each other’s difficulties. Herriot, who speaks German

well and has studied their system of civic organisation, had an honest

desire to be fair and just to Germany while not betraying French

interests. He did not call the German people “_Sales Boches_.” He did

not want to kill their babies or starve them to death. He acknowledged

that they had a right to live. He wanted to deal with them on business

terms and, if possible—if possible!—get their good will and free

consent to a plan by which French and Germans may live in the same

world without periodical spasms of slaughter. With Herriot and Ramsay

MacDonald in cordial agreement on the ideals of peace in the London

Conference in August, ten years after the beginning of war, the peace

of Europe had a greater chance than any other statesmen of England and

France would have made conceivable. Luck, or Fate, was on the side of

success.

Ten years after · 第 66 / 93 题