THE PROBLEM OF GERMANY

Germany remained the great problem of Europe and the great peril.

After the war, when “something seemed to break in them,” as a German

wrote to me, they were for a time stunned and dazed by defeat. To

German pride of race it seemed incredible, even in the face of dreadful

facts, that they had lost everything for which they had fought and

struggled with such desperate and stubborn will-power. After all their

victories! After all that slaughter! “_Deutschland über Alles!_” Now

they were in chains, hopeless and helpless, disarmed, under the heel of

France, Britain, Belgium—done and down!

The military chiefs hid themselves in their castles—sullen, broken.

They put all the blame on the German people. It was they who had

blundered and had been defeated. The invincible German armies had

never been defeated. Never! Only Ludendorff in an incautious book

confessed the truth that he had not been able to hold the line against

the overwhelming assault of the Allies. But his argument was the same.

It was German will-power that had broken behind the lines. It was

Bolshevism and Pacifism that had let down the fighting men. When the

Peace Treaties were published the German people gasped and, for a time,

despaired. They were confronted with conditions which would crush them

for all time. However hard they worked, all the profits of their labour

would be seized by their enemies. However much they pinched, more

would be demanded. There was no fixed sum which they could wipe out by

stupendous effort, but only sums rising higher in fantastic figures for

ever and ever. They were the bondslaves of the world.

That mood did not last, though it came back again. A new mood followed

and buoyed them up for a year or two. They had lost the War, but they

would show the world that they could win the peace. German genius,

organisation, and industry would rise above even the monstrous

penalties exacted by their enemies. They would capture the markets of

the world, smash all competitors by an industrial war, regain their

liberty and commercial power. The Krupp works which had made great guns

and all the monstrous machinery of war converted their plant to the

instruments of peace, produced ploughs, steam-engines, safety razors,

cash registers, everything that is made of metal for the use of life.

Every factory in Germany got to work again. There were no unemployed

as in England, because the workers accepted low wages, and desired

work almost as much as bread in a fever of industrial energy, to wipe

out the War and build up the prosperity of a peace. Defeat was better

than victory in its moral effect upon the German people. At least they

did not fall into that idleness, that craving for gaiety, that moral

lassitude and indiscipline of spirit which overcame the victorious

peoples. When I went to Germany, several times after the War, I was

amazed at its energy and industry. There were no scenes in Berlin like

those in London, with processions of unemployed and innumerable beggars

and crowds of loungers round the Labour Exchanges. There was an air of

activity in Germany, startling and rather splendid. The whole nation

was working full steam ahead, and the products of its industry were

being offered in the markets of the world at less than the cost price

of similar goods in England. It steadied them and gave them a purpose

in life.

And yet beneath this superficial appearance of renewed prosperity and

industrial power there was, as I could see, something rotten. Misery

was not to be seen in the open, as in London, but it was there, in

middle-class homes and mean streets. The whole of this new industrial

adventure in Germany was based upon underpaid and under-nourished

labour, upon cut-throat prices, and upon the temporary advantage of a

falling exchange.

The German Government was tinkering with its money, speeding up the

printing presses, issuing notes beyond the backing of real securities.

The illusion of a Germany capturing the world’s markets had no great

basis of truth. The world markets had lost their purchasing power,

however cheap were German goods. Russia was not buying much from

Germany, nor Austria, nor Poland, nor Hungary, nor Turkey. Looking

into the figures given me by experts—English as well as German—it

seemed certain that there was an adverse trade balance against Germany

when her national expenditure was reckoned with her revenue. The

reparations she was beginning to pay, the deliveries in kind she

was making to France, Belgium, and Italy, the costs of the Armies

of Occupation on the Rhine, were eating into her capital wealth and

swallowing up her last gold reserves. She had to pay her indemnities by

buying foreign money—dollars, sterling, francs—and after each payment

her own money depreciated by irresistible economic laws.

Ten years after · 第 52 / 93 题