COMMENT.

Selfishness is common to all ages and countries. In all ages

Self-seeking is the Rule, and Self-sacrifice the Exception. But if to

seek our private advantage in harmony with, and by the furtherance of,

the public prosperity, and to derive a portion of our happiness from

sympathy with the prosperity of our fellow-men--if this be Public

Spirit, it would be morose and querulous to pretend that there is any

want of it in this country and at the present time. On the contrary,

the number of "public souls" and the general readiness to contribute

to the public good, in science and in religion, in patriotism and in

philanthropy, stand prominent[70] among the characteristics of this

and the preceding generation. The habit of referring actions and

opinions to fixed laws; convictions rooted in principles; thought,

insight, system;--these, had the good Bishop lived in our times, would

have been his _desiderata_, and the theme of his complaints.--"We want

_thinking_ Souls, we _want them_."

This and the three preceding extracts will suffice as precautionary

Aphorisms. And here again, the reader may exemplify the great

advantages to be obtained from the habit of tracing the _proper_

meaning and history of words. We need only recollect the common and

idiomatic phrases in which the word "spirit" occurs in a physical or

material sense (as, fruit has lost its _spirit_ and flavour), to be

convinced that its property is to improve, enliven, actuate some other

thing, not to constitute a thing in its own name. The enthusiast may

find one exception to this where the material itself is called

_Spirit_. And when he calls to mind, how _this_ spirit acts when taken

_alone_ by the unhappy persons who in their first exultation will

boast that it is meat, drink, fire, and clothing to them, all in

one--when he reflects, that its properties are to inflame, intoxicate,

madden, with exhaustion, lethargy, and atrophy for the sequels--well

for him, if in some lucid interval he should fairly put the question

to his own mind, how far this is _analogous_ to his own case, and

whether the exception does not confirm the rule. The _Letter_ without

the Spirit killeth; but does it follow, that the Spirit is to kill the

Letter? To kill that which it is its appropriate office to enliven?

However, where the Ministry is not invaded, and the plain sense of the

Scriptures is left undisturbed, and the Believer looks for the

suggestions of the Spirit only or chiefly in applying particular

passages to his own individual case and exigences; though in this

there may be much weakness, some delusion and imminent danger of more,

I cannot but join with Henry More in avowing, that I feel knit to such

a man in the bonds of a common faith far more closely, than to those

who receive neither the Letter nor the Spirit, turning the one into

metaphor, and oriental hyperbole, in order to explain away the other

into the influence of motives suggested by their own understandings,

and realized by their own strength.

[69] Hacket's Sermons, p. 449.--ED.

[70] The very marked _positive_ as well as comparative, magnitude and

prominence of the bump, entitled BENEVOLENCE (_see Spurzheim's Map of

the Human Skull_) on the head of the late Mr. John Thurtel, has

woefully unsettled the faith of many ardent Phrenologists, and

strengthened the previous doubts of a still greater number into utter

disbelief. On MY mind this fact (for a _fact_ it is) produced the

directly contrary effect; and inclined me to suspect, for the first

time, that there may be some truth in the Spurzheimian Scheme. Whether

future Craniologists may not see cause to _new-name_ this and one or

two other of these convex gnomons, is quite a different question. At

present, and according to the present use of words, any such change

would be premature; and we must be content to say, that Mr. Thurtel's

Benevolence was insufficiently modified by the unprotrusive and

unindicated convolutes of the brain, that secrete honesty and

common-sense. The organ of Destructiveness was indirectly

_potentiated_ by the absence or imperfect development of the glands of

Reason and Conscience in this, "_unfortunate Gentleman_!"

Aids to Reflection; and, The Confessions of an Inquiring Spirit · 第 234 / 365 题