DIVERSIONS OF AN ABANDONED SINNER

1

Almost immediately after my conversion, or at least as soon as it

had become noised about that I had consigned my holy relative to

what some of our more finicky Sisters, unable to bring themselves to

say “Hell,” referred to coyly as “the bad place,” I abandoned myself

to a life of sin and became a total spiritual loss in the eyes of

all Farmington except members of my immediate family and certain of

my intimate friends who collaborated with me in various wicked but

pleasant enterprises. That is to say, I cast aside the taboos and the

inhibitions that religion had thrown about me, and became for the

first time in my life a normal boy. I existed simply to play and raise

hell generally, and for some curious reason the activity which gave me

the most pleasure was throwing rocks at the church or in some manner

interrupting the service.

It was not long before even the most hopeful had ceased their talk

of sending me to a theological school and fitting me to carry on

the family labors, for I began to smoke cigarettes, play cards,

swear, drink when I could find a bartender willing to ignore the law

forbidding the sale of liquor to a minor, and to cock an appreciative

and appraising eye at the girls. It was then agreed that it was too

late to do anything with me or for me, and on the Sunday morning that

I mounted my new bicycle and rode brazenly past the Southern Methodist

church as the Brothers and Sisters filed with bowed heads into the

edifice for worship, I was consigned body and soul to the sizzling pits

of Hell.

I suffered a great deal of physical agony before I learned to smoke

cigarettes, and it was some time before I learned to blow smoke through

my nose with the nonchalant ease affected by the group of older boys

and young men who loafed in Doss’s barber shop and around the Post

Office Building and McKinney’s peanut and popcorn machine. My older

brother had learned a year or so before, and he frequently made himself

very offensive to me by boasting that he could smoke a whole package of

Sweet Caporals or Drums without becoming ill. I yearned to try, but he

would not give me a cigarette, and neither would any of the other boys,

and my finances were in such shape that I could not purchase any. And,

of course, such wicked things could not be purchased and charged to my

father; I could have charged a plug of chewing tobacco to him, but not

cigarettes.

But one day I was loafing hopefully in McKinney’s when my brother came

in and produced a dime that he had amassed by laborious work chopping

wood at home, and bought a package of Sweet Caporal Little Cigars.

These were really nothing but cigarettes wrapped with tobacco instead

of paper, but they resembled a cigar and were thought to be infinitely

more stylish and manly than the ordinary cigarette. I asked him for

one, and he said he would not give one to John the Baptist himself. But

I persisted, and followed him home, aghast at his determination to hide

behind the barn and smoke the whole package one after the other.

“I’ll light one from the end of the other,” he boasted.

Finally as we came opposite Brother Nixon’s house just south of Elmwood

Seminary, he relented and very carefully opened the box and handed me

a Little Cigar. It was a great moment. The yard of Elmwood Seminary

fairly swarmed with girl students, including the young lady who at the

time represented everything that was desirable in the female sex, and

I visioned their cries of startled admiration as I passed, puffing

nonchalantly, blowing smoke from my nose and perhaps from my ears.

I had no doubt of my ability to handle the innocent-looking Little

Cigar; indeed, at that time I considered no problem insurmountable.

My brother instructed me to fill my mouth with smoke and then take a

long, deep breath, and after that blow the smoke out gently and slowly,

holding the Little Cigar between the first and second finger and

crooking the little finger as we did when we drank tea or coffee, that

being a mark of gentility and refinement. As we came in front of the

old Clardy homestead less than half a block from the Seminary I struck

a match and applied it to the end of the Little Cigar, while my brother

watched anxiously and from time to time gave me advice. I puffed as he

directed.

“Got a mouthful?” he asked.

Unable to speak, my cheeks bulging, I nodded.

“Now take a long breath.”

But, alas, I did not breathe; I swallowed, and while the smoke

penetrated me and spread throughout my interior, it did not take the

correct route. I began to strangle, and my brother got excited.

“Blow it out, you damn fool!” he cried. “You’ll choke!”

I did choke. I did even worse; I became very ill, and the spectacle

which so intrigued the young ladies of the Seminary that day was not

that of a young gentleman going nonchalantly to Hell by the cigarette

route. Instead, they saw a very sick boy rolling on the sidewalk trying

desperately to stem a distressing internal upheaval.

It was several days later before I had enough courage to try again,

and I debated within myself whether or not God had caused me to be so

ill in order to show me that smoking was a sin. But I had definitely

committed myself to the Devil, so a few days later I begged a dime

from my father and bought a package of Drums and another of Sweet

Caporals, the two most popular brands of cigarettes. With these, and

a supply of matches, I went behind the barn. I made a neat pile of

sawdust to lie upon, and there I remained the whole afternoon, smoking

one cigarette after another. I was terribly ill at first, but gradually

improved until the last three or four gave me no trouble. I did not

have much appetite for dinner that night, but I had conquered the

cigarette and I felt a glow of pride at the fact that I had got a very

good start in the direction of the bad place.

The basis of my overwhelming desire to smoke cigarettes was the fact

that cigarette-smoking when I was a boy in Farmington was one of the

major sins. It ranked with adultery and just a little ahead of murder

and theft. The Preachers called them coffin nails and delivered violent

sermons against them, and every once in a while an evangelist would

come to town with medical charts showing the effect of tobacco upon

the interior human organs. But the fact that it was bad physically for

growing boys was seldom stressed at all; we were impressed instead with

the fact that God thought it a sin to smoke cigarettes, although it did

not appear that it was a sin for the tobacconist to sell them. That was

business.

Many efforts were made to reform me after I had begun to smoke. My

mother said she had hoped I wouldn’t, but that was all she said, and my

father said he did not give a hoot whether I smoked or not, but that he

hoped I would not be a fool and overdo it. He himself had learned the

art of chewing tobacco when he was a boy of seven in Mississippi, and

so far as I have ever been able to learn, God had never called him to

account. He died at the age of seventy-nine, suddenly, and a slab of

plug-cut was in his pocket. It is impossible for me to believe that God

refused him entrance into whatever Heaven there may be on account of

his habit, which he thoroughly enjoyed.

But the Preachers and the Brothers and Sisters did not agree with my

parents, nor would they admit that it was none of their business. On

the contrary, they said that it was the Lord’s business, and since they

were the duly accredited agents of the Lord, appointed by Him to lead

Farmington into the paths of righteousness, it was their business also.

When Brother Fontaine was our Methodist pastor he did not look with

disfavor upon chewing, because he himself was seldom without a chew and

presumably had an indulgence from God, but he looked upon the cigarette

as an invention of the Devil. In this view he was upheld by the

Ladies’ Aid Society and the Farmington branch of the Women’s Christian

Temperance Union. And the W. C. T. U., with the possible exception of

the Methodist Board of Temperance, Prohibition and Public Morals, was

and is the world’s best example of an organization maintained for the

sole purpose of minding other people’s business.

The hullabaloo over my smoking only made me more determined to smoke

until my insides turned black and I was called home by Satan and

transformed into a tobacco demon. For that reason I probably smoked too

much. As a matter of principle I always lighted a cigarette just in

front of the Southern Methodist church, and in front of the home of my

uncle, who was an enemy of anything that provided physical pleasure and

contentment. I always smoked another as I passed the Northern Methodist

church, the scene of the McConnell revival orgy, and still another in

front of the Christian church, in memory of Brother Nations. That was

four in half a mile, and of course was too many, but sometimes I was

not permitted to finish all of them. Frequently a Brother or a Sister,

seeing me thus flaunting my sin on the public highway, snatched the

nasty thing from my mouth and gave me a lecture that dripped religion

and was principally concerned with the fate of boys who defied God and

Jesus Christ by smoking cigarettes. One Sister asked me:

“Where did you get the vile things?”

I told her that I had bought them at her husband’s store, and she

shrieked:

“You saucy, blasphemous boy!”

But on that particular occasion I was not lectured, although she

telephoned my mother that I had been impudent to her. My mother told

her it was too bad.

2

I learned to play pinochle when I was about fifteen, only a few

months after I had become an accomplished cigarette fiend and was

generally considered a fine prospect for Satan, and thereafter was a

regular participant in the game that went on every night in the back

room of Karl Schliesser’s cigar factory. This was a notable den of

evil, and while religion had me in its clutches I thought black magic

was practiced there, and that its habitués had communion with the

Devil; among us it was believed that God had doubtless never heard

of the place or He would have destroyed it with a withering blast of

lightning. It was frequented by Germans and other low forms of life,

and they were principally Catholics and Lutherans, with a sprinkling

of renegade Protestants like myself. The Brothers and Sisters held the

opinion that if this crowd had a God at all he must have been a very

queer being, for bursts of ribald laughter came from Schliesser’s back

room, and there was card-playing, and I do not doubt that occasionally

someone gambled.

Schliesser was the Town Socialist, and was looked upon with grave

suspicion by the better element, as in those days it was generally

recognized that a Socialist was an emissary of the Devil. But the

Brothers and Sisters and the Preachers looked with even more suspicion

upon Victor Quesnel. In this attitude they had the support of the

Catholics. Victor Quesnel was born in France, but he had lived in

Farmington for many years. He frequently quoted Voltaire, and appeared

to believe that a man’s religion and his belief or disbelief in God was

a matter of his own personal taste, and he was therefore regarded as an

atheist. As a matter of fact he was probably more truly religious than

most of the pious Brothers and Sisters; the principal difference was

that he did not try to compel everyone he met to embrace his creed.

Frequently, and without particular regard as to who heard him,

Quesnel discussed the advantages of sleeping naked, or, as we say

in present-day journalism, undraped. That was his hobby. He said he

thought it was a healthful practice, that he slept better without

clothing, and that come what might he was going to continue to sleep

that way. This was considered heathenish doctrine; some of our finest

church members owned stores in which they sold nightgowns and pajamas,

and it was felt that Quesnel’s attitude was not only a direct affront

to God but was also injurious to business. Moreover, the Brothers and

Sisters did not consider such a practice modest; there were scores,

perhaps hundreds of people in Farmington who had never in their lives

removed all of their clothing. Once at a meeting of the Ladies’ Aid

Society I heard an old Sister say that she had reached the age of sixty

and had never been entirely undressed; and that when she bathed she

kept her eyes closed as she applied the sponge to her body. A great

deal of juicy conversation could be overheard at these Ladies’ Aid

meetings by a bright young lad who knew where the best keyholes were

located.

3

Sunday was much more enjoyable after I had become a sinner and had

left Sunday school and the Church to whatever fate the Lord had in

store for them. I arose a little later, had a leisurely breakfast and

a refreshing quarrel or fight with my brothers and sister, and then

went leisurely to my room and as leisurely put on my Sunday suit, with

no intention of removing it until I retired for the night. Curiously

enough, as soon as I quit going regularly to church and Sunday school I

began to wear my Sunday suit all day, and the little voice that I had

in the selection of this garment I raised in hopeful pleas for loud

checks and glaring colors. No longer did I wish to clothe myself in

the sombre blacks suitable for church wear and religious activity; I

desired to blossom and bloom in the more violent and pleasant colors of

Hell.

Once arrayed in my Sunday suit, I left the house, a cigarette dangling

from my lower lip, and my hat, carefully telescoped in the prevailing

mode, sitting just so on the side of my head. I tried to time my march

downtown so that I would reach Elmwood Seminary just as the young lady

students resident there marched across the street, after Sunday school,

from the Presbyterian church; they were not permitted to remain at

the church during the fifteen or twenty-minute interval because they

attracted such hordes of feverish boys intent upon everything but

religion. Usually I reached the scene in time, and leaned nonchalantly

against the Seminary fence, puffing vigorously and ostentatiously on a

cigarette and winking at various and sundry of the girls as they passed

in their caps and gowns.

For these smart-aleck activities I was presently placed upon the

school’s black list and was not permitted to call upon the one night

each month allotted to such social intercourse, but as I soon learned

to climb a rope ladder this did not annoy me greatly. Anyhow, calling

night at Elmwood Seminary was not very exciting. The procedure was to

place a dozen or so chairs about a big room, in pairs but with at least

twelve inches between them, in which sat the girls and their callers.

In the center sat a gimlet-eyed teacher, constantly ready with

Biblical and other uplifting quotations and seeing to it that nothing

scandalous occurred. From eight to ten the caller was permitted to

engage his lady love in conversation, but it was a rule that everything

that was said must be audible to the teacher on guard. Whisperings and

gigglings were taboo, and resulted in the young man being placed on

the black list, and forbidden thereafter to darken the doors of the

institution. But occasionally the teacher relaxed her vigilance for a

moment, providing an opportunity to arrange a clandestine meeting. That

was the principal reason that the boys of Farmington went to Elmwood on

calling nights.

The regular Sunday incident of the Seminary girls having been brought

to a satisfactory and successful conclusion, I went on downtown. I was

very young then, and I considered myself, in my Sunday suit, a very

striking and elegant figure. I thought of myself as a parade, and felt

morally certain that the eyes of every girl were upon me, and that

their hearts were fluttering with amatory admiration. The Methodist

church was only two blocks south of the Presbyterian edifice, and I

generally reached it as the Sunday-school pupils trooped out with their

arms full of lesson pamphlets and their souls full of salvation, Golden

Texts and catechisms. I regarded them pityingly, puffed vaingloriously

at my symbol of sin, and went on past the Christian church and the

Northern Methodist church and so to McKinney’s, the Post Office

Building and the fascinating popcorn and peanut machine.

In the winter time Doss’s barber shop was generally open until noon so

Billy Priester could shine the shoes of the young bucks who proposed to

defile the Sabbath by gallivanting around with young hussies. It was a

favorite loafing place for all abandoned wretches who did not care for

the glory that was free in all churches. But in summer we generally sat

in front of McKinney’s and the Post Office Building and, when finances

permitted, ate popcorn and peanuts, envying Riley Hough as he hurried

out now and then to attend to the machine and stuff his mouth with

popcorn before hastening back into the store.

All of the young sinners of the town loafed there during the church

services, and at twelve o’clock noon we rose in a body and walked

down the street to Pelty’s Book Store, where the Sunday papers were

distributed. The afternoons were devoted to baseball games and amatory

pursuits, and occasionally we went fishing. But this was considered

a Cardinal Sin, and was frowned upon by even our liberal element;

it was felt that it was a desecration of God’s Day to drag one of

His creatures from the river with a cruel fishhook. On week days, of

course, fishing was all right, although a waste of time, but on Sunday

an expedition to Blumeyer’s Ford, or to Gruner’s Hole, was followed

the next morning by buzzing comment all over town, and only a grown man

could hope to indulge in such sinful adventures and escape subsequent

punishment.

4

It was the custom of our pastors and pious brethren, and of the

professional sorcerers who were imported from time to time to cast

their spells and shoo the demons away from our housetops, to proclaim

loudly and incessantly that our collective morals were compounded of

a slice of Sodom and a cut of Gomorrah, with an extract of Babylon

to flavor the sorry stew. They worried constantly and fretfully over

our amorous activities; in their more feverish discourses appeared

significant references to the great difficulty of remaining pure,

and in effect they advised our young women to go armed to the teeth,

prepared to do battle in defense of their virginity.

In Farmington and other small towns of the Middle West this sort of

thing was the principal stock in trade of those who would lead their

brethren to the worship of the current god; the evangelist assured

his hearers that their town was overrun by harlots, and that brothels

abounded in which prominent men abandoned themselves to shameful

orgies, while church attendance dwindled, and collections became

smaller and smaller, and chicken appeared less and less frequently upon

the ministerial table. His tirades were generally in this fashion:

“Shall we permit these painted daughters of Jezebel, these bedizened

hussies, to stalk the streets of this fair city and flaunt their sin

in the face of the Lord? Shall we permit them to lure our sons and

brothers into their vile haunts and ply their nefarious trade in the

very shadow of the House of God? No! I say NO! Jesus Christ must live

in this town!”

Immediately everyone shouted “Amen, Brother!” and “Praise the Lord!”

But it was sometimes difficult to determine whether the congregation

praised the Lord for inspiring the evangelist so courageously to defy

the harlots, or for permitting him to discover them. If the Man of God

could find them, why not the damned, too? Certainly there were always

many who wondered if the brother had acquired any good addresses or

telephone numbers since coming to town. Not infrequently, indeed, he

was stealthily shadowed home by young men eager to settle this question.

These charges and denunciations were repeated, with trimmings, at the

meetings for men only which were always a most interesting feature of

the revivals. At similar gatherings for women, or ladies, as we called

them in small-town journalism, his wife or a devout Sister discussed

the question from the feminine viewpoint. What went on at these latter

conclaves I do not know, though I can guess, for I have often seen

young girls coming out of them giggling and blushing. The meetings for

men were juicy, indeed. The evangelist discussed all angles of the

subject, and in a very free manner. His own amorous exploits before

he was converted were recited in considerable detail, and he painted

vivid word pictures of the brothels he had visited, both as a paying

client and in the course of his holy work. Almost invariably they were

subterranean palaces hung with silks and satins, with soft rugs upon

the floor, and filled with a vast multitude of handsome young women,

all as loose as ashes. Having thus intimated, with some smirking, that

for many years he was almost the sole support of harlotry, he became

confidential. He leaned forward and said:

“There are such Dens of the Devil right here in your town!”

This was first-hand information, and immediately there was a stir in

the audience, many of his hearers betraying an eagerness to be gone.

But before they could get away the evangelist thundered:

“Shall we permit them to continue their wicked practices?”

I always hoped to be present some day when the audience forgot itself

and answered that question with the thought that was so plainly in its

mind, namely, “Yes!” But, alas, I never heard it, although there was

much shouting of “Amen!” and “Glory to God!” These meetings for men

only were generally held in the afternoon, and their net result was

that the business of the drug store increased immediately, and when

night fell bands of young good-for-nothings scurried hither and yon

about the town, searching feverishly for the Dens of the Devil. They

searched without fear, confident that modern science would save them

from any untoward consequences, and knowing that no matter what they

did they would go to Heaven if they permitted a preacher to intercede

for them in the end, or a priest to sprinkle them with holy water.

But the Dens of the Devil were not found, neither in Farmington nor in

any other small town in that region, for the very good reason that they

did not exist. The evangelist did not know what he was talking about;

he was simply using stock blather which he had found by experience

would excite the weak-minded to both sexual and religious emotions.

He knew that when they were thus upset they would be less likely to

question his ravings--that they would be more pliable in his hands and

easier to convert.

Our small towns were not overrun by harlots simply because harlotry

could not flourish in a small town. It was economically impossible;

there were not enough cash customers to make the scarlet career

profitable. Also, the poor girls had to meet too much competition from

emotional ladies who had the professional spirit but retained their

amateur standing by various technicalities. And harlots, like the rest

of us, had to live; they required the same sort of raiment and food

that sufficed their virtuous sisters; it was not until they died that

they wore nothing but the smoke of Hell and were able to subsist on a

diet of brimstone and sulphur.

Many men who in larger communities would have patronized the

professionals could not do so in a small town. They could not afford

to; it was too dangerous. The moment a woman was suspected of being

a harlot she was eagerly watched by everyone from the mayor down to

the preachers, and the name of every man seen talking to her, or even

looking at her, went winging swiftly from mouth to mouth, and was

finally posted on the heavenly bulletin board as that of an immoral

wretch. A house in which harlotry was practiced was picketed day and

night by small boys eager to learn the forbidden mysteries, and by

Brethren and Sisters hopefully sniffing for sin. It was not possible

for a harlot to keep her clientèle secret, for the sexual life of a

small town is an open book, and news of amorous doings could not travel

faster if each had a tabloid newspaper.

Exact statistics, of course, are not available, but it is probably true

that no small American town has ever harbored a harlot whose income

from professional services was sufficient to feed and clothe her. Few

if any such towns have ever been the abode of more than one harlot at

a time. When I was a boy every one had its town harlot, just as it had

its town sot (this, of course, was before drunkards became extinct) and

its town idiot. But she was generally a poor creature who was employed

by day as a domestic servant and practiced her ancient art only in her

hours of leisure. She turned to it partly for economic reasons, but

chiefly because of a great yearning for human companionship, which

she could obtain in no other way. She remained in it because she was

almost instantly branded a Daughter of Satan, and shunned by good and

bad alike. She seldom, if ever, realized that she was doing wrong;

her moral standards were those of a bedbug. She thought of harlotry

in terms of new ribbons and an occasional pair of shoes, and in terms

of social intercourse; she was unmoral rather than immoral, and the

proceeds of her profession, to her, were just so much extra spending

money.

Small-town men who occasionally visited the larger cities, and there

thought nothing of spending from ten to fifty dollars in metropolitan

brothels, were very stingy in dealing with the town harlot. They

considered a dollar an enormous price for her, and frequently they

refused to give her anything. Many small communities were not able to

support even a part-time harlot; consequently some members of the craft

went from town to town, taking secular jobs and practicing harlotry

as a side line until driven out by the godly, or until the inevitable

business depression occurred. I recall one who made several towns along

the O. K. Railroad in Northeastern Missouri as regularly as the shoe

drummers. Her studio was always an empty box car on the town siding,

and she had a mania for inscribing in such cars the exact dates and

hours of her adventures, and her honoraria. It was not unusual to find

in a car some such inscription as this:

“Ten P.M., July 8. Fifty cents.”

These writings, scrawled in lead pencil or with a bit of chalk, were

signed “Box Car Molly.” Once, in a car from which I had unloaded many

heavy bags of cement, I came across what seemed to be a pathetic bit of

very early, and apparently authentic, Box-Car-Molliana. On the wall was

this:

“I was ruined in this car May 10.

“BOX CAR MOLLY.”

Our town harlot in Farmington was a scrawny creature called variously

Fanny Fewclothes and Hatrack, but usually the latter in deference

to her figure. When she stood with her arms outstretched she bore a

remarkable resemblance to the tall hatracks then in general use in

our homes, and since she was always most amiable and obliging, she

was frequently asked to pose thus for the benefit of drummers and

other infidels. In time, she came to take a considerable pride in this

accomplishment; she referred to herself as a model, and talked vaguely

of abandoning her wicked life and going to St. Louis, where she was

sure she could make a living posing for artists.

Six days a week Hatrack was a competent and more or less virtuous

drudge employed by one of our best families, but Sunday was her day

off, and she then, in turn, offered her soul to the Lord and went

to the Devil. For the latter purpose she utilized both the Masonic

and Catholic cemeteries. Hatrack’s regular Sunday-night parade, her

descent from righteousness into sin, was one of the most fascinating

events of the week, and promptly after supper those of us who did not

have engagements to take young ladies to church (which was practically

equivalent to publishing the banns) went downtown to the loafing place

in front of the Post Office and waited impatiently.

On week days Hatrack turned a deaf ear to the blandishments of our

roués, but on Sunday night she was more gracious. This, however, was

not until she had gone to church and had been given to understand,

tacitly but none the less clearly, that there was no room for her in

the Kingdom of Heaven. Our Sunday-night services usually began about

eight o’clock, following the meetings of the various young people’s

societies. At seven-thirty, regardless of the weather, the angular

figure of Hatrack could be discerned coming down the hill from the

direction of the cemeteries. She lived somewhere in that section and

worked out by the day. She was always dressed in her best, and in her

eyes was the light of a great resolve. She was going to church, and

there was that in her walk and manner which said that thereafter she

was going to lead a better life.

There was always a group of men waiting for her around the Post Office.

But although several muttered “Here she comes!” it was not good form

to speak to her then, and she walked past them as if she had not seen

them. But they, with their wide knowledge of the vagaries of the Agents

of God, grinned hopefully and settled down to wait. They knew she would

be back. She went on up the street past the Court House and turned

into the Northern Methodist church, where she took a seat in the last

row. All about her were empty seats; if they were not empty when she

got there they were soon emptied. No one spoke to her. No one asked

her to come to Jesus. No one held out a welcoming hand. No one prayed

for her. No one offered her a hymn book. At the protracted meetings

and revivals, which she invariably attended, none of the Brothers and

Sisters tried to convert her; she was a Scarlet Woman and belonged to

the Devil. There was no place for her in a respectable congregation.

They could not afford to be seen talking to her, even in church, where

God’s love, by their theory, made brothers and sisters of us all.

It was pitiful to watch her; she listened to the Word with such rapt

attention; she sang the hymns with such fanatical fervor, and she so

yearned for the comforts of that barbaric religion and the blessings

of easy intercourse with decent people. But she never got them. From

the Christians and their God she got nothing but scorn. Of all the

sinners in our town Hatrack would have been easiest to convert; she

was so pathetically eager for salvation. If a Preacher, or a Brother,

or a Sister, had so much as spoken a kind word to her she would have

dropped to her knees and given up her soul to the Methodist God. And

her conversion, in all likelihood, would have been permanent, for

she was not mentally equipped for a struggle against the grandiose

improbabilities of revealed religion. If someone had told her, as I was

told, that God was an old man with long whiskers, she would not have

called Him “Daddy,” as some of her more flippant city sisters might

have done; she would have accepted Him and gloried in Him.

But she was not plucked from the burning, for the workers for the

Lord would have nothing to do with her, and by the end of the service

her eyes had grown sullen and her lip had curled upward in a sneer.

Before the final hymn was sung and the benediction pronounced upon the

congregation, she got to her feet and left the church. None tried to

stop her; she was not wanted in the House of God. I have seen her sit

alone and miserably unhappy while the Preacher bellowed a sermon about

forgiveness, with the whole church rocking to a chorus of sobbing,

moaning amens as he told the stories of various Biblical harlots, and

how God had forgiven them.

But for Hatrack there was no forgiveness. Mary Magdalene was a saint

in Heaven, but Hatrack remained a harlot in Farmington. Every Sunday

night for years she went through the same procedure. She was hopeful

always that someone would speak to her and make a place for her, that

the Brothers and Sisters who talked so volubly about the grace and the

mercy of God would offer her some of the religion that they dripped

so freely over everyone else in town. But they did not, and so she

went back down the street to the Post Office, swishing her skirts and

brazenly offering herself to all who desired her. The men who had been

waiting for her, and who had known that she would come, leered at her

and hailed her with obscene speech and gesture. And she gave them back

leer for leer, meeting their sallies with giggles, and motioning with

her head toward the cemeteries.

And so she went up the hill. A little while later a man left the group,

remarking that he must go home. He followed her. And a moment after

that another left, and then another, until behind Hatrack was a line of

men, about one to a block, who would not look at one another, and who

looked sheepishly at the ground when they met anyone coming the other

way. As each man accosted her in turn Hatrack inquired whether he was

a Protestant or a Catholic. If he was a Protestant she took him into

the Catholic cemetery; if he was a Catholic they went into the Masonic

cemetery.

5

I fell a willing victim to the wiles of the Rum Demon on the night of

my conversion, and thereafter, in common with other boys of the town

who were aflame with revolt against the religious taboos which had so

oppressed us, I drank whenever I could obtain the liquor. This was not

often, because I seldom had any money and it was difficult to find a

bartender who would sell a drink to a minor. The eagle eye of the W. C.

T. U. was constantly upon him. But occasionally the darkies would buy

for us in return for one swig at the bottle, and as often as possible

we purchased by this means a pint or quart of whisky or gin. I did not

drink because I liked the taste of liquor, for I didn’t, and I do not

now, but I thought it was smart and manly to get drunk.

And there was another, and a deeper reason. It seemed to me that in

the eyes of the Preachers and the Brothers and Sisters a man could

commit no more heinous sin than to get tight; it was even worse than

smoking. Such being the case, I felt that it was incumbent upon me to

achieve that condition, and thereby show them that I had no use for

them and the things for which they stood. And that was also the reason

we sang vulgar songs, and roared with gusto the parodies on hymns

that we learned from time to time. It was our custom to get as drunk

as possible and then group ourselves about the pump in the courthouse

yard, where we bellowed ditties and parodies until the town marshal or

some outraged Brother or Sister stopped us.

There were few such songs that we did not sing; it was at the pump,

on a summer night, that I first heard the “Song of Jack Hall.” It

was taught to us by a shoe drummer from St. Louis, who sang it with

appropriate gestures, and for a long time it was our favorite song. The

version that we sang was this--it should be rendered with great gusto

and feeling, and the final line of each verse should be dragged from

deep down in the chest:

Oh, me nyme it is Jack Hall, ’tis Jack Hall,

Oh, me nyme it is Jack Hall, ’tis Jack Hall;

Oh, me nyme it is Jack Hall,

And I’ll tell youse one and all,

The story of me fall,

God damn your eyes.

Oh, I killed a man ’tis said, so ’tis said,

Oh, I killed a man ’tis said, so ’tis said;

Oh, I killed a man ’tis said,

And I kicked his bloody head,

And I left him lyin’ dead,

God damn his eyes.

So they chucked me here in quod, here in quod,

So they chucked me here in quod, here in quod;

So they chucked me here in quod,

With a ball and chain and rod,

They did, so help me God,

God damn their eyes.

Well, the parson he did come, he did come,

Well, the parson he did come, he did come;

Well, the parson he did come,

And he looked so God-damned glum,

As he talked of Kingdom Come,

God damn his eyes.

And the sheriff he came, too, he came, too,

And the sheriff he came, too, he came, too;

And the sheriff he came, too,

With his little boys in blue,

He said: “Jack, we’ll see you through,

God damn your eyes.”

So it’s up the rope I go, up I go,

So it’s up the rope I go, up I go;

So it’s up the rope I go,

And those devils down below,

They’ll say: “Jack, we told you so!”

God damn their eyes.

The parodies on hymns that we sang were almost innumerable, and were

undoubtedly sung all over the country by other boys who, in the eyes

of their elders, were only being smart-alecky, but who, like us,

had a deeper reason for the eagerness with which they paraded their

disrespect for the Church and for religion. It was one of the few ways

we knew to flaunt our sin, and nothing pleased us more than to break up

a church service, or at least interrupt it, by bellowing at the top of

our voices some disreputable and unholy parody that had reached us in

one way or another.

One of our most enjoyable Sunday-night escapades was to gather in a

group outside a church window, and sing a parody immediately after

the choir and the congregation inside had sung the hymn itself. We

persisted in this until finally the pastor of the Northern Methodist

church had Wint Jackson, the Night Marshal, chase us away. We went

without comment or objection when Jackson ordered us to disperse,

because he had just killed a desperado named Yates, and we considered

him something of a hero; we thought that he went about with his finger

constantly in the trigger of his revolver, and that the finger itched.

On this particular night the parody which made the Methodist minister

so angry, and swept from his mind all thought of his Christian duty to

turn the other cheek for us to swat, was on “Oh, that will be glory for

me.” Our version went like this:

Oh, there will be no chicken for me,

No chicken for me, no chicken for me;

When all the preachers have gulped their share,

There’ll be no chicken, no chicken for me.

To give the proper swing to the tune, “gulped” must be pronounced

“gulluped.”

Perhaps the most celebrated of all the parodies, at that time, was on

the favorite old hymn, “At the Bar.” We sang it thus:

At the bar, at the bar,

Where I smoked my first cigar,

And the nickels and the dimes rolled away;

It was there, by chance,

That I ripped my Sunday pants,

And now I can wear them every day.

Another parodied “Nearer, My God, to Thee,” thus:

Nero, my dog, has fleas,

Nero has fleas;

Although I wash him clean,

Nero, my dog, has fleas.

And thus, to the tune of “Hallelujah, Thine the Glory”:

Hellilujah, I’m a hobo,

Hellilujah, I’m a bum;

Hellilujah, give us a handout,

Revive us again.

There was also in circulation at that time a great number of parodies

on hymns in which mention was made of Beecham’s Pills, the merits

of which were emblazoned on every barn and fence throughout the

countryside. I have heard that these parodies were circulated by

the Beecham Pill people themselves in response to a plea of English

churches for hymn books, but I do not know if the story is true. One of

our favorites of this collection was the parody on “Hark, the herald

angels sing.” It went:

Hark, the herald Angels sing,

Beecham’s Pills are just the thing;

Peace on earth and mercy mild,

Two for man and one for child.

6

To my long list of unhallowed but frequently pleasant accomplishments

I added, in my sixteenth summer, journalism and dancing; I went to

work on the Farmington _Times_ and learned to waltz and two-step, and

on occasion danced the Virginia Reel and the quadrille with spirit

and abandon if not with elegant grace. The practice of journalism was

not then, in all quarters, considered a sin of the first magnitude;

nor is it so considered to-day except when various Preachers and

other goody-bodies find their names mentioned infrequently and their

daily denunciations ignored. It is then the fashion to denounce the

newspapers, and to deplore the low plane to which the fourth estate has

fallen. But in Farmington in my youth the feeling against the Sunday

newspaper was so great that it was felt generally that all journalism

was at least slightly tainted, and so I list it as a sin. So far as the

financial rewards go, it is even now nothing less than a crime.

There was no question about the sinfulness of dancing, especially the

round dances, as we used to call the waltz and two-step. In some parts

of the country exception was made for the square dances, but everywhere

in my section of Missouri the waltz and two-step were considered Steps

toward Hell. I frequently heard Preachers and Brothers and Sisters

pronounce solemn judgment against young girls who indulged in such

heinous practices, and brand them before God and man as abandoned

scarlet women glorying in the unsanctified embraces of wicked men. That

was the way the Preachers usually talked, too. One man in our town was

even criticized for waltzing with his wife.

Not only was the wicked waltz and the devilish two-step, no matter

how decorously performed, a Sunday taboo in our town, but in our most

religious families it was taboo at all times, and several persons were

dismissed from church for participating in such orgies. We had one

Preacher who informed us that both Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed

by God because their inhabitants danced and for no other reason, and

the prediction was freely made that Farmington was destined for the

same dreadful end, and he intimated that we would not even reap the

resultant benefits of great fame and publicity. His tirades were

strikingly similar to the ones that are being made every day now by the

Methodist Board of Temperance, Prohibition and Public Morals against

New York City and other centers of sin.

As I have said, for many years the Presbyterians, city slickers at

heart, had a virtual monopoly of dancing in Farmington. It was they

who introduced the waltz and the two-step, to the great horror of

all of our old women, both male and female, and it is they who must

be held responsible when God sends His avenging angels to blast and

destroy. Occasionally a Baptist or a Methodist backslid sufficiently to

trip the light fantastic toe, as I delighted to call it as a juvenile

reporter on the _Times_, but not often; generally the Presbyterians

alone thus flaunted their wickedness. But when God failed to perform

as expected, others became bold and abandoned all caution, and when I

left Farmington, dancing was general and the town was obviously headed

straight for Hell. But even then there was very little dancing done on

Sunday night.

We had two newspapers in Farmington, the _Times_ and the _News_, the

former owned by Mr. Theodore Fisher and the latter by the Denman

brothers, extraordinarily devout members of the Northern Methodist

church and leaders in most of the town’s religious activities. Mr.

Fisher was a Presbyterian, a liberal at heart, but for business

reasons he was unable to do or say anything to stem the tide of

prying Puritanism. Both papers were controlled by the churches of the

town, and published everything that the Preachers and the Brothers

and Sisters asked them to; as I grew older, Mr. Fisher became more

confidential and frequently expressed his disgust at many things that

went on in Farmington, but he was powerless. If he had said a word in

favor of a more liberal attitude his paper would have had an even more

difficult time getting along, and Heaven knows it was hard enough as

it was; Mr. Fisher frequently had to spend all of Saturday morning

collecting advertising accounts so he could pay wages in the afternoon.

But the _News_ was always very prosperous.

When I went into the newspaper business, or game, as it is called in

the motion pictures and the schools of Journalism, I went in with the

enthusiastic thoroughness with which I had abandoned myself to a life

of sin. Mr. Fisher hired me at $2 a week, during the summer vacation,

to be the office devil, and for that princely wage I built the fires

each morning, swept the office, carried copy, set type, distributed pi,

kicked the job press, cranked the gasoline engine on Thursdays, fed the

big roller press, folded the papers, wrote names on them and carried

them to the Post Office in sacks. And I had many other duties besides.

These multitudinous activities sufficed me for a few weeks, because

in doing them, and in so being engaged in journalistic practice, I

had the same feeling that so encouraged me when I danced or drank or

smoked cigarettes; I was confident that I was doing something of which

the righteous did not wholly approve. But later I became ambitious. I

wanted to be an editor. Only God knows why, but I did. So I became an

editor; indeed, I became many editors. Using the small job press and

Mr. Fisher’s stock of vari-colored inks, I printed cards informing the

world that I was sporting editor, society editor, fire editor, crime

editor, baseball editor, football editor, financial editor, religious

editor, and barber-shop editor, this last because I purposed to

interview the customers in Doss’s barber shop.

Thus equipped, I felt able to handle any journalistic problem that

might confront me, and I spent my spare time interviewing people

and gathering items which, because of the extreme godliness of our

citizens, usually consisted of nothing more exciting than announcements

that so-and-so was on the sick list, or had been on the sick list and

was now improving. When I asked a banker if he knew any news I gravely

presented him with my financial-editor card; and when it became my

proud duty to interview my youthful idol and our most famous citizen,

Mr. Barney Pelty, the major-league baseball pitcher, he learned by

ocular proof that I was both sporting editor and baseball editor,

and as such fully competent to transmit to type and to posterity his

deathless utterances. As I recall them, these were generally that he

would be in town to visit his relatives or because some member of his

family was on the sick list, and would then return to St. Louis to

take up again the onerous duties of his profession. Once he predicted

that the Browns would win the pennant, and I wrote this exclusive

information with all the large and handsome words at my command, but he

was mistaken.

As time went on I became almost everything that it was possible

to be on the _Times_; I was printer, pressman, reporter, mechanic,

editor of this and that, and what not. But I was never permitted to

write editorials or chronicle the doings of our best people. The

_Times_ was passionately addicted to the Democrats, and each week our

editorial page trumpeted the widely known and indisputable fact that

the Republicans were a lot of skunks. These blasts were written, and

well written, by Mr. Fisher himself, and my own share in the good work

was merely to put them into type, and occasionally correct Mr. Fisher’s

phraseology when I did not think that he had expressed himself clearly.

And since these corrections were made at the case after the proof had

been corrected, they nearly always got printed, sometimes with dire

results. Once Mr. Fisher wrote, in jovial vein, about the gaudy house

in which a certain political candidate resided, and I corrected it

to read “bawdy house,” holding that the latter was more definitely

descriptive.

Another member of Mr. Fisher’s family, who had previously spoken to me

pleasantly when she met me on the street but who regarded me as nothing

but hired help after I had accepted employment, wrote about the social

activities of our first families on Columbia Street and the second and

third families in Doss’s Addition. I was occasionally permitted to

describe the pitiful doings of the Catholics, the Lutherans and other

curious humans down near the ice plant, and the weekly dances given

by the abandoned young people at our chief source of civic pride, the

insane asylum. But the functions of Society were obviously beyond

the descriptive powers of a mere printer’s devil. It was bad enough

that such a person had to set the type. Nevertheless I attended these

functions, and gained great comfort by inserting my name in the list

of those present, and by adding the important and vital information

that dainty and delicious refreshments had been served and a good time

had by all. If it was a birthday party the host was wished many happy

returns of the day. It was my belief at that time that it was against

the law to publish an account of a social event without so stating. It

was not always true; frequently the refreshments were not delicious

and no one had a good time, but in those days I did not have that high

regard for the truth that I have since acquired through labors on the

great metropolitan journals; indeed, a night seldom passes now that I

do not ask myself: “Have I written the truth to-day?” The answer, has,

so far, eluded me. But Mr. Fisher, and to an even greater extent the

Brothers Denman, sole owners of the _News_, frankly tried to please the

advertisers and the subscribers; there was not then that fine spirit of

independence which is such an essential part of modern journalism.

I advanced rapidly on the _Times_, and eventually was receiving $7

a week and had appointed myself to so many editorships that my cards

filled two pockets. I was satisfied, and probably would have remained

so for some years, but the end of my allotted time in Farmington was

drawing near. I went to Northeast Missouri to visit relatives, and Mr.

Fisher discharged me for over-staying my leave. This was a terrific

blow; it seemed to me that my journalistic career had been cut off in

the flower of its youth. I went to work in a lumber yard, and kept the

job until the first carload of cement came in. But after I had pulled

and tugged at the ninety-eight-pound sacks for ten hours I concluded

that the lumber business held out no glowing promise for a young man

who wished to retain his health and have leisure for a reasonable

amount of traffic with Satan.

So I resigned and went to Quincy, Ill., where after considerable

negotiations I obtained a job as reporter on the Quincy _Journal_ and

embarked on a career in daily journalism. So far this has kept me in

the cities, where the opportunities for sin are vastly more numerous

than in the small towns, but where there is less sin in proportion

to the number of inhabitants. This is true despite the horde of

wailing prophets and professional devil-chasers and snoopers whose

principal occupation is violent and false denunciation of every city

large enough to have an electric-light plant. And in a city one can,

by diligent search, find a few people who will admit that a man’s

religion, or his lack of religion, is his own affair.

Up from Methodism · 第 12 / 16 题