THE RESPONSIBILITY OF MOTHERHOOD

As far as the necessities for it go in the animal world, nearly all

animals have a very strong sense of the responsibility of

motherhood--unless they have become over-civilised, or live under

unnatural circumstances. A striking example of the consequences of the

latter state of being is shown by "Barbara," that thrillingly

attractive Polar bear in the Zoo, whose twelfth and thirteenth infants

were only the other day condemned to follow their brothers and sisters

to an early grave through their parents'--and especially their

mother's--gross stupidity about their bringing-up and welfare. And we

who are human animals, given by God conscious souls, ought to realise

the fact that civilisation and pampered environment have enormously

blunted our natural instincts in this respect, just as they have

Barbara's, and so we should try to restore the loss by consciously

cultivating our understanding of the subject and deliberately

realising the tremendous responsibilities we incur by bringing

children into the world. When we think about the matter quietly, the

magnitude of it is almost overwhelming, and yet there are hundreds and

thousands of women who never give it a serious thought! They have some

vague idea that to have children is the inevitable result of

matrimony, and that if they pay others to feed and clothe the little

creatures, and give them some instruction in the way that they should

go, their own part of the affair is finished. That, until a child is

grown to an age to judge for itself, the parents will be held

responsible for their stewardship of its body and soul at the great

tribunal of God does not strike them, and it is only perhaps when the

boomerang of their neglect has returned to them and blasted them with

calamity that they become conscious of their past negligence.

In this article I do not propose to touch upon the father's side of

the question, important as it is, but shall confine myself to the

mother's, because this has always been one of my deep preoccupations

to think out the meaning of it all, and how best to fulfil the trust.

Obviously the sole aim of true motherhood is the moral and physical

welfare of the child, and to accomplish this end we should understand

that it is quite impossible to lay down any set rule, or go by any

recognised and unchangeable method. For in one age certain precepts

are taught which are obsolete in the next, because science and the

improvement of mechanical aids to well-being advance with such giant

strides. But if we keep _the end_ in view it is simple enough to see

that common sense and discrimination, unclouded by custom or sentiment

or superstition, can accomplish miracles. The circumstances of the

particular case must always govern the method to be used in order to

obtain the same given end, no matter what the station in life of the

parents. Thus every mother, from the humblest to the highest, ought to

think out how she can best procure her child moral and physical

welfare _according to her means_.

In the lives of the very poor the only thing to be done for the

betterment of the understanding of the responsibility of motherhood

seems to be to teach the simplest rules of hygiene which animals know

by instinct, and after that for the State to take care of the children

as much as possible. For this very strange fact is in operation,

namely, that while Nature leaves an insatiable desire to create life,

she allows civilisation to rob human beings of instinctive knowledge

of how to preserve it in its earliest stages, and that the human

mother is of all creation the only one entirely at the mercy of

imparted knowledge as regards the proper treatment of her offspring.

Into the conception of the duties of motherhood among the very poor we

cannot go in this short paper--the subject is too vast--so we must

confine ourselves to discussing those of a higher class where, having

the means to do well, the responsibilities are far greater. I want, if

I can, to open a window, as it were, upon the outlook of the general

responsibility of motherhood and let each class apply what it gathers

of the meaning, if it wishes, to its own circumstances.

It is the aim and end of a thing which is of sole importance; in this

case the aim and end being the happiness and welfare of the child. And

that is the point which I want to harp upon, the necessity of keeping

the goal in view and of not wandering off into side issues. It was for

the sake of the end, namely, obtaining happiness, that I tried to show

in my articles upon marriage how common sense might secure this

desired state. And it was to _the end_ of what might be best for

England that I pleaded for the necessity of using fair judgment over

the question of facilitating or restricting divorce. And it is now to

_the end_ of helping the coming race to be fine and true that I want

to talk about the responsibility of motherhood.

Let us take the subject from the very beginning.

Three Things · 第 16 / 27 题