WHAT THE REFORMATION WAS.

It is hard to take in the depth and magnitude of what is called The

Great Reformation. It stands out in history like a range of Himalayan

mountains, whose roots reach down into the heart of the world and

whose summits pierce beyond the clouds.

To Bossuet and Voltaire it was a mere squabble of the monks; to others

it was the cupidity of secular sovereigns and lay nobility grasping

for the power, estates, and riches of the Church. Some treat of it as

a simple reaction against religious scandals, with no great depths of

principle or meaning except to illustrate the recuperative power of

human society to cure itself of oppressive ills. Guizot describes it

as "a vast effort of the human mind to achieve its freedom--a great

endeavor to emancipate human reason." Lord Bacon takes it as the

reawakening of antiquity and the recall of former times to reshape and

fashion our own.

Whatever of truth some of these estimates may contain, they fall far

short of a correct idea of what the Reformation was, or wherein lay

the vital spring of that wondrous revolution. Its historic and

philosophic centre was vastly deeper and more potent than either or

all of these conceptions would make it. Many influences contributed to

its accomplishment, but its inmost principle was unique. The real

nerve of the Reformation was religious. Its life was something

different from mere earthly interests, utilities, aims, or passions.

_Its seat was in the conscience._ Its true spring was the soul,

confronted by eternal judgment, trembling for its estate before divine

Almightiness, and, on pain of banishment from every immortal good,

forced to condition and dispose itself according to the clear

revelations of God. It was not mere negation to an oppressive

hierarchy, except as it was first positive and evangelic touching the

direct and indefeasible relations and obligations of the soul to its

Maker. Only when the hierarchy claimed to qualify these direct

relations and obligations, thrust itself between the soul and its

Redeemer, and by eternal penalties sought to hold the conscience bound

to human authorities and traditions, did the Reformation protest and

take issue. Had the inalienable right and duty to obey God rather than

man been conceded, the hierarchy, as such, might have remained, the

same as monarchical government. But this the hierarchy negatived,

condemned, and would by no means tolerate. Hence the mighty contest.

And the heart, sum, and essence of the whole struggle was the

maintenance and the working out into living fact of this direct

obligation of the soul to God and the supreme authority of His clear

and unadulterated word.

Luther and the Reformation: The Life-Springs of Our Liberties · 第 36 / 142 题