MAIDENKIRK, 1875. DAVID R. WILLIAMSON.

_LITERATURE._

_TRANSACTIONS OF THE GAELIC SOCIETY OF INVERNESS. Vols. III. and IV.,

1873-74 and 1874-75 (Bound in one)._

THIS is the third publication issued by the Gaelic Society since its

establishment in 1871. The previous volumes were very creditable,

especially the first, but the one now before us is out of sight superior

not only in size, but in the quality of its contents. First we have an

Introduction of eight pages giving the history of the movement in favour

of establishing a Celtic Chair in one of our Scottish Universities, and

the steps taken by the Gaelic Society of London, who appear to have

worked single-handed to promote this object since 1835, when they

presented their first petition to the House of Commons, down to 1870,

when the Council of the Edinburgh University took the matter in hand. In

December 1869 the Gaelic Society of London sent out circulars addressed

to ministers of all denominations in Scotland asking for information as

to the number of churches in which Gaelic was preached. The circulars

were returned, the result being "that out of 3395 places of worship of

all denominations in Scotland, 461 had Gaelic services once-a-day in the

following proportions--Established Church, 235; Free Church, 166; Catholic

Chapels, 36; Baptists, 12; Episcopalians, 9; Congregationalists, 3."

The first paper in the volume is a very interesting account, by Dr

Charles Mackay, the poet, of "The Scotch in America." We give the

following extract:--

I was invited to dine with a wealthy gentleman of my own name.

There were present on that occasion 120 other Scotchmen, and

most of them wore the Highland dress. My host had a piper

behind the chair playing the old familiar strains of the pipes.

The gentleman told me, in the course of the evening, that his

father was a poor cottar in Sutherlandshire. "My mother," said

he, "was turned out upon the moor on a dark cold night, and

upon that moor I was born." My friend's family afterwards went

to America, and my friend became a "dry" merchant, or as you

would say in Scotland, a draper. I said to him, seeing that his

position had so improved, "Well, I suppose you do not bear any

grudge against the people by whose agency your family were

turned upon the moor." "No," he replied, "I cannot say that I

bear them any grudge, but at the same time I cannot say that I

forgive them. If my position has improved, it is by my own

perseverance, and not by their good deeds or through their

agency." In every great city of Canada--Toronto, Kingstown,

Montreal, New Brunswick, St John's, Nova Scotia, and in almost

every town and village, you will find many Scotchmen; in fact,

in the large towns they are almost as numerous as in Edinburgh

and Inverness. You will see a Highland name staring you in the

face in any or every direction. If you ask for the principal

merchant or principal banker, you will be almost sure to find

that he's a Scotchman; and no matter in what part of the world

your fellow countrymen may be cast, they keep up the old

manners and customs of their mother country. They never forget

the good old times of "Auld lang syne;" they never forget the

old songs they sung, the old tunes they played, nor the old

reels and dances of Scotland.

The Scotch, especially in Canada, take the Gaelic with them.

They have Gaelic newspapers, which have a large

circulation--larger, perhaps, than any Gaelic newspaper at

home. They have Gaelic preachers. In fact, there is one part of

Canada which might be called the new Scotland; and it is a

Scotchman who is now at the head of the Canadian

Government--John Macdonald.[A]

The next is a paper by Archibald Farquharson, Tiree, headed "The Scotch

at Home and Abroad," but really a thrilling appeal in favour of teaching

Gaelic in Highland Schools. It is impossible to give an idea of this

excellent paper by quoting extracts. We, however, give the following on

the teaching of Gaelic in the schools:--

Reading a language they do not understand has a very bad effect

upon children. It leaves the mind indolent and lazy; they do

not put themselves to any trouble to endeavour to ascertain the

meaning of what they read; whereas, were they taught to

translate as they went along, whenever a word they did not

understand presented itself to their minds, they would have no

rest until they would master it by finding out its meaning. And

I am pretty certain that were the Gaelic-speaking children thus

to be taught, that by the time they would reach the age of

fourteen years, they would be as far advanced, if not farther,

than those who have no Gaelic at all; so that, instead of the

Gaelic being their misfortune, it would be the very reverse. It

would, with the exception of Welshmen (were they aware of it),

place them on an eminence above any in Great Britain, not only

as scholars, but as having the best languages for the soul and

for the understanding. And should they enter college, they

would actually leave others behind them, because, in the first

place, they acquired the habit of translating in their youth,

which would make translating from dead languages comparatively

easy; and in the second place, they would derive great aid from

their knowledge of the Gaelic. If Professor Blackie has found

500 Greek roots in the Gaelic, what aid would they derive from

it in studying that language? and they would find equally as

much aid in studying Latin, and even Hebrew.

Comparing the melody of the English with that of the Gaelic, Mr

Farquharson says:--

Certainly, compared with Gaelic and Broad Scotch, it [English]

has no melody. It is true that it may be set off and adorned

with artificial melody. What is the difference between natural

and artificial melody? Natural melody is the appropriate melody

with which a piece is sung which has true melody inherent in

itself, and artificial melody is that with which a piece is

sung that is destitute of real melody. In the former case the

mind is influenced by what is sung, the music giving additional

force and power to it; but in the latter case the mind is more

influenced by the sound of the music than by what is sung. I

may explain this by two young females; the one has, I do not

call it a bonny face, but a very agreeable expression of

countenance; the other has not. Were the former to be neatly

and plainly dressed, her dress would give additional charms to

her, but in looking at her you would not think of the dress at

all, but of the charms of the young woman. But although the

other were adorned in the highest style of fashion, with

flowers and brocades, and chains of gold, and glittering

jewels, in looking at her you would not think of the charms of

the young woman, for charms she had none, your mind would be

altogether occupied with what was artificial about her, with

what did not belong to her, and not with what she was in

herself. Both the natural and artificial melody elevate the

mind, the one by what is sung, and the other by the grand sound

of the music. There is real melody in "Scots wha hae," which is

natural and appropriate, which gives additional power and force

to the sentiment of the piece. In singing it the mind is not

occupied with the sound, but with proud Edward, his chains and

slavery--Scotia's King and law--the horrors of slavery--the

blessing of liberty, and a fixed determination to act.

Dr Masson's description of "Tho Gael in the Far West" is a very readable

paper, and gives an interesting account of his tour among the Canadian

Gael, where he says, "the very names of places were redolent of the

heather--in the land where, alas! the tenderest care has never yet been

able to make the heather grow--Fingal, Glencoe, Lochiel, Glengarry,

Inverness, Tobermory, St Kilda, Iona, Lochaber, and the rest!" We part

with this paper perfectly satisfied that whether or not the Gael and his

language are to be extirpated among his own native hills neither the

race nor the language will yet become extinct in our British Colonies.

Sir Kenneth S. Mackenzie, Bart. of Gairloch, makes the following remarks

on "The Church in the Highlands." He said that if they wished to improve

the Highlands:--

There was no way in which it could be done better than by

raising the class from which ministers were drawn. He

remembered saying at the opening meeting of this Society, that

one of its objects should be to excite the interest of the

upper classes in the language of their forefathers, inducing

them to retain that language, or acquire it if lost. Because,

when the cultivated classes lost their interest in it, the

leaven which leavens society ceased to influence the mass of

the people; and it was one of the most unfortunate things in

regard to a dying language, when the upper classes lost the use

of it, and the uneducated classes came to be in a worse

condition than in an earlier state of civilisation, when there

was an element of refinement among them. It was an understood

fact, that the clergy at this moment had a great influence in

the Highlands; and although there were persons present of

different persuasions, he thought they would all admit that the

Free Church was the Church that influenced the great mass of

Highlanders. There were Catholics in Mar, Lochaber, the Long

Island, and Strathglass, and Episcopalians in Appin; but the

people generally belonged to the Free Church, and if they

wanted to influence the mass, it was through the clergy of the

Free Church they could do it. Now, it was an unfortunate thing,

and generally admitted, that the clergy of the Free Church--he

believed it was the same in the Established Church--were not

rising in intellect and social rank--that there was rather a

falling off in that--that the clergy were drawn not so much

from the manse as from the cottar's house; and though he knew a

number of clergy, very excellent, godly men, and very superior,

considering the station from which they had risen, he thought

it was not advantageous, as a rule, to draw the clergy from the

lower, uneducated classes. They did not start with that

advantage in life which their sons would start with. There had

been a talk of instituting bursaries for the advancement of

Gaelic-speaking students. He did not see why they should not

start a bursary or have a special subscription--he would

himself contribute to it--a bursary for theological students

sprung from parents of education--whose parents had been

ministers, or who themselves had taken a degree in arts. That

would tend to encourage the introduction of a superior class of

clergymen. He wished to say nothing against the present

ministers. He knew they were excellent men, but he thought

their sons would be, in many cases, superior to themselves if

they took to the ministry. He was sorry they did not take to it

more frequently, and he would be glad if this Society offered

them some encouragement.

Two learned papers appear from the Rev. John Macpherson, Lairg, and Dr

M'Lauchlan, Edinburgh--the one on "The Origin of the Indo-European

Languages," and the other--"Notices of Brittany." Space will not now

allow us to give extracts long enough to give any idea of the value and

interest of these papers, or of the one immediately following--a

metrical translation into English of "Dan an Deirg"--by Lachlan Macbean,

Inverness. We shall return to them in a future number.

The Rev. A. C. Sutherland gives one of the best written and most

interesting papers in the volume on the "Poetry of Dugald Buchanan, the

Rannach Bard." The following is a specimen of Mr Sutherland's treatment

of the poet, and of his own agreeable style:--

At the time when the great English critic was oracularly

declaring that the verities of religion were incapable of

poetic treatment, there was a simple Highlander, quietly

composing poems, which, of themselves, would have upset the

strange view, otherwise sufficiently absurd. But in all

justice, we must say that many, very many, both of Gaelic and

English poets, who have attempted to embody religious

sentiments in poetic forms, have, by their weak efforts,

exposed themselves, unarmed, to the attacks of those who would

exclude religion from the sphere of the imagination. All good

poetry, in the highest sense, deals with, and appeals to, what

is universal and common to all men....

It is frequently charged upon the Celt, that in religion as in

other matters, emotion, inward feeling in the shape of awe,

adoration, undefined reverence, are more eagerly sought, and

consequently more honoured, than the practice of the simple

external virtues, of which feeling should be the ministers and

fountains. Whether this accusation holds good generally, or

whether it applies more particularly to the more recent

manifestations of the religious life among us, this is not the

time to inquire. One thing we are sure of, that a

representative religious teacher like Buchanan never allows

that any fulness of inward life can dispense with the duties of

every-day life, with mercy, truth, industry, generosity,

self-control. The unworthy man who is excluded from the kingdom

is not the man of blunt, homely feeling, incapable of ecstatic

rapture and exalted emotion, but the man who locks up for

himself the gold God gave him for the general good, who shuts

his ear to the cry of the poor, who entrenches his heart behind

a cold inhumanity, who permits the naked to shiver unclothed,

who lessens not his increasing flock by a single kid to satisfy

the orphan's want. Indeed, one who reads carefully Buchanan's

_Day of Judgment_, with his mind full of the prejudices or

truths regarding the place of honour given by the Celt to

inward experience and minute self-analysis, cannot fail to be

astonished how small a place these occupy in that great poem.

There, at least, mental experience is of no value, except in so

far as it blossoms into truth, purity, and love. We cannot,

however, pause to illustrate these statements in detail. We

shall merely refer to the indignation into which the muse of

Buchanan is stirred in the presence of pride and oppression.

The lowest deep is reserved for these. The poet's charity for

men in general becomes the sublime growl of a lion as it

confronts the chief who fleeces but tends not his people.

"An robh thu ro chruaidh,

A' feannadh do thuath,

'S a' tanach an gruaidh le mal;

Le h-agartas geur,

A glacadh an spreidh,

'S am bochdainn ag eigheach dail?

Gun chridhe aig na daoine,

Bha air lomadh le h-aois,

Le 'n claigeannan maola truagh;

Bhi seasamh a' d' choir,

Gun bhoineid 'nan dorn,

Ge d' tholladh gaoth reota an cluas.

Thu nise do thraill,

Gun urram a' d' dhail,

Gun ghearsonn, gun mhal, gun mhod:

Mor mholadh do'n bhas,

A chasgair thu tra,

'S nach d' fhuiling do straic fo'n fhoid."

We part with this paper with an interest in Buchanan's Poems which we

never before felt, although we repeatedly read them.

A well written paper, in Gaelic, by John Macdonald, Inland Revenue,

Lanark, brings the session of 1873-74 to an end. Mr Macdonald advocates

the adoption of one recognised system of orthography in writing Gaelic,

and concludes in favour of that of the Gaelic Bible, as being not only

the best and purest, but also the best known.

In the second part of the volume 1874-75 are Professor Blackie's famous

address, under the auspices of the Society, his first in favour of a

Celtic Professor; "The Black Watch Deserters" by Alex. Mackintosh Shaw,

London; "History of the Gaelic Church of Inverness", by Alex. Fraser,

accountant; "Ancient Unpublished Gaelic Poetry," "The Prophecies of

_Coinneach Odhar Fiosaiche_, the Brahan Seer," by Alex. Mackenzie,

Secretary to the Society; and other interesting matter. We shall notice

these in our next number. This valuable volume is given free to all Members

of the Society, besides free Admission to all Lectures and Meetings, while

the Annual Subscription for Ordinary Membership is only 5s.

The Celtic Magazine, Vol. 1, No. 1, November 1875 A Monthly Periodical Devoted to the Literature, History, Antiquities, Folk Lore, Traditions, and the Social and Material Interests of the Celt at Home and Abroad. · 第 30 / 32 题