It is the old contrast--old as literature, old as man--between the

ordered steadfastness of nature and the disorder and brevity of human

life. The Preacher gazes on the universe above and around him. The

ancient earth is firm and strong beneath his feet. The sun runs his

race with joy, sinks exhausted into its ocean bed, but rises on the

morrow, like a giant refreshed with old wine, to renew its course. The

variable and inconstant wind, which bloweth where it listeth, blows

from the same quarters, runs through the very circuit which was its

haunt in the time of the world's grey fathers. The streams which ebb

and flow, which go and come, run along time-worn beds and are fed from

their ancient source. But man, "to one point constant never," shifts

from change to change. As compared with the calm uniformity of nature,

his life is a mere phantasy, passing for ever through a tedious and

limited range of forms, each of which is as unsubstantial as the

fabric of a vision, many of which are as base and sordid as they are

unreal, and all of which, for ever in a flux, elude the grasp of those

who pursue them, or disappoint those who hold them in their hands.

"All is vanity; for man has no profit," no adequate and enduring

reward, "for all his labour;" literally, "no balance, no surplus, on

the balance-sheet of life:" less happy, because less stable, than the

earth on which he dwells, he comes and goes, while the earth goes on

for ever (vv. 2-4).

This painful contrast between the ordered stability of nature and the

changeful and profitless disorder of human life is emphasized by a

detailed reference to the large natural forces which rule the world,

and which abide unchanged, although to us they seem the very types of

change. The figure of ver. 5 is, of course, that of the racer. The sun

rises every morning to run its course, pursues it through the day,

"pants," as one well-nigh breathless, toward its goal, and sinks at

night into its subterraneous bed in the sea; but, though exhausted and

breathless at night, it rises on the morrow refreshed, and eager, like

a strong, swift man, to renew its daily race. In ver. 6 the wind is

represented as having a regular law and circuit, though it now blows

South, and now veers round to the North. The East and West are not

mentioned, probably because they are tacitly referred to in the rising

and setting sun of the previous verse: all the four quarters are

included between the two. In ver. 7 the streams are described as

returning on their sources; but there is no allusion here, as we might

suppose, to the tides,--and indeed tidal rivers are comparatively

rare,--or to the rain which brings back the water evaporated from the

surface of the streams and of the sea. The reference is, rather, to an

ancient conception of the physical order of nature held by the Hebrew

as by other races, according to which the ocean, fed by the streams,

sent back a constant supply through subterraneous passages and

channels, in which the salt was filtered out of it; through these they

supposed the rivers to return to the place whence they came. The

ruling sentiment of these verses is that, while all the natural

elements and forces, even the most variable and inconstant, renew

their strength and return upon their course, for frail man there is no

return; permanence and uniformity characterise _them_, while

transitoriness and instability mark _him_ for their own. They seem to

vanish and disappear; the sun sinks, the winds lull, the streams run

dry; but they all come back again: for him there is no coming back;

once gone, he is gone for ever.

But it is vain to talk of these or other instances of the weary yet

restless activity of the universe; "man cannot utter it." For, besides

these elemental illustrations, the world is crowded with illustrations

of incessant change, which yet move within narrow bounds and do

nothing to relieve its sameliness. So numerous are they, so

innumerable, that the curious eye and inquisitive ear of man would be

worn out before they had completed the tale of them: and if eye and

ear could never be satisfied with hearing and seeing, how much less

the slower tongue with speaking (ver. 8)? All through the universe

what hath been still is and will be; what was done is done still and

always will be done; the sun still running the same race, the winds

still blowing from the same points, the streams still flowing between

the same banks and returning by the same channels. If any man suppose

that he has discovered new phenomena, any natural fact which has not

been repeating itself from the beginning, it is only because he is

ignorant of that which has been from of old (vv. 9, 10).[26] Yet,

while in nature all things return on their course and abide for ever,

man's day is soon spent, his force soon exhausted. _He_ does not

return; nay, he is not so much as remembered by those who come after

him. Just as we have forgotten those who were before us, so those who

live after us will forget us (ver. 11). The burden of all this

unintelligible world lies heavily on the Preacher's soul. He is weary

of the world's "everlasting sameness." The miseries and confusions of

the human lot baffle and oppress his thoughts. Above all, the contrast

between Nature and Man, between its massive and stately permanence and

the frailty and brevity of our existence, breeds in him the despairing

mood of which we have the keynote in his cry, "Vanity of vanities,

vanity of vanities, all is vanity!"

[26] So Marcus Aurelius (_Meditt._, xi. 1): "They that come after us

will see nothing new; and they who went before saw nothing more than

we have seen."

Yet this is not the only, not the inevitable, mood of the mind as it

ponders that great contrast. _We_ have learned to look upon it with

other, perhaps with wider, eyes. We say, How grand, how soothing, how

hopeful is the spectacle of nature's uniformity! How it lifts us above

the fluctuations of inward thought, and gladdens us with a sense of

stability and repose! As we see the ancient inviolable laws working

out into the same gracious and beautiful results day after day and

year by year, and reflect that "what has been will be," we are

redeemed from our bondage to vanity and corruption; we look up with

composed and reverent trust to Him who is our God and Father, and

onward to the stable and glorious immortality we are to spend with

Him; we argue with Habakkuk (chap. i. ver. 12), "Art not _Thou_ from

everlasting, O Lord our God, our Holy One? _We_ shall not die," but

live.

But if we did not know the Ruler of the universe to be our God and

Father; if our thoughts had still to "jump the life to come" or to

leap at it with a mere guess; if we had to cross the gulf of death on

no more solid bridge than a Peradventure; if, in short, our life were

infinitely more troubled and uncertain than it is, and the true good

of life and its bright sustaining hope were still to seek, how would

it be with us then? Then, like the Preacher, we might feel the

steadfastness and uniformity of nature as an affront to our vanity and

weakness. In place of drinking in hope and composure from the fair

visage and unbroken order of the universe, we might deem its face to

be darkened with a frown or its eye to be glancing on us with bitter

irony. Instead of finding in its inevitable order and permanence a

hopeful prophecy of _our_ recovery into an unbroken order and an

enduring peace, we might passionately demand why, on an abiding earth

and under an unchanging heaven, we should die and be forgotten; why,

more inconstant than the variable wind, more evanescent than the

parching stream, one generation should go never to return, and another

generation come to enjoy the gains of those who were before them, and

to blot their memory from the earth.

This, indeed, _has_ been the impassioned protest and outcry of every

age. Literature is full of it. The contrast between the tranquil

unchanging sky, with its myriads of pure lustrous stars, which are

always there and always in a happy concert, and the frailty of man

rushing blindly through his brief and perturbed course has lent its

ground-tones to the poetry of every race. We meet it everywhere. It is

the oldest of old songs. In all the many languages of the divided

earth we hear how the generations of men pass swifty and stormfully

across its bosom, "searching the serene heavens with the inquest of

their beseeching looks," but winning no response; asking always, and

always in vain, "Why are we thus? why are we thus? frail as the moth,

and of few days like the flower?" It is this contrast between the

serenity and the stability of nature and the frailty and turbulence of

man which afflicts Coheleth and drives him to conclusions of despair.

Here is man, "so noble in reason, so infinite in faculty, in

apprehension so like a god," longing with an ardent intensity for the

peace which results from the equipoise and happy occupation of his

various powers; and yet his whole life is wasted in labours and

tumults, in perplexity and strife; he goes to his grave with his

cravings unsatisfied, his powers untrained, unharmonised, knowing no

rest till he lies in the narrow bed from which is no uprising! What

wonder if to such an one as he "this goodly frame, the earth, seems

but a sterile promontory" stretching out a little space into the dark,

infinite void; "this most excellent canopy, the air ... this brave

o'erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire,"

nothing but "a foul, pestilential congregation of vapours"? What

wonder if, for him, the very beauty of nature should turn into a

repulsive hideousness, and its steadfast, unchanging order be held a

satire on the disorder and vanity of his life?

Solomon, moreover,--and Solomon in his premature old age, sated and

weary, is the mask under which the Preacher conceals his natural

face,--had had a large experience of life, had tried its ambitions,

its lusts, its pursuits and pleasures; he had tested every promise of

good which it held forth, and found them all illusory; he had drunk of

every stream, and found no pure living water with which he could slake

his thirst. And men such as he, sated but not satisfied, jaded with

voluptuous delights and without the peace of faith, commonly look out

on the world with haggard eyes. They feed their despair on the

natural order and purity which they feel to be a rebuke to the

impurity of their own restless and perturbed hearts. Many of us have,

no doubt, stood on Richmond Hill, and looked with softening eyes on

the rich pastures dotted with cattle, and broken with clumps of trees

through which shoot up village spires, while the full, placid Thames

winds in many a curve through pasture and wood. It is not a grand or

romantic scene; but on a quiet evening, in the long level rays of the

setting sun, it is a scene to inspire content and thankful, peaceful

thoughts. Wilberforce tells us that he once stood in the balcony of a

villa looking down on this scene. Beside him stood the owner of the

villa, a duke notorious for his profligacy in a profligate age; and as

they looked across the stream, the duke cried out, "O that river!

there it runs, on and on, and I so weary of it!" And _there_ you have

the very mood of this Prologue; the mood for which the fair, smiling

heavens and the gracious, bountiful earth carry no benediction of

peace, because they are reflected from a heart all tossed into

crossing and impure waves.

All things depend on the heart we bring to them. This very contrast

between Nature and Man has no despair in it, breeds no dispeace or

anger in the heart at leisure from itself and at peace with God.

Tennyson, for instance, makes a merry musical brook sing to us on this

very theme.

"I come from haunts of coot and hern,

I make a sudden sally

And sparkle out among the fern,

To bicker down a valley.

"I chatter over stony ways

In little sharps and trebles,

I bubble into eddying bays,

I babble on the pebbles.

"I chatter, chatter as I flow

To join the brimming river;

_For men may come and men may go,

But I go on for ever_.

"I steal by lawns and grassy plots,

I slide by hazel covers;

I move the sweet forget-me-nots

That grow for happy lovers.

"I slip, I slide, I gloom, I glance

Among my skimming swallows;

I make the netted sunbeams dance

Against my sanded shallows.

"I murmur under moon and stars

In brambly wildernesses;

I linger by my shingly bars;

I loiter round my cresses.

"And out again I curve and flow

To join the brimming river;

_For men may come and men may go

But I go on for ever_."

It is the very plaint of the Preacher set to sweet music. He murmurs,

"One generation passeth, and another generation cometh, but the earth

abideth for ever;" while the refrain of the Brook is,--

"For men may come and men may go,

But I go on for ever."

Yet we do not feel that the Song of the Brook should feed any mood of

grief and despair. The tune that it sings to the sleeping woods all

night is "a cheerful tune." By some subtle process we are made to

share us bright, tender hilarity, though we too are of the men that

come and go. Into what a fume would the Hebrew Preacher have been

thrown had any little "babbling brook" dared to sing this saucy song

_to him_. He would have felt it as an insult, and have assumed that

the merry, innocent creature was "crowing" over the swiftly passing

generations of men. But, for the Christian Poet, the Brook sings a

song whose blithe dulcet strain attunes the heart to the quiet

harmonies of peace and good-will.

Again I say all depends on the heart we turn to nature. It was because

his heart was heavy with the memory of many sins and many failures,

because too the lofty Christian hopes were beyond his reach, that this

"son of David" grew mournful and bitter in her presence.

This, then, is the mood in which the Preacher commences his quest of

the Chief Good. He is driven to it by the need of finding that in

which he can rest. As a rule, it is only on the most stringent

compulsions that we any of us undertake this high Quest. Of their

profound need of a Chief Good most men are but seldom and faintly

conscious; but to the favoured few, who are to lead and mould the

public thought, it comes with a force they cannot resist. It was thus

with Coheleth. He could not endure to think that those who have "all

things put under their feet" should lie at the mercy of accidents from

which their realm is exempt; that _they_ should be the mere fools of

change, while _that_ abides unchanged for ever. And, therefore, he set

out to discover the conditions on which they might become partakers of

the order and stability and peace of nature; the conditions on which,

raised above all the tides and storms of change, they might sit calm

and serene even though the heavens should be folded as a scroll and

the earth be shaken from its foundations. This, and only this, will he

recognise as the Chief Good, the Good appropriate to the nature of

man, because capable of satisfying all his cravings and supplying all

his wants.

FIRST SECTION.

_THE QUEST OF THE CHIEF GOOD IN WISDOM AND IN PLEASURE._

CHAP. I., VER. 12, TO CHAP. II., VER. 26.

Oppressed by his profound sense of the vanity of the life which man

lives amid the play of permanent natural forces, Coheleth sets out on

the search for that true and supreme Good which it will be well for

the sons of men to pursue through their brief day; the good which will

sustain them under all their toils, and be "a portion" so large and

enduring as to satisfy even their vast desires.

[Sidenote: _The Quest in Wisdom._ Ch. i., vv. 12-18.]

1. And, as was natural in so wise a man, he turns first to _Wisdom_.

He gives himself diligently to inquire into all the actions and toils

of men. He will ascertain whether a larger acquaintance with their

conditions, a deeper insight into the facts, a more just and complete

estimate of their lot, will remove the depression which weighs upon

his heart. He devotes himself earnestly to this Quest, and acquires a

"greater wisdom than all who were before him."

This wisdom, however, is not a scientific knowledge of facts or of

social and political laws, nor is it the result of philosophical

speculations on "the first good or the first fair," or on the nature

and constitution of man. It is the wisdom that is born of wide and

varied experience, not of abstract study. He acquaints himself with

the facts of human life, with the circumstances, thoughts, feelings,

hopes, and aims of all sorts and conditions of men. He is fain to know

"all that men do under the sun," "all that is done under heaven." Like

the Arabian Caliph, "the good Haroun Alraschid," we may suppose that

Coheleth goes forth in disguise to visit all quarters of the city; to

talk with barbers, druggists, calenders, porters, with merchants and

mariners, husbandmen and tradesmen, mechanics and artizans; to try

conclusions with travellers and with the blunt wits of home-keeping

men. He will look with his own eyes and learn for himself what their

lives are like, how they conceive of the human lot, and what, if any,

are the mysteries which sadden and perplex them. He will ascertain

whether _they_ have any key that will unlock his perplexities, any

wisdom that will solve his problems or help him to bear his burden

with a more cheerful heart. Because his depression was fed by every

fresh contemplation of the order of the universe, he turns from nature

to "the proper study of mankind."

But this also he finds a heavy and disappointing task. After a wide

and dispassionate scrutiny, when he has "seen _much_ wisdom and

knowledge," he concludes that man has no fair reward "for all his

labour that he laboureth under the sun," that no wisdom avails to set

straight that which is crooked in human affairs, or to supply that

which is lacking in them. The sense of vanity bred by his

contemplation of the stedfast round of nature only grows more profound

and more painful as he reflects on the numberless and manifold

disorders which afflict humanity. And hence, before he ventures on a

new experiment, he makes a pathetic appeal to the heart which he had

so earnestly applied to the search, and in which he had stored up so

large and various a knowledge, and confesses that "even this is

vexation of spirit," that "in much wisdom is much sadness," and that

"to multiply knowledge is to multiply sorrow."

And whether we consider the nature of the case or the conditions of

the time in which this Book was written, we shall not be surprised at

the mournful conclusion to which he comes. For the time was full of

cruel oppressions and wrongs. Life was insecure. To acquire property

was to court extortion. The Hebrews, and even the conquering race

which ruled them, were slaves to the caprice of satraps and

magistrates whose days were wasted in revelry and in the unbridled

indulgence of their lusts. And to go among the various conditions of

men groaning under a despotism like that of the Turk, whose foot

strikes with barrenness every spot on which it treads; to see all the

fair rewards of honest toil withheld, the noble degraded and the

foolish exalted, the righteous trodden down by the feet of the wicked;

all this was not likely to quicken cheerful thoughts in a wise man's

heart: instead of solving, it could but complicate and darken the

problems over which he was already brooding in despair.

And, apart from the special wrongs and oppressions of the time, it is

inevitable that the thoughtful student of men and manners should

become a sadder as he becomes a wiser man. To multiply knowledge, at

least of this kind, _is_ to multiply sorrow. We need not be cynics and

leave our tub only to reflect on the dishonesty of our neighbours, we

need only go through the world with open and observant eyes in order

to learn that "in much wisdom is much sadness." Recall the wisest of

modern times, those who have had the most intimate acquaintance with

man and men, Goethe and Carlyle for example; are they not all touched

with a profound sadness?[27] Do they not look with some scorn on the

common life of the mass of men, with its base passions and pleasures,

struggles and rewards? and, in proportion as they have the spirit of

Christ, is not their very scorn kindly, springing from a pity which

lies deeper than itself? Did not even the Master Himself, though full

of ruth and grace, share their feeling as He saw publicans growing

rich by extortion, hypocrites mounting to Moses' chair, subtle, cruel

foxes couched on thrones, scribes hiding the key of knowledge, and the

blind multitude following their blind leaders into the ditch?

[27] Pere Lacordaire has a fine passage on this theme. "Weak and

little minds find here below a nourishment which suffices for their

intellect and satisfies their love. They do not discover the emptiness

of visible things because they are incapable of sounding them to the

bottom. But a soul which God has drawn nearer to the Infinite very

soon feels the narrow limits within which it is pent; it experiences

moments of inexpressible sadness, the cause of which for a long time

remains a mystery; it even seems as though some strange concurrence of

events must have chanced in order thus to disturb its life; and all

the while the trouble comes from a higher source. In reading the lives

of the Saints, we find that nearly all of them have felt that sweet

melancholy of which the ancients said _that there was no genius

without it_. In fact, melancholy is inseparable from every mind that

looks below the surface and every heart that feels profoundly. Not

that we should take complacency in it, for it is a malady that

enervates when we do not shake it off; and it has but two

remedies--_Death or God_." Elsewhere, still quite in the spirit of the

Preacher, he says: "Every day I feel more and more that all is vanity.

_I cannot leave my heart in this heap of mud._"

Nay, if we look out on the world of to-day, can we say that even the

majority of men are wise and pure? Is it always the swift who win the

race, and the strong who carry off the honours of the battle? Do none

of our "intelligent lack bread," nor any of the learned favour? Are

there no fools lifted to high places to show with how little wisdom

the world is governed, and no brave and noble breasts dinted by the

blows of hostile circumstances or wounded by "the slings and arrows of

outrageous fortune"? Are all our workmen diligent and all our masters

fair? Are no false measures and balances known in our markets, and no

frauds on our exchanges? Are none of our homes dungeons, with fathers

and husbands for jailors? Do we never hear, as we stand without, the

sound of cruel blows and the shrieks of tortured captives? Are there

no hypocrites in our Churches "that with devotion's visage sugar o'er"

a corrupt heart? And do the best men always gain the highest place and

honour? Are there none in our midst who have to bear--

"The whips and scorns of time,

The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,

The pangs of despised love, the laws delay.

The insolence of office, and the spurns

That patient merit of the unworthy takes"?

Alas, if we think to find the true Good in a wide and varied knowledge

of the conditions of men, their hopes and fears, their struggles and

successes, their loves and hates, their rights and wrongs, their

pleasures and their pains, we shall but share the defeat of the

Preacher, and repeat his bitter cry, "Vanity of vanities, vanity of

vanities, all is vanity!" For, as he himself implies at the very

outset (ver. 13), "this sore task," this eternal quest of a wisdom

which will solve the problems and remove the inequalities of human

life, is God's _gift_ to the children of men,--this search for a

solution they never reach. Age after age, unwarned by the failure of

those who took this road before them, they renew the hopeless quest.

[Sidenote: _The Quest in Pleasure._ Ch. ii., vv. 1-11.]

2. But if we cannot reach the object of our Quest in Wisdom, we may,

perchance, find it in Pleasure. This experiment also the Preacher has

tried, tried on the largest scale and under the most auspicious

conditions. Wisdom failing to satisfy the large desires of his soul,

or even to lift it from its depression, he turns to mirth.[28] Once

more, as he forthwith announces, he is disappointed in the result. He

pronounces mirth a brief madness; in itself, like wisdom, a good, it

is not the Chief Good; to make it supreme is to rob it of its natural

charm.

[28] So Goethe's _Faust_, after having failed to solve the insoluble

problems of life by study and research, "plunges deep in pleasure,"

that he "may thus still the burning thirst of passionate desire."

Expositor's Bible: The Book of Ecclesiastes · 第 6 / 18 段