CHAPTER XXX.

The Missouri Compromise--Erie Canal Opened--Political Parties and Great

National Issues--President Jackson Crushes the United States Bank--South

Carolina Pronounces the Tariff Law Void--Jackson's Energetic Action--A

Compromise--Territory Reserved for the Indians--The Seminole War--

Osceola's Vengeance--His Capture and Death--The Black Hawk War--Abraham

Lincoln a Volunteer--Texas War for Independence--Massacre of the Alamo

--Mexican Defeat at San Jacinto--The Mexican President a Captive--Texas

Admitted to the Union--Oregon--American Statesmen Blinded by the Hudson

Bay Company--Marcus Whitman's Ride--Oregon Saved to the Union--The "Dorr

War."

The Missouri Compromise, by which Congress, after admitting Missouri as a

slave State, took the parallel of thirty-six degrees thirty minutes as a

dividing line through the rest of the Louisiana Purchase, between slavery

and freedom, averted for another generation the great struggle between

North and South. At peace with the rest of the world, the United States

had time to devote to national development without the distraction of

war, and financial questions, the tariff and internal improvements

engrossed the attention of Congress and of the States. The opening of the

Erie Canal, connecting Lake Erie with the Hudson River, in 1825, made

central New York the great highway of commerce and of travel, and New

York gradually became the leading State of the Union in population,

wealth and trade. There was a strong agitation in favor of a general

system of roads and canals, connecting the various parts of the country,

and to be constructed at the expense of the nation, and not of the

States. The party known as National Republicans, direct successors of the

Federalists, supported this proposition, and also advocated a high tariff

on imports and an extension of the charter of the United States Bank,

about to expire in 1836. The Democratic Republicans, now known simply as

Democrats, denied the constitutional authority of the national government

to construct roads and canals, or to impose a tariff except for revenue,

or to charter a national bank. During the administration of John Quincy

Adams the National Republicans succeeded in having tariff laws enacted in

1824 and 1828, which gave substantial and, in the view of the Democrats,

excessive protection to domestic manufactures.

General Andrew Jackson was elected President in 1828, after a most bitter

contest, in which John Quincy Adams was his opponent. Jackson

claimed--and the evidence seems to support his claim--that the United

States Bank had used all its influence against him, and had even made

antagonism to Jackson a condition of mercantile accommodation. He had

long before been prejudiced against the bank through the stupid red

tapeism of an agent of the bank in New Orleans who stood by a rule not

intended for emergencies when Jackson needed money for his army. He was

convinced that not only all the power of the bank, but all the power

which the Federal Government could exert to defeat him had been exerted,

and being victorious in despite of this opposition, he resolved to crush

the bank and to make a clean sweep of the officeholders. The old

pamphlets in the Astor Library which tell the story of the bank's

struggle to escape annihilation are almost pathetic reading. The giant

was prostrate, and his enemy had no mercy. In 1832 Jackson vetoed the

bill to renew the charter of the bank. Re-elected President in 1832 by an

overwhelming majority of votes in the Electoral College, Jackson, in the

following year, removed the public money which had been deposited in the

United States Bank, and distributed it among various State banks. The

Senate censured Jackson, but the censure was expunged after a long

struggle, in which Senator Thomas Hart Benton, of Missouri, championed

the President.

The opposition to a tariff for protection was very bitter in the South,

where the people regarded the tariff duties as a tribute exacted from

them for the benefit of the North. This feeling was especially strong in

South Carolina, where a State convention undertook to pronounce the

tariff law null and void, and held out a threat of secession should the

Federal Government attempt to collect the duties. The States of Alabama,

Tennessee and Georgia took firm ground against nullification, and on

December 10, 1832, President Jackson issued his famous proclamation,

exhorting all persons to obey the laws, and denouncing the South Carolina

ordinance. "I consider then," said the President, "the power to annul a

law of the United States, assumed by one State, incompatible with the

existence of the Union, contradicted expressly by the letter of the

Constitution, unauthorized by its spirit, inconsistent with every

principle on which it was founded, and destructive of the great object

for which it was formed." The President declared it to be his intent to

"take care that the laws be faithfully executed," and he warned the

citizens of South Carolina that "the course they are urged to pursue is

one of ruin and disgrace to the very State whose rights they affect to

support." Major Heileman, commanding the United States troops at

Charleston, was instructed to be vigilant in defeating any attempt to

seize the forts in that harbor, and two companies of artillery were

ordered to Fort Moultrie. The Unionist sentiment in South Carolina itself

was strong, and the crisis fortunately passed without any attempt to

carry into execution the nullification ordinance. Excitement ran high,

however, until the adoption in March, 1833, of a compromise tariff, which

provided for a gradual reduction of duties.

* * *

General Jackson in his annual message of 1830, recommended the devotion

of a large tract of land, west of the Mississippi, to the use of the

Indian tribes yet remaining east of that river, and Congress, in 1834,

enacted that "all that part of the United States west of the Mississippi

River, and not within the States of Missouri and Louisiana, or the

Territory of Arkansas, shall be considered the Indian country." This was

the origin of the present Indian Territory, gradually reduced in area by

the successive formation of States and Territories. The Seminoles of

Florida naturally objected to removal from the land of their ancestors to

a far-distant region, and under the leadership of a brave and skillful

chief named Osceola they resisted the troops sent to coerce them into

obedience. The most memorable event of the war was the massacre of Major

Dade and about one hundred soldiers in an ambuscade, December 28, 1835.

On the same day Osceola with a small party of followers killed and

scalped General Wiley Thomson, of the United States army and five of

Thomson's friends. Before the opening of hostilities Thomson had put

Osceola in irons on account of his refractory attitude, and the Indian

chief long planned the act of vengeance which he thus signally executed.

The war lasted almost seven years, and was attended with a distressing

loss of life and property. Not less than 9000 United States troops were

in the Seminole territory in the latter part of 1837, and while the

Indians were more than once severely chastised when brought to an

engagement, it was almost impossible to pursue them in their native

everglades. Osceola was taken prisoner when in conference, under a flag

of truce, with General Jesup, of the United States army, but the

Seminoles maintained the struggle under other leaders, and it was not

until 1842 that peace was established, and the Indians driven to

surrender. Osceola did not live to see the defeat of the cause for which

he had fought so resolutely. He died of fever at Fort Moultrie on the

last day of 1839.

* * *

The Black Hawk War in the Northwest was, as usual with Indian wars, a

struggle on the part of the red men to retain the lands of their fathers.

Black Hawk was a noted chief of the Sacs and Foxes, and he claimed that

the original treaty by which his tribe sold all their lands in Illinois

to the United States was made by only four chiefs, and that they were

drunk when they signed it. Assuming this charge to be true it remains

that the provisions of the first treaty were confirmed by two subsequent

treaties, the last in 1830, when the principal chief, Keokuk, made the

final cession to the United States of all the country owned by the Sacs

and Foxes east of the Mississippi River. This was done without the

knowledge of Black Hawk, whose indignation was greatly aroused upon

hearing of the negotiation. Black Hawk was yet more enraged when he

found, in April, 1831, that during the absence of himself and his people

from their village on a hunting expedition a fur-trader had purchased

from the government the ground on which the village stood, and was

preparing to cultivate the field upon which the Indians had for many

years raised their corn. This was in violation of the letter and spirit

of the treaty, which provided that the Indians could occupy their lands

until they were needed for settlement, and the frontier settlements were

yet fifty miles distant. War soon followed between the whites and

Indians, Abraham Lincoln, afterward President of the United States, being

enlisted as a volunteer. Colonel Zachary Taylor, afterward President, was

one of the officers in command of the United States troops. After

fighting with varied fortunes for several months, Black Hawk was defeated

with the loss of many warriors, and fled to a village of the Winnebagoes.

The latter escorted the fallen chieftain to the United States authorities

at Prairie du Chien. "Black Hawk is an Indian," said the captive warrior,

speaking in the third person. "He has done nothing an Indian need be

ashamed of. He has fought the battles of his country against the white

men, who come year after year to cheat them and take away their lands. He

will go to the world of spirits contented." Black Hawk was well treated

as a prisoner, taken to Washington to visit the President, and liberated

after peace had been made.

* * *

During Jackson's second term the American settlers in Texas succeeded,

after a conflict attended by signal heroism and ferocity, in securing

their independence of Mexico. The massacre of the Alamo by the Mexicans

under Santa Anna, will always be remembered in American history. The

Mission of the Alamo, which the Texans defended to the death against

overwhelming numbers, was entirely isolated from the town of San Antonio.

It consisted of several buildings, and a convent yard, surrounded by high

and thick walls, having partly, like all the old missions, the character

of a fortress. Fourteen pieces of artillery were mounted for the defence,

and the garrison, when it entered the Alamo, consisted of one hundred and

forty-five men, untrained in arms, except in the use of the rifle. Their

leader was Lieutenant Colonel William Barret Travis, a native of North

Carolina, and second in command was Colonel James Bowie, inventor of the

terrible bowie-knife. Santa Anna, the President of Mexico, was in

personal command of the attacking forces, numbering between 6000 and 7000

men. He declared that he would grant no quarter. The troops ordered to

the assault numbered 2500, or about twenty-five Mexicans to one American.

The deadly fire from the Alamo twice repelled the enemy, but they were

driven on by the blows and shouts of their officers, and at the third

attempt they scaled the wall, and carried the defences. While life lasted

the Texans fought. They had agreed to blow up the buildings in the last

extremity, but Major T. C. Evans, when about to fire the magazine, was

struck down by a bullet. Not a defender who could be found was spared.

Five Texans who had hidden themselves were taken before Santa Anna. At a

word from that monster of cruelty they were at once dispatched with

bayonets.

The Alamo was not long unavenged. The massacre took place on March 6,

1836. On April 21, the Texans, led by General Sam Houston, met the

Mexicans at San Jacinto. The Texans numbered 743; the Mexicans about

1400, with Santa Anna in command. Houston, by strategy worthy of greater

fame, had managed to come upon the Mexican President when the latter was

separated from the larger part of his forces. Determined to win or die,

Houston destroyed a bridge which afforded the only retreat for his men or

escape for the enemy. The Texans delivered one volley at close range, and

then clubbed their rifles or drew their bowie-knives, with the

cry--"Remember the Alamo!" In fifteen minutes the Mexicans were in

flight, pursued by the yelling Texans. "Me no Alamo! Me no Alamo!" cried

the terrified fugitives. The Texans did not stay their hands until they

had killed six hundred and thirty and wounded two hundred and eight of

their cowardly foes. The remainder of the Mexicans were allowed to

surrender, and were not maltreated as prisoners. Santa Anna was captured

while hiding in the grass at some distance from the battlefield, and

brought, a pallid and trembling captive, before Houston. The latter

spared the tyrant's life, and placed a guard to protect him. The battle

of San Jacinto virtually put an end to the war, and Texas remained the

Lone Star Republic, until admitted to the American Union in 1845.

* * *

This period witnessed also the successful assertion of American title to

that extensive and productive region now divided into the States of

Oregon, Washington and Idaho. President Jefferson had seen almost with

the vision of prophecy the future of that distant portion of the

Louisiana Purchase. "I looked forward with gratification," he said in his

later years, "to the time when the descendants of the settlers of Oregon

would spread themselves through the whole length of the coast, covering

it with free, independent Americans, unconnected with us but by the ties

of blood and interest, and enjoying, like us, the rights of

self-government." And yet, for forty years after the treaty which

transferred to the United States the possessions of France in America,

the leading statesmen of our republic, Jefferson excepted, remained blind

to the value of America's domain on the Pacific. In 1810, John Jacob

Astor's American Fur Company undertook to establish a post upon what they

regarded as American soil, at a place which the founders called Astoria.

The Hudson Bay Company then claimed Oregon as part of their territory,

and when the War of 1812 broke out the British attacked Astoria, took the

Americans prisoners, and changed the name of the post to Fort George. The

Astor attempt to found a settlement in Oregon was not without favorable

bearing on American claims to that territory, especially as the

enterprise had the sanction of the United States Government, and a United

States naval officer commanded the leading vessel in the expedition.

Under the treaty of Ghent, Astoria was to be restored to its original

owners, but it was not until 1846 that this act of justice was

consummated. In 1818 it was mutually agreed that each nation should

equally enjoy the privileges of all the bays and harbors on that coast

for ten years, and this agreement was renewed in 1827 for an indefinite

time. Practically this meant the occupation of the country by the Hudson

Bay Company, which found its forests and waters a mine of fur-bearing

wealth. The most eminent of America's statesmen, so far as the Pacific

Northwest was concerned, seemed to be under the spell of their own

ignorance and of the Hudson Bay Company's misrepresentations. The great

Senator Benton said that, "The ridge of the Rocky Mountains may be named

as a convenient, natural and everlasting boundary." Winthrop, of

Massachusetts, quoted and commended this statement of Benton, and

McDuffie of South Carolina declared that the wealth of the Indies would

be insufficient to pay the cost of a railroad to the mouth of the

Columbia. While the nation was stirred up over a boundary dispute

involving a comparatively small district in the Northeast--settled by the

Ashburton Treaty in 1842--Oregon, with its extensive territory and

magnificent natural wealth was treated as unworthy of controversy. But

for the patriot missionary, Marcus Whitman, who in the winter of 1842-43

made a perilous journey from his mission post in Oregon to Washington, to

stir up the American Government to a sense of its duty, and of the

imminent danger of the seizure of Oregon by the British, that valuable

region would in all probability have passed under British dominion. "All

I ask," said Doctor Whitman to President Tyler, "is that you won't barter

away Oregon or allow English interference until I can lead a band of

stalwart American settlers across the plains; for this I will try to do."

The President promised; the settlers went, and Oregon was saved.[1] For a

time it seemed that war might result, but the two nations at length

compromised on a boundary line at forty-nine north latitude.

[1] It is sad to know that this patriot missionary and his admirable

wife were massacred in 1847, with a number of other persons, at

their mission station of Waiilatpwi by the very Indians they were

educating. There is reason to believe the massacre was indirectly

the result of Whitman's service to his country in rescuing Oregon

from the Hudson Bay Company. The treaty of 1846 greatly irritated

that powerful corporation, and this feeling inevitably spread to

the Indians who depended upon the company for supplies, and who

naturally sympathized with its policy of keeping the land for

fur-bearing animals and savage humanity. It is unnecessary to

suspect the company or the Roman Catholic missionaries attached to

the company of any plot against Whitman's life. It was sufficient

for the savages to know that the company hated Whitman, and that the

American Protestant missionaries sought to convert them not only to

Christianity, but also to industry.

During President Tyler's administration Rhode Island was the scene of a

commotion known as the "Dorr War." While the property qualification for

voters had been discarded in nearly every Northern State, Rhode Island

still adhered to the system of government provided in the King Charles

charter of 1663, which restricted the franchise to freeholders and their

eldest sons. This restriction gave occasion for many abuses, mortgagees

often exercising control over the votes of their debtors, and citizens

who paid taxes on mortgaged property being sometimes denied the privilege

of voting on the ground that they did not possess sufficient equity in

their estates. The majority of the people desired a frame of government

in accord with the spirit of American institutions, but were resisted by

the minority in actual power. The party of reform, therefore, held an

election in defiance of the charter, adopted a new constitution arid

chose Thomas W. Dorr governor, along with other general officers and a

General Assembly. The Dorr legislature met in a foundry and passed

various laws, which they had no power to enforce. The charter government

called out the militia, the Dorrites also took arms, and for some time

there was danger of a collision. The Dorrites were ultimately dispersed

without a battle, and the charter government remained in power. From a

sanitary standpoint it was a healthy war, as more people were probably

benefited by the outing than injured by bullets and bayonets.[2] Dorr was

afterward sentenced to State Prison for life, but was pardoned after a

few years, and his sentence expunged by vote of the legislature, from the

records of the court. A constitution embodying most of the reforms for

which the Dorrites had striven was legally adopted, and Rhode Island

settled down to its customary calm and prosperity.

[2] The "Dorr war," however, was very real to the people of Rhode

Island. About thirteen years ago the writer was present in the

office of the clerk of a Rhode Island town, when an old lady

entered, and told the clerk that she wanted to see the record of a

deed. Upon being asked to indicate the probable date, she said it

was "before the war." On inquiry by the clerk it appeared that she

meant the "Dorr war."

The Land We Live In The Story of Our Country · 第 30 / 39 章