Council_, vol. v., edited by N.H. Nicolas (1835); and the other
journal in the _Official Correspondence of Thomas Bekynton_, edited by
G. Williams for the Rolls Series (1872), which contains many
interesting letters. This latter journal has been translated into
English by N.H. Nicolas (1828). See G.G. Perry, "Bishop Beckington and
Henry VI.," in the _English Historical Review_ (1894).
BECKMANN, JOHANN (1739-1811), German scientific author, was born on the
4th of June 1739 at Hoya in Hanover, where his father was postmaster and
receiver of taxes. He was educated at Stade and the university of
Gottingen. The death of his mother in 1762 having deprived him of his
means of support, he went in 1763 on the invitation of the pastor of the
Lutheran community, Anton Friedrich Busching, the founder of the modern
historic statistical method of geography, to teach natural history in
the Lutheran academy, St Petersburg. This office he relinquished in
1765, and travelled in Denmark and Sweden, where he studied the methods
of working the mines, and made the acquaintance of Linnaeus at Upsala.
In 1766 he was appointed extraordinary professor of philosophy at
Gottingen. There he lectured on political and domestic economy with such
success that in 1770 he was appointed ordinary professor. He was in the
habit of taking his students into the workshops, that they might acquire
a practical as well as a theoretical knowledge of different processes
and handicrafts. While thus engaged he determined to trace the history
and describe the existing condition of each of the arts and sciences on
which he was lecturing, being perhaps incited by the _Bibliothecae_ of
Albrecht von Haller. But even Beckmann's industry and ardour were unable
to overtake the amount of study necessary for this task. He therefore
confined his attention to several practical arts and trades; and to
these labours we owe his _Beitrage zur Geschichte der Erfindungen_
(1780-1805), translated into English as the _History of Inventions_--a
work in which he relates the origin, history and recent condition of the
various machines, utensils, &c., employed in trade and for domestic
purposes. This work entitles Beckmann to be regarded as the founder of
scientific technology, a term which he was the first to use in 1772. In
1772 Beckmann was elected a member of the Royal Society of Gottingen,
and he contributed valuable scientific dissertations to its proceedings
until 1783, when he withdrew from all further share in its work. He died
on the 3rd of February 1811. Other important works of Beckmann are
_Entwurf einer allgemeinen Technologie_ (1806); _Anleitung zur
Handelswissenschaft_ (1789); _Vorbereitung zur Warenkunde_ (1795-1800);
_Beitrage zur Okonomie, Technologie, Polizei- und, Kameralwissenschaft_
(1777-1791).
BECKWITH, JAMES CARROLL (1852-), American portrait-painter, was born at
Hannibal, Missouri, on the 23rd of September 1852. He studied in the
National Academy of Design, New York City, of which he afterwards became
a member, and in Paris (1873-1878) under Carolus Duran. Returning to the
United States in 1878, he gradually became a prominent figure in
American art. He took an active part in the formation of the Fine Arts
Society, and was president of the National Free Art League, which
attempted to secure the repeal of the American duty on works of art.
Among his portraits are those of W.M. Chase (1882), of Miss Jordan
(1883), of Mark Twain, T.A. Janvier, General Schofield and William
Walton. He decorated one of the domes of the Manufactures Building at
the Columbian Exposition, Chicago, 1893.
BECKWITH, SIR THOMAS SYDNEY (1772-1831), British general, was the son of
Major-General John Beckwith, who was colonel of the 20th regiment
(Lancashire Fusiliers) in the charge at Minden. In 1791 he entered the
71st regiment (then commanded by Colonel David Baird), in which he
served in India and elsewhere until 1800, when he obtained a company in
Colonel Coote Manningham's experimental regiment of riflemen, shortly
afterwards numbered as the 95th Rifles and now called the Rifle Brigade.
In 1802 he was promoted major, and in the following year
lieutenant-colonel. Beckwith was one of the favourite officers of Sir
John Moore in the famous camp of Shorncliffe, and aided that general in
the training of the troops which afterwards became the Light Division.
In 1806 he served in the expedition to Hanover, and in 1807 in that
which captured Copenhagen. In 1806 the Rifles were present at Vimeira,
and in the campaign of Sir John Moore they bore the brunt of the
rearguard fighting. Beckwith took part in the great march of Craufurd to
the field of Talavera, in the advanced guard fights on the Coa in 1810
and in the campaign in Portugal. On the formation of the Light Division
he was given a brigade command in it. After the brilliant action of
Sabugal, Beckwith had to retire for a time from active service, but the
Rifles and the brigade he had trained and commanded added to their fame
on every subsequent battlefield. In 1812 he went to Canada as assistant
quartermaster-general, and he took part in the war against the United
States. In 1814 he became major-general, and in 1815 was created K.C.B.
In 1827 he was made colonel commandant of the Rifle Brigade. He went to
India as commander-in-chief at Bombay in 1829, and was promoted
lieutenant-general in the following year. He died on the 15th of January
1831 at Mahableshwar.
His elder brother, Sir GEORGE BECKWITH (1753-1823), distinguished
himself as a regimental officer in the American War of Independence, and
served subsequently in high administrative posts and in numerous
successful military operations in the West Indies during the French
Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars. He was made a K.B. for his capture of
Martinique in 1809, and attained the full rank of general in 1814. Sir
George Beckwith commanded the forces in Ireland, 1816-1820. He died in
London on the 20th of March 1823.
Their nephew, Major-General JOHN CHARLES BECKWITH (1789-1862), joined
the 50th regiment in 1803, exchanging in 1804 into the 95th Rifles, with
which regiment he served in the Peninsular campaigns of 1808-10. He was
subsequently employed on the staff of the Light Division, and he was
repeatedly mentioned in despatches, becoming in 1814 a brevet-major, and
after the battle of Waterloo (in which he lost a leg) lieutenant-colonel
and C.B. In 1820 he left active service. Seven years later an accident
drew his attention to the Waldenses, whose past history and present
condition influenced him so strongly that he settled in the valleys of
Piedmont. The rest of his life was spent in the self-imposed task of
educating the Waldenses, for whom he established and maintained a large
number of schools, and in reviving the earlier faith of the people. In
1848 King Charles Albert made him a knight of the order of St Maurice
and St Lazarus. He was promoted colonel in the British army in 1837 and
major-general in 1846. He died on the 19th of July 1862 at La Torre,
Piedmont.
BECKX, PIERRE JEAN (1795-1887), general of the Society of Jesus, was
born at Sichem in Belgium on the 8th of February 1795, and entered the
novitiate of the order at Hildesheim in 1819. His first important post
was as procurator for the province of Austria, 1847; next year he became
rector of the Jesuit college at Louvain, and, after serving as secretary
to the provincials of Belgium and Austria, was elected head of the order
in 1853. His tenure of office was marked by an increased zeal for
missions in Protestant lands, and by the removal of the society's
headquarters from Rome to Fiesole near Florence in 1870. His chief
literary work was the often-translated _Month of Mary_ (Vienna, 1843).
He retired in September 1883, being succeeded by Anthony M. Anderledy, a
Swiss, who had seen service in the United States. He died at Rome on the
4th of March 1887.
BECQUE, HENRY FRANCOIS (1837-1899), French dramatist, was born on the
9th of April 1837 in Paris. He wrote the book of an opera _Sardanapale_
in imitation of Lord Byron for the music of M. Victorin Joncieres in
1867, but his first important work, _Michel Pauper_, appeared in 1870.
The importance of this sombre drama was first realized when it was
revived at the Odeon in 1886. _Les Corbeaux_ (1882) established Becque's
position as an innovator, and in 1885 he produced his most successful
play, _La Parisienne_. Becque produced little during the last years of
his life, but his disciples carried on the tradition he had created. He
died in May 1899.
See his _Querelles litteraires_ (1890), and _Souvenirs d'un auteur
dramatique_ (1895), consisting chiefly of reprinted articles in which
he does not spare his opponents. His _Theatre complet_ (3 vols., 1899)
includes _L'Enfant prodigue_ (Vaudeville Theatre, 6th of Nov. 1868);
_Michel Pauper_ (Theatre de la Porte-Saint-Martin, 17th of June 1870);
_L'Enlevement_ (Vaudeville, 18th of Nov. 1871); _La Navette_ (Gymnase,
15th of Nov. 1878); _Les Honnetes Femmes_ (Gymnase, 1st of Jan. 1880);
_Les Corbeaux_ (Comedie Francaise, 14th of Sept. 1882); _La
Parisienne_ (Theatre de la Renaissance, 7th of Feb. 1885).
BECQUER, GUSTAVO ADOLFO (1836-1870), Spanish poet and romance-writer,
was born at Seville on the 17th of February 1836. Left an orphan at an
early age, he was educated by his godmother, refused to adopt any
profession, and drifted to Madrid, where he obtained a small post in the
civil service. He was dismissed for carelessness, became an incorrigible
Bohemian, and earned a precarious living by translating foreign novels;
he died in great poverty at Madrid on the 22nd of December 1870. His
works were published posthumously in 1873. In such prose tales as _El
Rayo de Luna_ and _La Mujer de piedra_, Becquer is manifestly influenced
by Hoffmann, and as a poet he has analogies with Heine. He dwells in a
fairyland of his own, crooning a weird elfin music which has no parallel
in Spanish; his work is unfinished and unequal, but it is singularly
free from the rhetoric characteristic of his native Andalusia, and its
lyrical ardour is of a beautiful sweetness and sincerity.
BECQUEREL, the name of a French family, several members of which have
been distinguished in chemical and physical research.
ANTOINE CESAR BECQUEREL (1788-1878), was born at Chatillon sur Loing on
the 8th of March 1788. After passing through the Ecole Polytechnique he
became _ingenieur-officier_ in 1808, and saw active service with the
imperial troops in Spain from 1810 to 1812, and again in France in 1814.
He then resigned from the army and devoted the rest of his life to
scientific investigation. His earliest work was mineralogical in
character, but he soon turned his attention to the study of electricity
and especially of electrochemistry. In 1837 he received the Copley medal
from the Royal Society "for his various memoirs on electricity, and
particularly for those on the production of metallic sulphurets and
sulphur by the long-continued action of electricity of very low
tension," which it was hoped would lead to increased knowledge of the
"recomposition of crystallized bodies, and the processes which may have
been employed by nature in the production of such bodies in the mineral
kingdom." In biological chemistry he worked at the problems of animal
heat and at the phenomena accompanying the growth of plants, and he also
devoted much time to meteorological questions and observations. He was a
prolific writer, his books including _Traite d'electricite et du
magnetisme_ (1834-1840), _Traite de physique dans ses rapports avec la
chimie_ (1842), _Elements de l'electro-chimie_ (1843), _Traite complet
du magnetisme_ (1845), _Elements de physique terrestre et de
meteorologie_ (1847), and _Des climats et de l'influence qu'exercent les
sols boises et deboises_ (1853). He died on the 18th of January 1878 in
Paris, where from 1837 he had been professor of physics at the Musee
d'Histoire Naturelle.
His son, ALEXANDRE EDMOND BECQUEREL (1820-1891), was born in Paris on
the 24th of March 1820, and was in turn his pupil, assistant and
successor at the Musee d'Histoire Naturelle; he was also appointed
professor at the short-lived Agronomic Institute at Versailles in 1849,
and in 1853 received the chair of physics at the Conservatoire des Arts
et Metiers. Edmond Becquerel was associated with his father in much of
his work, but he himself paid special attention to the study of light,
investigating the photochemical effects and spectroscopic characters of
solar radiation and the electric light, and the phenomena of
phosphorescence, particularly as displayed by the sulphides and by
compounds of uranium. It was in connexion with these latter inquiries
that he devised his phosphoroscope, an apparatus which enabled the
interval between exposure to the source of light and observation of the
resulting effects to be varied at will and accurately measured. He
published in 1867-1868 a treatise in two volumes on _La Lumiere, ses
causes et ses effets_. He also investigated the diamagnetic and
paramagnetic properties of substances; and was keenly interested in the
phenomena of electrochemical decomposition, accumulating much evidence
in favour of Faraday's law and proposing a modified statement of it
which was intended to cover certain apparent exceptions. He died in
Paris on the 11th of May 1891.
ANTOINE HENRI BECQUEREL (1852-1908), son of the last-named, who
succeeded to his chair at the Musee d'Histoire Naturelle in 1892, was
born in Paris on the 15th of December 1852, studied at the Ecole
Polytechnique, where he was appointed a professor in 1895, and in 1875
entered the department _des ponts et chaussees_, of which in 1894 he
became _ingenieur en chef_. He was distinguished as the discoverer of
radioactivity, having found in 1896 that uranium at ordinary
temperatures emits an invisible radiation which in many respects
resembles Rontgen rays, and can affect a photographic plate after
passing through thin plates of metal. For his researches in this
department he was in 1903 awarded a Nobel prize jointly with Pierre
Curie. He also engaged in work on magnetism, the polarization of light,
phosphorescence and the absorption of light in crystals. He died at
Croisic in Brittany on the 25th of August 1908.
BED (a common Teutonic word, cf. German _Bett_, probably connected with
the Indo-European root _bhodh_, seen in the Lat. _fodere_, to dig; so "a
dug-out place" for safe resting, or in the same sense as a garden
"bed"), a general term for a resting or sleeping place for men and
animals, and in particular for the article of household furniture for
that object, and so used by analogy in other senses, involving a
supporting surface or layer. The accompaniments of a domestic bed
(bedding, coverlets, &c.) have naturally varied considerably in
different times, and its form and decoration and social associations
have considerable historical interest. The Egyptians had high bedsteads
which were ascended by steps, with bolsters or pillows, and curtains to
hang round. Often there was a head-rest as well, semi-cylindrical and
made of stone, wood or metal. Assyrians, Medes and Persians had beds of
a similar kind, and frequently decorated their furniture with inlays or
_appliques_ of metal, mother-of-pearl and ivory. The oldest account of a
bedstead is probably that of Ulysses which Homer describes him as making
in his own house, but he also mentions the inlaying of the woodwork of
beds with gold, silver and ivory. The Greek bed had a wooden frame, with
a board at the head and bands of hide laced across, upon which skins
were placed. At a later period the bedstead was often veneered with
expensive woods; sometimes it was of solid ivory veneered with
tortoise-shell and with silver feet; often it was of bronze. The pillows
and coverings also became more costly and beautiful; the most celebrated
places for their manufacture were Miletus, Corinth and Carthage. Folding
beds, too, appear in the vase paintings. The Roman mattresses were
stuffed with reeds, hay, wool or feathers; the last was used towards the
end of the Republic, when custom demanded luxury. Small cushions were
placed at the head and sometimes at the back. The bedsteads were high
and could only be ascended by the help of steps. They were often
arranged for two persons, and had a board or railing at the back as well
as the raised portion at the head. The counterpanes were sometimes very
costly, generally purple embroidered with figures in gold; and rich
hangings fell to the ground masking the front. The bedsteads themselves
were often of bronze inlaid with silver, and Elagabalus, like some
modern Indian princes, had one of solid silver. In the walls of some of
the houses at Pompeii bed niches are found which were probably closed by
curtains or sliding partitions. The marriage bed, _lectus genialis_, was
much decorated, and was placed in the atrium opposite the door. A low
pallet-bed used for sick persons was known as _scimpodium_. Other forms
of couch were called _lectus_, but were not beds in the modern sense of
the word except the _lectus funebris_, on which the body of a dead
person lay in state for seven days, clad in a toga and rich garments,
and surrounded by flowers and foliage. This bed rested on ivory legs,
over which purple blankets embroidered with gold were spread, and was
placed in the atrium with the foot to the door and with a pan of incense
by its side. The ancient Germans lay on the floor on beds of leaves
covered with skins, or in a kind of shallow chest filled with leaves and
moss. In the early middle ages they laid carpets on the floor or on a
bench against the wall, placed upon them mattresses stuffed with
feathers, wool or hair, and used skins as a covering. They appear to
have generally lain naked in bed, wrapping themselves in the large linen
sheets which were stretched over the cushions. In the 13th century
luxury increased, and bedsteads were made of wood much decorated with
inlaid, carved and painted ornament. They also used folding beds, which
served as couches by day and had cushions covered with silk laid upon
leather. At night a linen sheet was spread and pillows placed, while
silk-covered skins served as coverlets. Curtains were hung from the
ceiling or from an iron arm projecting from the wall. The Carolingian
MSS. show metal bedsteads much higher at the head than at the feet, and
this shape continued in use till the 13th century in France, many
cushions being added to raise the body to a sloping position. In the
12th-century MSS. the bedsteads appear much richer, with inlays, carving
and painting, and with embroidered coverlets and mattresses in harmony.
Curtains were hung above the bed, and a small hanging lamp is often
shown. In the 14th century the woodwork became of less importance, being
generally entirely covered by hangings of rich materials. Silk, velvet
and even cloth of gold were much used. Inventories from the beginning of
the 14th century give details of these hangings lined with fur and
richly embroidered. Then it was that the tester bed made its first
appearance, the tester being slung from the ceiling or fastened to the
walls, a form which developed later into a room within a room, shut in
by double curtains, sometimes even so as to exclude all draughts. The
space between bed and wall was called the _ruelle_, and very intimate
friends were received there. In the 15th century beds became very large,
reaching to 7 or 8 ft. by 6 or 7 ft. Viollet-le-Duc says that the
mattresses were filled with pea-shucks or straw--neither wool nor
horsehair is mentioned--but feathers also were used. At this time great
personages were in the habit of carrying most of their property about
with them, including beds and bed-hangings, and for this reason the
bedsteads were for the most part mere frameworks to be covered up; but
about the beginning of the 16th century bedsteads were made lighter and
more decorative, since the lords remained in the same place for longer
periods. In the museum at Nancy is a fine bedstead of this period which
belonged to Antoine de Lorraine. It has a carved head and foot as well
as the uprights which support the tester. Another is in the Musee Cluny
ascribed to Pierre de Gondi, very architectural in design, with a
bracketed cornice, and turned and carved posts; at the head figures of
warriors watch the sleeper. Louis XIV. had an enormous number of
sumptuous beds, as many as 413 being described in the inventories of his
palaces. Some of them had embroideries enriched with pearls, and figures
on a silver or golden ground. The carving was the work of Proux or
Caffieri, and the gilding by La Baronniere. The great bed at Versailles
had crimson velvet curtains on which "The Triumph of Venus" was
embroidered. So much gold was used that the velvet scarcely showed.
Under the influence of Madame de Maintenon "The Sacrifice of Abraham,"
which is now on the tester, replaced "The Triumph of Venus." In the 17th
century, which has been called "the century of magnificent beds," the
style _a la duchesse_, with tester and curtains only at the head,
replaced the more enclosed beds in France, though they lasted much
longer in England. In the 18th century feather pillows were first used
as coverings in Germany, which in the fashions of the bed and the
curious etiquette connected with the bedchamber followed France for the
most part. The beds were _a la duchesse_, but in France itself there was
great variety both of name and shape--the _lit a alcove, lit d'ange_,
which had no columns, but a suspended tester with curtains drawn back,
_lit a l'Anglaise_, which looked like a high sofa by day, _lit en
baldaquin_, with the tester fixed against the wall, _lit a couronne_
with a tester shaped like a crown, a style which appeared under Louis
XVI., and was fashionable under the Restoration and Louis Philippe, and
_lit a l'imperiale_, which had a curved tester, are a few of their
varieties. The _lit en baldaquin_ of Napoleon I. is still at
Fontainebleau, and the Garde Meuble contains several richly carved beds
of a more modern date. The custom of the "bed of justice" upon which the
king of France reclined when he was present in parliament, the princes
being seated, the great officials standing, and the lesser officials
kneeling, was held to denote the royal power even more than the throne.
Louis XI. is credited with its first use, and the custom lasted till the
end of the monarchy. From the habit of using this bed to hear petitions,
etc., came the usage of the _grand lit_, which was provided wherever the
king stayed, called also _lit de parement_ or _lit de parade_, rather
later. Upon this bed the dead king lay in state. The beds of the king
and queen were saluted by the courtiers as if they were altars, and none
approached them even when there was no railing to prevent it. These
railings were apparently placed for other than ceremonial reasons
originally, and in the accounts of several castles in the 15th century
mention is made of a railing to keep dogs from the bed. In the _chambre
de parade_, where the ceremonial bed was placed, certain persons, such
as ambassadors or great lords, whom it was desired to honour, were
received in a more intimate fashion than the crowd of courtiers. The
_petit lever_ was held in the bedroom itself, the _grand lever_ in the
_chambre de parade_. At Versailles women received their friends in their
beds, both before and after childbirth, during periods of mourning, and
even directly after marriage--in fact in any circumstances which were
thought deserving of congratulation or condolence. During the 17th
century this curious custom became general, perhaps to avoid the
tiresome details of etiquette. Portable beds were used in high society
in France till the end of the _ancien regime_. The earliest of which
mention has been found belonged to Charles the Bold (see _Memoirs_ of
Philippe de Comines). They had curtains over a light framework, and were
in their way as fine as the stationary beds. Iron beds appear in the
18th century; the advertisements recommend them as free from the insects
which sometimes infested wooden bedsteads, but one is mentioned in the
inventory of the furniture of the castle of Nerac in 1569, "un lit de
fer et de cuivre, avec quatre petites colonnes de laiton, ensemble
quatre satyres de laiton, quatre petits vases de laiton pour mettre sur
les colonnes; dedans le dit lit il y a la figure d'Olopherne ensemble de
Judith, qui sont d'albatre." In Scotland, Brittany and Holland the
closed bed with sliding or folding shutters has persisted till our own
day, and in England--where beds were commonly quite simple in form--the
four-poster, with tester and curtains all round, was the usual citizen's
bed till the middle of the 19th century. Many fine examples exist of
17th-century carved oak bedsteads, some of which have found their way
into museums. The later forms, in which mahogany was usually the wood
employed, are much less architectural in design. Some exceedingly
elegant mahogany bedsteads were designed by Chippendale, Hepplewhite and
Sheraton, and there are signs that English taste is returning to the
wooden bedstead in a lighter and less monumental form. (J. P.-B.)
BED, in geology, a term for certain kinds of rock usually found to be
arranged in more or less distinct layers; these are the beds of rock or
strata. Normally, the bedding of rocks is horizontal or very nearly so;
when the upper and lower surfaces of a bed are parallel, the bedding is
said to be regular; if it is thickest at one point and thins away thence
in every direction, the bedding is lenticular. Beds may be thick (50 ft.
or more) or so thin as to be like sheets of paper, e.g. paper shales,
such thin beds being often termed layers or laminae; intermediate
regular varieties may be called flags, flagstones or tilestones. In
fine-grained rocks the bedding is usually thinner and more regular than
in coarser rocks, such as sandstones and grits. Bedding is confined to
rocks which have been formed under water or by the agency of wind; these
are the "stratified" rocks.
The deposition of rock material by moving water is not as a rule
uniform, slight changes in the velocity produce an immediate change in
the size of the particles deposited upon a given area; thus a coarse
sand layer may be succeeded by a finer sand or a mud, or two sandy
layers may be separated by a thin layer of muddy shale. Bedding is most
often induced by a change in the nature of the contiguous strata; thus a
sandstone is followed by a shale or vice versa--changes which may be due
to the varying volume or velocity of a current. Or the nature of the
deposit may be influenced by chemical actions, whereby we get beds of
rock-salt or gypsum between beds of marl. Or again, organic activities
may influence the deposit, beds of coal may succeed layers of shale,
iron-stone may lie between limestones or clays, a layer of large fossils
or of flints may determine a bedding plane in massive limestones. Flaky
minerals like mica frequently assist in the formation of bedding planes;
and the pressure of superincumbent strata upon earlier formed deposits
has no doubt often produced a tendency in the particles to arrange
themselves normal to the direction of pressure, thus causing the rock to
split more readily along the same direction.
Where rapidly-moving currents of water (or air) are transporting or
depositing sand, &c., the bedding is generally not horizontal, but
inclined more or less steeply; this brings about the formation of what
is variously called "cross-bedding," "diagonal bedding", "current
bedding" or improperly "false-bedding." Igneous materials, when
deposited through the agency of water or air, exhibit bedding, but no
true stratification is seen in igneous rocks that have solidified after
cooling, although in granites and similar rocks the process of
weathering frequently produces an appearance resembling this structure.
Miners not infrequently describe a bed of rock as a "vein," if it is one
that has some economic value, e.g. a "vein of coal or ironstone."
(J. A. H.)
BEDARESI, YEDAIAH (1270-1340), Jewish poet, physician and philosopher of
Provence. His most successful work was an ethical treatise, _Behinath
'Olam_ (Examination of the World), a didactic poem in thirty-seven short
sections. The work is still very popular. It was translated into English
by Tobias Goodman.
BEDARIEUX, a town of southern France, in the department of Herault, on
the Orb, 27 m. N.N.W. of Beziers by rail. Pop. (1906) 5594. The town has
a 16th-century church, a board of trade arbitration, a chamber of arts
and manufactures, a communal college and a school of drawing. Bedarieux
was at one time a notable manufacturing centre. Its cloth-weaving
industry, carried on under a special royal privilege from the end of the
17th century to the Revolution, employed in 1789 as many as 5000
workmen, while some thousand more were occupied in wool and cotton
spinning, &c. In spite of the introduction of modern machinery from
England, the industries of the place declined, mainly owing to the loss
of the trade with the Levant; but of late years they have somewhat
revived, owing partly to the opening up of coal mines in the
neighbourhood. Besides cloth factories and wool-spinning mills, there
are now numerous tanneries and leather-dressing works. There is some
trade in timber, wool and agricultural produce.
BEDDGELERT ("Gelert's grave"), a village in Carnarvonshire, North Wales,
at the foot of Snowdon. The tradition of Gelert, Llewelyn's hound, being
buried there is old in Wales; and common to it and India is the legend
of a dog (or ichneumon) saving a child from a beast of prey (or
reptile), and being killed by the child's father under the delusion that
the animal had slain the infant. The English poet, W.R. Spencer, has
versified the tale of Llewelyn, king of Wales, leaving Gelert and the
baby prince at home, returning to find Gelert stained with the blood of
a wolf, and killing the hound because he thought his child was slain.
Sir W. Jones, the Welsh philologist and linguist, gives the Indian
equivalent (Lord Teignmouth's _Life of Jones_, ed. Rev. S.C. Wilkes,
editor's supplement). A Brahmin, leaving home, left his daughter in
charge of an ichneumon, which he had long cherished. A black snake came
up and was killed by the ichneumon, mistakenly killed, in its turn, by
the Brahmin on his coming back. Another version is the medieval romance
in _The Seven Wise Masters of Rome_. In the edition printed by Wynkyn de
Worde it is told by "the first master"--a knight had one son, a
greyhound and a falcon; the knight went to a tourney, a snake attacked
the son, the falcon roused the hound, which killed the serpent, lay down
by the cradle, and was killed by the knight, who discovered his error,
like Llewelyn, and similarly repented (Villon Society, British Museum
reprint, by Gomme and Wheatley).
On the west of Beddgelert is Moel Hebog (Bare-hill of the falcon), a
hiding-place of Owen Glendower. Here, in 1784, was found a brass Roman
shield. Near is the famous Aberglaslyn Pass, dividing Carnarvon and
Merioneth. In the centre is Cadair Rhys Goch o'r Eryri, a rock named as
the chair of Rhys Goch, a bard contemporary with Glendower (died
traditionally, 1429). Not far hence passed the Roman road from Uriconium
to Segontium (see CARNARVON).
BEDDOES, THOMAS (1760-1808), English physician and scientific writer,
was born at Shiffnall in Shropshire on the 13th of April 1760. After
being educated at Bridgnorth grammar school and at Pembroke College,
Oxford, he studied medicine in London under John Sheldon (1752-1808). In
1784 he published a translation of L. Spallanzani's _Dissertations on
Natural History_, and in 1785 produced a translation, with original
notes, of T.O. Bergman's _Essays on Elective Attractions_. He took his
degree of doctor of medicine at Oxford in 1786, and, after visiting
Paris, where he became acquainted with Lavoisier, was appointed reader
in chemistry at Oxford University in 1788. His lectures attracted large
and appreciative audiences; but his sympathy with the French Revolution
exciting a clamour against him, he resigned his readership in 1792. In
the following year he published _Observations on the Nature of
Demonstrative Evidence_, and the _History of Isaac Jenkins_, a story
which powerfully exhibits the evils of drunkenness, and of which 40,000
copies are reported to have been sold. About the same time he began to
work at his project for the establishment of a "Pneumatic Institution"
for treating disease by the inhalation of different gases. In this he
was assisted by Richard Lovell Edgeworth, whose daughter, Anna, became
his wife in 1794. In 1798 the institution was established at Clifton,
its first superintendent being Humphry Davy, who investigated the
properties of nitrous oxide in its laboratory. The original aim of the
institution was gradually abandoned; it became an ordinary
sick-hospital, and was relinquished by its projector in the year before
his death, which occurred on the 24th of December 1808. Beddoes was a
man of great powers and wide acquirements, which he directed to noble
and philanthropic purposes. He strove to effect social good by
popularizing medical knowledge, a work for which his vivid imagination
and glowing eloquence eminently fitted him. Besides the writings
mentioned above, he was the author of _Political Pamphlets_ (1795-1797),
a popular _Essay on Consumption_ (1799), which won the admiration of
Kant, an _Essay on Fever_ (1807), and _Hygeia, or Essays Moral and
Medical_ (1807). He also edited John Brown's _Elements of Medicine_
(1795), and _Contributions to Physical and Medical Knowledge,
principally from the West of England_ (1799).
A life of Beddoes by Dr John E. Stock was published in 1810.
BEDDOES, THOMAS LOVELL (1803-1849), English dramatist and poet, son of
the physician, Thomas Beddoes, was born at Clifton on the 20th of July
1803. His mother was a sister of Maria Edgeworth, the novelist. He was
sent to Bath grammar school and then to the Charterhouse. At school he
wrote a good deal of verse and a novel in imitation of Fielding. In 1820
he was entered at Pembroke College, Oxford, and in his first year
published _The Improvisatore_, afterwards carefully suppressed, and in
1822 _The Bride's Tragedy_, which showed him as the disciple of the
later Elizabethan and Jacobean dramatists. The play found a small circle
of admirers, and procured for Beddoes the friendship of Bryan Waller
Procter (Barry Cornwall). Beddoes retired to Southampton to read for his
degree, and there Procter introduced him to a young lawyer, Thomas
Forbes Kelsall, with whom he became very intimate, and who became his
biographer and editor. At this time he composed the dramatic fragments
of _The Second Brother_ and _Torrismond_. Unfortunately he lacked the
power of constructing a plot, and seemed to suffer from a constitutional
inability to finish anything. Beddoes was one of the first outside the
limited circle of Shelley's own friends to recognize Shelley's genius,
and he was certainly one of the earliest imitators of his lyrical
method. In the summer of 1824 he was summoned to Florence by the illness
of his mother, but she died before he arrived. He remained some time in
Italy, and met Mrs Shelley and Walter Savage Landor before he returned
to England. In 1825 he took his degree at Oxford, and in that year he
began what he calls (_Letters_, p. 68) "a very Gothic styled tragedy"
with "a jewel of a name." This work was completed in 1829 as the
fantastic and incoherent drama, _Death's Jest Book or The Fool's
Tragedy_; but he continued to revise it until his death, and it was only
published posthumously. On leaving Oxford he decided to study anatomy
and physiology, not, however, without some hope that his studies might,
by increasing his knowledge of the human mechanism, further his efforts
as a dramatist. In the autumn of 1825 he entered on his studies at
Gottingen, where he remained for four years. In 1829 he removed to
Wurzburg, and in 1832 obtained his doctorate in medicine, but his
intimate association with democratic and republican leaders in Germany
and Switzerland forced him to leave Bavaria without receiving his
diploma. He settled in Zurich, where he practised for some time as a
physician, and was even elected to be professor of comparative anatomy
at the university, but the authorities refused to ratify his appointment
because of his revolutionary views. He frequently contributed political
poems and articles to German and Swiss papers, but none of his German
work has been identified. The years at Zurich seem to have been the
happiest of his life, but in 1839 the anti-liberal riots in the town
rendered it unsafe for him, and early in the next year he had to escape
secretly. From this time he had no settled home, though he stored his
books at Baden in Aargau. His long residence in Germany was only broken
by visits to England in 1828 to take his master of arts degree, in 1835,
in 1842 and for some months in 1846. He had adopted German thought and
manners to such an extent that he hardly felt at home in England; and
his study of the German language, which he had begun in 1825, had almost
weaned him from his mother-tongue; he was, as he says in a letter, "a
non-conductor of friendship"; and it is not surprising that his old
friends found him much changed and eccentric. In 1847 he returned to
Frankfort, where he lived with a baker called Degen, to whom he became
much attached, and whom he persuaded to become an actor. He took Degen
with him to Zurich, where he chartered the theatre for one night to give
his friend a chance of playing Hotspur. The two separated at Basel, and
in a fit of dejection (May 1848) Beddoes tried to bleed himself to
death. He was taken to the hospital, and wrote to his friends in England
that he had had a fall from horseback. His leg was amputated, and he was
in a fair way to recovery when, on the first day he was allowed to leave
the hospital, he took curare, from the effects of which he died on the
26th of January 1849. His MSS. he left in the charge of his friend
Kelsall.
In one of his letters to Kelsall Beddoes wrote:--"I am convinced the man
who is to awaken the drama must be a bold, trampling fellow--no creeper
into worm-holes--no reviser even--however good. These reanimations are
vampire cold. Such ghosts as Marloe, Webster, &c., are better
dramatists, better poets, I dare say, than any contemporaries of
ours--but they are ghosts--the worm is in their pages" (_Letters_, p.
50). In spite of this wise judgment, Beddoes was himself a "creeper into
worm-holes," a close imitator of Marston and of Cyril Tourneur,
especially in their familiar handling of the phenomena of death, and in
the remoteness from ordinary life of the passions portrayed. In his
blank verse he caught to a certain degree the manner of his Jacobean
models, and his verse abounds in beautiful imagery, but his _Death's
Jest Book_ is only finished in the sense of having five acts completed;
it remains a bizarre production which appeals to few minds, and to them
rather for the occasional excellence of the poetry than as an entire
composition. His lyrics show the influence of Shelley as well as the
study of 17th-century models, but they are by no means mere imitations,
and some of them, like the "Dirge for Wolfram" ("If thou wilt ease thy
heart"), and "Dream Pedlary" ("If there were dreams to sell"), are among
the most exquisite of 19th-century lyrics.
Kelsall published Beddoes' great work, _Death's Jest Book: or, The
Fool's Tragedy_, in 1850. The drama is based on the story that a
certain Duke Boleslaus of Munsterberg was stabbed by his court-fool,
the "Isbrand" of the play (see C.F. Floegel, _Geschichte der
Hofnarren_, Leipzig, 1789, pp. 297 et seq.). He followed this in 1851
with _Poems of the late Thomas Lovell Beddoes_, to which a memoir was
prefixed. The two volumes were printed together (1851) with the title
of _Poems, Posthumous and Collected_. All these volumes are very rare.
Kelsall bequeathed the Beddoes MSS. to Robert Browning, with a note
stating the real history of Beddoes' illness and death, which was kept
back out of consideration for his relatives. Browning is reported to
have said that if he were ever Professor of Poetry his first lecture
would be on Beddoes, "a forgotten Oxford poet." Mr Edmund Gosse
obtained permission to use the documents from Browning, and edited a
fuller selection of the _Poetical Works_ (2 vols., 1890) for the
"Temple Library," supplying a full account of his life. He also edited
the _Letters of Thomas Lovell Beddoes_ (1894), containing a selection
from his correspondence, which is full of gaiety and contains much
amusing literary criticism. See also the edition of Beddoes by Ramsay
Colles in the "Muses' Library" (1906).
BEDE, BEDA, or BAEDA (672 or 673-735), English historian and theologian.
Of Baeda, commonly called "the Venerable Bede," almost all that we know
is contained in the short autobiographical notice which he has appended
to his _Ecclesiastical History_:--"Thus much concerning the
ecclesiastical history of Britain, and especially of the race of the
English, I, Baeda, a servant of Christ and priest of the monastery of
the blessed apostles St Peter and St Paul, which is at Wearmouth and at
Jarrow, have with the Lord's help composed, so far as I could gather it,
either from ancient documents, or from the tradition of the elders, or
from my own knowledge. I was born in the territory of the said
monastery, and at the age of seven I was, by the care of my relations,
given to the reverend Abbot Benedict (Biscop), and afterwards to
Ceolfrid, to be educated. From that time I have spent the whole of my
life within that monastery devoting all my pains to the study of the
scriptures; and amid the observance of monastic discipline, and the
daily charge of singing in the church, it has ever been my delight to
learn or teach or write. In my nineteenth year I was admitted to the
diaconate, in my thirtieth to the priesthood, both by the hands of the
most reverend Bishop John (of Hexham), and at the bidding of Abbot
Ceolfrid. From the time of my admission to the priesthood to my
(present) fifty-ninth year, I have endeavoured, for my own use and that
of my brethren, to make brief notes upon the Holy Scripture, either out
of the works of the venerable fathers, or in conformity with their
meaning and interpretation." Then follows a list of his works, so far
as, at that date, they had been composed. As the _Ecclesiastical
History_ was written in 731, we obtain the following dates for the
principal events in Bede's uneventful life:--birth, 672-673; entrance
into the monastery, 679-680; ordination as deacon, 691-692; as priest,
702-703.
The monastery of Wearmouth was founded by Benedict Biscop in 674, and
that of Jarrow in 681-682. Though some 5 or 6 m. apart, they were
intended to form a single monastery under a single abbot, and so Bede
speaks of them in the passage given above. It is with Jarrow that Bede
is chiefly associated, though no doubt from the close connexion of the
two localities he would often be at Wearmouth. The preface to the prose
life of Cuthbert proves that he had stayed at Lindisfarne prior to 721,
while the Epistle to Egbert shows that he had visited him at York in
733. The tradition that he went to Rome in obedience to a summons from
Pope Sergius is contradicted by his own words above, and by his total
silence as to any such visit. In the passage cited above, "monastic
discipline, the daily charge of singing in the church, learning,
teaching, writing," in other words devotion and study make up the even
tenor of Bede's tranquil life. Anecdotes have been preserved which
illustrate his piety both in early and in later years; of his studies
the best monument is to be found in his writings. As a little boy he
would take his place among the pupils of the monastic school, though he
would soon pass to the ranks of the teachers, and the fact that he was
ordained deacon at nineteen, below the canonical age, shows that he was
regarded as remarkable both for learning and goodness.
For the rest, it is in his works that we must chiefly seek to know him.
They fall into three main classes: (1) scientific; (2) historical; (3)
theological. The first class comprises works on grammar, one on natural
phenomena, and two on chronology and the calendar. These last were
inspired largely by the Paschal Question, which was the subject of such
bitter controversy between the Roman and Celtic Churches in the 7th
century. They form a natural transition to the second class. In this the
chief place is held by the _Ecclesiastical History of the English
Nation_. By this Bede has justly earned the title of the Father of
English History. By this almost exclusively he is known to others than
professed students. It is indeed one of the most valuable and one of the
most beautiful of historical works. Bede has the artist's instinct of
proportion, the artist's sense for the picturesque and the pathetic. His
style too, modelled largely, in the present writer's opinion, on that of
Gregory in the _Dialogues_, is limpid and unaffected. And though it
would be wrong to call Bede a critical historian in the modern sense of
the words, he shows a very unusual conscientiousness in collecting his
information from the best available sources, and in distinguishing
between what he believed to be fact, and what he regarded only as rumour
or tradition. Other historical works of Bede are the _History of the
Abbots_ (of Wearmouth and Jarrow), and the lives of Cuthbert in verse
and prose. The _History of the Abbots_ and the prose life of Cuthbert
were based on earlier works which still survive. In the case of the
latter it cannot honestly be said that Bede has improved on his
original. In the _History of the Abbots_ he was much nearer to the
facts, and could make additions out of his own personal knowledge. The
Epistle to Egbert, though not historical in form, may be mentioned here,
because of the valuable information which it contains as to the state of
the Northumbrian Church, on which the disorders and revolutions of the
Northumbrian kingdom had told with disastrous effect. It is probably the
latest of Bede's extant works, as it was written in November 734, only
six months before his death. The third or theological class of writings
consists mainly of commentaries, or of works which, if not commentaries
in name, are so in fact. They are based largely on the works of the four
great Latin Fathers, SS. Augustine, Jerome, Ambrose and Gregory; though
Bede's reading is very far from being limited to these. His method is
largely allegorical. For the text of scripture he uses both the Latin
versions, the Itala and the Vulgate, often comparing them together. But
he certainly knew Greek, and possibly some Hebrew. Indeed it may be said
that his works, scientific, historical and theological, practically sum
up all the learning of western Europe in his time, which he thus made
available for his countrymen. And not for them only; for in the school
of York, founded by his pupil Archbishop Ecgberht, was trained Alcuin
(Ealhwine) the initiator under Charles the Great of the Frankish
schools, which did so much for learning on the continent. And though
Bede makes no pretensions to originality, least of all in his
theological works, freely taking what he needed, and (what is very rare
in medieval writers) acknowledging what he took, "out of the works of
the venerable Fathers," still everything he wrote is informed and
impressed with his own special character and temper. His earnest yet
sober piety, his humility, his gentleness, appear in almost every line.
"In history and in science, as well as in theology, he is before all
things the Christian thinker and student." (Plummer's _Bede_, i. 2.) Yet
it should not be forgotten that Bede could hardly have done what he did
without the noble library of books collected by Benedict Biscop.
Several quaint and beautiful legends have been handed down as to the
origin of the epithet of "venerable" generally attached to his name.
Probably it is a mere survival of a title commonly given to priests in
his day. It has given rise to a false idea that he lived to a great
age; some medieval authorities making him ninety when he died. But he
was not born before 672 (see above); and though the date of his death
has been disputed, the traditional year, 735, is most probably correct.
This would make him at most sixty-three. Of his death a most touching
and beautiful account has been preserved in a contemporary letter. His
last hours were spent, like the rest of his life, in devotion and
teaching, his latest work being to dictate, amid ever-increasing bodily
weakness, a translation into the vernacular of the Gospel of St John, a
work which unhappily has not survived. It was a fitting close to such a
life as his.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.--The above sketch is largely based on the present
writer's essay on Bede's Life and Works, prefixed to his edition of
Bede's _Historia Ecclesiastica, &c._ (2 vols., Clarendon Press, 1896).
_Beda der Ehrwurdige und seine Zeit_, by Dr Karl Werner (Vienna,
1875), is excellent. Gehle, _Disputatio ... de Bedae vita et Scriptis_
(Leiden, 1838), is still useful. Dr William Bright's _Chapters of
Early English Church History_ (3rd ed., Clarendon Press, 1897) is
indispensable. See also Ker, _Dark Ages_, pp. 141 ff. Of the collected
works of Bede the most convenient edition is that by Dr Giles in
twelve volumes (8vo., 1843-1844), which includes translations of the
_Historical Works_. The Continental folio editions (Basel, 1563;
Cologne, 1612 and 1688) contain many works which cannot by any
possibility be Bede's. The edition of Migne, _Patralogia Latina_ (1862
ff.) is based on a comparison of the Cologne edition with Giles and
Smith (see below), and is open to the same criticism. On the
chronology and genuineness of the works commonly ascribed to Bede, see
Plummer's ed., i., cxlv-clix.
On the MSS. early editions and translations of the _Historia
Ecclesiastica_, see Plummer, u.s., i., lxxx-cxxxii. The edition of
Whelock (Cambridge, fol. 1643-1644) is noteworthy as the first English
edition of the Latin text, and as the _editio princeps_ of the
Anglo-Saxon version ascribed to King Alfred (see ALFRED THE GREAT).
Smith's edition (Cambridge, fol. 1722) contained not only these, but
also the other historical works of Bede, with notes and appendices. It
is a monument of learning and scholarship. The most recent edition is
that with notes and introduction by the present writer, u.s. It
includes also the _History of the Abbots_, and the Epistle to Egbert.
Of books iii. and iv. only, there is a learned edition by Professors
Mayor and Lumby of Cambridge (3rd ed., 1881). A cheap and handy
edition of the text alone is that by A. Holder (Freiburg im Breisgau,
1882, &c.). The best-known modern English translation is that by the
Rev. L. Gidley (1870). Of the minor historical works a good edition
was edited by Rev. J. Stevenson for the Eng. Hist. Soc. in 1841; and a
translation by the same hand was included in _Church Historians of
England_, vol. i., part ii. (1853). See also Plummer's edition, pp.
cxxxii-cxlii. (C. Pl.)
BEDE, CUTHBERT, the pen-name of Edward Bradley (1827-1889), English
author, who was born at Kidderminster on the 25th of March 1827. He
entered University College, Durham, in 1845, and later studied at
Oxford, where he made the acquaintance of J.G. Wood, the naturalist. He
took holy orders, and eventually became rector of Stretton in
Rutlandshire. Here he gained a reputation as a humorist and numbered
among his friends Cruikshank, Frank Smedley, Mark Lemon and Albert
Smith. He wrote for various magazines and, in the pages of the
_Illustrated London News_, introduced the double acrostic. He is chiefly
known as the author of _The Adventures of Mr Verdant Green, an Oxford
Freshman_ (1853), which he also illustrated and of which a third part
appeared in 1856. Several well-known Oxford characters of the time are
depicted in its pages, such as Dr Plumptre the vice-chancellor, Dr Bliss
the registrar, and the waiter at the Mitre. The book abounds in innocent
fun. In 1883 he was given the living of Lenton, or Lavington,
Lincolnshire, where he died on the 12th of December 1889.
BEDELL, WILLIAM (1571-1642), Anglican divine, was born at Black Notley
in Essex, in 1571. He was educated at Cambridge, became fellow of
Emmanuel in 1593, and took orders. In 1607 he was appointed chaplain to
Sir H. Wotton, then English ambassador at Venice, where he remained for
four years, acquiring a great reputation as a scholar and theologian. He
translated the _Book of Common Prayer_ into Italian, and was on terms of
closest friendship with the reformer, Sarpi (Fra Paolo). In 1616 he was
appointed to the rectory of Horningsheath (near to Bury St Edmunds,
where he had previously laboured), which he held for twelve years. In
1627 he became provost of Trinity College, Dublin, and, in 1629, bishop
of Kilmore and Ardagh. He set himself to reform the abuses of his
diocese, encouraged the use of the Irish language, and personally
undertook the duties generally discharged by the bishop's lay
chancellor. In 1633 he resigned his see. In 1641, when the Protestants
were being massacred, Bedell's house was not only left untouched, but
became the place of refuge for many fugitives. In the end, however, the
rebels insisted upon the dismissal of all who had taken shelter in his
house, and on the bishop's refusal he was seized and imprisoned with
some others in the ruined castle of Loughboughter. Here he was detained
for several weeks, and when released, rapidly sank from the effects of
exposure, and died on the 7th of February 1642.
His life was written by Bishop Gilbert Burnet in 1685, and also by his
elder son (ed. T.W. Jones, for the Camden Society, 1872).
BEDESMAN, or BEADSMAN (Med. Eng. _bede_, prayer, from O. Eng. _biddan_,
to pray; literally "a man of prayer"), generally a pensioner or almsman
whose duty it was to pray for his benefactor. In Scotland there were
public almsmen supported by the king and expected in return to pray for
his welfare and that of the state. These men wore long blue gowns with a
pewter badge on the right arm, and were nicknamed Blue Gowns. Their
number corresponded to the king's years, an extra one being added each
royal birthday. They were privileged to ask alms throughout Scotland. On
the king's birthday each bedesman received a new blue gown, a loaf, a
bottle of ale, and a leathern purse containing a penny for every year of
the king's life. On the pewter badge which they wore were their name and
the words "pass and repass," which authorized them to ask alms. In 1833
the appointment of bedesmen was stopped. In 1863 the last payment was
paid to a bedesman. In consequence of its use in this general sense of
pensioner, "bedesman" was long used in English as equivalent to
"servant." The word had a special sense as the name for those almsmen
attached to cathedral and other churches, whose duty it was to pray for
the souls of deceased benefactors. A relic of pre-Reformation times,
these old men still figure in the accounts of English cathedrals.
BEDFORD, EARLS AND DUKES OF. The present English title of duke of
Bedford comes from a line of earls and dukes in the Russell family. In
January 1550 John, Baron Russell, was created earl of Bedford, and in
May 1694 his descendant, William, the 5th earl, became duke of Bedford.
The Russell line is dealt with in the later part of this article. The
title of duke of Bedford had, however, been previously held, notably by
the third son of Henry IV.; and the earlier creations may first be
considered here.
JOHN PLANTAGENET, duke of Bedford (1389-1435), third son of Henry IV.,
king of England, was born on the 20th of June 1389. He received various
dignities after his father became king in 1399, and gained his early
experiences in warfare when he undertook the office of warden of the
east marches of Scotland in 1404; he was fairly successful in this
command, which he held until September 1414. In the previous May his
brother, the new king Henry V., had created him duke of Bedford, and
after resigning the wardenship he began to take a leading part in the
royal councils. He acted as lieutenant of the kingdom during Henry's
expedition to France in 1415, and in August 1416 commanded the ships
which defeated the French fleet at the mouth of the Seine, and was
instrumental in relieving Harfleur. Again appointed lieutenant in July
1417, he marched against the Scots, who abandoned the siege of Berwick
at his approach; and on his return to London he brought Sir John
Oldcastle to trial and was present at his execution. He appears to have
governed the country with considerable success until December 1419, when
he resigned his office as lieutenant and joined the king in France.
Returning to England, he undertook the lieutenancy for the third time in
June 1421, and in the following May conducted the queen to join Henry in
Normandy. He then took his brother's place and led the English troops to
the relief of Cosne, but on hearing of the king's serious illness he
left the army and hurried to his side. Henry's last wish was that
Bedford should be guardian of the kingdom and of the young king, and
that Philip the Good, duke of Burgundy, should act as regent in France.
But when Philip declined to undertake this office, it too was assumed by
Bedford, who, after the death of the French king Charles VI. in October
1422, presided at a session of the parlement of Paris, and compelled
all present to take an oath of fidelity to King Henry VI. Meanwhile the
English parliament had decided that Bedford should be "protector and
defender" of the kingdom, and that in his absence the office should
devolve upon his brother Humphrey, duke of Gloucester. Confining himself
to the conduct of affairs in France the protector took up Henry V.'s
work of conquest, captured Meulan and other places, and sought to
strengthen his position by an alliance with Philip of Burgundy. This
task was rendered more difficult as Gloucester had just married
Jacqueline, countess of Holland and Hainaut, a union which gave the
English duke a claim on lands which Philip hoped to secure for himself.
Bedford, however, having allayed Philip's irritation, formed an alliance
with him and with John VI., duke of Brittany, at Amiens in April 1423,
and himself arranged to marry Anne, a sister of the Burgundian duke.
This marriage was celebrated at Troyes in the following June, and the
war against Charles, the dauphin of France, was prosecuted with vigour
and success. Bedford sought to restore prosperity to the districts under
his rule by reforming the debased coinage, granting privileges to
merchants and manufacturers, and removing various abuses. He then
granted some counties to Philip to check the growing hostility between
him and Gloucester, and on the 17th of August 1424 gained a great
victory over a combined army of French and Scots at Verneuil. But in
spite of the efforts of the protector the good understanding between
England and Burgundy was partially destroyed when Gloucester invaded
Hainaut in October 1424. The ambition of his brother gave Bedford
trouble in another direction also; for on his return from Hainaut
Gloucester quarrelled with the chancellor, Henry Beaufort, bishop of
Winchester, and the council implored Bedford to come to England to
settle this dispute. He reached London in January 1426, and after
concluding a bond of alliance with Gloucester effected a reconciliation
between the duke and the chancellor; and knighted the young king, Henry
VI. Bedford then promised to act in accordance with the will of the
council, and in harmony with the decision of this body raised a body of
troops and returned to France in March 1427. Having ordered Gloucester
to desist from a further attack on Hainaut, he threatened Brittany and
compelled Duke John to return to the English alliance; and the success
of his troops continued until the siege of Orleans, to which he
consented with reluctance, was undertaken in October 1428. Having
assured himself that Philip was prepared to desert him, Bedford sent
orders to his army to raise the siege in April 1429. He then acted with
great energy and judgment in attempting to stem the tide of disasters
which followed this failure, strengthened his hold upon Paris, and sent
to England for reinforcements; but before any engagement took place he
visited Rouen, where he sought to bind the Normans closer to England,
and after his return to Paris resigned the French regency to Philip of
Burgundy in accordance with the wish of the Parisians. Retaining the
government of Normandy Bedford established himself at Rouen and directed
the movements of the English forces with some success. He did not
interfere to save the life of Joan of Arc. He was joined by Henry VI. in
April 1430, when the regency was temporarily suspended, and he secured
Henry's coronation at Paris in December 1431. In November 1432 his wife
Anne died, and in April 1433 he was married at Therouanne to Jacqueline,
daughter of Pierre I., count of St Pol. But notwithstanding Bedford's
vigour the English lost ground steadily; and the death of Anne and this
marriage destroyed the friendly relations between England and Burgundy.
Negotiations for peace had no result, and when the duke returned to
England in June 1433 he told parliament that he had come home to defend
himself against the charge that the losses in France were caused by his
neglect, and demanded that his detractors should make their accusations
public. The chancellor replied that no such charges were known to the
king or the council, and the duke was thanked for his great services.
His next act was to secure an inquiry into the national finances; and
when asked by the parliament to stay in England he declared that his
services were at the king's disposal. As chief councillor he offered to
take a smaller salary than had been previously paid to Gloucester, and
undertook this office in December 1433, when his demands with regard to
a continual council were conceded. Bedford, who was anxious to prosecute
the war in France, left England again in 1434, but early in 1435 was
obliged to consent to the attendance of English r epresentatives at a
congress held to arrange terms of peace at Arras. Unable to consent to
the French terms the English envoys left Arras in September, and Philip
of Burgundy made a separate treaty with France. Bedford only lived to
see the ruin of the cause for which he struggled so loyally. He died at
Rouen on the 14th of September 1435, and was buried in the cathedral of
that city. He left a natural son, Richard, but no legitimate issue.
Bedford was a man of considerable administrative ability, brave and
humane in war, wise and unselfish in peace. He was not responsible for
the misfortunes of the English in France, and his courage in the face of
failure was as admirable as his continued endeavour to make the people
under his rule contented and prosperous.
The chief contemporary authorities for Bedford's life are: _Vita et
gesta Henrici Quinti_, edited by T. Hearne (Oxford, 1727); E. de
Monstrelet, _Chronique_, edited by L.D. d'Arcq. (Paris, 1857-1862);
William of Worcester, _Annales rerum Anglicarum_, edited by J.
Stevenson (London, 1864). See also _Proceedings and Ordinances of the
Privy Council of England_, edited by J.R. Dasent (London, 1890-1899);
W. Stubbs, _Constitutional History_, vol. iii. (Oxford, 1895); P.A.
Barante, _Histoire des ducs de Bourgogne_ (Paris, 1824).
In 1470 GEORGE NEVILL (c. 1457-1483), son of John, earl of
Northumberland, was created duke of Bedford; but after his father's
attainder and death at the battle of Barnet in 1471 he was degraded from
the peerage.
The next duke of Bedford was JASPER TUDOR (c. 1430-1495), half-brother
of King Henry VI. and uncle of Henry VII. He was made earl of Pembroke
in 1453. Having survived the vicissitudes of the Wars of the Roses he
was restored to his earldom and created duke of Bedford in 1485. The
duke, who was lord-lieutenant of Ireland from 1486 to 1494, died without
legitimate issue on the 21st of December 1495.
JOHN RUSSELL, 1st earl of Bedford (c. 1486-1555), was a son of James
Russell (d. 1509). Having travelled widely, he attained some position at
the court of Henry VII., and was subsequently in great favour with Henry
VIII. In 1513 he took part in the war with France, and, having been
knighted about the same time, was afterwards employed on several
diplomatic errands. He was with Henry at the Field of the Cloth of Gold
in 1520, and, returning to military service when the French war was
renewed, lost his right eye at the siege of Morlaix in 1522. He was soon
made knight marshal of the royal household, and in 1523 went secretly to
France, where he negotiated a treaty between Henry and Charles, duke of
Bourbon, who was anxious to betray the French king Francis I. After a
short visit to England Russell was sent with money to Bourbon, joining
the constable at the siege of Marseilles. In 1524 he visited Pope
Clement VII. at Rome, and, having eluded the French, who endeavoured to
capture him, was present at the battle of Pavia in February 1525,
returning to England about the close of the year. In January 1527 he was
sent as ambassador to Clement, who employed him to treat on his behalf
with Charles de Lannoy, the general of Charles V. The next few years of
Russell's life were mainly spent in England. He was member of parliament
for Buckingham in the parliament of 1529, and although an opponent of
the party of Anne Boleyn, retained the favour of Henry VIII. He took an
active part in suppressing the Pilgrimage of Grace in 1536, and was one
of the commissioners appointed to try the Lincolnshire prisoners.
Honours now crowded upon him. His appointment as comptroller of the
king's household in 1537 was followed by that of a privy councillor in
1538; then he was made lord high admiral, high steward of the duchy of
Cornwall and a knight of the garter. In March 1539 he was created Baron
Russell of Chenies, and in 1542 became high steward of the university of
Oxford, and keeper of the privy seal. In 1539, when Charles V. and
Francis I. were threatening to invade England, he was sent into the
west, and crossed to France when Henry attacked Francis in 1544. He was
in command of an army in the west of England in 1545, and when Henry
died in January 1547 was one of the executors of his will. Under Edward
VI. Russell was lord high steward and keeper of the privy seal, and the
defeat which he inflicted on the rebels at Clyst St Mary near Exeter in
August 1549, was largely instrumental in suppressing the rising in
Devonshire. In January 1550 he was created earl of Bedford, and was one
of the commissioners appointed to make peace with France in this year.
He opposed the proposal to seat Lady Jane Grey on the throne; supported
Queen Mary, who reappointed him lord privy seal; and assisted to prevent
Sir Thomas Wyat's rising from spreading to Devonshire. In 1554 he went
to Spain to conclude the marriage treaty between Mary and Philip II.,
and soon after his return died in London on the 14th of March 1555. By
extensive acquisitions of land Bedford was the founder of the wealth and
greatness of the house of Russell. Through his wife, Anne (d. 1550),
daughter of Sir Guy Sapcote, whom he married in 1526, he obtained
Chenies, and in 1539 was granted the forest of Exmoor, and also
Tavistock, and a number of manors in Devon, Cornwall and Somerset, which
had formerly belonged to the abbey of Tavistock. In 1549 he received
Thorney, the abbey of Woburn, and extensive lands in the eastern
counties; and in 1552 Covent Garden and seven acres of land in London,
formerly the property of the protector Somerset. He left an only son,
Francis, who succeeded him in the title.
See _Letters and Papers of Henry VIII._ (London, 1862-1901); _State
Papers during the Reign of Henry VIII._ (London, 1831-1852); _Calendar
of State Papers, Edward VI. and Mary_ (London, 1861); J.H. Wiffen,
_Historical Memoirs of the House of Russell_ (London, 1833); J.A.
Froude, _History of England, passim_ (London, 1881 fol.).
FRANCIS RUSSELL, 2nd earl of Bedford (c. 1527-1585), was educated at
King's Hall, Cambridge. He accompanied his father to the French war in
1544, and from 1547 to 1552 was member of parliament for
Buckinghamshire, being probably the first heir to a peerage to sit in
the House of Commons. He assisted to quell the rising in Devonshire in
1549, and after his father had been created earl of Bedford in January
1550, was known as Lord Russell, taking his seat in the House of Lords
under this title in 1552. Russell was in sympathy with the reformers,
whose opinions he shared, and was in communication with Sir Thomas Wyat;
and in consequence of his religious attitude was imprisoned during the
earlier part of Mary's reign. Being released he went into exile; visited
Italy; came into touch with foreign reformers; and fought at the battle
of St Quentin in 1557. Afterwards he seems to have enjoyed some measure
of the royal favour, and was made lord-lieutenant of the counties of
Devon, Cornwall and Dorset early in 1558. When Elizabeth ascended the
throne in November 1558 the earl of Bedford, as Russell had been since
1555, became an active figure in public life. He was made a privy
councillor, and was sent on diplomatic errands to Charles IX. of France
and Mary queen of Scots. From February 1564 to October 1567 he was
governor of Berwick and warden of the east marches of Scotland, in which
capacity he conducted various negotiations between Elizabeth and Mary.
He appears to have been an efficient warden, but was irritated by the
vacillating and tortuous conduct of the English queen. When the northern
insurrection broke out in 1569, Bedford was sent into Wales, and he sat
in judgment upon the duke of Norfolk in 1572. In 1576 he was president
of the council of Wales, and in 1581 was one of the commissioners
deputed to arrange a marriage between Elizabeth and Francis, duke of
Anjou. Bedford, who was made a knight of the garter in 1564, was lord
warden of the Stannaries from 1553 to 1580. He appears to have been a
generous and popular man, and died in London on the 28th of July 1585.
He was buried at Chenies. His first wife was Margaret (d. 1562),
daughter of Sir John St John, by whom he had four sons and three
daughters. His three eldest sons predeceased their father. His second
wife was Bridget (d. 1601), daughter of John, Lord Hussey. He was
succeeded as 3rd earl by his grandson, EDWARD (1572-1627), only son of
Francis, Lord Russell (c. 1550-1585). The 3rd earl left no children when
he died on the 3rd of May 1627, and was succeeded by his cousin.
FRANCIS RUSSELL, 4th earl of Bedford (1593-1641), was the only son of
William, Lord Russell of Thornhaugh, to which barony he succeeded in
August 1613. For a short time previously he had been member of
parliament for the borough of Lyme Regis; in 1623 he was made
lord-lieutenant of Devonshire; and in May 1627 became earl of Bedford by
the death of his cousin, Edward, the 3rd earl. When the quarrel broke
out between Charles I. and the parliament, Bedford supported the demands
of the House of Commons as embodied in the Petition of Right, and in
1629 was arrested for his share in the circulation of Sir Robert
Dudley's pamphlet, "Proposition for His Majesty's service," but was
quickly released. The Short parliament meeting in April 1640 found the
earl as one of the king's leading opponents. He was greatly trusted by
John Pym and Oliver St John, and is mentioned by Clarendon as among the
"great contrivers and designers" in the House of Lords. In July 1640 he
was among the peers who wrote to the Scottish leaders refusing to invite
a Scottish army into England, but promising to stand by the Scots in all
legal and honourable ways; and his signature was afterwards forged by
Thomas, Viscount Savile, in order to encourage the Scots to invade
England. In the following September he was among those peers who urged
Charles to call a parliament, to make peace with the Scots, and to
dismiss his obnoxious ministers; and was one of the English
commissioners appointed to conclude the treaty of Ripon. When the Long
parliament met in November 1640, Bedford was generally regarded as the
leader of the parliamentarians. In February 1641 he was made a privy
councillor, and during the course of some negotiations was promised the
office of lord high treasurer. He was essentially a moderate man, and
seemed anxious to settle the question of the royal revenue in a
satisfactory manner. He did not wish to alter the government of the
Church, was on good terms with Archbishop Laud, and, although convinced
of Stafford's guilt, was anxious to save his life. In the midst of the
parliamentary struggle Bedford died of smallpox on the 9th of May 1641.
Clarendon described him as "a wise man, and of too great and plentiful a
fortune to wish the subversion of the government," and again referring
to his death said that "many who knew him well thought his death not
unseasonable as well to his fame as his fortune, and that it rescued him
as well from some possible guilt as from those visible misfortunes which
men of all conditions have since undergone." Bedford was the head of
those who undertook to drain the great level of the fens, called after
him the "Bedford level." He spent a large sum of money over this work
and received 43,000 acres of land, but owing to various jealousies and
difficulties the king took the work into his own hands in 1638, making a
further grant of land to the earl. Bedford married Catherine (d. 1657),
daughter of Giles, 3rd Lord Chandos, by whom he had four sons and four
daughters. His eldest son, WILLIAM (1613-1700), succeeded him as 5th
earl, fought first on the side of the parliament and then on that of the
king during the Civil War, and in 1694 was created marquess of Tavistock
and duke of Bedford.
See Clarendon, _History of the Rebellion, passim_ (Oxford, 1888); J.H.
Wiffen, _Historical Memoirs of the House of Russell_ (London, 1833);
J.L. Sanford, _Studies and Illustrations of the Great Rebellion_
(London, 1858).
The first duke, who married Anne (d. 1684), daughter of Robert Carr,
earl of Somerset, was succeeded in the title by his grandson Wriothesley
(1680-1711), who was a son of Lord William Russell (q.v.) by his
marriage with Rachel, daughter of Thomas Wriothesley, 4th earl of
Southampton, and who became second duke in 1700. Eleven years later the
second duke was succeeded by his eldest son Wriothesley (1708-1732), who
died without issue in October 1732, when the title passed to his brother
John.
JOHN RUSSELL, 4th duke of Bedford (1710-1771), second son of Wriothesley
Russell, 2nd duke of Bedford, by his wife, Elizabeth, daughter and
heiress of John Howland of Streatham, Surrey, was born on the 30th of
September 1710. Known as Lord John Russell, he married in October 1731
Lady Diana Spencer, daughter of Charles, 3rd earl of Sunderland; became
duke of Bedford on his brother's death a year later; and having lost
his first wife in 1735, married in April 1737 Lady Gertrude
Leveson-Gower (d. 1794), daughter of John, Earl Gower. In the House of
Lords he joined the party hostile to Sir Robert Walpole, took a fairly
prominent part in public business, and earned the dislike of George II.
When Carteret, now Earl Granville, resigned office in November 1744,
Bedford became first lord of the admiralty in the administration of
Henry Pelham, and was made a privy councillor. He was very successful at
the admiralty, but was not equally fortunate after he became secretary
of state for the southern department in February 1748. Pelham accused
him of idleness; he was constantly at variance with the duke of
Newcastle, and resigned office in June 1751. Instigated by his friends
he was active in opposition to the government, and after Newcastle's
resignation in November 1756, became lord-lieutenant of Ireland in the
ministry of William Pitt and the duke of Devonshire, retaining this
office after Newcastle, in alliance with Pitt, returned to power in June
1757. In Ireland he favoured a relaxation of the penal laws against
Roman Catholics, but did not keep his promises to observe neutrality
between the rival parties, and to abstain from securing pensions for his
friends. His own courtly manners and generosity, and his wife's good
qualities, however, seem to have gained for him some popularity,
although Horace Walpole says he disgusted everybody. In March 1761 he
resigned this office. Having allied himself with the earl of Bute and
the party anxious to bring the Seven Years' War to a close, Bedford was
noticed as the strongest opponent of Pitt, and became lord privy seal
under Bute after Pitt resigned in October 1761. The cabinet of Bute was
divided over the policy to be pursued with regard to the war, but
pacific counsels prevailed, and in September 1762 Bedford went to France
to treat for peace. He was considerably annoyed because some of the
peace negotiations were conducted through other channels, but he signed
the peace of Paris in February 1763. Resigning his office as lord privy
seal soon afterwards, various causes of estrangement arose between Bute
and Bedford, and the subsequent relations of the two men were somewhat
virulent. The duke refused to take office under George Grenville on
Bute's resignation in April 1763, and sought to induce Pitt to return to
power. A report, however, that Pitt would only take office on condition
that Bedford was excluded, incensed him and, smarting under this rebuff,
he joined the cabinet of Grenville as lord president of the council in
September 1763. His haughty manner, his somewhat insulting language, and
his attitude with regard to the regency bill in 1765 offended George
III., who sought in vain to supplant him, and after this failure was
obliged to make humiliating concessions to the ministry. In July 1765,
however, he was able to dispense with the services of Bedford and his
colleagues, and the duke became the leader of a political party,
distinguished for rapacity, and known as the "Bedford party," or the
"Bloomsbury gang." During his term of office he had opposed a bill to
place high import duties on Italian silks. He was consequently assaulted
and his London residence attacked by a mob. He took some part in
subsequent political intrigues, and although he did not return to
office, his friends, with his consent, joined the ministry of the duke
of Grafton in December 1767. This proceeding led "Junius" to write his
"letter to the duke of Bedford," one of especial violence. Bedford was
hostile to John Wilkes, and narrowly escaped from a mob favourable to
the agitator at Honiton in July 1769. His health had been declining for
some years, and in 1770 he became partially paralysed. He died at Woburn
on the 15th of January 1771, and was buried in the family burying place
at Chenies. His three sons all predeceased him, and he was succeeded in
the title by his grandson, Francis. The duke held many public offices:
lord-lieutenant of Bedfordshire and Devonshire, and chancellor of Dublin
University among others, and was a knight of the garter. Bedford was a
proud and conceited man, but possessed both ability and common-sense.
The important part which he took in public life, however, was due rather
to his wealth and position than to his personal taste or ambition. He
was neither above nor below the standard of political morality of the
time, and was influenced by his duchess, who was very ambitious, and by
followers who were singularly unscrupulous.
See _Correspondence of John, 4th Duke of Bedford_, edited by Lord John
Russell (London, 1842-1846); J.H. Wiffen, _Historical Memoirs of the
House of Russell_ (London, 1833); W.E.H. Lecky, _History of England_,
vol. iii. (London, 1892); Horace Walpole, _Memoirs of the Reign of
George II._ (London, 1847), and _Memoirs of the Reign of George III._,
edited by G.F.R. Barker (London, 1894.)
FRANCIS RUSSELL, 5th duke of Bedford (1765-1802), eldest son of Francis
Russell, marquess of Tavistock (d. 1767), by his wife, Elizabeth (d.
1768), daughter of William Keppel, 2nd earl of Albemarle, was baptized
on the 23rd of July 1765. In January 1771 he succeeded his grandfather
as duke of Bedford, and was educated at Westminster school and Trinity
College, Cambridge, afterwards spending nearly two years in foreign
travel. Regarding Charles James Fox as his political leader, he joined
the Whigs in the House of Lords, and became a member of the circle of
the prince of Wales, afterwards George IV. Having overcome some
nervousness and educational defects, he began to speak in the House, and
soon became one of the leading debaters in that assembly. He opposed
most of the measures brought forward by the ministry of William Pitt,
and objected to the grant of a pension to Edmund Burke, an action which
drew down upon him a scathing attack from Burke's pen. Bedford was
greatly interested in agriculture. He established a model farm at
Woburn, and made experiments with regard to the breeding of sheep. He
was a member of the original board of agriculture, and was the first
president of the Smithfield club. He died at Woburn on the 2nd of March
1802, and was buried in the family burying-place at Chenies. The duke
was never married, and was succeeded in the title by his brother, John.
See Lord Holland, _Memoirs of the Whig Party_ (London, 1854); J.H.
Wiffen, _Historical Memoirs of the House of Russell_ (London, 1833):
E. Burke, _Letter to a Noble Lord_ (Edinburgh, 1837); and Earl
Stanhope, _Life of Pitt_ (London, 1861-1862).
JOHN RUSSELL, 6th duke of Bedford (1766-1839), was succeeded as seventh
duke by his eldest son, Francis (1788-1861), who had an only son,
William (1809-1872), who became duke on his father's death in 1861. When
the eighth duke died in 1872, he was succeeded by his cousin, Francis
Charles Hastings (1819-1891), who was member of parliament for
Bedfordshire from 1847 until he succeeded to the title. The ninth duke
was the eldest son of Major-General Lord George William Russell
(1790-1846), who was a son of the sixth duke. He married Elizabeth,
daughter of George John, 5th Earl de la Warr, and both his sons, George
William Francis Sackville (1852-1893), and Herbrand Arthur (b. 1858),
succeeded in turn to the title.
BEDFORD, a municipal and parliamentary borough, and the county town of
Bedfordshire, England, 50 m. north-north-west of London by the Midland
railway; served also by a branch of the London & North-Western. Pop.
(1901) 35,144. It lies in the fertile valley of the Ouse, on both banks,
but mainly on the north, on which stands the mound which marks the site
of the ancient castle. The church of St Paul is Decorated and
Perpendicular, but its central tower and spire are modern; it contains
the tomb of Sir William Harper or Harpur (c. 1496-1573), lord mayor of
London, a notable benefactor of his native town of Bedford. St Peter's
church has in its central tower masonry probably of pre-Conquest date;
that of St Mary's is in part Norman, and that of St John's Decorated;
but the bodies of these churches are largely restored. There are some
remains of a Franciscan friary of the 14th century. The Congregational
chapel called Bunyan's or the "Old Meeting" stands on the site of the
building in which John Bunyan preached from 1656 onward. His chair is
preserved here, and a tablet records his life in the town, where he
underwent a long but in part nominal imprisonment. He was born at
Elstow, 1-1/2 m. from Bedford, where, while playing on the green, he
believed himself to have received the divine summons to renounce sin. In
the panels of a fine pair of bronze doors in the chapel are scenes
illustrative of Bunyan's _Pilgrim's Progress_. Bedford is noted for its
grammar school, founded by Edward VI. in 1552, and endowed by Sir
William Harper. The existing buildings date from 1891, and have been
increased since that date, and the school is one of the important
public schools of England. Harper's endowment includes land in London,
and is now of great value, and the Harper Trust supports in addition
modern and elementary schools for boys and girls, a girls' high school,
and almshouses. The grammar school annually awards both entrance
exhibitions and two exhibitions to a university or other higher
educational institution. The old grammar school buildings are used as a
town hall; and among other modern buildings may be mentioned the shire
hall and county hospital. There are statues of John Bunyan (1874) and
John Howard (1894) the philanthropist (1726-1790), who founded the
Congregational chapel which bears his name, and resided at Cardington in
the vicinity. There are two parks. Bedford has a large trade as a market
town for agricultural produce, and extensive engineering works and
manufactures of agricultural implements. The parliamentary borough
returns one member. The municipal borough is under a mayor, 6 aldermen
and 18 councillors. Area, 2223 acres.
Bedford (Bedcanforda, Bedanforda, Bedeford) is first mentioned in 571,
when Cuthwulf defeated the Britons here. It subsequently became a Danish
borough, which in 914 was captured by Edward the Elder. In Domesday, as
the county town, it was entered apart from the rest of the shire, and
was assessed at half a hundred for the host and for ship service. The
prescriptive borough received its first charter from Henry II., who gave
the town to the burgesses to hold at a fee-farm rent of L40 in lieu of
all service. The privileges included a gild-merchant, all tolls, and
liberties and laws in common with the citizens of Oxford. This charter
was confirmed by successive sovereigns down to Charles II. During the
15th century, owing to the rise of other market towns, Bedford became
less prosperous, and the fee-farm rent was finally reduced to L20 by
charter of Henry VII. Henry VIII. granted a November fair to St
Leonard's hospital, which was still held in the 19th century at St
Leonard's farm, the site of the hospital. Mary granted two fairs, one in
Lent and one on the Feast of the Conception, and also a weekly market. A
17th century pamphlet on river navigation in Bedfordshire mentions the
trade which Bedford carried on in coal, brought by the Ouse from Lynn
and Yarmouth. The town was also one of the earliest centres of the lace
trade, to the success of which French refugees in the 17th and 18th
centuries largely contributed.
Bedford was represented in the parliament of 1295, and after that date
two members were returned regularly, until by the Redistribution of
Seats Act in 1885 Bedford lost one of its members. The unlimited power
of creating freemen, an inherent right of the borough, led to great
abuse, noticeably in 1769 when 500 freemen[1] were created to support
the political interest of Sir Robert Barnard, afterwards recorder of the
borough.
Bedford castle, of which mention is first heard during Stephen's reign
(1136), was destroyed by order of Henry III. in 1224. The mound marking
its site is famous as a bowling-green.