It seems impossible not to be struck, at this point, with the contrast

between the times preceding the Advent, and those which have followed

it. Since the Advent, Christianity has marched for fifteen hundred

years at the head of human civilization; and has driven, harnessed to

its chariot as the horses of a triumphal car, the chief intellectual

and material forces of the world. Its learning has been the learning of

the world, its art the art of the world, its genius the genius of the

world, its greatness, glory, grandeur, and majesty have been almost,

though not absolutely, all that in these respects the world has had to

boast of. That which is to come, I do not presume to portend: but of

the past we may speak with confidence. He who hereafter, in even the

remotest age, with the colourless impartiality of mere intelligence,

may seek to know what durable results mankind has for the last fifteen

hundred years achieved, what capital of the mind it has accumulated and

transmitted, will find his investigations perforce concentrated upon,

and almost confined to that part, that minor part, of mankind which has

been Christian.

Before the Advent, it was quite otherwise. The treasure of Divine

Revelation was then hidden in a napkin: it was given to a people who

were almost forbidden to impart it; at least of whom it was simply

required, that they should preserve it without variation. They had

no world-wide vocation committed to them; they lay ensconced in a

country which was narrow and obscure; obscure, not only with reference

to the surpassing splendour of Greece and Rome, but in comparison with

Assyria, or Persia, or Egypt. They have not supplied the Christian

ages with laws and institutions, arts and sciences, with the chief

models of greatness in genius or in character. The Providence of

God committed this work to others; and to Homer seems to have been

intrusted the first, which was perhaps, all things considered, also the

most remarkable stage of it[1017].

[1017] I must frankly own that, for one, I can never read without pain

the disparaging account of the Greek mind and its achievements which,

in the Fourth Book of the Paradise Regained, so great a man as Milton

has too boldly put into the mouth of our Blessed Lord. We there find

our sympathies divided, in an indescribable and most unhappy manner,

between the person of the All-wise, and the language and ideas, on

the whole not less just, which are given to Satan. In particular, I

lament the claim, really no better than a childish one, made on the

part of the Jews, to be considered as the fountainhead of the Greek

arts and letters, and the assumption for them of higher attainments in

political science. This is a sacrifice of truth, reason, and history to

prejudice, by which, as by all such proceedings, religion is sure to be

in the end the loser.

~_Christianity supplied a centre to history._~

Without bearing fully in mind this contrast between the providential

function of the Jews and that of other nations, we can hardly embrace

as we ought the importance of the part assigned, before the Advent of

our Lord, to nations and persons who lived beyond the immediate and

narrow pale of Divine Revelation. The relation of the old dispensation

to those who were not Jews, was essentially different from that of

Christendom to those who are not Christians. Only the fall of man

and his recovery are the universal facts with which Revelation is

concerned; all others are limited and partial. The interval between

the occurrence of the first, and the provision for the second, was

occupied by a variety of preparations in severalty for the revelation

of the kingdom of God. Until the Incarnation, the world’s history was

without a centre. When the Incarnation came, it showed itself to be the

centre of all that had preceded, as well as of all that was to follow:

and since the withdrawal of the visible Messiah, the history of man has

been grouped around His Word, and around the Church in which the effect

and virtue of His Incarnation are still by His unseen power prolonged.

The picture thus offered to our view is a very remarkable one. We see

the glories of the world, and that greatest marvel of God’s earthly

creation, the mind of man, become like little children, and yield

themselves to be led by the hand of the Good Shepherd: but it seems as

though the ancient promise of His coming, while just strong enough to

live in this wayward sphere, was not strong enough to make the conquest

of it; as if nothing but His own actual manifestation in the strength

of lowliness and of sorrow, and crowned by the extremity of contempt

and shame, was sufficient to restore for the world at large that symbol

of the universal duty of individual obedience and conformity, which is

afforded by the establishment of the authority of the spiritual King

over all the functions of our nature, and all the spheres, however

manifold and remote they may seem to be, in which they find their

exercise. Nor is this lesson the less striking because this, like other

parts of the divine dispensations, has been marred by the perversity of

man, ever striving to escape from that inward control wherein lies the

true hope and safety of his race.

But, even after the Advent, it was not at once that the Sovereign

of the new kingdom put in His claim for all the wealth that it

contained. As, in the day of His humiliation, He rode into Jerusalem,

foreshadowing his royal dominion to come, so Saint Paul was forthwith

consecrated to God as a kind of first fruits of the learning and

intellect of man. Yet for many generations after Christ, it was still

the Supreme will to lay in human weakness the foundations of divine

strength. Not the Apostles only, but the martyrs, and not the martyrs

only, but the first fathers and doctors of the Church, were men of whom

none could suspect that they drew the weapons of their warfare from the

armouries of human cultivation: nor of them could it be said, that by

virtue of their human endowments they had achieved the triumphs of the

cross; as it might perhaps have been said, had they brought to their

work the immense popular powers of St. Chrysostom, or the masculine

energy of St. Athanasius, or the varied and comprehensive genius of St.

Augustine.

Nor, again, if we are right in the belief that we are not to look

for the early development of humanity in the pages of Jewish and

patriarchal history, but rather to believe that it was given to

another people, and the office of recording it to the father, not only

of poetry, but of letters, does it seem difficult to read in this

arrangement the purpose of the Most High, and herewith the wisdom of

that purpose. Had the Scriptures been preserved, had the Messiah been

Incarnate, among a people who were in political sagacity, in martial

energy, in soaring and diving intellect, in vivid imagination, in the

graces of art and civilized life, the flower of their time, then the

divine origin of Christianity would have stood far less clear and

disembarrassed than it now does. The eagle that mounted upon high,

bearing on his wings the Everlasting Gospel, would have made his first

spring from a great eminence, erected by the wit and skill of man;

and the elevation of that eminence, measured upward from the plain

of common humanity, would have been so much to be deducted from the

triumph of the Redeemer.

~_Purpose served by the design._~

Thus the destructive theories of those, who teach us to regard

Christianity as no more than a new stage, added to stages that had

been previously achieved in the march of human advancement, would have

been clothed in a plausibility which they must now for ever want. ‘God

hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and

God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things

which are mighty; and base things of the world, and things which are

despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to

nought things that are[1018].’ An unhonoured undistinguished race,

simply elected to be the receivers of the Divine Word, and having

remained its always stiffnecked and almost reluctant guardians, may

best have suited the aim of Almighty Wisdom; because the medium,

through which the most precious gifts were conveyed, was pale and

colourless, instead of being one flushed with the splendours of Empire,

Intellect, and Fame.

[1018] 1 Cor. i. 27, 8.

Transcriber's Note

Page headers in the printed book have been converted to headings, and

are marked with ~swung dashes~.

The following apparent errors have been corrected:

p. xiv "sovereignity" changed to "sovereignty"

p. 42 (note) "vii-x." changed to "vii.-x."

p. 79 "unequivocially" changed to "unequivocally"

p. 118 "insolence:" changed to "insolence:’"

p. 165 "ὤλετό" changed to "ὤλετο"

p. 173 "attention," changed to "attention."

p. 192 "exemplfied" changed to "exemplified"

p. 277 "order" changed to "order."

p. 285 "Hom Theol." changed to "Hom. Theol."

p. 288 "Ganymed" changed to "Ganymede"

p. 291 "ἀῖσα" changed to "αἶσα"

p. 299 "peoples," changed to "peoples"

p. 320 "ῥεία" changed to "ῥεῖα"

p. 328 in "disaffection has yet been exhibited.[607]", the footnote

anchor has been added to the text.

p. 336 "ῥεία" changed to "ῥεῖα"

p. 352 "subject so" changed to "subject to"

p. 354 "2." changed to "(2.)"

p. 356 "δὲ" changed to "δέ"

p. 364 "it sessential" changed to "its essential"

p. 365 in "νόον ἔτραπεν[711].", the footnote anchor has been added to

the text.

p. 377 "purity, of" changed to "of purity,"

p. 383 (note) "264" changed to "264."

p. 403 (note) "Romische" changed to "Römische"

p. 404 "elswehere" changed to "elsewhere"

p. 410 "devolopment" changed to "development"

p. 420 "ἔσθλος" changed to "ἐσθλὸς"

p. 426 "morality." changed to "morality,"

p. 436 "ἀτὴ" changed to "ἄτη"

p. 460 "Ἕρως" changed to "Ἔρως"

p. 474 "ἔγω" changed to "ἐγὼ"

p. 494 in "Ajax had a spurious brother", a footnote anchor has been

removed from the text.

p. 499 (note) "in excellently" changed to "is excellently"

p. 505 "φρέσι" changed to "φρεσὶ"

p. 517 "ἔγωγε" changed to "ἐγώγε"

The following are used inconsistently in the book:

aftertimes and after-times

battlefield and battle-field

bowstring and bow-string

cupbearer and cup-bearer

dependence and dependance

Dî and Dii

Dioscuri and Dioscouroi

Erinuës and Erinues

fountainhead and fountain-head

Histie and Hestie

i. e. and i.e.

indoor and in-door

preeminence and pre-eminence

reestablished and re-established

stepmother and step-mother

synonym and synonyme

Theomythology and Theo-mythology

Studies on Homer and the Homeric Age, Vol. 2 of 3 Olympus; or, the Religion of the Homeric Age · 第 38 / 38 段