But we have interrupted Sir Bulwer Lytton,—he thus proceeds:—

“Thirdly, that wide and grisly family of affliction classed under

the common name of dyspepsia. All derangements of the digestive

organs, imperfect powers of nutrition—the malaise of an injured

stomach, appear precisely the complaints on which the system takes

firmest hold, and in which it effects those cures that convert

existence from a burden into a blessing.

“Hence it follows that many nameless and countless complaints,

proceeding from derangement of the digestive organs, cease as that

great machine is restored to order. I have seen disorders of the

heart which have been pronounced organic by no inferior authorities

of the profession, disappear in an incredibly short time; cases of

incipient consumption, in which the seat is in the nutritious

powers; hæmorrhages, and various congestions, shortness of breath,

habitual fainting fits, many of what are called improperly nervous

complaints, but which in reality are radiations from the main

ganglionic spring: the disorders produced by the abuse of powerful

medicines, especially mercury and iodine; the loss of appetite, the

dulled sense and the shaking hand of intemperance, skin complaints,

and the dire scourge of scrofula;—all these seem to obtain from

Hydropathy relief,—nay, absolute and unqualified cure, beyond not

only the means of the most skilful practitioner, but the hopes of

the most sanguine patient.”

Nor will the above results form at all a subject for wonder, when it

is remembered that every natural disease arises either from impurity

in the blood or maldistribution of it, and that all the processes

of the water cure, from the Turkish bath down to the wet sheet,

act powerfully as depurators of the blood and controllers of its

circulation,—attracting it here, and repelling it there, at will.

We know not whether the public will prefer the impartial testimony of

an intelligent observer like Sir Bulwer Lytton, to that of the

Allopathic physician, naturally wedded to his own system and anxious to

sustain it against all intruders; but we may observe, that we never yet

met a physician opposed to Hydropathy, who did not, on catechising him,

exhibit the most absurd ignorance respecting it. Their chronic idea is

that of a person being left to shiver in wet sheets; and, as a

consequence, their chronic note of warning, accompanied by an ominous

shake of the head, consists in, “Don’t attempt the water cure, or it

will kill you.” [17] If medical men would but see, before they assert,

then much value might be attached to their opinion; but what value can

be attached to their opinion about a system which they will not take

the trouble of examining into? How many orthodox physicians have ever

visited Blarney, or any similar Hydropathic establishment?—The

proportion of such visitors (and no one can form a fair idea of the

system without seeing it at work), to the whole profession would be

more than represented by an infinitesimal fraction.

We wonder how long the public will continue to poison [18] their

systems with mercury, colchicum, iodine, and prussic acid, because a

physician chooses to tell them that a mode of treatment which he has

never investigated “will kill them.”

It may not be uninteresting to observe, that under Hydropathic

treatment, chronic disease frequently becomes acute; for, as the body

improves in strength, the more acutely will any existing disease

develop itself, and for the following reason: pain is caused by an

effort of nature to relieve the system of some morbid influence

residing in it, and the stronger the constitution, the greater efforts

will it make to remove that morbid influence, and therefore the greater

will be the pain; but on the other hand, when the body is enfeebled,

its efforts to relieve itself, though continual, are weak and

inefficient, and the disease remaining in the system, assumes the

chronic and less painful form. Now with these facts before them, we

have been amused at hearing physicians observe, in their efforts to

decry the “Water System,” “Oh it is good for the general health, but

nothing more,” a result albeit, which unfortunately the Allopathic

system cannot lay claim to. When speaking thus they do not however

reflect that they are affording the strongest possible testimony in

support of the system which they seek to decry, inasmuch as every

physiologist, from Cape Clear to the Giant’s Causeway, admits the

principle, that the cure of disease is to be sought for in the powers

of the living organism alone; and it must be evident that the more you

strengthen that organism, the more you increase its powers to cure

itself, and diminish its liability to future disease.

Having trespassed thus far on the attention of our readers, we would

conclude by inviting them and the medical profession, generally, to a

calm and dispassionate investigation, as far as the opportunities of

each allow, of the relative merits of the Allopathic and Hydropathic

systems, approaching the investigation, as far as possible, with a mind

devoid of prejudice and bigotry. Their duty to themselves and to

society demands this inquiry at their hands—two antagonistic (we use

the term advisedly) systems are presented for their acceptance—which

will they lay hold of? To assist them in determining this point we

would recommend for their quiet perusal either or all of the works

alluded to in this article, [19] the study of which will be found

interesting and profitable. If they conclude that drugs are wholesome,

let them by all means be swallowed; but if they are proved to be

injurious, deleterious and unnecessary, then away with them;—if opiates

are innocuous let them be retained, but if they congest the liver,

sicken the stomach, and paralyze the actions of the vital organs, the

sooner they are erased for ever from the Hygienic Pharmacopeia the

better—let them gracefully retire before the improved system of hot

stupes, fomentations, and the abdominal compress.

The very simplicity of the processes of the “water-cure,” which people

cannot believe capable of producing the effects ascribed to them,

combined with a belief, ingrained by long habit, in the absolute

necessity for drugs in curing disease, have chiefly militated against a

more extended reception of Hydropathy by the lay public; but when they

reflect that ALL the powers of the medical art range themselves under

two great categories, stimulants and sedatives—blistering, bleeding,

drugs, and leeching—acknowledging no other objects, they cannot but

admit the possibility of Hydropathy possessing the powers attributed to

it, since its bracing and soothing properties cannot be questioned.

Were, however, the position of affairs reversed, and Hydropathy become

as old a system as the Allopathic this belief, in the efficacy of the

old school might be securely entertained; for no one would think for a

moment of exchanging a system, fixed, intelligible, and certain in its

action, as based on scientific principles, and consonant with the laws

of physiology, for the uncertain, groping, empirical, and injurious

practice of drug medication.

We would ask the medical profession of Ireland to reflect on the fact,

that Dr. Barter’s establishment at Blarney, contains at this moment

upwards of 120 patients, with many more frequently seeking for

admission within its walls, most of whom leave the establishment ardent

converts to Hydropathy, determined for the rest of their lives to

“throw physic to the dogs,” fleeing from it as from some poisonous

thing. It will not do for them to “pooh-pooh” the system, and tell

their patients, as many of them do, that it will kill them; [20] such

language only betrays ignorance on their part, and will not put down a

system which daily gives the lie to their predictions by affording

ocular demonstration of its efficacy, in the restored health and

blooming cheek of many a once emaciated friend. Men are too sensible

now-a-days to pin their faith on the dictum of a medical man, who runs

down a system without fairly investigating it, and examining the

principles on which it acts, to say nothing of the prejudice he must

feel in favour of his own particular system; but if a mode of treatment

be rational, producing cures where every other system of treatment has

failed, and recommend itself to the common sense and reason of mankind,

we believe that such a principle will make its way despite of the

opposition of all the physicians that ever lived; and this very

progress the water cure is now making.

We would in conclusion apostrophize Hydropathy, in the words of the

American traveller, who gave vent to his feelings on first beholding

the falls of Niagara, by exclaiming, “Well done, Water!!”

Life in a tub; with a description of the Turkish bath · 第 21 / 29 题