Of Scott he says:--

“As a poet, Scott cannot live, for he has never in verse written

anything addressed to the immortal part of man. In making amusing

stories in verse, he will be superseded by some newer versifier; what he

writes in the way of natural description is merely rhyming nonsense. As

a prose writer, Mr. Wordsworth admitted that Scott had touched a higher

vein, because there he had really dealt with feeling and passion. As

historical novels, professing to give the manners of a past time, he did

not attach much value to those works of Scott’s, so called, because that

he held to be an attempt in which success was impossibility. This led to

some remarks on historical writing, from which it appeared that Mr.

Wordsworth has small value for anything but contemporary history. He

laments that Dr. Arnold should have spent so much of his time and powers

in gathering up, and putting into imaginary shape, the scattered

fragments of the history of Rome.”

Memoirs of William Wordsworth · 第 29 / 39 题