CHAPTER I -- ORIGIN OF MEDICINE

Produced by Charles Keller and David Widger

THE EVOLUTION OF MODERN MEDICINE

A SERIES OF LECTURES DELIVERED AT YALE UNIVERSITY

ON THE SILLIMAN FOUNDATION

IN APRIL, 1913

by William Osler

THE SILLIMAN FOUNDATION

IN the year 1883 a legacy of eighty thousand dollars was left to the

President and Fellows of Yale College in the city of New Haven, to be

held in trust, as a gift from her children, in memory of their beloved

and honored mother, Mrs. Hepsa Ely Silliman.

On this foundation Yale College was requested and directed to establish

an annual course of lectures designed to illustrate the presence and

providence, the wisdom and goodness of God, as manifested in the natural

and moral world. These were to be designated as the Mrs. Hepsa Ely

Silliman Memorial Lectures. It was the belief of the testator that any

orderly presentation of the facts of nature or history contributed

to the end of this foundation more effectively than any attempt to

emphasize the elements of doctrine or of creed; and he therefore

provided that lectures on dogmatic or polemical theology should be

excluded from the scope of this foundation, and that the subjects should

be selected rather from the domains of natural science and history,

giving special prominence to astronomy, chemistry, geology and anatomy.

It was further directed that each annual course should be made the basis

of a volume to form part of a series constituting a memorial to Mrs.

Silliman. The memorial fund came into the possession of the Corporation

of Yale University in the year 1901; and the present volume constitutes

the tenth of the series of memorial lectures.

CONTENTS

Chapter I. Origin Of Medicine

Chapter II. Greek Medicine

Chapter III. Mediaeval Medicine

Chapter IV. The Renaissance and the Rise of Anatomy and Physiology

Chapter V. The Rise and Development of Modern Medicine

Chapter VI. The Rise of Preventive Medicine

PREFACE

THE manuscript of Sir William Osler's lectures on the "Evolution of

Modern Medicine," delivered at Yale University in April, 1913, on the

Silliman Foundation, was immediately turned in to the Yale University

Press for publication. Duly set in type, proofs in galley form had been

submitted to him and despite countless interruptions he had already

corrected and revised a number of the galleys when the great war came.

But with the war on, he threw himself with energy and devotion into

the military and public duties which devolved upon him and so never

completed his proof-reading and intended alterations. The careful

corrections which Sir William made in the earlier galleys show that the

lectures were dictated, in the first instance, as loose memoranda for

oral delivery rather than as finished compositions for the eye, while

maintaining throughout the logical continuity and the engaging con moto

which were so characteristic of his literary style. In revising the

lectures for publication, therefore, the editors have merely endeavored

to carry out, with care and befitting reverence, the indications

supplied in the earlier galleys by Sir William himself. In supplying

dates and references which were lacking, his preferences as to editions

and readings have been borne in mind. The slight alterations made, the

adaptation of the text to the eye, detract nothing from the original

freshness of the work.

In a letter to one of the editors, Osler described these lectures as "an

aeroplane flight over the progress of medicine through the ages." They

are, in effect, a sweeping panoramic survey of the whole vast field,

covering wide areas at a rapid pace, yet with an extraordinary variety

of detail. The slow, painful character of the evolution of medicine from

the fearsome, superstitious mental complex of primitive man, with his

amulets, healing gods and disease demons, to the ideal of a clear-eyed

rationalism is traced with faith and a serene sense of continuity. The

author saw clearly and felt deeply that the men who have made an idea or

discovery viable and valuable to humanity are the deserving men; he

has made the great names shine out, without any depreciation of the

important work of lesser men and without cluttering up his narrative

with the tedious prehistory of great discoveries or with shrill claims

to priority. Of his skill in differentiating the sundry "strains"

of medicine, there is specific witness in each section. Osler's wide

culture and control of the best available literature of his subject

permitted him to range the ampler aether of Greek medicine or the

earth-fettered schools of today with equal mastery; there is no quickset

of pedantry between the author and the reader. The illustrations (which

he had doubtless planned as fully for the last as for the earlier

chapters) are as he left them; save that, lacking legends, these have

been supplied and a few which could not be identified have with regret

been omitted. The original galley proofs have been revised and corrected

from different viewpoints by Fielding H. Garrison, Harvey Cushing,

Edward C. Streeter and latterly by Leonard L. Mackall (Savannah, Ga.),

whose zeal and persistence in the painstaking verification of citations

and references cannot be too highly commended.

In the present revision, a number of important corrections, most of

them based upon the original MS., have been made by Dr. W.W. Francis

(Oxford), Dr. Charles Singer (London), Dr. E.C. Streeter, Mr. L.L.

Mackall and others.

This work, composed originally for a lay audience and for popular

consumption, will be to the aspiring medical student and the hardworking

practitioner a lift into the blue, an inspiring vista or "Pisgah-sight"

of the evolution of medicine, a realization of what devotion,

perseverance, valor and ability on the part of physicians have

contributed to this progress, and of the creditable part which our

profession has played in the general development of science.

The editors have no hesitation in presenting these lectures to the

profession and to the reading public as one of the most characteristic

productions of the best-balanced, best-equipped, most sagacious and most

lovable of all modern physicians.

F.H.G.

BUT on that account, I say, we ought not to reject the ancient Art, as

if it were not, and had not been properly founded, because it did

not attain accuracy in all things, but rather, since it is capable of

reaching to the greatest exactitude by reasoning, to receive it and

admire its discoveries, made from a state of great ignorance, and as

having been well and properly made, and not from chance. (Hippocrates,

On Ancient Medicine, Adams edition, Vol. 1, 1849, p. 168.)

THE true and lawful goal of the sciences is none other than this: that

human life be endowed with new discoveries and powers. (Francis Bacon,

Novum Organum, Aphorisms, LXXXI, Spedding's translation.)

A GOLDEN thread has run throughout the history of the world, consecutive

and continuous, the work of the best men in successive ages. From point

to point it still runs, and when near you feel it as the clear and

bright and searchingly irresistible light which Truth throws forth when

great minds conceive it. (Walter Moxon, Pilocereus Senilis and Other

Papers, 1887, p. 4.)

FOR the mind depends so much on the temperament and disposition of the

bodily organs that, if it is possible to find a means of rendering men

wiser and cleverer than they have hitherto been, I believe that it is in

medicine that it must be sought. It is true that the medicine which is

now in vogue contains little of which the utility is remarkable; but,

without having any intention of decrying it, I am sure that there is

no one, even among those who make its study a profession, who does not

confess that all that men know is almost nothing in comparison with

what remains to be known; and that we could be free of an infinitude

of maladies both of body and mind, and even also possibly of the

infirmities of age, if we had sufficient knowledge of their causes,

and of all the remedies with which nature has provided us. (Descartes:

Discourse on the Method, Philosophical Works. Translated by E. S.

Haldane and G. R. T. Ross. Vol. I, Cam. Univ. Press, 1911, p. 120.)

CHAPTER I -- ORIGIN OF MEDICINE

INTRODUCTION

SAIL to the Pacific with some Ancient Mariner, and traverse day by day

that silent sea until you reach a region never before furrowed by keel

where a tiny island, a mere speck on the vast ocean, has just risen from

the depths, a little coral reef capped with green, an atoll, a mimic

earth, fringed with life, built up through countless ages by life on the

remains of life that has passed away. And now, with wings of fancy,

join Ianthe in the magic car of Shelley, pass the eternal gates of the

flaming ramparts of the world and see his vision:

Below lay stretched the boundless Universe!

There, far as the remotest line

That limits swift imagination's flight,

Unending orbs mingled in mazy motion,

Immutably fulfilling

Eternal Nature's law.

Above, below, around,

The circling systems formed

A wilderness of harmony.

(Daemon of the World, Pt. I.)

And somewhere, "as fast and far the chariot flew," amid the mighty

globes would be seen a tiny speck, "earth's distant orb," one of "the

smallest lights that twinkle in the heavens." Alighting, Ianthe

would find something she had probably not seen elsewhere in her magic

flight--life, everywhere encircling the sphere. And as the little coral

reef out of a vast depth had been built up by generations of polyzoa,

so she would see that on the earth, through illimitable ages, successive

generations of animals and plants had left in stone their imperishable

records: and at the top of the series she would meet the thinking,

breathing creature known as man. Infinitely little as is the architect

of the atoll in proportion to the earth on which it rests, the polyzoon,

I doubt not, is much larger relatively than is man in proportion to

the vast systems of the Universe, in which he represents an

ultra-microscopic atom less ten thousand times than the tiniest of the

"gay motes that people the sunbeams." Yet, with colossal audacity, this

thinking atom regards himself as the anthropocentric pivot around which

revolve the eternal purposes of the Universe. Knowing not whence he

came, why he is here, or whither he is going, man feels himself of

supreme importance, and certainly is of interest--to himself. Let us

hope that he has indeed a potency and importance out of all proportion

to his somatic insignificance. We know of toxins of such strength that

an amount too infinitesimal to be gauged may kill; and we know that

"the unit adopted in certain scientific work is the amount of emanation

produced by one million-millionth of a grain of radium, a quantity

which itself has a volume of less than a million-millionth of a cubic

millimetre and weighs a million million times less than an exceptionally

delicate chemical balance will turn to" (Soddy, 1912). May not man be

the radium of the Universe? At any rate let us not worry about his size.

For us he is a very potent creature, full of interest, whose mundane

story we are only beginning to unravel.

Civilization is but a filmy fringe on the history of man. Go back as far

as his records carry us and the story written on stone is of yesterday

in comparison with the vast epochs of time which modern studies demand

for his life on the earth. For two millions (some hold even three

millions) of years man lived and moved and had his being in a world very

different from that upon which we look out. There appear, indeed, to

have been various types of man, some as different from us as we are

from the anthropoid apes. What upstarts of yesterday are the Pharaohs in

comparison with the men who survived the tragedy of the glacial period!

The ancient history of man--only now beginning to be studied--dates

from the Pliocene or Miocene period; the modern history, as we know it,

embraces that brief space of time that has elapsed since the earliest

Egyptian and Babylonian records were made. This has to be borne in mind

in connection with the present mental status of man, particularly in his

outlook upon nature. In his thoughts and in his attributes, mankind at

large is controlled by inherited beliefs and impulses, which countless

thousands of years have ingrained like instinct. Over vast regions of

the earth today, magic, amulets, charms, incantations are the chief

weapons of defense against a malignant nature; and in disease, the

practice of Asa(*) is comparatively novel and unusual; in days of

illness many millions more still seek their gods rather than the

physicians. In an upward path man has had to work out for himself

a relationship with his fellows and with nature. He sought in the

supernatural an explanation of the pressing phenomena of life, peopling

the world with spiritual beings, deifying objects of nature, and

assigning to them benign or malign influences, which might be invoked or

propitiated. Primitive priest, physician and philosopher were one, and

struggled, on the one hand, for the recognition of certain practices

forced on him by experience, and on the other, for the recognition

of mystical agencies which control the dark, "uncharted region" about

him--to use Prof. Gilbert Murray's phrase--and were responsible for

everything he could not understand, and particularly for the mysteries

of disease. Pliny remarks that physic "was early fathered upon the

gods"; and to the ordinary non-medical mind, there is still something

mysterious about sickness, something outside the ordinary standard.

(*) II Chronicles xvi, 12.

Modern anthropologists claim that both religion and medicine took origin

in magic, "that spiritual protoplasm," as Miss Jane Harrison calls it.

To primitive man, magic was the setting in motion of a spiritual power

to help or to hurt the individual, and early forms may still be studied

in the native races. This power, or "mana," as it is called, while

possessed in a certain degree by all, may be increased by practice.

Certain individuals come to possess it very strongly: among native

Australians today it is still deliberately cultivated. Magic in healing

seeks to control the demons, or forces; causing disease; and in a way it

may be thus regarded as a "lineal ancestor of modern science" (Whetham),

which, too, seeks to control certain forces, no longer, however,

regarded as supernatural.

Primitive man recognized many of these superhuman agencies relating

to disease, such as the spirits of the dead, either human or animal,

independent disease demons, or individuals who might act by controlling

the spirits or agencies of disease. We see this today among the negroes

of the Southern States. A Hoodoo put upon a negro may, if he knows of

it, work upon him so powerfully through the imagination that he becomes

very ill indeed, and only through a more powerful magic exercised by

someone else can the Hoodoo be taken off.

To primitive man life seemed "full of sacred presences" (Walter Pater)

connected with objects in nature, or with incidents and epochs in life,

which he began early to deify, so that, until a quite recent period, his

story is largely associated with a pantheon of greater and lesser

gods, which he has manufactured wholesale. Xenophanes was the earliest

philosopher to recognize man's practice of making gods in his own image

and endowing them with human faculties and attributes; the Thracians,

he said, made their gods blue-eyed and red-haired, the Ethiopians,

snub-nosed and black, while, if oxen and lions and horses had hands

and could draw, they would represent their gods as oxen and lions and

horses. In relation to nature and to disease, all through early history

we find a pantheon full to repletion, bearing testimony no less to the

fertility of man's imagination than to the hopes and fears which led

him, in his exodus from barbarism, to regard his gods as "pillars of

fire by night, and pillars of cloud by day."

Even so late a religion as that of Numa was full of little gods to be

invoked on special occasions--Vatican, who causes the infant to utter

his first cry, Fabulinus, who prompts his first word, Cuba, who keeps

him quiet in his cot, Domiduca, who watches over one's safe home-coming

(Walter Pater); and Numa believed that all diseases came from the gods

and were to be averted by prayer and sacrifice. Besides the major gods,

representatives of Apollo, AEsculapius and Minerva, there were scores of

lesser ones who could be invoked for special diseases. It is said that

the young Roman mother might appeal to no less than fourteen goddesses,

from Juno Lucina to Prosa and Portvorta (Withington). Temples were

erected to the Goddess of Fever, and she was much invoked. There is

extant a touching tablet erected by a mourning mother and inscribed:

Febri divae, Febri

Sancte, Febri magnae

Camillo amato pro

Filio meld effecto. Posuit.

It is marvellous what a long line of superhuman powers, major and minor,

man has invoked against sickness. In Swinburne's words:

God by God flits past in thunder till his glories turn to shades,

God by God bears wondering witness how his Gospel flames and

fades;

More was each of these, while yet they were, than man their

servant seemed;

Dead are all of these, and man survives who made them while he

dreamed.

Most of them have been benign and helpful gods. Into the dark

chapters relating to demonical possession and to witchcraft we

cannot here enter. They make one cry out with Lucretius (Bk. V):

O genus infelix humanum, talia divis

Cum tribuit facta atque iras adjunxit acerbas!

Quantos tum gemitus ipsi sibi, quantaque nobis

Vulnera, quas lacrimas peperere minoribu' nostris.

In every age, and in every religion there has been justification for

his bitter words, "tantum religio potuit suadere malorum"--"Such wrongs

Religion in her train doth bring"--yet, one outcome of "a belief in

spiritual beings"--as Tylor defines religion--has been that man has

built an altar of righteousness in his heart. The comparative method

applied to the study of his religious growth has shown how man's

thoughts have widened in the unceasing purpose which runs through his

spiritual no less than his physical evolution. Out of the spiritual

protoplasm of magic have evolved philosopher and physician, as well

as priest. Magic and religion control the uncharted sphere--the

supernatural, the superhuman: science seeks to know the world, and

through knowing, to control it. Ray Lankester remarks that Man is

Nature's rebel, and goes on to say: "The mental qualities which have

developed in Man, though traceable in a vague and rudimentary condition

in some of his animal associates, are of such an unprecedented power and

so far dominate everything else in his activities as a living organism,

that they have to a very large extent, if not entirely, cut him off from

the general operation of that process of Natural Selection and survival

of the fittest which up to their appearance had been the law of the

living world. They justify the view that Man forms a new departure in

the gradual unfolding of Nature's predestined scheme. Knowledge, reason,

self-consciousness, will, are the attributes of Man."(1) It has been

a slow and gradual growth, and not until within the past century has

science organized knowledge--so searched out the secrets of Nature, as

to control her powers, limit her scope and transform her energies. The

victory is so recent that the mental attitude of the race is not yet

adapted to the change. A large proportion of our fellow creatures still

regard nature as a playground for demons and spirits to be exorcised or

invoked.

(1) Sir E. Ray Lankester: Romanes Lecture, "Nature and Man,"

Oxford Univ. Press, 1905, p. 21.

Side by side, as substance and shadow--"in the dark backward and abysm

of time," in the dawn of the great civilizations of Egypt and Babylon,

in the bright morning of Greece, and in the full noontide of modern

life, together have grown up these two diametrically opposite views of

man's relation to nature, and more particularly of his personal relation

to the agencies of disease.

The purpose of this course of lectures is to sketch the main features of

the growth of these two dominant ideas, to show how they have influenced

man at the different periods of his evolution, how the lamp of reason,

so early lighted in his soul, burning now bright, now dim, has never,

even in his darkest period, been wholly extinguished, but retrimmed

and refurnished by his indomitable energies, now shines more and more

towards the perfect day. It is a glorious chapter in history, in which

those who have eyes to see may read the fulfilment of the promise of

Eden, that one day man should not only possess the earth, but that he

should have dominion over it! I propose to take an aeroplane flight

through the centuries, touching only on the tall peaks from which may be

had a panoramic view of the epochs through which we pass.

ORIGIN OF MEDICINE

MEDICINE arose out of the primal sympathy of man with man; out of the

desire to help those in sorrow, need and sickness.

In the primal sympathy

Which having been must ever be;

In the soothing thoughts that spring

Out of human suffering.

The instinct of self-preservation, the longing to relieve a loved one,

and above all, the maternal passion--for such it is--gradually softened

the hard race of man--tum genus humanum primum mollescere coepit. In

his marvellous sketch of the evolution of man, nothing illustrates more

forcibly the prescience of Lucretius than the picture of the growth of

sympathy: "When with cries and gestures they taught with broken words

that 'tis right for all men to have pity on the weak." I heard the

well-known medical historian, the late Dr. Payne, remark that "the basis

of medicine is sympathy and the desire to help others, and whatever is

done with this end must be called medicine."

The first lessons came to primitive man by injuries, accidents, bites

of beasts and serpents, perhaps for long ages not appreciated by his

childlike mind, but, little by little, such experiences crystallized

into useful knowledge. The experiments of nature made clear to him the

relation of cause and effect, but it is not likely, as Pliny suggests,

that he picked up his earliest knowledge from the observation of

certain practices in animals, as the natural phlebotomy of the plethoric

hippopotamus, or the use of emetics from the dog, or the use of enemata

from the ibis. On the other hand, Celsus is probably right in his

account of the origin of rational medicine. "Some of the sick on account

of their eagerness took food on the first day, some on account of

loathing abstained; and the disease in those who refrained was more

relieved. Some ate during a fever, some a little before it, others after

it had subsided, and those who had waited to the end did best. For the

same reason some at the beginning of an illness used a full diet, others

a spare, and the former were made worse. Occurring daily, such things

impressed careful men, who noted what had best helped the sick, then

began to prescribe them. In this way medicine had its rise from

the experience of the recovery of some, of the death of others,

distinguishing the hurtful from the salutary things" (Book I). The

association of ideas was suggestive--the plant eyebright was used for

centuries in diseases of the eye because a black speck in the flower

suggested the pupil of the eye. The old herbals are full of similar

illustrations upon which, indeed, the so-called doctrine of signatures

depends. Observation came, and with it an ever widening experience. No

society so primitive without some evidence of the existence of a healing

art, which grew with its growth, and became part of the fabric of its

organization.

With primitive medicine, as such, I cannot deal, but I must refer to

the oldest existing evidence of a very extraordinary practice, that of

trephining. Neolithic skulls with disks of bone removed have been found

in nearly all parts of the world. Many careful studies have been made

of this procedure, particularly by the great anatomist and surgeon,

Paul Broca, and M. Lucas-Championniere has covered the subject in a

monograph.(2) Broca suggests that the trephining was done by scratching

or scraping, but, as Lucas-Championniere holds, it was also done by a

series of perforations made in a circle with flint instruments, and a

round piece of skull in this way removed; traces of these drill-holes

have been found. The operation was done for epilepsy, infantile

convulsions, headache, and various cerebral diseases believed to be

caused by confined demons, to whom the hole gave a ready method of

escape.

(2) Lucas-Championniere: Trepanation neolithique, Paris,

1912.

The practice is still extant. Lucas-Championniere saw a Kabyle thoubib

who told him that it was quite common among his tribe; he was the son of

a family of trephiners, and had undergone the operation four times,

his father twelve times; he had three brothers also experts; he did not

consider it a dangerous operation. He did it most frequently for pain in

the head, and occasionally for fracture.

The operation was sometimes performed upon animals. Shepherds trephined

sheep for the staggers. We may say that the modern decompression

operation, so much in vogue, is the oldest known surgical procedure.

EGYPTIAN MEDICINE

OUT of the ocean of oblivion, man emerges in history in a highly

civilized state on the banks of the Nile, some sixty centuries ago.

After millenniums of a gradual upward progress, which can be traced in

the records of the stone age, civilization springs forth Minerva-like,

complete, and highly developed, in the Nile Valley. In this sheltered,

fertile spot, neolithic man first raised himself above his kindred races

of the Mediterranean basin, and it is suggested that by the accidental

discovery of copper Egypt "forged the instruments that raised

civilization out of the slough of the Stone Age" (Elliot Smith). Of

special interest to us is the fact that one of the best-known names

of this earliest period is that of a physician--guide, philosopher and

friend of the king--a man in a position of wide trust and importance.

On leaving Cairo, to go up the Nile, one sees on the right in the desert

behind Memphis a terraced pyramid 190 feet in height, "the first large

structure of stone known in history." It is the royal tomb of Zoser, the

first of a long series with which the Egyptian monarchy sought "to adorn

the coming bulk of death." The design of this is attributed to Imhotep,

the first figure of a physician to stand out clearly from the mists of

antiquity. "In priestly wisdom, in magic, in the formulation of wise

proverbs, in medicine and architecture, this remarkable figure of

Zoser's reign left so notable a reputation that his name was never

forgotten, and 2500 years after his death he had become a God of

Medicine, in whom the Greeks, who called him Imouthes, recognized their

own AEsculapius."(3) He became a popular god, not only healing men when

alive, but taking good care of them in the journeys after death. The

facts about this medicinae primus inventor, as he has been called, may

be gathered from Kurt Sethe's study.(4) He seems to have corresponded

very much to the Greek Asklepios. As a god he is met with comparatively

late, between 700 and 332 B.C. Numerous bronze figures of him remain.

The oldest memorial mentioning him is a statue of one of his priests,

Amasis (No. 14765 in the British Museum). Ptolemy V dedicated to him a

temple on the island of Philae. His cult increased much in later days,

and a special temple was dedicated to him near Memphis Sethe suggests

that the cult of Imhotep gave the inspiration to the Hermetic

literature. The association of Imhotep with the famous temple at Edfu is

of special interest.

(3) Breasted: A History of the Ancient Egyptians, Scribner,

New York, 1908, p. 104.

(4) K. Sethe: Imhotep, der Asklepios der Aegypter, Leipzig,

1909 (Untersuchungen, etc., ed. Sethe, Vol. II, No. 4).

Egypt became a centre from which civilization spread to the other

peoples of the Mediterranean. For long centuries, to be learned in all

the wisdom of the Egyptians meant the possession of all knowledge. We

must come to the land of the Nile for the origin of many of man's

most distinctive and highly cherished beliefs. Not only is there a

magnificent material civilization, but in records so marvellously

preserved in stone we may see, as in a glass, here clearly, there

darkly, the picture of man's search after righteousness, the earliest

impressions of his moral awakening, the beginnings of the strife

in which he has always been engaged for social justice and for the

recognition of the rights of the individual. But above all, earlier and

more strongly than in any other people, was developed the faith that

looked through death, to which, to this day, the noblest of their

monuments bear an enduring testimony. With all this, it is not

surprising to find a growth in the knowledge of practical medicine; but

Egyptian civilization illustrates how crude and primitive may remain a

knowledge of disease when conditioned by erroneous views of its nature.

At first, the priest and physician were identified, and medicine never

became fully dissociated from religion. Only in the later periods did

a special group of physicians arise who were not members of priestly

colleges.(6) Maspero states that the Egyptians believed that disease

and death were not natural and inevitable, but caused by some malign

influence which could use any agency, natural or invisible, and very

often belonged to the invisible world. "Often, though, it belongs to

the invisible world, and only reveals itself by the malignity of

its attacks: it is a god, a spirit, the soul of a dead man, that has

cunningly entered a living person, or that throws itself upon him

with irresistible violence. Once in possession of the body, the evil

influence breaks the bones, sucks out the marrow, drinks the blood,

gnaws the intestines and the heart and devours the flesh. The invalid

perishes according to the progress of this destructive work; and death

speedily ensues, unless the evil genius can be driven out of it before

it has committed irreparable damage. Whoever treats a sick person

has therefore two equally important duties to perform. He must first

discover the nature of the spirit in possession, and, if necessary, its

name, and then attack it, drive it out, or even destroy it. He can

only succeed by powerful magic, so he must be an expert in reciting

incantations, and skilful in making amulets. He must then use medicine

(drugs and diet) to contend with the disorders which the presence of the

strange being has produced in the body."(6)

(5) Maspero: Life in Ancient Egypt and Assyria, London,

1891, p. 119.

(6) Maspero: Life in Ancient Egypt and Assyria, London,

1891, p. 118.

(7) W. Wreszinski: Die Medizin der alten Aegypter, Leipzig,

J. C. Hinrichs, 1909-1912.

In this way it came about that diseases were believed to be due to

hostile spirits, or caused by the anger of a god, so that medicines,

no matter how powerful, could only be expected to assuage the pain; but

magic alone, incantations, spells and prayers, could remove the disease.

Experience brought much of the wisdom we call empirical, and the

records, extending for thousands of years, show that the Egyptians

employed emetics, purgatives, enemata, diuretics, diaphoretics and

even bleeding. They had a rich pharmacopoeia derived from the animal,

vegetable and mineral kingdoms. In the later periods, specialism reached

a remarkable development, and Herodotus remarks that the country was

full of physicians;--"One treats only the diseases of the eye, another

those of the head, the teeth, the abdomen, or the internal organs."

Our knowledge of Egyptian medicine is derived largely from the

remarkable papyri dealing specially with this subject. Of these, six or

seven are of the first importance. The most famous is that discovered by

Ebers, dating from about 1500 B.C. A superb document, one of the

great treasures of the Leipzig Library, it is 20.23 metres long and 30

centimetres high and in a state of wonderful preservation. Others are

the Kahun, Berlin, Hearst and British Museum papyri. All these have now

been published--the last three quite recently, edited by Wreszinski.(7)

I show here a reproduction from which an idea may be had of these

remarkable documents. They are motley collections, filled with

incantations, charms, magical formulae, symbols, prayers and

prescriptions for all sorts of ailments. One is impressed by the

richness of the pharmacopoeia, and the high development which the art

of pharmacy must have attained. There were gargles, salves, snuffs,

inhalations, suppositories, fumigations, enemata, poultices and

plasters; and they knew the use of opium, hemlock, the copper salts,

squills and castor oil. Surgery was not very highly developed, but

the knife and actual cautery were freely used. Ophthalmic surgery was

practiced by specialists, and there are many prescriptions in the papyri

for ophthalmia.

One department of Egyptian medicine reached a high stage of development,

vis., hygiene. Cleanliness of the dwellings, of the cities and of the

person was regulated by law, and the priests set a splendid example in

their frequent ablutions, shaving of the entire body, and the spotless

cleanliness of their clothing. As Diodorus remarks, so evenly ordered

was their whole manner of life that it was as if arranged by a learned

physician rather than by a lawgiver.

Two world-wide modes of practice found their earliest illustration in

ancient Egypt. Magic, the first of these, represented the attitude of

primitive man to nature, and really was his religion. He had no idea

of immutable laws, but regarded the world about him as changeable and

fickle like himself, and "to make life go as he wished, he must be able

to please and propitiate or to coerce these forces outside himself."(8)

(8) L. Thorndike: The Place of Magic in the Intellectual

History of Europe, New York, 1905, p. 29.

The point of interest to us is that in the Pyramid Texts--"the oldest

chapter in human thinking preserved to us, the remotest reach in the

intellectual history of man which we are now able to discern"(9)--one of

their six-fold contents relates to the practice of magic. A deep belief

existed as to its efficacy, particularly in guiding the dead, who

were said to be glorious by reason of mouths equipped with the charms,

prayers and ritual of the Pyramid Texts, armed with which alone could

the soul escape the innumerable dangers and ordeals of the passage

through another world. Man has never lost his belief in the efficacy

of magic, in the widest sense of the term. Only a very few of the most

intellectual nations have escaped from its shackles. Nobody else has

so clearly expressed the origins and relations of magic as Pliny in

his "Natural History."(10) "Now, if a man consider the thing well,

no marvaile it is that it hath continued thus in so great request and

authoritie; for it is the onely Science which seemeth to comprise in

itselfe three possessions besides, which have the command and rule

of mans mind above any other whatsoever. For to begin withall, no man

doubteth but that Magicke tooke root first, and proceeded from Physicke,

under the presence of maintaining health, curing, and preventing

diseases: things plausible to the world, crept and insinuated farther

into the heart of man, with a deepe conceit of some high and divine

matter therein more than ordinarie, and in comparison whereof, all

other Physicke was but basely accounted. And having thus made way and

entrance, the better to fortifie it selfe, and to give a goodly colour

and lustre to those fair and flattering promises of things, which our

nature is most given to hearken after, on goeth the habite also and

cloake of religion: a point, I may tell you, that even in these daies

holdeth captivate the spirit of man, and draweth away with it a greater

part of the world, and nothing so much. But not content with this

successe and good proceeding, to gather more strength and win a

greater name, shee entermingled with medicinable receipts and religious

ceremonies, the skill of Astrologie and arts Mathematicall; presuming

upon this, That all men by nature are very curious and desirous to know

their future fortunes, and what shall betide them hereafter, persuading

themselves, that all such foreknowledge dependeth upon the course and

influence of the starres, which give the truest and most certain light

of things to come. Being thus wholly possessed of men, and having their

senses and understanding by this meanes fast ynough bound with three

sure chains, no marvell if this art grew in processe of time to such

an head, that it was and is at this day reputed by most nations of

the earth for the paragon and cheefe of all sciences: insomuch as

the mightie kings and monarchs of the Levant are altogether ruled and

governed thereby."

(9) Breasted: Development of Religion and Thought in

Ancient Egypt, New York, 1912, p. 84.

(10) The Historie of the World, commonly called the Naturall

Historie of C. Plinius Secundus, translated into English by

Philemon Holland, Doctor in Physieke, London, 1601, Vol. II,

p. 371, Bk. XXX, Chap. I, Sect. 1.

The second world-wide practice which finds its earliest record among

the Egyptians is the use secretions and parts of the animal body as

medicine. The practice was one of great antiquity with primitive man,

but the papyri already mentioned contain the earliest known records.

Saliva, urine, bile, faeces, various parts of the body, dried and

powdered, worms, insects, snakes were important ingredients in the

pharmacopoeia. The practice became very widespread throughout the

ancient world. Its extent and importance may be best gathered from

chapters VII and VIII in the 28th book of Pliny's "Natural History."

Several remedies are mentioned as derived from man; others from the

elephant, lion, camel, crocodile, and some seventy-nine are prepared

from the hyaena. The practice was widely prevalent throughout the

Middle Ages, and the pharmacopoeia of the seventeenth and even of the

eighteenth century contains many extraordinary ingredients. "The Royal

Pharmacopoeia" of Moses Charras (London ed., 1678), the most scientific

work of the day, is full of organotherapy and directions for the

preparation of medicines from the most loathsome excretions. A curious

thing is that with the discoveries of the mummies a belief arose as to

the great efficacy of powdered mummy in various maladies. As Sir Thomas

Browne remarks in his "Urn Burial": "Mummy has become merchandize.

Mizraim cures wounds, and Pharaoh is sold for balsams."

One formula in everyday use has come to us in a curious way from the

Egyptians. In the Osiris myth, the youthful Horus loses an eye in his

battle with Set. This eye, the symbol of sacrifice, became, next to the

sacred beetle, the most common talisman of the country, and all museums

are rich in models of the Horus eye in glass or stone.

"When alchemy or chemistry, which had its cradle in Egypt, and derived

its name from Khami, an old title for this country, passed to the hands

of the Greeks, and later of the Arabs, this sign passed with it. It

was also adopted to some extent by the Gnostics of the early Christian

church in Egypt. In a cursive form it is found in mediaeval translations

of the works of Ptolemy the astrologer, as the sign of the planet

Jupiter. As such it was placed upon horoscopes and upon formula

containing drugs made for administration to the body, so that the

harmful properties of these drugs might be removed under the influence

of the lucky planet. At present, in a slightly modified form, it still

figures at the top of prescriptions written daily in Great Britain

(Rx)."(11)

(11) John D. Comrie: Medicine among the Assyrians and

Egyptians in 1500 B.C., Edinburgh Medical Journal, 1909, n.

s., II, 119.

For centuries Egyptian physicians had a great reputation, and in the

Odyssey (Bk. IV), Polydamna, the wife of Thonis, gives medicinal plants

to Helen in Egypt--"a country producing an infinite number of drugs

. . . where each physician possesses knowledge above all other men."

Jeremiah (xlvi, 11) refers to the virgin daughter of Egypt, who should

in vain use many medicines. Herodotus tells that Darius had at his court

certain Egyptians, whom he reckoned the best skilled physicians in all

the world, and he makes the interesting statement that: "Medicine is

practiced among them on a plan of separation; each physician treats

a single disorder, and no more: thus the country swarms with medical

practitioners, some under taking to cure diseases of the eye, others of

the head, others again of the teeth, others of the intestines, and some

those which are not local."(12)

(12) The History of Herodotus, Blakesley's ed., Bk. II, 84.

A remarkable statement is made by Pliny, in the discussion upon the

use of radishes, which are said to cure a "Phthisicke," or ulcer of the

lungs--"proofe whereof was found and seen in AEgypt by occasion that the

KK. there, caused dead bodies to be cut up, and anatomies to be made,

for to search out the maladies whereof men died."(13)

(13) Pliny, Holland's translation, Bk. XIX, Chap. V, Sect.

26.

The study of the anatomy of mummies has thrown a very interesting light

upon the diseases of the ancient Egyptians, one of the most prevalent

of which appears to have been osteo-arthritis. This has been studied by

Elliot Smith, Wood Jones, Ruffer and Rietti. The majority of the lesions

appear to have been the common osteo-arthritis, which involved not only

the men, but many of the pet animals kept in the temples. In a much

higher proportion apparently than in modern days, the spinal column was

involved. It is interesting to note that the "determinative" of old age

in hieroglyphic writing is the picture of a man afflicted with arthritis

deformans. Evidences of tuberculosis, rickets and syphilis, according to

these authors, have not been found.

A study of the internal organs has been made by Ruffer, who has shown

that arterio-sclerosis with calcification was a common disease 8500

years ago; and he holds that it could not have been associated with hard

work or alcohol, for the ancient Egyptians did not drink spirits, and

they had practically the same hours of work as modern Egyptians, with

every seventh day free.

ASSYRIAN AND BABYLONIAN MEDICINE

OF equally great importance in the evolution of medicine was the

practically contemporary civilization in Mesopotamia. Science here

reached a much higher stage then in the valley of the Nile. An elaborate

scheme of the universe was devised, a system growing out of the

Divine Will, and a recognition for the first time of a law guiding

and controlling heaven and earth alike. Here, too, we find medicine

ancillary to religion. Disease was due to evil spirits or demons. "These

'demons'--invisible to the naked eye were the precursors of the modern

'germs' and 'microbes,' while the incantations recited by the priests

are the early equivalents of the physician's prescriptions. There

were different incantations for different diseases; and they were

as mysterious to the masses as are the mystic formulas of the modern

physician to the bewildered, yet trusting, patient. Indeed, their

mysterious character added to the power supposed to reside in the

incantations for driving the demons away. Medicinal remedies accompanied

the recital of the incantations, but despite the considerable progress

made by such nations of hoary antiquity as the Egyptians and Babylonians

in the diagnosis and treatment of common diseases, leading in time to

the development of an extensive pharmacology, so long as the cure

of disease rested with the priests, the recital of sacred formulas,

together with rites that may be conveniently grouped under the head of

sympathetic magic, was regarded as equally essential with the taking of

the prescribed remedies."(14)

(14) Morris Jastrow: The Liver in Antiquity and the

Beginnings of Anatomy. Transactions College of Physicians,

Philadelphia, 1907, 3. s., XXIX, 117-138.

Three points of interest may be referred to in connection with

Babylonian medicine. Our first recorded observations on anatomy are in

connection with the art of divination--the study of the future by the

interpretation of certain signs. The student recognized two divisions

of divination--the involuntary, dealing with the interpretation of signs

forced upon our attention, such as the phenomena of the heavens, dreams,

etc., and voluntary divination, the seeking of signs, more particularly

through the inspection of sacrificial animals. This method reached an

extraordinary development among the Babylonians, and the cult spread to

the Etruscans, Hebrews, and later to the Greeks and Romans.

Of all the organs inspected in a sacrificial animal the liver, from its

size, position and richness in blood, impressed the early observers as

the most important of the body. Probably on account of the richness in

blood it came to be regarded as the seat of life--indeed, the seat of

the soul. From this important position the liver was not dislodged for

many centuries, and in the Galenic physiology it shared with the heart

and the brain in the triple control of the natural, animal and vital

spirits. Many expressions in literature indicate how persistent was this

belief. Among the Babylonians, the word "liver" was used in hymns and

other compositions precisely as we use the word "heart," and Jastrow

gives a number of illustrations from Hebrew, Greek and Latin sources

illustrating this usage.

The belief arose that through the inspection of this important organ in

the sacrificial animal the course of future events could be predicted.

"The life or soul, as the seat of life, in the sacrificial animal is,

therefore, the divine element in the animal, and the god in accepting

the animal, which is involved in the act of bringing it as an offering

to a god, identifies himself with the animal--becomes, as it were, one

with it. The life in the animal is a reflection of his own life,

and since the fate of men rests with the gods, if one can succeed in

entering into the mind of a god, and thus ascertain what he purposes to

do, the key for the solution of the problem as to what the future has in

store will have been found. The liver being the centre of vitality--the

seat of the mind, therefore, as well as of the emotions--it becomes in

the case of the sacrificial animal, either directly identical with the

mind of the god who accepts the animal, or, at all events, a mirror in

which the god's mind is reflected; or, to use another figure, a watch

regulated to be in sympathetic and perfect accord with a second watch.

If, therefore, one can read the liver of the sacrificial animal, one

enters, as it were, into the workshop of the divine will."(15)

(15) Morris Jastrow: loc. cit., p. 122.

Hepatoscopy thus became, among the Babylonians, of extraordinary

complexity, and the organ of the sheep was studied and figured as early

as 3000 B.C. In the divination rites, the lobes, the gall-bladder, the

appendages of the upper lobe and the markings were all inspected with

unusual care. The earliest known anatomical model, which is here shown,

is the clay model of a sheep's liver with the divination text dating

from about 2000 B.C., from which Jastrow has worked out the modern

anatomical equivalents of the Babylonian terms. To reach a decision on

any point, the phenomena of the inspection of the liver were carefully

recorded, and the interpretations rested on a more or less natural and

original association of ideas. Thus, if the gall-bladder were swollen on

the right side, it pointed to an increase in the strength of the King's

army, and was favorable; if on the left side, it indicated rather

success of the enemy, and was unfavorable. If the bile duct was long, it

pointed to a long life. Gallstones are not infrequently mentioned in

the divination texts and might be favorable, or unfavorable. Various

interpretations were gathered by the scribes in the reference note-books

which serve as guides for the interpretation of the omens and for

text-books of instructions in the temple schools (Jastrow).

The art of divination spread widely among the neighboring nations. There

are many references in the Bible to the practice. The elders of Moab

and Midian came to Balaam "with the rewards of divination in their hand"

(Numbers xxii, 7). Joseph's cup of divination was found in Benjamin's

sack (Genesis xliv, 5, 12); and in Ezekiel (xxi, 21) the King of Babylon

stood at the parting of the way and looked in the liver. Hepatoscopy was

also practiced by the Etruscans, and from them it passed to the

Greeks and the Romans, among whom it degenerated into a more or less

meaningless form. But Jastrow states that in Babylonia and Assyria,

where for several thousand years the liver was consistently employed

as the sole organ of divination, there are no traces of the rite having

fallen into decay, or having been abused by the priests.

In Roman times, Philostratus gives an account of the trial of Apollonius

of Tyana,(16) accused of human hepatoscopy by sacrificing a boy in

the practice of magic arts against the Emperor. "The liver, which the

experts say is the very tripod of their art, does not consist of pure

blood; for the heart retains all the uncontaminated blood, and irrigates

the whole body with it by the conduits of the arteries; whereas the

gall, which is situated next the liver, is stimulated by anger and

depressed by fear into the hollows of the liver."

We have seen how early and how widespread was the belief in amulets and

charms against the occult powers of darkness. One that has persisted

with extraordinary tenacity is the belief in the Evil Eye the power

of certain individuals to injure with a look. Of general belief in the

older civilizations, and referred to in several places in the Bible,

it passed to Greece and Rome, and today is still held fervently in many

parts of Europe. The sign of "le corna,"--the first and fourth fingers

extended, the others turned down and the thumb closed over them,--still

used against the Evil Eye in Italy, was a mystic sign used by the Romans

in the festival of Lemuralia. And we meet with the belief also in this

country. A child with hemiplegia, at the Infirmary for Diseases of the

Nervous System, Philadelphia, from the central part of Pennsylvania, was

believed by its parents to have had the Evil Eye cast upon it.

The second contribution of Babylonia and Assyria to medicine--one that

affected mankind profoundly--relates to the supposed influence of the

heavenly bodies upon man's welfare. A belief that the stars in their

courses fought for or against him arose early in their civilizations,

and directly out of their studies on astrology and mathematics. The

Macrocosm, the heavens that "declare the glory of God," reflect, as in

a mirror, the Microcosm, the daily life of man on earth. The first step

was the identification of the sun, moon and stars with the gods of

the pantheon. Assyrian astronomical observations show an extraordinary

development of practical knowledge. The movements of the sun and moon

and of the planets were studied; the Assyrians knew the precession of

the equinoxes and many of the fundamental laws of astronomy, and the

modern nomenclature dates from their findings. In their days the signs

of the zodiac corresponded practically with the twelve constellations

whose names they still bear, each division being represented by the

symbol of some god, as the Scorpion, the Ram, the Twins, etc. "Changes

in the heavens . . . portended changes on earth. The Biblical expression

'hosts of heaven' for the starry universe admirably reflects the

conception held by the Babylonian astrologers. Moon, planets and stars

constituted an army in constant activity, executing military manoeuvres

which were the result of deliberation and which had in view a fixed

purpose. It was the function of the priest--the barqu, or 'inspector,'

as the astrologer as well as the 'inspector' of the liver was called--to

discover this purpose. In order to do so, a system of interpretation was

evolved, less logical and less elaborate than the system of hepatoscopy,

which was analyzed in the preceding chapter, but nevertheless meriting

attention both as an example of the pathetic yearning of men to

peer into the minds of the gods, and of the influence that

Babylonian-Assyrian astrology exerted throughout the ancient world"

(Jastrow).(17)

(16) Philostratus: Apollonius of Tyana, Bk. VIII, Chap.

VII, Phillimore's transl., Oxford, 1912, II, 233. See,

also, Justin: Apologies, edited by Louis Pautigny, Paris,

1904, p. 39.

(17) M. Jastrow: Aspects of Religious Belief and Practice

in Babylonia and Assyria, New York, 1911, p. 210.

With the rationalizing influence of the Persians the hold of astrology

weakened, and according to Jastrow it was this, in combination with

Hebrew and Greek modes of thought, that led the priests in the three

centuries following the Persian occupation, to exchange their profession

of diviners for that of astronomers; and this, he says, marks the

beginning of the conflict between religion and science. At first an

expression of primitive "science," astrology became a superstition, from

which the human mind has not yet escaped. In contrast to divination,

astrology does not seem to have made much impression on the Hebrews and

definite references in the Bible are scanty. From Babylonia it passed to

Greece (without, however, exerting any particular influence upon Greek

medicine). Our own language is rich in words of astral significance

derived from the Greek, e.g., disaster.

The introduction of astrology into Europe has a passing interest.

Apparently the Greeks had made important advances in astronomy before

coming in contact with the Babylonians,--who, in all probability,

received from the former a scientific conception of the universe. "In

Babylonia and Assyria we have astrology first and astronomy afterwards,

in Greece we have the sequence reversed--astronomy first and astrology

afterwards" (Jastrow).(18)

(18) M. Jastrow: Aspects of Religious Belief and Practice

in Babylonia and Assyria, New York, 1911, p. 256.

It is surprising to learn that, previous to their contact with the

Greeks, astrology as relating to the individual--that is to say,

the reading of the stars to determine the conditions under which the

individual was born--had no place in the cult of the Babylonians and

Assyrians. The individualistic spirit led the Greek to make his gods

take note of every action in his life, and his preordained fate might

be read in the stars.--"A connecting link between the individual and the

movements in the heavens was found in an element which they shared in

common. Both man and stars moved in obedience to forces from which there

was no escape. An inexorable law controlling the planets corresponded to

an equally inexorable fate ordained for every individual from his birth.

Man was a part of nature and subject to its laws. The thought could

therefore arise that, if the conditions in the heavens were studied

under which a man was born, that man's future could be determined in

accord with the beliefs associated with the position of the planets

rising or visible at the time of birth or, according to other views, at

the time of conception. These views take us back directly to the system

of astrology developed by Babylonian baru priests. The basis on which

the modified Greek system rests is likewise the same that we have

observed in Babylonia--a correspondence between heaven and earth, but

with this important difference, that instead of the caprice of the

gods we have the unalterable fate controlling the entire universe--the

movements of the heavens and the life of the individual alike"

(Jastrow).(19)

(19) Ibid., pp. 257-258.

From this time on until the Renaissance, like a shadow, astrology

follows astronomy. Regarded as two aspects of the same subject, the one,

natural astrology, the equivalent of astronomy, was concerned with the

study of the heavens, the other, judicial astrology, was concerned with

the casting of horoscopes, and reading in the stars the fate of the

individual.

As I mentioned, Greek science in its palmy days seems to have been very

free from the bad features of astrology. Gilbert Murray remarks that

"astrology fell upon the Hellenistic mind as a new disease falls upon

some remote island people." But in the Greek conquest of the Roman mind,

astrology took a prominent role. It came to Rome as part of the great

Hellenizing movement, and the strength of its growth may be gauged from

the edicts issued against astrologers as early as the middle of the

second century B.C. In his introduction to his recent edition of Book II

of the Astronomicon of Manilius, Garrod traces the growth of the

cult, which under the Empire had an extraordinary vogue. "Though these

(heavenly) signs be far removed from us, yet does he (the god) so make

their influences felt, that they give to nations their life and their

fate and to each man his own character."(20) Oracles were sought on all

occasions, from the planting of a tree to the mating of a horse, and the

doctrine of the stars influenced deeply all phases of popular thought

and religion. The professional astrologers, as Pliny(21) says, were

Chaldeans, Egyptians and Greeks. The Etruscans, too, the professional

diviners of Rome, cultivated the science. Many of these "Isiaci

conjectores" and "astrologi de circo" were worthless charlatans, but

on the whole the science seems to have attracted the attention of

thoughtful men of the period. Garrod quotes the following remarkable

passage from Tacitus: "My judgment wavers," he says, "I dare not say

whether it be fate and necessity immutable which governs the changing

course of human affairs--or just chance. Among the wisest of the

ancients, as well as among their apes, you will find a conflict of

opinion. Many hold fixedly the idea that our beginning and our end--that

man himself--is nothing to the Gods at all. The wicked are in prosperity

and the good meet tribulation. Others believe that Fate and the facts

of this world work together. But this connection they trace not to

planetary influences but to a concatenation of natural causes. We choose

our life that is free: but the choice once made, what awaits us is fixed

and ordered. Good and evil are different from the vulgar opinion of

them. Often those who seem to battle with adversity are to be accounted

blessed; but the many, even in their prosperity, are miserable. It needs

only to bear misfortune bravely, while the fool perishes in his wealth.

Outside these rival schools stands the man in the street. No one will

take from him his conviction that at our birth are fixed for us the

things that shall be. If some things fall out differently from what was

foretold, that is due to the deceit of men that speak what they know

not: calling into contempt a science to which past and present alike

bear a glorious testimony" (Ann. vi, 22).

(20) Manili Astronomicon Liber II, ed. H. W. Garrod, Oxford,

1911, p. lxix, and II, ll. 84-86.

(21) Pliny: Natural History, Bk. XVIII, Chap. XXV, Sect.

57.

Cato waged war on the Greek physicians and forbade "his uilicus all

resort to haruspicem, augurem, hariolum Chaldaeum," but in vain; so

widespread became the belief that the great philosopher, Panaetius (who

died about 111 B.C.), and two of his friends alone among the stoics,

rejected the claims of astrology as a science (Garrod). So closely

related was the subject of mathematics that it, too, fell into

disfavor, and in the Theodosian code sentence of death was passed upon

mathematicians. Long into the Middle Ages, the same unholy alliance

with astrology and divination caused mathematics to be regarded with

suspicion, and even Abelard calls it a nefarious study.

The third important feature in Babylonian medicine is the evidence

afforded by the famous Hammurabi Code (circa 2000 B.C.)--a body of laws,

civil and religious, many of which relate to the medical profession.

This extraordinary document is a black diorite block 8 feet high, once

containing 21 columns on the obverse, 16 and 28 columns on the reverse,

with 2540 lines of writing of which now 1114 remain, and surmounted by

the figure of the king receiving the law from the Sun-god. Copies of

this were set up in Babylon "that anyone oppressed or injured, who had

a tale of woe to tell, might come and stand before his image, that of a

king of righteousness, and there read the priceless orders of the King,

and from the written monument solve his problem" (Jastrow). From the

enactments of the code we gather that the medical profession must have

been in a highly organized state, for not only was practice regulated

in detail, but a scale of fees was laid down, and penalties exacted

for malpraxis. Operations were performed, and the veterinary art was

recognized. An interesting feature, from which it is lucky that we have

in these days escaped, is the application of the "lex talionis"--an eye

for an eye, bone for a bone, and tooth for a tooth, which is a striking

feature of the code.

Some of the laws of the code may be quoted:

Paragraph 215. If a doctor has treated a gentleman for a severe wound

with a bronze lances and has cured the man, or has opened an abscess of

the eye for a gentleman with the bronze lances and has cured the eye of

the gentleman, he shall take ten shekels of silver.

218. If the doctor has treated a gentleman for a severe wound with a

lances of bronze and has caused the gentleman to die, or has opened

an abscess of the eye for a gentleman and has caused the loss of the

gentleman's eye, one shall cut off his hands.

219. If a doctor has treated the severe wound of a slave of a poor man

with a bronze lances and has caused his death, he shall render slave for

slave.

220. If he has opened his abscess with a bronze lances and has made him

lose his eye, he shall pay money, half his price.

221. If a doctor has cured the shattered limb of a gentleman, or has

cured the diseased bowel, the patient shall give five shekels of silver

to the doctor.

224. If a cow doctor or a sheep doctor has treated a cow or a sheep for

a severe wound and cured it, the owner of the cow or sheep shall give

one-sixth of a shekel of silver to the doctor as his fee.(22)

(22) The Oldest Code of Laws in the World; translated by C.

H. W. Johns, Edinburgh, 1903.

HEBREW MEDICINE

THE medicine of the Old Testament betrays both Egyptian and Babylonian

influences; the social hygiene is a reflex of regulations the origin

of which may be traced in the Pyramid Texts and in the papyri. The

regulations in the Pentateuch codes revert in part to primitive times,

in part represent advanced views of hygiene. There are doubts if the

Pentateuch code really goes back to the days of Moses, but certainly

someone "learned in the wisdom of the Egyptians" drew it up. As

Neuburger briefly summarizes:

"The commands concern prophylaxis and suppression of epidemics,

suppression of venereal disease and prostitution, care of the skin,

baths, food, housing and clothing, regulation of labour, sexual life,

discipline of the people, etc. Many of these commands, such as Sabbath

rest, circumcision, laws concerning food (interdiction of blood and

pork), measures concerning menstruating and lying-in women and those

suffering from gonorrhoea, isolation of lepers, and hygiene of the

camp, are, in view of the conditions of the climate, surprisingly

rational."(23)

(23) Neuburger: History of Medicine, Oxford University

Press, 1910, Vol. I, p. 38.

Divination, not very widely practiced, was borrowed, no doubt, from

Babylonia. Joseph's cup was used for the purpose, and in Numbers, the

elders of Balak went to Balaam with the rewards of divination in their

hands. The belief in enchantments and witchcraft was universal, and the

strong enactments against witches in the Old Testament made a belief in

them almost imperative until more rational beliefs came into vogue in

the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

Whatever view we may take of it, the medicine of the New Testament is

full of interest. Divination is only referred to once in the Acts (xvi,

16), where a damsel is said to be possessed of a spirit of divination

"which brought her masters much gain by soothsaying." There is only one

mention of astrology (Acts vii, 43); there are no witches, neither

are there charms or incantations. The diseases mentioned are numerous:

demoniac possession, convulsions, paralysis, skin diseases,--as

leprosy,--dropsy, haemorrhages, fever, fluxes, blindness and deafness.

And the cure is simple usually a fiat of the Lord, rarely with a prayer,

or with the use of means such as spittle. They are all miraculous,

and the same power was granted to the apostles--"power against unclean

spirits, to cast them out, to heal all manner of sickness and all manner

of disease." And more than this, not only the blind received their

sight, the lame walked, the lepers were cleansed, the deaf heard, but

even the dead were raised up. No question of the mandate. He who went

about doing good was a physician of the body as well as of the soul, and

could the rich promises of the Gospel have been fulfilled, there would

have been no need of a new dispensation of science. It may be because

the children of this world have never been able to accept its hard

sayings--the insistence upon poverty, upon humility, upon peace that

Christianity has lost touch no less with the practice than with the

principles of its Founder. Yet, all through the centuries, the Church

has never wholly abandoned the claim to apostolic healing; nor is there

any reason why she should. To the miraculous there should be no

time limit--only conditions have changed and nowadays to have a

mountain-moving faith is not easy. Still, the possession is cherished,

and it adds enormously to the spice and variety of life to know that men

of great intelligence, for example, my good friend, Dr. James J. Walsh

of New York, believe in the miracles of Lourdes.(24) Only a few weeks

ago, the Bishop of London followed with great success, it is said, the

practice of St. James. It does not really concern us much--as Oriental

views of disease and its cure have had very little influence on

the evolution of scientific medicine--except in illustration of the

persistence of an attitude towards disease always widely prevalent,

and, indeed, increasing. Nor can we say that the medicine of our great

colleague, St. Luke, the Beloved Physician, whose praise is in the

Gospels, differs so fundamentally from that of the other writings of the

New Testament that we can claim for it a scientific quality. The stories

of the miracles have technical terms and are in a language adorned

by medical phraseology, but the mental attitude towards disease

is certainly not that of a follower of Hippocrates, nor even of a

scientifically trained contemporary of Dioscorides.(25)

(24) Psychotherapy, New York, 1919, p. 79, "I am convinced

that miracles happen there. There is more than natural power

manifest."

(25) See Luke the Physician, by Harnack, English ed., 1907,

and W. K. Hobart, The Medical Language of St. Luke, 1882.

CHINESE AND JAPANESE MEDICINE

CHINESE medicine illustrates the condition at which a highly

intellectual people may arrive, among whom thought and speculation were

restricted by religious prohibitions. Perhaps the chief interest in its

study lies in the fact that we may see today the persistence of views

about disease similar to those which prevailed in ancient Egypt and

Babylonia. The Chinese believe in a universal animism, all parts being

animated by gods and spectres, and devils swarm everywhere in numbers

incalculable. The universe was spontaneously created by the operation

of its Tao, "composed of two souls, the Yang and the Yin; the Yang

represents light, warmth, production, and life, as also the celestial

sphere from which all those blessings emanate; the Yin is darkness,

cold, death, and the earth, which, unless animated by the Yang or

heaven, is dark, cold, dead. The Yang and the Yin are divided into an

infinite number of spirits respectively good and bad, called shen and

kwei; every man and every living being contains a shen and a kwei,

infused at birth, and departing at death, to return to the Yang and the

Yin. Thus man with his dualistic soul is a microcosmos, born from the

Macrocosmos spontaneously. Even every object is animated, as well as the

Universe of which it is a part."(26)

(26) J. J. M. de Groot: Religious System of China, Vol. VI,

Leyden, 1910, p. 929.

In the animistic religion of China, the Wu represented a group of

persons of both sexes, who wielded, with respect to the world of

spirits, capacities and powers not possessed by the rest of men. Many

practitioners of Wu were physicians who, in addition to charms and

enchantments, used death-banishing medicinal herbs. Of great antiquity,

Wu-ism has changed in some ways its outward aspect, but has not altered

its fundamental characters. The Wu, as exorcising physicians and

practitioners of the medical art, may be traced in classical literature

to the time of Confucius. In addition to charms and spells, there were

certain famous poems which were repeated, one of which, by Han Yu, of

the T'ang epoch, had an extraordinary vogue. De Groot says that the

"Ling," or magical power of this poem must have been enormous, seeing

that its author was a powerful mandarin, and also one of the loftiest

intellects China has produced. This poetic febrifuge is translated in

full by de Groot (VI, 1054-1055), and the demon of fever, potent chiefly

in the autumn, is admonished to begone to the clear and limpid waters of

the deep river.

In the High Medical College at Court, in the T'ang Dynasty, there

were four classes of Masters, attached to its two High Medical Chiefs:

Masters of Medicine, of Acupuncture, of Manipulation, and two Masters

for Frustration by means of Spells.

Soothsaying and exorcism may be traced far back to the fifth and sixth

centuries B.C.

In times of epidemic the specialists of Wu-ism, who act as seers,

soothsayers and exorcists, engage in processions, stripped to the waist,

dancing in a frantic, delirious state, covering themselves with blood by

means of prick-balls, or with needles thrust through their tongues, or

sitting or stretching themselves on nail points or rows of sword edges.

In this way they frighten the spectres of disease. They are nearly

all young, and are spoken of as "divining youths," and they use an

exorcising magic based on the principle that legions of spectres prone

to evil live in the machine of the world. (De Groot, VI, 983-985.)

The Chinese believe that it is the Tao, or "Order of the Universe,"

which affords immunity from evil, and according to whether or no the

birth occurred in a beneficent year, dominated by four double cyclical

characters, the horoscope is "heavy" or "light." Those with light

horoscopes are specially prone to incurable complaints, but much harm

can be averted if such an individual be surrounded with exorcising

objects, if he be given proper amulets to wear and proper medicines to

swallow, and by selecting for him auspicious days and hours.

Two or three special points may be referred to. The doctrine of the

pulse reached such extraordinary development that the whole practice

of the art centred round its different characters. There were scores

of varieties, which in complication and detail put to confusion the

complicated system of some of the old Graeco-Roman writers. The basic

idea seems to have been that each part and organ had its own proper

pulse, and just as in a stringed instrument each chord has its own tone,

so in the human body, if the pulses were in harmony, it meant health; if

there was discord, it meant disease. These Chinese views reached

Europe in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and there is a very

elaborate description of them in Floyer's well-known book.(27) And the

idea of harmony in the pulse is met with into the eighteenth century.

(27) Sir John Floyer: The Physician's Pulse Watch, etc.,

London, 1707.

Organotherapy was as extensively practiced in China as in Egypt. Parts

of organs, various secretions and excretions are very commonly used. One

useful method of practice reached a remarkable development, viz., the

art of acupuncture--the thrusting of fine needles more or less deeply

into the affected part. There are some 388 spots on the body in which

acupuncture could be performed, and so well had long experience taught

them as to the points of danger, that the course of the arteries may be

traced by the tracts that are avoided. The Chinese practiced inoculation

for smallpox as early as the eleventh century.

Even the briefest sketch of the condition of Chinese medicine leaves the

impression of the appalling stagnation and sterility that may afflict a

really intelligent people for thousands of years. It is doubtful if they

are today in a very much more advanced condition than were the Egyptians

at the time when the Ebers Papyrus was written. From one point of view

it is an interesting experiment, as illustrating the state in which

a people may remain who have no knowledge of anatomy, physiology or

pathology.

Early Japanese medicine has not much to distinguish it from the Chinese.

At first purely theurgic, the practice was later characterized by

acupuncture and a refined study of the pulse. It has an extensive

literature, largely based upon the Chinese, and extending as far back as

the beginning of the Christian era. European medicine was introduced by

the Portuguese and the Dutch, whose "factory" or "company" physicians

were not without influence upon practice. An extraordinary stimulus was

given to the belief in European medicine by a dissection made by

Mayeno in 1771 demonstrating the position of the organs as shown in

the European anatomical tables, and proving the Chinese figures to be

incorrect. The next day a translation into Japanese of the anatomical

work of Kulmus was begun, and from its appearance in 1773 may be dated

the commencement of reforms in medicine. In 1793, the work of de Gorter

on internal medicine was translated, and it is interesting to know that

before the so-called "opening of Japan" many European works on medicine

had been published. In 1857, a Dutch medical school was started in Yedo.

Since the political upheaval in 1868, Japan has made rapid progress in

scientific medicine, and its institutions and teachers are now among the

best known in the world.(28)

(28) See Y. Fujikawa, Geschichte der Medizin in Japan,

Tokyo, 1911.

The Evolution of Modern Medicine A Series of Lectures Delivered at Yale University on the Silliman Foundation in April, 1913 · 第 1 / 6 章