I have been speaking in the present: I should have spoken in the past.

It was shortly after Fidèle's appointment--in the early autumn--that I

first made his and Sorel's acquaintance.

I was teaching in an evening school, not far from Madeira Place, and

among my scholars was Sorel's only son, a boy of perhaps fourteen, whom

his father had left behind, for a time, at school in France, and had but

lately brought over. He was a shy, modest, intelligent little fellow,

utterly out of place in his rude surroundings. From the pleasant village

home-school, of which he sometimes told me, to the _Maison Sorel_, was a

grating change.

He was always waiting for me at the schoolroom door, and was always the

last one to speak to me at closing. Perhaps I reminded him of some young

usher whom he had known when life was more pleasant.

If, however, the _Maison Sorel_ chafed Auguste, it was not for lack of

affection on his father's part Sorel often came with him to the door of

the school-room; and every night, rain or shine, he was there at nine to

accompany him home. It was in this way that I first came to know Sorel;

and whether it was from some kindness that Auguste may have thought

I showed, or because I could talk a little French, Sorel took a great

liking to me. At first, he and Auguste would walk with me a few blocks

after school; then he would look in upon me for a few minutes at the

law-office where I was studying, where I had a large anteroom to myself;

finally, nothing would do but that I should visit him at his house. I

had always been fond of strolling about the wharves, and I should have

liked very well to stop occasionally at Sorel's, if I could have been

allowed to sit in the kitchen and hear the general conversation. But

this was not sufficient state for “M. le maître d'école.” I must be

drawn off upstairs to the bedroom parlor, to hear of Auguste's virtues.

Such devotion I have seldom seen. Sorel would have praised Auguste, with

tears in his eyes, for hours together, if I would have stayed to listen.

He had many things to show in that parlor. He had gyroscopes: and he

would wind them up and set half-a-dozen of those anti-natural tops

spinning straight out in the air for my diversion. There were great

sacks of uninflated balloons, and delicate sheet-rubber, from which

Sorel made up balloons. There were other curious things in rubber,--a

tobacco-pouch, for example, in perfect outward imitation of an iron

kilogramme-weight, with a ring to lift it by, warranted to create

“immense surprise” among those who should lift it for iron;

tobacco-pouches, too, in fac-simile of lobsters and crabs and reptiles,

colored to nature, which Sorel assured me would cause roars of laughter

among my friends: there was no pleasanter way, he said, of entertaining

an evening company than suddenly to display one of these creatures,

and make the ladies scream and run about. He presented me, at different

times, with a gyroscope, a kilogramme-weight and a lobster with a blue

silk lining.

As time ran on, and, in the early winter, I began practice, Sorel

brought me a little business. He had to sue two Graeco-Roman wrestlers

for board and attach their box-office receipts. Some Frenchman had heard

of a little legacy left him in the Calvados, and wanted me to look up

the matter.

Fidèle, too, came to me every quarter-day, to make oath before me to his

pension certificate, and stopped and made a short call. He had little to

say about France. His great romance had been the war, although it

seemed to have fused itself into a hazy, high-colored dream of danger,

excitement, suffering, and generous devotion. Tears always rose in his

eyes when he spoke of “_la république?_”

In those first days of practice, anything by the name of law business

wore a halo, and I used to encourage Sorel's calls, partly for this

reason and partly for practice in talking French with a common man. I

hoped to go to France some day, and I wanted to be able then to talk not

only with the grammatical, but with the dear people who say, “I guess

likely,” and “How be you?” in French.

Moreover, Sorel was rather amusing. He was something of a humorist. Once

he came to tell me, excitedly, that Auguste was learning music: “_Il

touche au violon,--mais_--'e play so _bien!_” And Sorel's eyes opened in

wonder at the boy's quickness.

“Who teaches him?” I asked. “Some Frenchman who plays in the theatre?”

“_Mais_, no,” Sorel replied, with a broad drollery in his eye; “_un

professeur d'occasion!_” It was a ruined music-teacher, engaged now

in selling balloons from Madeira Place, who was the “_professeur

d'occasion_.”

One day Sorel appeared with a great story to tell. Auguste, it seemed,

had wearied of home, and was determined to go to sea. Nothing could

deter him. Whereupon M. Sorel had hit upon a stratagem. He had hunted

up, somewhere along the wharves, two French sailors with conversational

powers, and had retained them to stay at his house for two or three

days, as chance comers. It was inevitable that Auguste should ply them

with eager questions,--and they knew their part.

As Sorel, entering into the situation now with all his dramatic nature,

with his eyes wide open, repeated to me some of the tales of horror

which they had palmed off upon innocent Auguste as spontaneous truth, I

could see, myself, the rigging covered with ice an inch thick; sailors

climbing up (“Ah! _comme ils grimpent,--ils grimpent!_”) bare-handed,

their hands freezing to the ropes at every touch, and leaving flesh

behind, “_comme_ if you put your tongue to a lam'post in the winter.”

I could see the seamen's backs cut up with lashes for the slightest

offences; I tasted the foul, unwholesome food. I think that Sorel half

believed it all himself,--his imagination was so powerful,--forgetting

that he had paid in silver coin for every word of it. At any rate, the

ruse had been successful. Auguste had been thoroughly scared and had

consented to stay at home, and the most threatening cloud of Sorel's

life had blown over.

Usually, however, Sorel and I talked politics; and to our common

pleasure we generally agreed. Sorel knew very little about the details

of our government, and he would listen to me with the utmost eagerness

while I practised my French upon him, explaining to his wondering mind

the relations of the States to each other and to the general government,

and the system of State and Federal courts. He was very quick, and he

took in the ingenious scheme with great facility. Then he would tell me

about the workings of government in the French villages and departments;

and as he read French papers, he had always something in the way of news

or explanation of recent events. I have since come to believe that he

was exceedingly well informed.

The most singular thing about him to me was how he could cherish on the

one hand such devotion as he plainly did, to France, and on the other

hand such a passionate attachment to the United States. In truth, that

double patriotism is one of the characteristic features of our country.

I could lead him, in twenty minutes, through the whole gamut of emotion,

by talking about Auguste, and then of politics. It was irresistible,

the temptation to lead him out. A word about Auguste, and he would wipe

tears from his eyes. A mention of Gambetta, and the bare idea filled

him with enthusiasm; he was instantly, in imagination, one of a surging

crowd, throwing his hat in the air, or drawing Gambetta's carriage

through the streets of Paris. I had only to speak of Alsace to bring

him to a mood of sullen ugliness and hatred. He was, I have no doubt,

a pretty good-tempered man; he was certainly warm-hearted; his apparent

harshness to his balloon-venders was probably nothing more than

necessary parental severity, and he was always ready to recognize their

successes. But I have never seen a more wicked and desperate expression

than an allusion to Alsace called up in his face and in his whole

bearing. Sometimes he would laugh, when I mentioned the severed

province; but it was with a hard, metallic, cruel laugh.' He felt the

loss as he would have felt the loss of a limb. The first time I brought

up the topic, I saw the whole bitter story of the dismembering of

France.

There was another subject which called out that same bitter revengeful

look, and that cruel nasal laugh,--the royalist factions and the

Bonapartists. When we spoke of them, and I watched his face and heard

his soulless laughter, I saw the French Revolution.

But he could always be brought back to open childish delight and warmth

by a reference to the United States. Our government, in his eyes,

embodied all that was good. France was now a “_république_,” to be sure,

and he rejoiced in the fact; but he plainly felt the power and settled

stability of our republic, and he seemed to have a filial devotion

toward it closely akin to his love for Auguste.

How fortunate we were! Here were no _Légitimistes_, no _Orléanistes_, no

_Bonapartistes_, for a perpetual menace! Here all citizens, however

else their views might differ, believed, at least, in the republic,

and desired to stay her hands. There were no factions here continually

plotting in the darkness. Here the machinery of government was all in

view, and open to discussion and improvement Ah, what a proud, happy

country is this!”_Que c'est une république!_”

I gathered enthusiasm myself from this stranger's ardor for the country

of his adoption. I think that I appreciated better, through him, the

free openness of our institutions. It is of great advantage to meet an

intense man, of associations different from your own, who, by his very

intensity and narrowness, instantly puts you at his standpoint. I viewed

the United States from the shores of a sister republic which has

to contend against strong and organized political forces not fully

recognized in the laws, working beneath the surface, which nevertheless

are facts.

One acquaintance leads to another. Through Sorel, whose house was the

final resort of Frenchmen in distress, and their asylum if they were

helpless, not only Fidèle, but a number of other Frenchmen of that

neighborhood, began to come to me with their small affairs. I was the

_avocat_ who “speak French.” I am afraid that they were surprised at my

“French” when they heard it.

There was a willow-worker from the Pas-de-Calais, a deformed man,

walking high and low, and always wanting to rise from his chair and lay

his hand upon my shoulder, as he talked, who came to consult me about

the recovery of a hundred francs which he had advanced at _Anvers_ to

a Belgian tailor upon the pledge of a sewing-machine, on consideration

that the tailor, who was to come in a different steamer, should take

charge of the willow-worker's dog on the voyage: the willow-worker had a

wife and six children to look after. This was a lofty contest; but I

had time then. I found a little amusement in the case, and I had the

advantage of two or three hours in all of practical French conversation

with men thoroughly in earnest. Finally, I had the satisfaction of

settling their dispute, and so keeping them from a quarrel.

Then there was a French cook, out of a job, who wanted me to find him a

place. He was gathering mushrooms, meanwhile, for the hotels. One day he

surprised me by coming into my office in a white linen cap, brandishing

in his hand a long, gleaming knife. He only desired, however, to tell

me that he had found a place at one of the clubs, and to show, in his

pride, the shining blade which he had just bought as his equipment.

But the man who impressed me most, after Sorel, was Carron. He first

appeared as the friend of the cook,--whom he introduced to me, with many

flourishes and compliments, although he was an utter stranger himself.

Carron was a well-built and rather handsome man, of medium height,

and was then perhaps fifty years of age. He had a remarkably bright,

intelligent face, curling brown hair, and a full, wavy brown beard. He

kept a rival boarding-house, not far from Sorel's, in a gabled wooden

house two hundred years old, which was anciently the home of an eminent

Puritan divine. In the oak-panelled room where the theologian wrote his

famous tract upon the Carpenter who Profanely undertook to Dispense the

Word in the way of Public Ministration, and was Divinely struck Dumb in

consequence, Carron now sold beer from a keg.

It was plain at a glance that his present was not of a piece with his

past I could not place him. His manners were easy and agreeable, and

yet he was not a gentleman. He was well informed, and evidently of some

mental training, and yet he was not quite an educated man. After his

first visit to me, with the cook, he, too, occasionally looked in upon

me, generally late in the afternoon, when I could call the day's work

done and could talk French for half an hour with him, in place of taking

a walk. He was strongly dramatic, like Sorel, but in a different

way. Sorel was intense; Carron was _théâtral_. He was very fond of

declamation; and seeing from the first my wish to learn French,--which

Sorel would never very definitely recognize,--he often recited to me,

for ear practice, and in an exceedingly effective way, passages from the

Old Testament. He seemed to know the Psalms by heart. He was a good deal

of an actor, and he took the part of a Hebrew prophet with great effect.

But his fervor was all stage fire, and he would turn in an instant from

a denunciatory Psalm to a humorous story. Even his stories were of

a religious cast, like those which ministers relate when they gather

socially. He told me once about a priest who was strolling along the

bank of the Loire, when a drunken sailor accosted him and reviled him as

a lazy good-for-nothing, a _fainéant_, and slapped his face. The priest

only turned the other cheek to him. “Strike again,” he said; and the

sailor struck. “Now, my friend,” said the priest, “the Scripture tells

us that when one strikes us we are to turn the other cheek. There

it ends its instruction and leaves us to follow our own judgment.”

Whereupon, being a powerful man, he collared the sailor and plunged him

into the water. He told me, too, with great unction, and with a roguish

gleam in his eye, a story of a small child who was directed to prepare

herself for confession, and, being given a manual for self-examination,

found the wrong places, and appeared with this array of sins: “I have

been unfaithful to my marriage vows.... I have not made the tour of my

diocese.”

Carron had an Irish wife (_une Irlandaise_), much younger than he, whom

he worshipped. He told me, one day, about his courtship. When he first

met her, she knew not a word of French, and he not a word of English.

He was greatly captivated (épris), and he had to contrive some mode of

communication. They were both Catholics. He had a prayer-book with Latin

and French in parallel columns; she had a similar prayer-book but in

Latin and English. They would seat themselves; Carron would find in his

prayer-book a sentence in French which would suit his turn, on a pinch,

and through the medium of the Latin would find the corresponding passage

in English in Norah's prayer-book and point it out to her. Norah, in

her turn, would select and point out some passage in English which would

serve as a tribute to Carron's charms, and he would discover in his

prayer-book, in French, what that tribute was. Why should we deem the

dead languages no longer a practical study, when Latin can gain for a

Frenchman an Irish wife!

Carron, as I have said, puzzled me. He had not the pensive air of one

who has seen better days. He was more than cheerful in his present life:

he was full of spirits; and yet it was plain that he had been brought

up for something different. I asked him once to tell me, for French

lessons, the story of his life. With the most charming complaisance, he

at once consented; but he proceeded in such endless detail, the first

time, in an account of his early boyhood in a strict Benedictine

monastery school, in the south of France, as to suggest that he was

talking against time. And although his spirited and amusing picture of

his childhood days only awakened my curiosity, I could never persuade

him to resume the history. It was always “the next time.”

He seemed to be poor: but he never asked a favor except for others. On

the contrary, he brought me some little business. A _Belge_ had been

cheated out of five hundred dollars; I recovered half of it for him.

A Frenchman from _le Midi_ had bought out a little business, and the

seller had immediately set up shop next door; I succeeded in shutting up

the rival. I was a prodigy.

After a time I was told something further as to Carron's life. He had

been a Capuchin monk, in a monastery at or near Paris. The instant that

I heard this statement, I felt in my very soul that it was true. My

eye had always missed something in Carron. I now knew exactly what it

was,--a shaved crown, bare feet, and a cowl.

It was the usage for the brethren of his order to go about Paris

barefoot, begging. They were not permitted by the _concierges_ to go

into the great apartment hotels. But “Carron, _il est très fin_,” said

my informant; “you know,--'e is var' smart.” Carron would learn, by

careful inquiry, the name of a resident on an upper floor; then he would

appear at the _concierge's_ door, and would mention the name of this

resident with such adroit, demure, and absolute confidence that he would

be permitted at once to ascend. Once inside, he would go the rounds of

the apartments. So he would get five times as much in a day as any of

his fellows. A certain amount of the receipts he would yield up to the

treasury of the monastery; the rest he kept for himself. After a while

this came to be suspected, and he quietly withdrew to a new country.

There was not the slightest tangible corroboration of this story. It

might have been the merest gossip or the invention of an enemy. But it

fitted Carron so perfectly, that from the day I heard it I could never,

somehow, question its substantial truth. If I had questioned it, I

should have repeated the story to him, to give him an opportunity to

answer. But something warned me not to do so.

Fidèle held on well at the custom-house, and I think that he became a

general favorite. No one who took the old soldier by the hand and looked

him in the eye could question his absolute honesty; and as for skill in

his duties,--well, it was the custom-house.

But he was not saving much money. He was free to give and free to lend

to his fellow-countrymen; and, moreover, various ways were pointed

out to him by Mr. Fox, from time to time, in which an old soldier,

delighting to aid his country, could serve her pecuniarily. The

republic,--that is, the Republicans,--it was all one.

One afternoon, late in summer, Fidèle appeared at my office. He seldom

visited me, except quarterly for his pension affidavit. As he came in

now, I saw that something had happened. His grisly face wore the same

kindly smile that it had always borne, but the light had gone out of it.

His story was short. He had lost his place. He had been notified that

his services would not be needed after Saturday. No reason had been

given him; he was simply dismissed in humiliation. There must be some

misunderstanding, such as occurs between the warmest friends. And was

not the great government his friend? Did it not send him his pension

regularly? Had it not sent a special messenger to seek him out, in his

obscurity, for this position; and was he not far better suited to it now

than at the outset?

In reply to questions from me, he told me more about Mr. Fox's first

visit than I had hitherto known. I asked him, in a casual way, about the

ward-meetings, and whether the French citizens generally attended them.

No, they had been dropping off; they had become envious, perhaps, of

him; they had formed a club, with Carron for president, and had voted to

act in a body (_en solidarité_).

Then I told Fidèle that I knew no way to help him, and that I feared his

dismission was final. He could not understand me, but went away, leaning

on his cane, dragging his left foot sidewise behind him, with something

of the air of an old faithful officer who has been deprived of his

sword.

He had not been gone more than an hour, when the door opened again, and

Carron looked in. Seeing that I was alone, he closed the door and walked

very slowly toward my desk,--erect, demure, impassive, looking straight

forward and not at me, with an air as if he were bearing a candle in

high mass, intoning, as he came, a passage from the Psalms: “_Je me

ré-jouirai; je partagerai Sichem, et je mesurerai la vallée de Succoth.

Galaad sera à moi, Manassé sera à moi.... Moab sera le bassin où je

me laverai et je jetterai mon soulier sur Édom.... Qui est-ce qui me

conduira dans la ville forte? Qui est-ce qui me conduira jusquen Édom?_”

(I will rejoice; I will divide Shechem and mete out the valley of

Succoth. Gilead is mine; Ma-nasseh is mine.... Moab is my washpot; over

Edom will I cast out my shoe.... Who will bring me into the strong city?

Who will lead me into Edom?)

Carron propounded the closing inquiry with great unction; his manner

expressed entire confidence that some one would be found to lead him

into the strong city, to lead him into Edom.

I had lost something of my interest in Carron since I had heard the

story of his Parisian exploits; but I could not help being amused at his

manner. It portended something. He made no disclosure, however. Whatever

he had to tell, he went away without telling it, contenting himself

for the present with intimating by his triumphal manner that great good

fortune was in the air.

On Saturday afternoon, as I was about closing my desk,--a little earlier

than usual, for it was a most tempting late September day, and the waves

of the harbor, which I could just see from my office window, called

loudly to me,--Sorel appeared. I held out my hand, but he affected not

to see it, and he sat down without a word. He was plainly disturbed and

somewhat excited.

Of course I knew that it was his old friend's misfortune which weighed

upon him; he was proud and fond of Fidèle.

I seated myself, and waited for him to speak. In a moment he began, with

a low, hard laugh: “_Semble que notre bon Fidèle a sa démission_: you

know,--our Fidèle got bounced!”

Yes, I said, Fidèle had told me so, and I was very sorry to hear it.

“_Evidemment_” (this in a tone of irony) “_il faut un homme plus juste,

plus loyale, que le pauvre Fidèle!_ (You know,--they got to 'ave one more

honester man!) _Bien!_ You know who goin' 'ave 'is place?”

In Madeira Place 1887 · 第 4 / 8 题