Humanity has not slept on this subject, though it has as yet

accomplished little. A boarding-house has been established in New York

for working-girls, excellent in its way, but intended mainly for those

who "have seen better days," and not for the most needy class of which

I have spoken. A noble institution, however, called "The Working

Woman's Protective Union," has sprung up, for the benefit of this

latter class, their object being to find places _in the country_, for

such of these girls as will leave the overcrowded city, not as

servants, but as operatives on sewing-machines, and to other similar

revenues of employment. Their places are secured before they are sent.

The person who engages them pays their expenses on leaving, and the

consent of parents, or guardians, or friends, is always obtained

before they leave. A room is to be connected with this institution,

containing several sewing-machines, where gratuitous instruction will

be furnished to those who desire it. A lawyer of New York has

generously volunteered his services also, to collect the too tardy

wages of these girls, due from flinty-hearted employers. Many of the

girls who have applied here are under fifteen. At first, they utterly

refused to go into the country, which to them was only another name

for dullness; even preferring to wander up and down the streets of the

city, half-fed and half-clothed, in search of employment, than to

leave its dear kaleidoscope delights. But after a little, when letters

came from some who had gone, describing in glowing terms, their

pleasant homes; the wages that one could live and save money on; their

kind treatment; the good, wholesome food and fresh air; their hearty,

jolly country fun; and more than all, when it was announced that one

of their number had actually married an ex-governor, the matter took

another aspect. And, though all may not marry governors, and some may

not marry at all; it still remains, that _inducing them to go to the

country is striking a brave blow at the root of the evil_; for we all

know, that human strength and human virtue have their limits; and the

dreadful pressure of temptations and present ease, upon the

discouragement, poverty and friendlessness of the working-girls of New

York, must be gratifying to the devil. I do not hesitate to say, that

there is no institution of the present day, more worthy to be

sustained, or that more imperatively challenges the good works and

good wishes of the benevolent, than "The New York Working Woman's

Protective Union." May God speed it!

_WASHING THE BABY._

You may think it a very simple thing to wash a baby. You may imagine

that one feels quite calm and composed, while this operation is being

faithfully and conscientiously performed. That shows how little you

know. When I tell you that there are four distinct, delicate chins, to

be dodgingly manipulated, between frantic little crying spells, and as

many little rolls of fat on the back of the neck, that have to be

searched out and bathed, with all the endearing baby-talk you can

command, the while, as a blind to your merciless intentions; when I

tell you that of all things, baby won't have her ears or nose meddled

with, and that she resents any infringement on her toes with shrill

outbreaks, and that it takes two people to open her chubby little

fists, when water seeks to penetrate her palms. When I tell you the

masterly strategy that has to be used to get one stiff, little,

rebellious arm out of a cambric sleeve, and the frantic kickings which

accompany any attempts to tie on her little red worsted-shoe; when I

tell you that she objects altogether to be turned over on her stomach,

in order to tie the strings of her frock, and that she is just as mad

when you lay her on her back; when I inform you that she can stiffen

herself out when she likes, so that you can't possibly make her sit

down, and at another time will curl herself up in a circle, so that

you can't possibly straighten her out; and when you enumerate the

garments that have to be got off, and got on, before this process is

finally concluded, and that it is to be done before a baking fire,

without regard to the state of the thermometer, or the agonized dew on

your brow; when I inform you that every now and then you must stop in

the process, to see that she is not choking, or strangling, or that

you have not dislocated any of her funny little legs, or arms, or

injured her bobbing little head, you can form some idea of the relief

when the last string is tied, and baby emerges from this, her daily

misery, into a state of rosy, diamond-eyed, scarlet-lipped, content;

looking sweet and fresh as a rosebud, and drowsing off in your arms

with quivering white eyelids and pretty unknown murmurings of the

little half-smiling lips, while the perfect little waxen hands lie

idly by her side. Ah me! how shall one keep from spoiling a baby? Ah!

how can one ever give brimming enough love-measure--to this--_the

motherless_.

_CHILDREN HAVE THEIR RIGHTS._

There is not a day of my life in which I am not vexed at the injustice

done to children. A Sunday or two since, I went to church. In the pew

directly in front of me sat a fine little lad, about twelve years old,

unobtrusively taking notes of the sermon. By my side sat a

man--gentleman, I suppose, he called himself--his coat, pants, boots,

and linen were all right as far as I am any judge, and dress seems to

be the test now-a-days--who occupied himself in leaning over the front

of the pew, and reading what the boy was writing--evidently much to

the discomfiture of the latter. Now I would like to ask, why that

child's pencilled notes should not have been as safe from curious eyes

as if he had been an adult? and what right that grown-up man had, to

bother and annoy him, by impertinently peeping over his shoulder? and

of what use is it to preach good manners to children, while nobody

thinks it worth while to practice the same toward them? The other day

I was sitting in a car, and a nice, well-behaved boy of ten years took

his seat and paid his fare. Directly after, in came the conductor, and

without a word of comment, coolly took him by the shoulder and placed

him on his feet, and then motioned a lady to his vacant seat? Why not

_ask_ the child, at least? I have often been struck with the ready

civility of boys in this respect, in public conveyances--but that is

no reason why they should be imposed upon; the lady who took the seat

might possibly have thanked a _gentleman_ for yielding it to her, but

she evidently did not think that good manners required she should

thank the boy. Again--what right has a gentleman to take a blushing

little girl of twelve or thirteen and seat her on his knee, when he

happens to want her seat. I have seen timid, bashful girls, suffering

crucifixion at the smiles called forth by this free and easy act; and

sometimes actually turning away their faces to conceal tears of

mortification; for there are little female children unspoiled even by

the present bold system of childhood annihilation--little violets who

seek the shade, and do not care to be handled and pulled about by

every passer-by. Again--why will parents, or those who have the charge

of children, make hypocrites of them by saying, Go kiss such and such

a person? A kiss is a holy thing, or should be, and not to be lightly

bestowed. At any rate, it never should be compulsorily given. Children

have their likes and dislikes, and often much more rationally grounded

than those of grown people, though they may not be able to syllable

them. I never shall forget a snuffy old lady whom I used to be

obliged, when a child, to kiss. I am not at all sure that my

unconquerable aversion to every form of tobacco does not date from

these repulsive and compulsory kisses. With what a lingering horror I

approached her, and with what a shiver of disgust I retreated to scrub

my lips with my pinafore, and shake my locks, lest peradventure a

particle of snuff had lodged there. How I wondered what she would do

in Heaven without that snuff-box, for she was a "church member," and

my notions of Heaven could by no stretch of liberality admit such a

nuisance; and how I inwardly vowed that if I ever grew to be a woman,

and if I ever was married, and if I ever had a little girl, all of

which were dead certainties in my childish future, I would never make

her kiss a person unless she chose to do it, never--never--which

article of my pinafore creed I do here publicly indorse with my

matronly hand.

* * * * *

Again, what more abominable tyranny than to force a child to eat

turnip, or cabbage, or fat meat or anything else for which it has an

unconquerable and unexplainable disgust? I have seen children actually

shudder and turn pale at being obliged to swallow such things. Pray,

why should not their wishes in this respect be regarded as much as

those of their seniors? Not that a child should eat everything which

it craves indiscriminately, but it should never, in my opinion, be

forced to swallow what is unpalatable, except in the case of medicine,

about which parents tell such fibs--that it "tastes good," and all

that--when they should say honestly, "It is very bad indeed, but you

know you _must_ take it, and the sooner it is over the better; now be

brave and swallow it." I do protest too against forcing big boys to

wear long curls down their backs after they are well into jackets, for

the gratification of mamma's pride, who "can't bear to cut them off,"

not even though her boy skulks out of sight of every "fellow" he meets

for fear of being called a "girl-boy;" or the practice making a boy of

that age wear an apron, which the "fellows" are quite as apt to twit

him about, or anything else which makes him look odd or ridiculous.

There is no computing the suffering of children in these respects. I

dare say many who read this will say, "But they should be taught not

to mind such things," etc.; that's all very well to say, but suppose

you try it yourself;--suppose you were compelled to walk into church

on Sunday with a collar that covered your cheeks, and your

great-grand-father's coat and vest on; to hear the suppressed titters,

and be an object of remark every time you stirred; and you a man who

hated notoriety, and felt like knocking everybody down who stared at

you? How would that suit? Nothing like bringing a case home to

yourself. Just sit down and recall your own childhood, and remember

the big lumps in your little throat that seemed like to choke you, and

the big tears of shame that came rolling down on your jacket, from

some such cause, and don't go through the world striding with your

grown-up boots on little children. They are not all angels, I know;

some of them are malicious, and ugly, and selfish and disagreeable;

and whose fault is it?--answer me that? Not one time in ten, the

child's. You may be sure of it. God made it right, but there were

bunglers who undertook a charge from which an angel might shrink.

* * * * *

And now I want to put in a plea for the children about story-reading.

At a certain age, children of both sexes delight in stories. It is as

natural, as it is for them to skip, run and jump, instead of walking

at the staid pace of their grandparents. Now some parents, very well

meaning ones too, think they do a wise thing when they deny this most

innocent craving, any legitimate outlet. They wish to cultivate, they

say, "a taste for solid reading." They might as well begin to feed a

new-born baby on meat, lest nursing should vitiate its desire for it.

The taste for meat will come when the child has teeth to chew it; so

will the taste for "solid reading" as the mind matures--_i. e._, if it

is not made to hate it, by having it forced violently upon its

attention during the story-loving period. That "there is a time for

all things," is truer of nothing more, than of this. Better far that

parents should admit it, and _wisely_ indulge it, than, by a too

severe repression, give occasion for _stealthy_ promiscuous reading.

* * * * *

How delicious in these days of hot-house-childhood it is to find a

little one who can relish puss in the corner. To find one who does

not at six years of age turn up its little nose at everything but

"round dances," and a supper of "pâté de foie gras" and champagne.

What a sorrowful sight are those blasé languid little things who are

incapable of a new sensation before they are out of short clothes--to

whom already there is no childhood left--who have turned their backs

on that path of flowers to which they can never return, through long

years of satiety and weariness. What shall compensate them for the

dear, fresh, innocent, simple delights, which to children, naturally

and simply brought up, are so attractive? We are all making grave

mistakes about children. Those who unfortunately live always in a

great city, are mostly the sufferers. Life there is such a maelstrom,

swallowing up every hour so much that is lovely and beautiful.

Fathers, and mothers, delegating so much of the care and oversight of

them to those, whose paid service yields neither sympathy nor

appreciation to the victims under their charge. Toy shops are

ransacked, and small fortunes expended, to supply this lamentable

deficiency; till the weary little one at six or seven has exhausted

the stock, and sighs for "something new;" like a flirt who has put her

slipper on a thousand hearts, or a man of the world, reduced by too

much money and leisure, and too little brains, to caress the head of

his cane, long, weary hours, staring out of his club window. I think

this is very pitiful, both for the child and the man. Indeed it is

children so brought up, who make such men, and women of a

corresponding type. Life seems fast losing its simplicity merely for

want of the brave courage to defy fashion's encroachments. "What will

they think?" is at the bottom of it. Who among us has pluck enough to

snap our fingers at that question, and face the formidable--"_Did you

ever?_" which treads upon the heels of independent thought and action,

even in a right and obviously sensible direction. Nor is it a question

of sex. I find as much of this spirit, or the want of it, in one sex

as in the other, and the children are the victims.

Now children naturally hate fine clothes and the restrictions upon

freedom and enjoyment that they impose. Children naturally prefer live

animals, to the pink dogs, and blue sheep, and green cows, presented

in a wooden "Noah's Ark." Children naturally prefer a garden and a

shovel, to a stereotyped lounge, with a silent cross nurse, over city

pavements. Children should be put to bed by loving hands, and their

eyes closed with a kiss, as our cherished dead pass into the land of

silence. Children should leap into loving arms when they again open

their eyes with the baptism of the fresh morning light.

Children should be kept in ignorance of nearly all that is now as

familiar to their ears as their own names. But, alas! we all know how

different things really are, and the result--is the children of

to-day--children, with rare and blessed exceptions, only in name. Oh!

the perpetual "nurse;" the perpetual nursery! The sad sight of the

spirit-weary little child checked in its most innocent and healthy

impulses; called "naughty," for being buoyant and merry, till

sullenness and defiant mischief are the result. Oh, mother in the

parlor, take off that silk dress which little feet may not climb upon,

and take a seat in your own nursery, and give that little one the

love, without which its whole sweet nature shall be turned into

bitterness. Oh, father, at the sound of whose footstep that child must

_always_ "hush up" or beat a hasty retreat to parts unknown--how much,

how _very_ much you lose, when never that little face grows brighter

that "papa has come home;" when, with your hands thrust into your

coat-pocket, you lounge along toward your door, and never invite with

your love that dear blessed little nose, to flatten itself against the

window-pane, watching for "my papa."

_My_ papa! Good heavens! what is it to be Senator, Member of Congress,

President, _King_, to that? "_My_ papa!" Man! what can you be thinking

of, that the sweet, trustful, blessed ownership in those two little

words, fails to move every drop of your blood? And what can the wide

earth, with all its cheating promises, give you, in compensation for

that which your short-sighted folly throws away? Oh, _sometimes_, stop

and think of that.

_MOURNING._

It is very strange how differently people are affected by a great

bereavement. One desires nothing so much as to flee as far as possible

from any scene, or association, which shall recall the lost. Every

relic he would banish forever from his presence. The spot where his

dead was laid he would never revisit, and, if possible, never

remember. When the anniversary of death occurs, no person should

allude to it in his presence; he would himself prefer to glide

obliviously over it. Another finds comfort and solace in the very

opposite course. He desires nothing so much as that the little

favorite home-surroundings of the dead should remain unchanged, as if

the owner were still living. He would sit down among them, and recall

by these silent mementoes every cherished look and tone; jealously

recording every detail and circumstance, lest memory should prove

unfaithful to her trust. Everything worn by the form now lifeless,

would he have often before his eyes, touching their folds with

caressing fingers. At the table and by the hearth, rising up and

sitting down, going out and coming in, would he evoke the dear

presence. He would pass through the streets where so often his dead

have passed with him. The place of that friend's sepulture, is to him

the place of all places where he would oftenest go. He plants there

his favorite flowers, and woos for them the balmiest air and warmest

sunshine. He reads over the name and date of birth and burial, each

time as if they were not already indelibly engraven on his memory; and

still, though months and years may have passed in this way, whenever

he catches himself saying, "It was about the time when our John," or

"our Mary, died," he will still shiver, as when the first time he had

occasion to couple death with that household name.

Again: One person on the death of a friend, is punctiliously

solicitous that no etiquette of mourning habiliments should be

disregarded, to the remotest fraction of an inch as to quantity; and

that the quality and fashioning of the same should be according to the

strictest rules laid down by custom on such occasions; considering all

variation from it, although demanded by health or comfort, as a

disrespect to the dead.

Another is scarcely conscious that he wears these outward tokens; or,

if so, knows little and cares less whether all the minutiæ of depth,

width and blackness is punctiliously followed. Attention to these

details seems to him a mockery, from which he turns impatiently away.

The whole world seems to him already draped in sable; what matters,

then, this intrusive pettiness? And that any one should measure the

depth of his loss by the width of a hem or a veil, or the fashion of a

hat, or the material of a garment, seems to him too monstrous an

absurdity for credence. And when he hears the common expression that

such a person is "in _half mourning_" it is so utterly repulsive to

him, that he almost feels that he should honor the dead more by a

total breach of the custom, than by its observance.

In truth, it may be a question whether a genuine grief can exist in

the artificial atmosphere where these slavish mourning etiquettes are

cultivated. The devil himself probably knew this; and contrived this

ingenious way to turn the mass of mankind aside from sober reflection

at a time when the march of life stands still.

When the bolt falls, which sooner or later strikes every man's house,

how philosophically lookers-on reason about it. How practically

unconscious are they, while gazing at the blood-besprinkled door-post

of a neighbor, that the advancing finger of Destiny is already pointed

at their own, as they plan for happy years to come the future of

husband, wife, child, brother and sister, as if _for them_ there was

immunity from dissolution and disruption. No acceleration of pulse, no

heart-quiver, when the funeral train passes by, or the sad face looks

out from its frame of sable; for no sweet bright face is missing from

_their_ little band. No pained ear listens at _their_ fireside for the

light footfall that will never come. No street is avoided in _their_

daily walks, which agonizingly suggests a floating form once watched

and waited for there. Nor may the passing stranger, whose step and

voice stir the troubled fountain of your tears, know by what personal

magnetism he has evoked your dead, and chained you to linger, and

look, and feed your excited fancy, till the impulse to throw yourself

on that strange heart and weep, almost sweeps away cold propriety.

_Ah! the difference, whether the hearse stands before one's own door,

or one's neighbor's._ And yet, how else could we all live on, playing

at jack-straws, as we do, day after day, while a momentous future

little by little unfolds itself? How else would one have courage to go

on planting what another hand than his shall surely reap; and what

pleasure would there be beneath the sun, if one sat crouching, and

listening for the step of the executioner, or clasping wild arms of

protection round the dear ones. Merciful indeed is it, that we can

travel on in to-day's sunshine, trusting to our Guide to shelter us,

when the storm shall gather and break over our heads.

_TO YOUNG GIRLS._

I wonder how many girls tell their mothers everything? _Not_ those

"young ladies" who, going to and from school, smile, bow, and exchange

notes and cartes de visite with young men, who are perfect strangers

to them. I grant this may all be done thoughtlessly and innocently,

for "fun," and without any wrong intention; but surely--surely--such

young girls should be told that not in this spirit will it be

received; and that to hold themselves in so cheap estimation, is

certainly to invite insult, how disguised soever it may be in the form

of compliment and flattery. Imagine a knot of young men making fun of

you and your "picture;" speaking of you in a way that would make your

cheeks burn with shame, could you hear it. All this, most credulous

and romantic young ladies, they will do, although they gaze at your

fresh young face admiringly, and send or give you charming verses and

bouquets. No matter what "other girls do;" don't _you_ do it. No

matter how "ridiculous" it is that you have "never had an offer,

although you were fifteen last spring;" there is time enough, and to

spare, yet. Girls who, falling in love, insist on getting married when

they are babies, will find that studying after marriage is tedious

work. A premature, faded, vacant old age!--you surely cannot desire

_that_. When is your mind to be informed, or to grow, if you place it

in a hot-house, that only the flower of Love be forced into early

bloom, to the dwarfing of every other faculty? And even should such a

foolish school flirtation end in early marriage, how long, think you,

before your husband would weary of a wife who only knew enough to talk

about dress or dancing? How painful for you to be silent, through

ignorance, should you chance to have intelligent guests at your house.

How painful, when your only charm, youth and its prettiness, has

faded, to find your husband gradually losing sight of you, as his mind

expanded, and yours grew still narrower, with the inevitable cares,

that only the _brain_ of a sensible woman can keep from overwhelming

her. How painful, as time passes on, and your children grow up about

you, to hear them talk intelligently on subjects of which you scarcely

know the names.

And this, remember, is taking the most _favorable_ view of the result

of school-girl flirtations. They _may_ end far more disastrously, as

many a foolish, wretched young girl could tell you.

But let us not talk of this. Your yearning for some one to love you,

and you only, is natural and right; it is a great need of every

woman's heart. But there is a time for everything; and it is wisdom

before seeking this to wait. Your choice at fifteen would be very

different from your choice at twenty. A man who would quite suit you

then, would only disgust and weary you when you grew older. Till

school-days are over, therefore, you can well afford to let love rest.

Don't let the bloom and freshness of your heart be brushed off in

silly flirtations. Study all you can and keep your health. Render

yourself _truly_ intelligent. And, above all, tell your mother

everything. "Fun" in _your_ dictionary would sometimes be

_indiscretion_ in hers. It will do you no harm to look and see. Never

be ashamed to tell her, who should be your best friend and confidant,

all you think and feel. She was once a girl herself; she had _her_

dreams, and can understand it. Not having been always as wise as she

is now, she can spare you many a pang of humiliation and regret if you

will profit by her advice.

Folly as It Flies; Hit at by Fanny Fern · 第 13 / 20 段