PROLOGUE

Certain persons have reproached the Author for knowing no more about

the language of the olden times than hares do of telling stories.

Formerly these people would have been vilified, called cannibals,

churls, and sycophants, and Gomorrah would have been hinted at as

their natal place. But the Author consents to spare them the flowery

epithets of ancient criticism; he contents himself with wishing not to

be in their skin, for he would be disgusted with himself, and esteem

himself the vilest of scribblers thus to calumniate a poor little book

which is not in the style of any spoil-paper of these times. Ah!

ill-natured wretches! you should save your breath to cool your own

porridge! The Author consoles himself for his want of success in not

pleasing everyone by remembering that an old Tourainian, of eternal

memory, had put up with such contumely, that losing all patience, he

declared in one of his prologues, that he would never more put pen to

paper. Another age, but the same manners. Nothing changes, neither God

above nor men below. Thereupon of the Author continues his task with a

light heart, relying upon the future to reward his heavy labours.

And certes, it is a hard task to invent _A Hundred Droll Tales_, since

not only have ruffians and envious men opened fire upon him, but his

friends have imitated their example, and come to him saying “Are you

mad? Do you think it is possible? No man ever had in the depths of his

imagination a hundred such tales. Change the hyperbolic title of your

budget. You will never finish it.” These people are neither

misanthropes nor cannibals; whether they are ruffians I know not; but

for certain they are kind, good-natured friends; friends who have the

courage to tell you disagreeable things all your life along, who are

rough and sharp as currycombs, under the pretence that they are yours

to command, in all the mishaps of life, and in the hour of extreme

unction, all their worth will be known. If such people would only keep

these sad kindnesses; but they will not. When their terrors are proved

to have been idle, they exclaimed triumphantly, “Ha! ha! I knew it. I

always said so.”

In order not to discourage fine sentiments, intolerable though they

be, the Author leaves to his friends his old shoes, and in order to

make their minds easy, assures them that he has, legally protected and

exempt from seizure, seventy droll stories, in that reservoir of

nature, his brain. By the gods! they are precious yarns, well rigged

out with phrases, carefully furnished with catastrophes, amply clothed

with original humour, rich in diurnal and nocturnal effects, nor

lacking that plot which the human race has woven each minute, each

hour, each week, month, and year of the great ecclesiastical

computation, commenced at a time when the sun could scarcely see, and

the moon waited to be shown her way. These seventy subjects, which he

gives you leave to call bad subjects, full of tricks and impudence,

lust, lies, jokes, jests, and ribaldry, joined to the two portions

here given, are, by the prophet! a small instalment on the aforesaid

hundred.

Were it not a bad time for a bibliopolists, bibliomaniacs,

bibliographers, and bibliotheques which hinder bibliolatry, he would

have given them in a bumper, and not drop by drop as if he were

afflicted with dysury of the brain. He cannot possibly be suspected of

this infirmity, since he often gives good weight, putting several

stories into one, as is clearly demonstrated by several in this

volume. You may rely on it, that he has chosen for the finish, the

best and most ribald of the lot, in order that he may not be accused

of a senile discourse. Put then more likes with your dislikes, and

dislikes with your likes. Forgetting the niggardly behaviour of nature

to story-tellers, of whom there are not more than seven perfect in the

great ocean of human writers, others, although friendly, have been of

opinion that, at a time when everyone went about dressed in black, as

if in mourning for something, it was necessary to concoct works either

wearisomely serious or seriously wearisome; that a writer could only

live henceforward by enshrining his ideas in some vast edifice, and

that those who were unable to construct cathedrals and castles of

which neither stone nor cement could be moved, would die unknown, like

the Pope’s slippers. The friends were requested to declare which they

liked best, a pint of good wine, or a tun of cheap rubbish; a diamond

of twenty-two carats, or a flintstone weighing a hundred pounds; the

ring of Hans Carvel, as told by Rabelais, or a modern narrative

pitifully expectorated by a schoolboy. Seeing them dumbfounded and

abashed, it was calmly said to them, “Do you thoroughly understand,

good people? Then go your ways and mind your own businesses.”

The following, however, must be added, for the benefit of all of whom

it may concern:--The good man to whom we owe fables and stories of

sempiternal authority only used his tool on them, having taken his

material from others; but the workmanship expended on these little

figures has given them a high value; and although he was, like M.

Louis Ariosto, vituperated for thinking of idle pranks and trifles,

there is a certain insect engraved by him which has since become a

monument of perennity more assured than that of the most solidly built

works. In the especial jurisprudence of wit and wisdom the custom is

to steal more dearly a leaf wrested from the book of Nature and Truth,

than all the indifferent volumes from which, however fine they be, it

is impossible to extract either a laugh or a tear. The author has

licence to say this without any impropriety, since it is not his

intention to stand upon tiptoe in order to obtain an unnatural height,

but because it is a question of the majesty of his art, and not of

himself--a poor clerk of the court, whose business it is to have ink

in his pen, to listen to the gentleman on the bench, and take down the

sayings of each witness in this case. He is responsible for

workmanship, Nature for the rest, since from the Venus of Phidias the

Athenian, down to the little old fellow, Godenot, commonly called the

Sieur Breloque, a character carefully elaborated by one of the most

celebrated authors of the present day, everything is studied from the

eternal model of human imitations which belongs to all. At this honest

business, happy are the robbers that they are not hanged, but esteemed

and beloved. But he is a triple fool, a fool with ten horns on his

head, who struts, boasts, and is puffed up at an advantage due to the

hazard of dispositions, because glory lies only in the cultivation of

the faculties, in patience and courage.

As for the soft-voiced and pretty-mouthed ones, who have whispered

delicately in the author’s ear, complaining to him that they have

disarranged their tresses and spoiled their petticoats in certain

places, he would say to them, “Why did you go there?” To these remarks

he is compelled, through the notable slanders of certain people, to

add a notice to the well-disposed, in order that they may use it, and

end the calumnies of the aforesaid scribblers concerning him.

These droll tales are written--according to all authorities--at that

period when Queen Catherine, of the house of Medici, was hard at work;

for, during a great portion of the reign, she was always interfering

with public affairs to the advantage of our holy religion. The which

time has seized many people by the throat, from our defunct Master

Francis, first of that name, to the Assembly at Blois, where fell M.

de Guise. Now, even schoolboys who play at chuck-farthing, know that

at this period of insurrection, pacifications and disturbances, the

language of France was a little disturbed also, on account of the

inventions of the poets, who at that time, as at this, used each to

make a language for himself, besides the strange Greek, Latin,

Italian, German, and Swiss words, foreign phrases, and Spanish jargon,

introduced by foreigners, so that a poor writer has plenty of elbow

room in this Babelish language, which has since been taken in hand by

Messieurs de Balzac, Blaise Pascal, Furetiere, Menage, St. Evremonde,

de Malherbe, and others, who first cleaned out the French language,

sent foreign words to the rightabout, and gave the right of

citizenship to legitimate words used and known by everyone, but of

which the Sieur Ronsard was ashamed.

Having finished, the author returns to his lady-love, wishing every

happiness to those by whom he is beloved; to the others misfortune

according to their deserts. When the swallows fly homeward, he will

come again, not without the third and fourth volume, which he here

promises to the Pantagruelists, merry knaves, and honest wags of all

degrees, who have a wholesome horror of the sadness, sombre meditation

and melancholy of literary croakers.

Droll Stories — Complete Collected from the Abbeys of Touraine · 第 30 / 68 题