CHAPTER V

THE EARLY ROMANOFFS

THE feeble Michael had, we saw, provided an heir to the golden throne,

and, owing to the comparative length of his reign, his son Alexis had

reached a mature age when his turn came to rule. The portraits of all

the Tsars have been so thickly overlaid with rhetorical paint that we

have some difficulty in discerning their true historical features.

Alexis seems to have been a ruler of generally excellent intentions and

very moderate ability. He was at the time of his accession a youth of

sixteen: a tall, handsome youth, physically stronger than his father and

fond of hunting, but nervous and irritable. It needed no keenness of

vision to see that Russia was in a deplorable condition. The nobles and

officials were as corrupt as ever; the fiscal system and administration

of justice were atrocious; the merchants struggled feebly against

foreign competition, and the serfs were crushed to the ground under

their burdens. Alexis assuredly resented this corruption and

incompetence, and sustained the small efforts of his father and

grandfather to improve the country.

The Tsar’s mother died soon after his accession, and the customary place

of chief favourite and virtual ruler fell to Boris Ivanovitch Morozoff,

who had for the preceding three years had charge of the prince’s

education. Morozoff had the ambition and moral indelicacy which were

common to his time and class, and he and his friends grew rich. But

there was one cloud on the horizon of their prosperity. Alexis must soon

marry, and behind the bride, whoever she might be, Morozoff and his

friends saw the usual crowd of greedy relatives hastening to Moscow and

clamouring for wealth and power. Morozoff cleverly conceived his plans

to avoid this danger.

In the early part of the year 1647 the thrilling message went through

the Empire that the young Tsar would choose a bride, and every noble or

commoner who had, or thought that he had, a youthful daughter with the

required degree of health, beauty, and virtue, made application to the

officials. A swarm of officers spread over the Empire and conducted the

preliminary examination. Then some two hundred picked beauties, rotund

and blushing, were drafted to the imperial palace and packed into what

might seem to be a large harem. At night, when the palpitating maids had

retired to bed, the Tsar and his medical attendant went from bed to bed

and inspected the very wakeful beauties. The golden rose fell on this

occasion to Euphemia Voievolojski, the daughter of a noble who was in

poor circumstances. But the unexpected honour was too much for the

obscure provincial girl. She fainted from joy and agitation, and the

party of Morozoff, who were apprehensive of the coming of rivals, put a

grave interpretation upon her weakness. She must be epileptic, and

entirely unfit to rear a brood of little Romanoffs; and poor Euphemia

and her relatives, who for a moment had had golden visions, were

dispatched to Siberia.

Morozoff had another plan for marrying the Tsar. An obscure man of the

boyar class named Miloslavski had two pretty daughters, and Morozoff

designed to wed one and make a Tsarina of the other. Whether he was

already in love with Anna Miloslavski, or whether he merely felt it

prudent to annex her and her relatives when the Tsar married her sister,

is not apparent. It is enough that Alexis married Maria, and ten days

afterwards Morozoff wedded her sister Anna, and neatly secured the

linking of the ambition of Miloslavski with his own. Legend afterwards

said that the two girls had, not long before, sold mushrooms in the

public market at Moscow. Certainly their father had been poor and

insignificant, and just as certainly he and his relatives at once began

to heap up wealth by every corrupt device known in the tradition of the

Moscovite court. Other Miloslavskis came to court, and a fresh brood of

parasites fastened upon the veins of the country.

The Tsar was a good-humoured, indulgent man. Good-humour, which really

meant an indolent and short-sighted habit of extracting whatever

pleasure the actual circumstances afforded, was at that time, and

remained until the present crisis, the chief characteristic of Russia.

The democratic peasant of the primitive tribe had relieved his labours

with the song and the dance. The serf now had little joy in life, but,

while the song and dance were banned, a new and potent element of gaiety

had been introduced: brandy. Everybody drank, and nearly everybody drank

copiously. Alexis himself was sober in habit, though even he liked to

intoxicate others at his table, but drunkenness was the daily rule. The

Patriarch of Moscow got drunk, the priests and monks got drunk, and the

people--as far as their means went--followed the example of their lords

and pastors. Vast quantities of wine, hydromel, and especially brandy

were consumed, and pepper was mixed with the brandy to improve its

sting. Babies drank neat brandy. Wives lay drunk, side by side with

their husbands, in a state of alarming _deshabille_, in the sleighs and

coaches which ran noisily along the street. The few who resisted were,

as a jest, compelled to drink. Even nuns and delicate young girls had

more than once the option of emptying a flagon of brandy or enduring a

whipping. Women at times prostituted themselves, and men sold their

clothes, in order to get the precious _vodka_.

Russian life generally did not rise much above this level. The people

were, as I said, so illiterate and ignorant that scarcely one in a

thousand could read. Superstition throve in proportion to the ignorance,

and vice and brutality were not far behind. Women were atrociously

treated. The women of the richer class contrived, as we shall see, to

creep through the restrictions imposed upon them and share the license

of their lords, but in the great mass of the people the mother had a

generally deplorable position. Wives were often whipped or beaten

until the blood flowed, and many a brutal husband rubbed salt into the

wounds. At times a frantic wife killed her husband, and in such cases

the law exacted an awful penalty. In other cases bloodshed was too

common an event to be severely punished. Moscow was distinguished among

European cities for violence and bloodshed.

Vice and coarseness were still common enough all over Europe, but it is

the almost unanimous opinion of the foreign visitors to Russia at the

time, who wrote their impressions, that vice was particularly free at

Moscow. Unnatural vice was a matter of jest. When the theatre became

popular, as it presently did, the vice was coarsely suggested on the

stage. Word and gesture everywhere were licentious. As the immense

majority of the Russian families, which were usually large, huddled over

the stove in one room, day and night, during the six months’

winter, the atmosphere that the children breathed may be left to the

imagination. Except amongst the wealthier nobles, who were being

modified at this time by foreign culture and refinement, manners were

indescribably gross. On all this the mass of the clergy had, and

purported to have, no influence. The greater part of the monks were as

gross as the monks of Europe had been generally before the Reformation,

and the false standards of the better monks--who laid a fierce

anathema upon chess or the dance or Sunday-work and a blessing upon

ignorance--made their influence small and ineffective. Kiss the

ikons and be docile, was the general philosophy they recommended.

[IMAGE: img086.jpg Ivan the Terrible, by Antokolsky]

That the early Romanoffs made a few improvements in this chaotic and

half-barbarous world is not saying very much to their credit. But beyond

a vague perception that more foreign light must be imported they had no

plan or statesmanship, and they proceeded piece-meal, under pressure.

The foreign merchants who were introduced or permitted to enter kept

industry and trade in their own hands, and did little for the native

development of Russia. The avarice and corruption of the court and

officials thought only of extortion, never of wise development. The

people, even of Moscow, sank under taxation and injustice, and a certain

measure of independence grew out of their very misery.

One day in the summer of 1648 the Tsar and the Patriarch were returning

to the palace from some ceremony when a frantic group of the people

approached with cries of grievances. They were, as usual, driven off;

but the distress was acute and soon an angry and dangerous throng of

soldiers, artisans, and small merchants and shop-keepers besieged the

Kreml and demanded the justice of the Tsar upon the bloodsuckers. Either

in fear or in anger--for Alexis was apt to boil over when the misdeeds

of some noble “son of a bitch” (as the Emperor put it) were brought to

his notice--the Tsar handed over to the mob two of the most hated

officials, and they were savagely murdered. The Clerk of the Council,

who was held particularly responsible for the salt-tax, which restricted

the supply of salt-fish, was assassinated on a dung-hill. The whetted

appetite then turned against Morozoff’s palace, but it was ingeniously

protected from destruction by the Tsar’s sending to the mob an assurance

that it was his own property. Morozoff himself was hidden in a monastery

until the fury of the storm spent itself, but the Tsar had to

promise to punish him, and to appoint a reform-commission. The autocrat

shed a flood of facile Moscovite tears as he protested that the people’s

grievances should be remedied; and his servants discreetly scattered

money amongst the soldiers, who formed the more dangerous part of the

mob. The fires which now threatened the entire city were extinguished,

and the people slowly and sullenly returned to discipline.

The insurrection had spread to the provinces, and the former republics

of Pskoff and Novgorod showed that their spirit of independence was not

extinct. Pskoff, in fact, inaugurated a genuine rebellion and had to be

reduced by the imperial troops, after a siege. Novgorod plundered the

stores of its foreign merchants and murdered more than one supporter of

the corrupt autocracy. When the Archbishop Nikon (of whom we shall see

more) attempted to defend the cause of the Tsar (as he was careful to

write to that monarch), his palace was invaded and he sank under a rain

of stones which nearly ended his life. Only the sworn promise of a

reform of the Empire put an end to the bloody insurrection.

It was under these circumstances, and with the added evil of an economic

system which failed yearly and a constant danger from the Poles, that

the second Romanoff began the reform of his kingdom. Morozoff was

condemned to a luxurious internment in a monastery, from which he

contrived for a long time to watch his interests and influence the Tsar,

and the sturdy Archbishop of Novgorod began to enjoy favour. A

commission of inquiry was appointed, and many reforms of the taxes, the

administration of justice, and the court were brought about.

In 1652 the Patriarch of Moscow died, and Nikon, who had steadily

advanced, was appointed to fill his place. For the next six years Nikon

was chief favourite and councillor, and his story is so characteristic

of the time that it must be briefly told. He was the son of a provincial

peasant: a man of robust constitution and conscience, and of no small

ambition. His success as a ruler of monks had won for him the

archbishopric of Novgorod, and he knew how to capture the nervous and

superstitious monarch. He claimed visions, and his shrewdness was at

least supported by a vigorous will. Before long the Tsar was little more

than an instrument of his will, and an abject spiritual pupil. He would

protest with tears that he was unworthy to wear the crown, and it was

only by reliance upon the Patriarch’s strong counsel that he was

dissuaded from abdicating.

The Tsar, like his predecessors, loved the elaborate ritual of the

Church, and Nikon interested him in the work of ecclesiastical reform.

The Slav translation of the Bible was very corrupt, and the corrupt

texts and ancient superstitious usages were to be rooted out. While

Poles and Swedes and Turks threatened--while the country rotted in

ignorance and economic folly--an immense zeal was concentrated upon

the purification of the text of the Scriptures and upon such grave

issues as the shaving of the beard, and the number of fingers that one

must use in making the sign of the cross. The court was purified of

“heretics” and the forces of the Empire were put at the

Patriarch’s disposal for the purification of the entire country.

Easy-going Russia had as yet not recognised its many heresies. Provided

that one repudiated the Pope one was esteemed orthodox; and indeed most

of the priests and monks were too densely ignorant to examine a

man’s orthodoxy.

It was now seen that a vast amount of heresy existed in Russia, and

every weird phase of dissent was truculently persecuted. Whole colonies

of monks were infected, and in places their monasteries sustained for

several years the attacks of imperial troops. Nikon was astute as well

as ambitious. He would invite some ragged popular fanatic of Moscow to

drink wine at his table, and would make great nobles tremble before his

power. He acquired enormous wealth, made an impressive display of pomp

and luxury, and contrived to indulge the heavy sensuality which then

belonged to all classes. Russia had become an autocracy. Nikon would

make it a theocracy.

But in such a court a man must have the truculence of Ivan the Terrible

or Peter the Great to hold such a power, and the undercurrents of

intrigue began in 1657 to weaken the Patriarch’s position. Old

believers, dissenters, and discontented nobles concentrated their hatred

upon him. It was in the summer of 1658 that he began to perceive the

effect. A foreign prince was to be entertained, and Nikon was not

invited to the banquet. He complained, and was insulted; and he next

perceived that Alexis was absent from _his_ functions. He resolved to

try a desperate remedy. Summoning his clergy and the people, he solemnly

and tearfully laid his sacred vestments upon the altar and declared that

enemies compelled him to abandon his high office. He retired to the New

Jerusalem monastery near Moscow to await the summons of the Tsar to

return to office, but no summons came.

For several years Nikon fiercely fought his clerical and lay opponents

from the monastery. “Brigand, pagan, stinking dog,” he howled at his

enemies; and they retorted that he was a “mad wolf.” In 1664 two high

oriental prelates, the Patriarchs of Alexandria and Antioch, visited

Moscow, and it was felt that they might be induced to end the scandal by

condemning Nikon’s reforms. But Nikon was undoubtedly right, and the

Tsar had to end it in his own way. The Patriarch was degraded and

imprisoned for life in a distant monastery. The issue is a sad page of

ecclesiastical history. The ageing Nikon lit up the monastery with

debauch. Not only did his large consumption of brandy immoderately

increase, but he loved to have women, especially young women, brought

into the monastery and stupefied with drink. At night his cell took on a

Rabelaisian aspect; and he died in an odour of sulphur, and was solemnly

buried with all the honours of a patriarch, in the year 1681.

By this time another interesting revolution had taken place at the

court. Power had passed to the Miloslavskis, the family of the Tsarina,

and they followed the familiar tradition. It may at least be said that

under their lead, and that of the boyar Nastchokin, a measure of reform

was carried out, and the country was strengthened against its enemies.

The Cossacks of the south were still under the dominion of Poland, and,

after many years of oppression and revolt, they appealed to Moscow for

help and protection. In 1654 the Tsar declared war upon Poland and

wrested a good deal of Russian territory from it. The Swedes also were

at war with Poland, and in the north the ambition of Russia clashed with

that of Sweden. Alexis made peace with Poland and entered upon an

unsuccessful war with Sweden. It ended indecisively, and the Poles

returned to the attack and inflicted severe defeats upon the Russians.

The war later ended in a costly compromise.

The economic condition of the country was such that the new drain caused

frightful distress, and the people of Moscow stirred once more. Copper

roubles had had to be coined, and poverty became deeper. One summer day

in 1662 the Tsar was at chapel in his country mansion, a few miles from

Moscow, when he was told that a crowd from Moscow beset the palace and

clamoured to be heard. His officers had dared to tear down a placard on

which they had exposed their grievances. The pious Tsar vigorously

refused to leave his devotions for so profane a cause, but he was

overruled, and he confronted the mob. He would, he said, proceed to

Moscow at the close of the service and make an inquiry. He must come at

once, with them, they answered; and a few of the bolder climbed the

balcony and pulled at his cloak. He was, however, permitted to return

and finish his devotions after he had taken a solemn oath to inquire

into their grievances. When he came down to carry out his promise, he

found that a larger and more violent crowd surrounded the palace. Two

regiments of the militia were summoned and, as the vast crowd still

jeered and flourished weapons, the order was given, and thousands of the

people were shot. Hundreds of others were afterwards exiled, and the

growing spirit of popular independence was, apparently, stifled.

Favourite succeeded favourite at court. Nastchokin and the Miloslavskis

gave way to a new and remarkable noble named Artaman Matveeff. Nikon

had, as I said, disposed the Tsar in favour of progress, of a kind, and

Matveeff was for still larger and more comprehensive progress. The

industrious and gifted son of a small official, he had become one of the

most accomplished and refined of the progressive party. His wife was a

Scottish woman of the Hamilton family. Like so many other foreigners,

many of the Scots who were driven from their country by Cromwell found

their way to Moscow and settled in trade there. The foreign colony

outside the walls grew, and its comparative refinement and culture

impressed the imagination of many of the Russians. Matveeff married the

refugee, and his home had a western complexion. The Scottish lady would

not be confined behind curtains. The furniture was of the more elegant

western kind. A library, and even a chemical laboratory, formed part of

the establishment.

Matveeff seems to have won the attention of the Tsar in the course of

some employment about the court, and he went on to secure his

friendship. He was promoted to the office of chief minister, and the

Tsar liked to visit him in his stimulating home. We may presume that it

was in the foreign quarter, where the neat brick villas, surrounded by

flower-gardens and shrubs, were in vivid contrast to the dull and

slovenly aspect of the clusters of wooden Russian houses. A new romance

of the court was born of this intercourse.

Matveeff adopted a beautiful orphan girl named Natalia Naryshkin, whose

father had been a captain of the militia. The Tsar, whose wife had died

in 1667, without (as we shall see) leaving a very promising heir to the

throne amongst her numerous children, was much struck with the charm of

Natalia, as she waited at table. Legend says that he at once offered to

“find her a husband.” He at all events decided to marry her, and told

Matveeff. But the courtier was too prudent to provide a wife for the

Tsar in this personal fashion. He persuaded Alexis to issue the

customary summons to a competition of health and beauty, and some

hundreds were lodged in the palace and gravely inspected. There seems to

have been some danger of Natalia losing her fortune, or else the comedy

was carried out very thoroughly. Another maiden was selected, and the

opponents of Matveeff pressed her charms. But it was decided that her

hands were too thin for a model of Russian beauty, and the intrigue was

defeated. The Tsar duly discovered the grace and gifts of the pretty

brunette Natalia--which he was not supposed to have seen in any

respectable Russian house--and in January, 1671, she was raised

to the throne.

The young girl had no conception of the opposition which her entrance

into the court would cause. Not only were the brother and other

relatives of the late Tsarina entrenched in lucrative positions, but

several of her children survived, and a grim silent struggle for the

succession grew up about the ageing monarch. Every act of the new

mistress was invidiously discussed. She declined to be secluded in

women’s quarters; she refused to have closed curtains to her litter when

she went abroad; she despised paint and the tawdry display which Russian

women usually made. A Russian envoy who had visited Italy brought news

of a magical form of entertainment known as a theatre, in which painted

scenes of castles and landscapes were put together and disappeared, and

life was remarkably imitated. Natalia and Matveeff set up a theatre,

and, although they did not venture beyond biblical plays, the monks and

reactionaries and envious made a great outcry. She brought into the

world, on May 20th, 1672, a wonderfully vigorous boy--the future Peter

the Great--and malicious tongues whispered that such a child was

assuredly not the son of Tsar Alexis, whose earlier sons had been

feeble. Two daughters followed in the next three years, and the silent

struggle became more tragic. Which of the two families--that of the

first or the second Tsarina--would secure the succession? The Tsar

himself brooded over the difficult problem; and in the midst of his

brooding, in 1676, he died, and left the settlement to the court.

Maria Miloslavski had had thirteen children, and of these two sons and

six daughters were alive when the Tsar died. The younger son, Ivan, was

a weak-witted boy whom none could seriously regard as a future ruler of

Russia. The two eldest sons had died. There remained Prince Feodor, and

the Miloslavskis had little trouble in securing his accession. A charge

of magic and other evil practices was trumped up against Matveeff, and

he was flogged and sent to Siberia. Natalia and her three children were

still at court, and she made a spirited stand against the grown-up

daughters of her predecessor and the three aunts who lived at court with

them. Her brother Ivan was banished, and she seemed to be in danger of

losing all hope, when a fresh court-revolution modified and complicated

the struggle.

The young Tsar, Feodor, was an invalid. Few expected him to live long,

and the prospect gave edge to the keen rivalry for power. But a former

tutor of Feodor’s elder brother now crept into favour and cut out the

Miloslavskis. This man and his brother were admirers of Poland, and, in

order to prepare the way for Polish influence, they induced the sickly

Tsar to wed a young and undistinguished woman of Polish extraction named

Agatha Grouchstska. Polish nobles and officers flocked to the court, and

an entirely new prospect was opened when, in July, 1681, a child was

born. Natalia and her children were now living in a village not far from

Moscow. The Miloslavskis had been disposed to make a nun of her, but

they were now fighting desperately for their own power. Agatha, to their

relief, died in childbirth, and the baby died a few weeks later. The

resolute friends of Poland made a last effort. They induced the dying

Tsar to wed a relative of his dead wife. But death made an end of the

mockery. Feodor died, in his twenty-first year, a few weeks after his

marriage, and the intriguing Poles were swept out of court.

Before the Miloslavskis had time to marshal their forces, the friends

and relatives of Natalia, the Naryshkin, got together the boyars and

persuaded them that the boy Peter was now the only possible heir to the

throne. The elder prince, Ivan, son of the first wife of Alexis, was, as

I said, an obvious imbecile. Peter, on the other hand, was a sturdy and

intelligent boy who promised to become a vigorous man. Before the day

was out on which Feodor died Natalia was summoned to Moscow by the news

that her son was Tsar, and she herself soon rejoiced in the titles of

Tsaritsa and Regent. Her brother was recalled, and a speedy messenger

was sent to bring back her friend and patron, Matveeff, from Siberia. It

was on April 27th, 1682, that Feodor died and Natalia returned to power.

On May 11th Matveeff arrived from Siberia, and received the respect of

the troops. The new regime seemed to be solidly established. And four

days later Moscow was shaken by one of the most sanguinary revolutions

that we find in its chronicles, and the Miloslavskis returned to power.

The story of that revolution introduces us to one of the strangest

princesses of the Romanoff house, who was to rule Russia for the next

seven years.

The Romance of the Romanoffs · 第 5 / 16 章