THE TRIUMPH OF THE SHORT STORY
Voluminous as may seem the poetry of the period when viewed by itself,
it sinks into insignificance when viewed against the mass of prose that
was contemporaneous with it. Overwhelmingly was it an age of prose
fiction. He who explores it emerges with the impression that he has
been threading a jungle chaotic and interminable. To chart it, to find
law and tendency in it, seems at first impossible. For a generation
or more every writer seems to have had laid upon him a necessity for
narration. Never before such widespread eagerness to din tales into the
ears of a world.
It was an age of brief fiction--this fact impresses one first of all.
The jungle growth was short. Not half a dozen writers in the whole
enormous group confined themselves to novels of length; the most
distinctive fictional volumes of the period: _The Luck of Roaring
Camp_, _Old Creole Days_, _In the Tennessee Mountains_, _Nights with
Uncle Remus_, _In Ole Virginia_, _A New England Nun_, _Deephaven_,
_Main-Traveled Roads_, _Flute and Violin_, and the like, were
collections of tales. One may venture to call the period the age of the
short story, or more accurately, perhaps, the age of short-breathed
work. Everywhere literature in small parcels. In January, 1872, the
_North American Review_, guardian of the old traditions, thought the
conditions serious enough to call for earnest protest:
A new danger has recently shown itself.... The great demand
on all sides is for _short_ books, _short_ articles, _short_
sketches; no elaborate essays, no complete monographs, are
wanted ... condensed thought, brief expression, the laconian
method everywhere.... The volume sinks into an article, the
article dwindles to an item to conciliate the demands of the
public.
That this shortness of unit was a sign of weakness, we to-day by no
means concede. It was rather a sign of originality, the symptom of a
growing disregard for British methods and British opinion. The English
genius always has been inclined to ponderousness--to great, slow-moving
novels, to elaborate essays that get leisurely under way, to romances
that in parts are treatises and in parts are histories, everywhere
to solidity and deliberateness of gait. The _North American Review_
protest was a British protest; it was the protest of conservatism
against what to-day we can see was the new spirit of America. The
American people from the first had been less phlegmatic, less
conservative, than the English. There were climatic influences, it may
be; there was surely a spirit of intensity everywhere that made for
short efforts. The task of subduing in a single century a raw continent
produced a people intolerant of the leisurely and the long drawn out.
Poe perceived the tendency early. In a letter to Professor Charles
Anthon he wrote:
Before quitting the _Messenger_ I saw, or fancied I saw,
through a long and dim vista the brilliant field for ambition
which a magazine of bold and noble aims presented to him who
should successfully establish it in America. I perceived
that the country, from its very constitution, could not fail
of affording in a few years a larger proportionate amount
of readers than any upon earth. I perceived that the whole
energetic, busy spirit of the age tended wholly to magazine
literature--to the curt, the terse, the well timed and the
readily diffused, in preference to the old forms of verbose and
ponderous and inaccessible.
This far-sightedness made of Poe the father of the American type of
short story. Irving undoubtedly had sown the earliest seeds, but
Irving was an essayist and a sketch-writer rather than a maker of
short stories in the modern sense. It was Poe's work to add art to
the sketch--plot structure, unity of impression, verisimilitude of
details, matter-of-factness, _finesse_--and, like Hawthorne, to throw
over it the atmosphere of his own peculiar personality. That he evolved
the form deliberately can not be doubted. In his oft-quoted review of
Hawthorne's tales he laid down what may be considered as the first
rules for short story writing ever formulated. His theories that all
art is short-breathed, that a long poem is a _tour de force_ against
nature, and that the unit of measure in fiction is the amount that may
be read with undiminished pleasure at a single sitting, are too well
known to dwell upon.
But the short story of the mid-century, even in its best specimens, was
an imperfect thing. In Hawthorne's tales the quality of the sketch or
the essay is always discernible. All of Poe's tales, and Hawthorne's as
well, lack vigor of characterization, sharpness of outline, swiftness
of movement. "The Gold Bug," for instance, has its climax in the
middle, is faulty in dialect, is utterly deficient in local color, and
is worked out with characters as lifeless as mere symbols.
The vogue of the form was increased enormously by the annuals which
figured so largely in the literary history of the mid-century, by the
increasing numbers of literary pages in weekly newspapers, and by the
growing influence of the magazines. The first volume of the _Atlantic
Monthly_ (1857) had an average of three stories in each number. But
increase in quantity increased but little the quality. The short story
of the annual was, for the most part, sentimental and over-romantic.
Even the best work of the magazines is colorless and ineffective when
judged by modern standards. Undoubtedly the best stories after Poe and
Hawthorne and before Harte are Fitz-James O'Brien's "Diamond Lens,"
1858, and "What Was It?" 1859, Edward Everett Hale's "The Man Without
a Country," 1863, and "The Brick Moon," 1869, and Thomas Wentworth
Higginson's "The Haunted Window," 1867. Well wrought they are for the
most part, unusual in theme, and telling in effect, yet are they open
nevertheless to the same criticisms which we have passed upon Poe.
The short story in its later form dates from Harte's "The Luck of
Roaring Camp." Harte added reality, sharpness of outline, vividness of
setting, vigor of characterization. The new period demanded actuality.
The writer must speak with authority; he must have been a part of what
he describes; he must have seen with his own eyes and he must reproduce
with a verisimilitude that grips the reader and hastens him on as if he
himself were a participant in the action. There must be at every point
sense of actuality, and, moreover, strangeness--new and unheard-of
types of humanity, uncouth dialects, peculiar environments. It was
far more concentrated than the mid-century work, but it was much more
given to general description and background effects and impressionistic
characterization.
In the mid-eighties came the perfecting of the form, the
molding of the short story into a finished work of art. Now was
demanded compression, nervous rapidity of movement, sharpness of
characterization, singleness of impression, culmination, _finesse_--a
studied artistry that may be compared with even the best work of the
French school of the same period. Stories like those of Aldrich,
Stockton, Bunner, Garland, Allen, Bierce, Grace King, Mrs. Chopin,
Stephen Crane, and Frank Norris, from the standpoint of mere art at
least, come near to perfection.
The decline of the short story, its degeneration into a journalistic
form, the substitution all too often of smartness, paradox, sensation,
for truth--all this is a modern instance outside the limits prescribed
for our study.
I
After Harte and the early local-colorists the next to develop the short
story was Frank R. Stockton. No writer of the period has been more
variously estimated and labeled. By some critics he has been rated as a
mere humorist, by others as a novelist, by still others as a writer of
whimsicalities in a class by himself.
It is undoubtedly true that his personality was so interfused with his
writings that the generation who knew and loved him were too kind in
their judgments. Behind his every story they saw the genial, whimsical
creator and they laughed even before they began to read. But a new
generation has arrived to whom Stockton is but a name and a set of
books, and it is becoming more and more evident now that very much that
he wrote was ephemeral. To this generation he is known as the author of
a single short story, or perhaps three or four short stories, of a type
that has its own peculiar flavor.
Stockton was born in Philadelphia in 1834, was educated in the high
school there, and then, at the request of his father, learned the trade
of wood engraving. But his inclinations were literary, and he was soon
an editorial worker on his brother's newspaper. Later he joined the
staff of _Hearth and Home_ in New York, then became connected with the
new _Scribner's Monthly_, and finally became assistant editor of _St.
Nicholas_.
The wide popularity of his stories induced him at length to withdraw
from editorial work to devote his whole time to his writings. He
became exceedingly productive: after his fiftieth year he published no
fewer than thirty volumes.
To understand Stockton's contribution to the period one must bear
in mind that he adopted early the juvenile story as his form of
expression, and that his first book, _Ting-a-ling Stories_, appeared
four years after _Alice in Wonderland_. When, at the age of forty-eight
he gained general recognition with his _The Lady, or the Tiger?_ he had
published nine books, eight of them juveniles. The fact is important.
He approached literature by the Wonderland gate and he never wandered
far from that magic entrance. After his short stories had made him
famous he continued to write juveniles, adapting them, however, to
his new audience of adult readers. He may be summed up as a maker of
grown-up juveniles, a teller, as it were, of the adventures of an adult
Alice in Wonderland.
All of his distinctive work was short. _Rudder Grange_, which first
made him at all known, was a series of sketches, the humorous
adventures of a newly married couple, the humor consisting largely of
incongruous situations. Even his so-called novels, like _The Casting
Away of Mrs. Lecks and Mrs. Aleshine_ and its sequel _The Dusantes_,
are but a series of episodes joined together as loosely as Alice's
well-known adventures. Plot there is really none. Characterization,
however, there is to a degree: the two women do carry their provincial
Yankee personalities and the atmosphere of their little home village
into whatever amazing environment they may find themselves, but one can
not say more.
There seems on the author's part a constant endeavor in all of his work
to invent incongruous situation and preposterous suggestion, and a
determination to present this topsy-turvy world gravely and seriously
as if it were the most commonplace thing in the world. He makes it
plausible by the Defoe method of multiplying minor details and little
realistic touches until the reader is thrown completely off his guard.
For instance, in the novel _The Dusantes_ the coach in which the party
is traveling is overtaken by night in the high mountains and before
morning is completely buried by a great snow storm. The following day,
after they had hollowed out a room for themselves in the snow, this
adventure befalls them:
I heard a low crunching sound on one side of me, and, turning
my head, I saw in the wall of my excavation opposite to the
stage coach and at a distance of four or five feet from the
ground an irregular hole in the snow, about a foot in diameter,
from which protruded the head of a man. This head was wrapped,
with the exception of the face, in a brown woolen comforter.
The features were those of a man of about fifty, a little
sallow and thin, without beard, whiskers, or mustache, although
the cheeks and chin were darkened with a recent growth.
The astounding apparition of this head projecting itself from
the snow wall of my cabin utterly paralyzed me, so that I
neither moved nor spoke, but remained crouching by the fire, my
eyes fixed upon the head. It smiled a little, and then spoke.
"Could you lend me a small iron pot?" it said.
Another coach, it seems, had likewise been snowed under, and the chief
occupant had tried to tunnel his way out for help, with the result
as recorded. The passage is typical. It illustrates a mannerism that
mars all his work. He is not telling a culminating story: he is adding
incongruity to incongruity for merely humorous effect, and after a time
the reader tires. It seems at length as if he were straining at every
point to bring in something totally unexpected and preposterous. In
short compass the device succeeded, but incongruity may not rule longer
than the moment.
It is to Stockton's short stories, then, that we are to look for his
distinctive work. Of one story we need say little. The sensation it
made has few parallels in the history of the period and the influence
it excited was undoubtedly great. Aldrich several years earlier had
told a story which depended for its effect upon a startling closing
sentence, but _Marjorie Daw_ attracted little attention as compared
with the tremendous vogue of _The Lady, or the Tiger?_ It was a step in
the direction of more elaborate art. It began to be realized that the
short story writer had the reader at his mercy. It was recognized that
it was a part of his art to startle, to perplex, to tantalize, to lead
into hidden pitfalls, yet always in a way to please and to stimulate.
From _Marjorie Daw_ and _The Lady, or the Tiger?_ it was but a step to
the jugglery of O. Henry.
None of Stockton's other short stories ever reached the vogue of this
lucky hit, but many of them surpass it in all the requisites of art.
"Negative Gravity," "The Transferred Ghost," "The Remarkable Wreck of
the Thomas Hyke," and "The Late Mrs. Null" may be cited as examples.
In all of them the art consists in perfect naturalness, in an exquisite
simplicity of style, and in topsy-turvyness made within short compass
completely plausible. We are led into a world of negative gravity where
everything goes completely by opposites. In "The Transferred Ghost" we
are gravely assured that Mr. Hinckman, at the point of death, has a
ghost appointed to haunt his late residence. He does not die, however,
and as a result the poor ghost is haunted by the living Mr. Hinckman
until it is nearly frightened out of its existence. And so skilful is
the author that the story becomes convincing.
Very much of the success of the work depends upon the element that we
call style. Stockton indeed is one of the half dozen prose writers of
the period to whom may be applied the now old-fashioned term stylist.
There is grace and character in his every sentence, a dignity despite
the whimsical content that never descends to vulgarity or to what
James has termed "newspaperese." Always is he clear, always is he
simple--his early experience with juveniles taught him that--and always
is he perfectly natural. Moreover, to all this he adds a delightfully
colloquial attitude toward his reader--a familiar personal tone at
times that is like nothing so much as Charles Lamb.
He was an anomaly in the period. In an age of localized fiction he
produced work as unlocalized as is Carroll's _Through the Looking
Glass_; instead of using dialect and curious provincial types, he dealt
always with refined gentle folk amid surroundings that seem to have
little to do with the actual solid earth; in a period that demanded
reality and fullness of life he wrote little that touches any of the
real problems of his time or that has in it anything to grip or even
to move the reader: even his murders are gentle affairs. There are
no moments of real emotion: all is _opera bouffe_; all is cheery and
whimsically conceived.
That there was knowledge of the human heart behind his quaint creations
undoubtedly is true. _The Lady, or the Tiger?_ is founded on a subtle
study of humanity, yet even as one says it he is forced to admit that
it added little to the real substance of the period. He was content to
be a mere entertainer, aware undoubtedly that the entertainment that
delights one generation all too often is obsolete in the next.
II
The appearance of "Monsieur Motte" in the _New Princeton Review_ of
January, 1886, marks another step in the development of the short
story. It was as distinctively French in its atmosphere and its art as
if it had been a translation from Maupassant, yet it was as originally
and peculiarly American as even _Madame Delphine_, which in so many
ways it resembles. Its English, which is Gallic in idiom and in
incisive brevity; its atmosphere quivering with passion; its characters
whimsical, impulsive, exquisite of manners; its dainty suggestions of
femininity, as in the case of the little Creole maiden Marie Modeste
or the stately Madame Lareveillere; its hints of a rich and tragic
background, and its startling "Marjorie Daw" culmination--there is
no Monsieur Motte; Monsieur Motte is only the pathetic _negresse_
Marcelite--all this was French, but the background was old Creole
New Orleans, and it was drawn by one who professed herself a severe
realist, or, to quote her own words, "I am not a romanticist, I am a
realist _a la mode de la Nouvelle-Orleans_. I have never written a line
that was not realistic, but our life, our circumstances, the heroism
of the men and women that surrounded my early horizon--all that was
romantic. I had a mind very sensitive to romantic impressions, but
critical as to their expression."
The writer was Grace Elizabeth King, daughter of a prominent barrister
of New Orleans, herself with a strain of Creole blood, educated at
the fashionable Creole _pension_ of the Mesdames Cenas--the Institute
St. Denis of "Monsieur Motte" and "Pupasse"--bilingual like all the
circle in which she moved, and later a resident for some two years in
France--no wonder that from her stories breathes a Gallic atmosphere
such as we find in no other work of the period. Three more episodes,
each a complete short story--"On the Plantation," "The Drama of an
Evening," and "The Marriage of Marie Modeste"--she added to her first
story, bits of art that Flaubert would have delighted in, and issued
them in 1888 under the title _Monsieur Motte_. She followed it with
_Earthlings_, which she has never republished, from _Lippincott's
Magazine_, and with other stories and sketches contributed to
_Harper's_ and the _Century_ that later appeared as _Tales of a Time
and Place_ and _Balcony Stories_.
The impulse to write fiction came to Miss King from a conviction
that Cable had done scant justice to the real Creoles of Louisiana.
She would depict those exclusive circles of old Creole life that she
herself had known in her early childhood, circles almost exclusively
French with just a touch, perhaps, of Spanish. She would differ from
Cable as Sarah Orne Jewett differs from Mary E. Wilkins Freeman in
her pictures of New England life. Her sketches, therefore, are more
minutely drawn, more gentle, more suggestive of the richness and beauty
of a vanished age that was Parisian and Bourbon in its brilliancy. She
excels in her pictures of old Mesdames, relics of the old regime, drawn
by the lightest of touches and suggestions until they are intensely
alive, like Bon Maman or like Madame Josephine in "A Delicate Affair."
A hint or a suggestion is made to do the work of a page of analysis.
Note a passage like this:
She played her game of solitaire rapidly, impatiently, and
always won; for she never hesitated to cheat and get out of
a tight place, or into a favorable one, cheating with the
quickness of a flash, and forgetting it the moment afterward.
Mr. Horace was as old as she, but he looked much younger,
although his dress and appearance betrayed no evidence of an
effort in that direction. Whenever his friend cheated, he would
invariably call her attention to it; and as usual she would
shrug her shoulders and say, "Bah! Lose a game for a card!" and
pursue the conversation.
All her feminine creations are Gallic, like Marie Modeste, or,
better still, the vividly drawn Misette in _Earthlings_, volatile,
lovable--impossible. She is always at her best while depicting these
whimsical, impracticable, tropic femininites; she makes them not
so bewitching as does Cable, but she makes them more real and more
intensely alive.
Her earlier stories are the best, judged merely as short stories.
As she continued her work she discovered more and more the wealth
of romantic material in the annals of the old city, especially in
the studies of Charles Gayarre (1805-1895), greatest of Southern
historians. The influence of his work upon her becomes increasingly
evident. Her stories grew into sketches. _Balcony Stories_ are not so
much stories as they are realistic sketches of social conditions in New
Orleans after the Reconstruction. More and more she wrote studies in
Creole atmospheres, impressions of picturesque places and persons after
the manner of Hearn, until at length she abandoned fiction altogether
to devote herself to history. In the period when historical fiction
for a time ruled everything, she wrote history itself in a manner that
was as graphic and as picturesque as fiction. Perhaps nothing that she
has written has in it more of vitality than her history of New Orleans
and its people. It is possible that her final place is to be with the
historians rather than with the makers of fiction.
In the technique of the short story she was surpassed by a later worker
in Louisiana materials, Kate Chopin (1851-1904), some of whose work is
equal to the best that has been produced in France or even in America.
She wrote but little, two volumes of stories, notably _Bayou Folks_,
containing all that is now accessible of her shorter work. Many of her
sketches and stories have never been republished from the magazines.
The strength of Mrs. Chopin's work came partly from the strangeness of
her material--she told of the Grand Pre Acadians in the canebrakes of
central Louisiana--and from her intimate knowledge of her field, but it
came more from what may be described as a native aptitude for narration
amounting almost to genius. She was of Celtic temperament--her father
was a Galway County Irishman and her mother was of mingled French and
old Virginian stock. Educated in the Convent of the Sacred Heart at St.
Louis, married at nineteen to a New Orleans cotton factor, spending
fourteen years in Louisiana, the last four of them in the remote hamlet
of Cloutiersville in Natchitoches Parish, "a rambling little French
village of one street, with the Catholic church at one end, and our
plantation at the other, and the Red River flowing through everybody's
backyard," left a widow at thirty-five with six children--all this had
little to do with the making of literature. Indeed, until her return
to St. Louis a year after her bereavement, she had never even thought
of writing. She began almost by chance, and, succeeding from the
first, she wrote story after story almost without effort and wholly
without study of narrative art. For a decade her work was in all of the
Northern magazines, then five years before her death, discouraged by
the reception of her novel _The Awakening_, she became silent.
No writer of the period was more spontaneously and inevitably a story
teller. There is an ease and a naturalness about her work that comes
from more than mere art. She seldom gave to a story more than a single
sitting, and she rarely revised her work, yet in compression of style,
in forbearance, in the massing of materials, and in artistry she
ranks with even the masters of the period. A story like "Desiree's
Baby," with its inevitableness and its culminating sentence that stops
for an instant the reader's heart, is well-nigh perfect. She was
emotional, she was minutely realistic, and, unlike Grace King, used
dialect sometimes in profusion; she was dramatic and even at times
melodramatic, yet never was she commonplace or ineffective. She had
command at times of a pervasive humor and a pathos that gripped the
reader before he was aware, for behind all was the woman herself. She
wrote as Dickens wrote, with abandonment, with her whole self. There
is art in her work, but there is more than art. One may read again and
again such bits of human life as "Madame Celestin's Divorce": it is
the art that is independent of time and place, the art indeed that is
universal.
III
Of a type the direct opposite was James Lane Allen, who was not
inspired and who was not an improvisatore. To Allen fiction was an
art learned with infinite patience. He was years in the mastering of
it, years in which he studied literature with the abandonment of a
Maupassant. He approached it deliberately; he made himself the most
scholarly of the novelists of the period--graduate and graduate student
of Transylvania University, first applicant for the degree of doctor
of philosophy at Johns Hopkins, though he never found opportunity for
residence, teacher for years of languages, and then professor of Latin
and higher English at Bethany College, West Virginia.
The circumstances of his early life made a literary career difficult.
He had been born on a small Kentucky plantation a few miles out of
Lexington, miles that he walked daily while gaining his education. A
college course for him meant toil and sacrifice. The war had brought
poverty, and the death of the father imposed new burdens. Like
Lanier, he was forced to teach schools when he would have studied at
German universities, but, like Lanier, he somehow had caught a vision
of literature that dominated him even through decades of seeming
hopelessness. Few have had to fight longer for recognition and few
have ever worked harder to master the art with which they were to make
their appeal. Like Howells, he studied masters and read interminably,
pursuing his work into the German and the French, writing constantly
and rewriting and destroying. And the result, as with Howells, was no
immaturities. His first book, _Flute and Violin_, published when he
was forty-two, is by many regarded as his best work. To his earliest
readers it seemed as if a new young writer had arrived to whom art was
a spontaneous thing mastered without effort.
A study of the available fragments of Allen's work written earlier than
the stories in this first volume reveals much. He began as a critic.
In Northern journals after 1883 one may find many articles signed with
his name: sharp criticisms of Henry James, appreciations of Heine and
Keats, studies of the art of Balzac and his circle, letters on timely
subjects which show the wideness of his reading and the gradual shaping
of his art. He evolved his method deliberately after consideration of
all that had been done in England and America and France. By no other
writer of the period was the short story worked out with more care or
with more knowledge of requirements.
Especially significant is an article entitled "Local Color" in the
_Critic_ of 1886. The time has come, he contended, when the writer
of fiction must broaden the old conceptions of art. Now the novelist
must be "in some measure a scientist; he must comprehend the natural
pictorial environment of humanity in its manifold effects upon
humanity, and he must make this knowledge available for literary
presentation." Other requirements had become imperative:
From an artistic point of view, the aim of local color should
be to make the picture of human life natural and beautiful, or
dreary, or somber, or terrific, as the special character of
the theme may demand; from a scientific point of view, the aim
of local color is to make the picture of human life natural
and--intelligible, by portraying those picturable potencies in
nature that made it what it was and must go along with it to
explain what it is. The novelist must encompass both aims.
He must also be a stylist. "The happiest use of local color," he
declares, "will test to the uttermost one's taste and attainments as a
language colorist." And again, "The utmost in the use of local color
should result, when the writer chooses the most suitable of all colors
that are characteristic; when he makes these available in the highest
degree for artistic presentation; and when he attains and uses the
perfection of coloring in style."
One makes another discovery as one works among these earlier fragments:
Allen, like Howells, was a poet. His first contributions to the larger
magazines--_Harper's_ and the _Atlantic_--were poems, beautiful,
serious, colorful.
After these preliminaries one is prepared to find work done with excess
of care, with precision and balance, and, moreover, to find color in
its literal sense, poetic atmosphere and poetic phrasing, scientific
truth too, nature studied as Thoreau studied it, and Burroughs. The
six stories in _Flute and Violin_ stand by themselves in American
literature. They are not perfect examples of the short story judged by
the latest canons. They make often too much of the natural background,
they lack in swiftness, and they do not culminate with dramatic force.
They are poetic, at times almost lyrical. Open, for instance, _A
Kentucky Cardinal_:
March has gone like its winds. The other night as I lay awake
with that yearning which often beats within, there fell from
the upper air the notes of the wild gander as he wedged his
way onward by faith, not by sight, towards his distant bourn.
I rose and, throwing open the shutters, strained eyes toward
the unseen and unseeing explorer, startled, as a half-asleep
soldier might be startled by the faint bugle-call of his
commander, blown to him from the clouds. What far-off lands,
streaked with mortal dawn, does he believe in? In what soft
sylvan waters will he bury his tired breast? Always when I
hear his voice, often when not, I too desire to be up and gone
out of these earthly marshes where hunts the dark Fowler--gone
to some vast, pure, open sea, where, one by one, my scattered
kind, those whom I love and those who love me, will arrive in
safety, there to be together.
One thinks of Thoreau--one thinks of him often as one reads Allen.
Everywhere Nature, and Nature with the metaphysical light upon it.
And connected with Nature always the tragedy of human life--beauty of
landscape expressed in perfect beauty of language, but under it and
behind it struggle and passion and pain. Nowhere else in the period
such distinction of expression, such charm of literary atmosphere,
combined with such deep soundings into the heart of human life. "The
White Cowl" which appeared in the _Century_ of 1888 and later "Sister
Dolorosa" may be compared with no other American work later than "Ethan
Brand."
In his first period Allen was distinctively a writer of short stories
and sketches. His canvas was small, his plots single and uncomplicated,
his backgrounds over-elaborate, impeding the movement of the plot and
overshadowing the characters. His art began with landscape--his second
book, much of the matter of which was written before the contents of
the first, was wholly landscape, landscape idealized and made lyric.
Then came _John Gray_, a preliminary sketch, and _A Kentucky Cardinal_
and its sequel _Aftermath_, long and short stories, parables, humanity
beginning to emerge from the vast cosmic nature spectacle and to
dominate. Over everything beauty, yet through it all a strain of
sadness, the sadness of youth repressed, of tragedy too soon.
The second period began in 1896 with the publication of _Summer in
Arcady_. The novelist had moved permanently to New York City. He had
gained a broader outlook; he had felt the new forces that were moving
Thomas Hardy and the French novelists. His early work seemed to him
now narrow and weak, mere exercises of a prentice hand. He would work
with the novel now rather than with the short story; he would deal
with broad canvas, with the great fundamental problems that complicate
human life. His essay in the _Atlantic_ of October, 1897, explains the
new period in his work. Literature even into the mid-nineties had been
feminine rather than masculine, he averred. The American novelists had
aimed too much at refinement.
They sought the coverts where some of the more delicate
elements of our national life escaped the lidless eye of
publicity, and paid their delicate tributes to these; on the
clumsy canvases of our tumultuous democracy they watched to
see where some solitary being or group of beings described
lines of living grace, and with grace they detached these
and transferred them to the enduring canvases of letters;
they found themselves impelled to look for the minute things
of our humanity, and having gathered these, to polish them,
carve them, compose them into minute structures with minutest
elaboration ... polishing and adornment of the little things
of life--little ideas, little emotions, little states of
mind and shades of feeling, climaxes and denouements, little
comedies and tragedies played quite through or not quite played
through by little men and women on the little stage of little
playhouses.
So much for the past, for the feminine age to which his own earlier
work had belonged. A new age had arisen; a masculine age, less
delicate, less refined, less heedful of little things, a strenuous age,
more passionate and virile, less shrinking and squeamish.
It is striking out boldly for larger things--larger areas of
adventure, larger spaces of history, with freer movements
through both: it would have the wings of a bird in the air,
and not the wings of a bird on a woman's hat. It reveals a
disposition to place its scenery, its companies of players,
and the logic of its dramas, not in rare, pale, half-lighted,
dimly beheld backgrounds, but nearer to the footlights of the
obvious. And if, finally, it has any one characteristic more
discernible than another, it is the movement away from the
summits of life downward towards the bases of life; from the
heights of civilization to the primitive springs of action;
from the thin-aired regions of consciousness which are ruled
over by Tact to the underworld of consciousness where are
situated the mighty workshops, and where toils on forever the
cyclopean youth, Instinct.
It was more than the analysis of a far-seeing critic: it was the call
of a novelist to himself to abandon the small ideals and narrow field
of his early art, and strike out into the main currents of the age.
Let us try for a while the literary virtues and the
literary materials of less self-consciousness, of larger
self-abandonment, and thus impart to our fiction the free, the
uncaring, the tremendous fling and swing that are the very
genius of our time and spirit.
Following this declaration came the three major novels, _The Choir
Invisible_, which was his old short story _John Gray_ enlarged and
given "fling and swing," _The Reign of Law_, and _The Mettle of the
Pasture_, novels of the type which he had denominated masculine,
American, yet to be grouped with nothing else in American literature,
their only analogues being found in England or France.
In all his work he had been, as he had promised in his essay on "Local
Color," essentially scientific in spirit, but now he became direct,
fearless, fundamental. Nature he made central now. The older art
had made of it a background, a thing apart from humanity, sometimes
sympathetic, sometimes indifferent, but Allen, like Hardy and his
school, made of it now a ruling force, a dominating personality in the
tragedy. The first title of _Summer in Arcady_ as it ran serially
in the _Cosmopolitan_ was _Butterflies: a Tale of Nature_. Its theme
was the compelling laws within human life: instincts, inheritances,
physical forces that bind beyond power to escape. Man is not to be
treated as apart from Nature but as inseparably a part of Nature,
hurled on by forces that he does not understand, ruled all unknowingly
by heredity, fighting senseless battles that, could he but know all,
would reduce life to a succession of ironies: "If Daphne had but known,
hidden away on one of those yellow sheets [on which her own runaway
marriage had just been recorded, the last of a long series of such
marriages] were the names of her own father and mother."
In these later novels one finds now fully developed an element that
had been latent in all of his early work--a mystic symbolism that in
many ways is peculiar to Allen. _Summer in Arcady_ is built up around a
parallelism that extends into every part of the story:
Can you consider a field of butterflies and not think of the
blindly wandering, blindly loving, quickly passing human race?
Can you observe two young people at play on the meadows of Life
and Love without seeing in them a pair of these brief moths of
the sun?
And _The Reign of Law_ is a parable from beginning to end, a linking
of man to Nature, a parallelism between human life and the life of the
hemp of the Kentucky fields:
Ah! type, too, of our life, which also is earth-sown,
earth-rooted; which must struggle upward, be cut down, rooted
and broken, ere the separation take place between our dross and
our worth--poor perishable shard and immortal fiber. Oh, the
mystery, the mystery of that growth from the casting of the
soul as a seed into the dark earth, until the time when, led
through all natural changes and cleansed of weakness, it is
borne from the field of its nativity for the long service.
All of his work is essentially timeless and placeless. He had had
from the first little in common with the other short story writers
of locality. Of dialect he has almost none; of the negro who so
dominates Southern literature he shows only a glimpse in one or two of
his earlier sketches. His background, to be sure, is always Kentucky
and this background he describes with minuteness, but there is no
attempt to portray personalities or types peculiar to the State. He is
working rather in the realm of human life. Always is he tremendously
serious. A lambent humor may play here and there over the tales, but
everywhere is there the feeling of coming tragedy. Too much concerned
he is, perhaps, with the conception of sex as the central problem of
life--_Summer in Arcady_ and _The Mettle of the Pasture_ were greeted
with storms of disapproval--but one feels that he is sincere, that he
stands always on scientific grounds, and that he is telling what he
conceives to be the undiminished truth about modern life.
And his solution, so far as he offers a solution, is free from
bitterness or pessimism. He is superior to Hardy inasmuch as he
is able to rise above the pagan standpoint and see the end of the
suffering and the irony crowned with ultimate good. John Gray in _The
Choir Invisible_ summed up the philosophy of the author in sentences
like these: "To lose faith in men, not in humanity; to see justice
go down and not to believe in the triumph of injustice; for every
wrong that you weakly deal another or another deals you to love more
and more the fairness and beauty of what is right, and so to turn
the ever-increasing love from the imperfection that is in us all to
the Perfection that is above us all--the perfection that is God:
this is one of the ideals of actual duty that you once said were to
be as candles in my hand. Many a time this candle has gone out; but
as quickly as I could snatch any torch--with your sacred name on my
lips--it has been relighted."
The volume of his writings is small. He has worked always slowly,
revising, rewriting, never satisfied. His earlier short stories are
perhaps his most perfect work; his longer short stories, like _A
Kentucky Cardinal_, his most charming; and his later novels like _The
Mettle of the Pasture_, his most enduring, inasmuch as they contain the
chief substance of what he had to say to his generation. His weakness
has been a fondness for elaboration: in _The Reign of Law_ a chapter
is given to the life history of the hemp plant and to a parallelism
between it and human life. The movement of his stories is constantly
impeded by what is really extraneous material, endless descriptions of
landscape, beautiful in itself but needless, and unnecessary episodes:
a cougar "gaunt with famine and come for its kill" is creeping up
to John Gray, who is weaponless, but before the final spring four
pages about the habits of the animal--a chapter altogether for the
adventure, and after it is all told it is "lumber" so far as the needs
of the novel are concerned.
But there is a more fundamental weakness: his work on the whole is
the product of a follower rather than a leader. He learned his art
deliberately impelled not by a voice within which demanded expression
but by a love for beautiful things and a dogged determination to win in
the field that he had chosen for his life work. By interminable toil
and patience, and by alertness to seize upon every new development
in his art, he made himself at last a craftsman of marvelous skill,
even of brilliancy. He was not a voice in the period; rather was he an
artisan with a sure hand, a craftsman with exquisite skill.
IV
The triumph of the short story came in the early nineties. In the
September, 1891, issue of _Harper's Monthly_ Mr. Howells, reviewing
Garland's _Main-Traveled Roads_, commented on the fact that collections
of stories from the magazines were competing on even terms with the
novels:
We do not know how it has happened; we should not at all
undertake to say; but it is probably attributable to a number
of causes. It may be the prodigious popularity of Mr. Kipling
which has broken down all prejudices against the form of his
success. The vogue that Maupassant's tales in the original or
in versions have enjoyed may have had something to do with it.
Possibly the critical recognition of the American supremacy
in this sort has helped. But however it has come about, it
is certain that the result has come, and the publishers are
fearlessly venturing volumes of short stories on every hand;
and not only short stories by authors of established repute,
but by new writers who would certainly not have found this way
to the public some time ago.
During this decade the short story reached its highest level. In
February, 1892, the _Atlantic Monthly_ in a review of current
collections of short stories by Thomas Nelson Page, Joel Chandler
Harris, James Lane Allen, Octave Thanet, Hamlin Garland, Richard
Harding Davis, Elizabeth Stuart Phelps, Rose Terry Cooke, George A.
Hibbard, William Douglas O'Connor, Clinton Ross, Thomas A. Janvier,
H. C. Bunner, Brander Matthews, and Frank R. Stockton, remarked of
the form that "in America it is the most vital as well as the most
distinctive part of literature. In fact, it flourishes so amply that
this very prosperity nullifies most of the apologies for the American
novel." But even within the limits of the decade of its fullest
success came the decline. The enormous vogue of the form resulted in
the journalization of it. O. Henry with his methods helped greatly to
devitalize and cheapen it. With him the short story became fictional
vaudeville. Everywhere a straining for effect, a search for the piquant
and the startling. He is theatric, stagy, smart, ultra modern. Instead
of attempts at truth a succession of smart hits: "The wind out of the
mountains was singing like a jew's-harp in a pile of old tomato-cans by
the railroad track"; "A bullet-headed man Smith was, with an oblique,
dead eye and the mustache of a cocktail mixer," etc. He is flippant,
insincere, with an eye to the last sentence which must startle the
reader until he gasps. After O. Henry the swift decline of the short
story, the inclusion of it in correspondence courses, and the reign of
machine-made art.
V
But during the decade of the high tide came some of the strongest work
in American literature. It was the period of the earlier and better
work of Hamlin Garland and Alice French, of Richard Harding Davis and
Ambrose Bierce, of Mrs. Deland and F. H. Smith, with Garland, perhaps,
the most distinctive worker. Garland began as an iconoclast, a leader
of the later phase of realism--depressed realism after the Russian and
the French types. His little book of essays, _Crumbling Idols_, breezy
and irreverent, with its cry for a new Americanism in our literature,
new truth, new realism, was the voice of the new generation after Harte
and Howells, the school inspired by Ibsen, Hardy, Tolstoy, Maupassant.
The Middle West was his background and he knew it with completeness.
He had been born in a Wisconsin "coule" on a ragged, half-broken farm,
and before he was eleven he had migrated with his parents westward,
three different times. His boyhood had followed the middle western
border. The father was of Maine Yankee stock, full of the restlessness
and eagerness of his generation. In his son's record he stands out in
almost epic proportions.
Hour after hour we pushed westward, the heads of our tired
horses hanging ever lower, and on my mother's face the shadow
deepened, but my father's voice calling to his team lost
nothing of its edge. He was in his element. He loved this
shelterless sweep of sod. This westward march delighted him. I
think he would have gladly kept on until he reached the Rocky
Mountains.[152]
He had stopped this time in Iowa and had begun once again the
tremendous task of making a farm out of the virgin prairie. The boy
took his full share of work. Speaking of himself in the third person,
he says: "In the autumn that followed his eleventh birthday he plowed
for seventy days, overturning nearly one hundred and fifty acres of
stubble." At fifteen he was head farmer and took a man's place on
the reaper, at the threshing, and in all of the farm work. Education
came to him as he could get it. He attended the winter sessions of
the district school and he read all the books that the neighborhood
afforded. By rarest good fortune his father subscribed for the new
_Hearth and Home_ in which the serial _The Hoosier Schoolmaster_ was
running, and in the boy's own words in later years the story was a
"milestone in his literary progress as it was in the development of
distinctive Western fiction."
His later struggles toward culture, his graduation in 1881 from Cedar
Valley Seminary, Osage, Iowa, his school teaching in Illinois and
Dakota, his experience as a settler during the Dakota land "boom" of
1883, his Howells-like journey to Boston the following year, and his
years of life there as teacher and eager student, must be passed over
swiftly. He haunted the Boston public library and read enormously,
he became impressed with the theories of the new French school of
"Veritists," and he soon began to write, first photographic sketches
of Middle-Western life--corn and wheat raising, rural customs, and the
like--then after a long period he returned West for his first vacation.
At Chicago he visited Joseph Kirkland (1830-1894), author of _Zury:
the Meanest Man in Spring County_ (1887), a book of crude yet strong
pictures of Western life, and the call was another milestone in his
literary life.
The result of that vacation was three books of short stories, their
author's most distinctive work, _Main-Traveled Roads_, _Prairie Folks_,
and _Other Main-Traveled Roads_. His own account of the matter is
worthy of quotation:
The entire series was the result of a summer-vacation visit
to my old home in Iowa, to my father's farm in Dakota, and,
last of all, to my birthplace in Wisconsin. This happened in
1887. I was living at the time in Boston, and had not seen
the West for several years, and my return to the scenes of my
boyhood started me upon a series of stories delineative of
farm and village life as I knew it and had lived it. I wrote
busily during the two years that followed, and in this revised
definitive edition of _Main-Traveled Roads_ and its companion
volume, _Other Main-Traveled Roads_ (compiled from other
volumes which now go out of print), the reader will find all of
the short stories which came from my pen between 1887 and 1889.
It remains to say that, though conditions have changed somewhat
since that time, yet for the hired man and the renter farm
life in the West is still a stern round of drudgery. My pages
present it--not as the summer boarder or the young lady
novelist sees it--but as the working farmer endures it.
After the years at Boston the life of his native region had taken on
for him a totally new aspect. He saw it now as Howard saw it in "Up
the Coule," the grinding toil of it, the brutality and hopelessness
and horror of it, and it filled him with fierce anger. He wrote with
full heart and with an earnestness that was terrible, and he had the
courage of his convictions. Will Hannan takes Agnes from the hell into
which she has married and bears her into his own new home of love and
helpfulness and there is no apology, and again the same theme in later
tales. There is the grimness and harshness and unsparing fidelity to
fact, however unpleasant, that one finds in the Russian realists,
but there is another element added to it: the fervor and faith of
the reformer. Such a story as "Under the Lion's Paw," for instance,
does not leave one, like Ibsen and Hardy, in despair and darkness;
it arouses rather to anger and the desire to take action harsh and
immediate. There is no dodging of facts. All the dirt and coarseness of
farm life come into the picture and often dominate it. The author is
not writing poetry; despite his _Prairie Songs_ he is no poet. Howard
is visiting home after a long absence:
It was humble enough--a small white story-and-a-half structure,
with a wing set in the midst of a few locust trees; a small
drab-colored barn with a sagging ridge-pole; a barnyard full
of mud, in which a few cows were standing, fighting the flies
and waiting to be milked. An old man was pumping water at the
well; the pigs were squealing from a pen near by; a child was
crying....
As he waited, he could hear a woman's fretful voice, and
the impatient jerk and jar of kitchen things, indicative
of ill-temper or worry. The longer he stood absorbing this
farm-scene, with all its sordidness, dullness, triviality, and
its endless drudgeries, the lower his heart sank. All the joy
of the home-coming was gone, when the figure arose from the cow
and approached the gate, and put the pail of milk down on the
platform by the pump.
"Good-evening," said Howard, out of the dusk.
Grant stared a moment. "Good-evening."
Howard knew the voice, though it was older and deeper and more
sullen. "Don't you know me, Grant? I am Howard."
The man approached him, gazing intently at his face. "You are?"
after a pause. "Well, I'm glad to see you, but I can't shake
hands. That damned cow has laid down in the mud."
But the most pitiful pictures are those of the women. Lucretia Burns is
a type:
She had no shawl or hat and no shoes, for it was still muddy
in the little yard, where the cattle stood patiently fighting
the flies and mosquitoes swarming into their skins, already
wet with blood. The evening was oppressive with its heat, and
a ring of just-seen thunder-heads gave premonitions of an
approaching storm.
She arose from the cow's side at last, and, taking her pails
of foaming milk, staggered toward the gate. The two pails hung
from her lean arms, her bare feet slipped on the filthy ground,
her greasy and faded calico dress showed her tired and swollen
ankles, and the mosquitoes swarmed mercilessly on her neck and
bedded themselves in her colorless hair.
The children were quarreling at the well, and the sound of
blows could be heard. Calves were querulously calling for their
milk, and little turkeys, lost in a tangle of grass, were
piping plaintively.
It was a pitifully worn, almost tragic face--long, thin,
sallow, hollow-eyed. The mouth had long since lost the power
to shape itself into a kiss, and had a droop at the corners
which seemed to announce a breaking-down at any moment into a
despairing wail. The collarless neck and sharp shoulders showed
painfully.
It is the tragic world of Mary E. Wilkins--her obstinate, elemental,
undemonstrative rustics moved into a new setting. As in her work,
simplicity, crude force, the power of one who for a moment has
forgotten art and gives the feeling of actual life, verisimilitude that
convinces and compels. The little group of stories is work sent hot
from a man's heart, and they are alive as are few other stories of the
period, and they will live. They are part of the deeper history of a
section and an era.
This element of purpose is found in all of Garland's work. Nowhere
is he a mere teller of tales. The Scotch and Yankee elements within
him made of him a preacher, a man with a message. The narrow field
of his first success could not long be worked, and, like the true
son of a pioneer, he began to follow his old neighbors in their
further migrations westward. His later work took the form of novels,
many of them dealing with the extreme West and all of them saturated
with purpose. His _Captain of the Gray Horse Troop_, for instance,
attempted for the Indian what _Ramona_ tried to do. It is a powerful
study of the wrongs done a race, and, moreover, it is a novel. Still
later the native mysticism of his race showed itself in such novels
as _The Tyranny of the Dark_, _The Shadow World_, _Victor Ollnee's
Discipline_--spiritualistic propaganda.
With the novel he has not fully succeeded. He lacks power of
construction and ability for extended effort. The short story "A
Branch Road" in _Main-Traveled Roads_ has a gripping power, but the
same theme treated at novel length in _Moccasin Ranch_ becomes too
much an exploiting of background. There is a sense of dilution, a loss
of effect. The author's first fine edge of anger, of conviction, of
complete possession by his material, is gone, and we have the feeling
that he has become a professional man of letters, an exploiter of what
he considers to be salable material. His best long novel is _Rose
of Dutcher's Coolly_. _Money Magic_ has a certain sense of power
connected with it, but it lacks the final touch of actual life. Unlike
_The Rise of Silas Lapham_, with which it may be compared, it leaves
us unsatisfied. The quivering sense of reality that one finds in
_Main-Traveled Roads_ is not there. It is a performance, a brilliant
picture made deliberately and coldly by a man in his study, whereas a
story like "Among the Corn Rows" reads as if it had taken possession of
its author, and had been written with a burst of creative enthusiasm.
One late fragment of Garland's must not be overlooked, his _A Son of
the Middle Border_, a part of which has appeared in serial form. It is
an autobiography, and it is more: it is a document in the history of
the Middle West. It has a value above all his novels, above all else
that he has written, saving always those tense short stories of his
first inspiration.
VI
The Western stories of Alice French antedated by several years
Garland's first work and perhaps had an influence upon it. Her strong
story "The Bishop's Vagabond" appeared in the _Atlantic_ as early as
1884 and her collection _Knitters in the Sun_ by Octave Thanet came out
in 1887. Her work, however, has not the originality and the sharpness
of outline of Garland's and it has failed to hold the high place that
was at first assigned to it. She is to be classed with Miss Woolson
rather than with Mrs. Wilkins Freeman, with Miss Murfree rather than
with Harris. She was not a native of the regions she chose as her
literary field, but she entered them with curiosity and studied their
peculiarities carefully with open note-book for Northern readers.
Her father and her brothers were extensive manufacturers, and contact
with their work gave her a knowledge of labor conditions and of
economic problems that enabled her in the early eighties to contribute
to the _Atlantic_ and other magazines able papers, such as "The Indoor
Pauper" and "Contented Masses," papers widely commented upon for
their brilliancy and breadth of view. But the success won everywhere
by the feminine short story writers tempted her from these economic
studies, and for a time she wrote local color tales with variety of
background--Canada, Florida, Iowa. Then, with ample means at her
disposal, she built at Clover Bend, Arkansas, a summer home on the
banks of the Black River, and, like Miss Murfree, became interested
in the crude social conditions about her, so different from those of
her native New England or her adopted Iowa city of Davenport. Stories
like "Whitsun Harp, Regulator" and "Ma' Bowlin'" followed, then the
fine studies entitled "Plantation Life in Arkansas" and "Town Life in
Arkansas."
These earlier stories are often dramatic, even melodramatic, and they
abound in sentiment. Sometimes a character stands out with sharpness,
but more often the tale impresses one as a performance rather than a
bit of actual life. The intense feeling that Garland, who wrote as
if his material came from out his own bitter heart, throws into his
stories she does not have. She stands as an outsider and looks on
with interest and takes notes, often graphic notes, then displays her
material as an exhibitor sets forth his curious collection.
More and more the sociological specialist and the reformer took
control of her pen. Even her short stories are not free from special
pleading: "Convict Number 49," for instance, is not so much a story
as a tract for the times. In her novels the problem dominates. _The
Man of the Hour_ and _The Lion's Share_ treat phases of the labor
problem, and _By Inheritance_ is a study of the negro question with an
attempted solution. The story, despite dramatic intensity at times and
lavish sentiment, fails often to interest the reader unless he be a
sociologist or a reformer. Already she holds her place by reason of a
few of her earlier short stories, and it would seem that even these are
now losing the place that once undoubtedly was theirs.
More convincing, though perhaps they have had smaller influence upon
their time, have been the Vermont stories of Rowland E. Robinson, which
are genuine at every point and full of subtle humor, and the Adirondack
stories of Philander Deming, which began to appear in the _Atlantic_
in the mid-seventies. Both men have written out of their own lives
with full hearts, and both have added to their material a touch of
originality that has made it distinctive.
VII
In tracing the development of the short story to the end of the century
one must pause at the exquisite work of H. C. Bunner, who undoubtedly
did much toward bringing the form to mechanical perfection. His volume
entitled _Made in France: French Tales with a U. S. Twist_, suggests
one secret of his art. He had a conciseness, a brilliancy of effect,
an epigrammatic touch, that suggest the best qualities of French
style. In his volumes _Short Sixes_ and _More Short Sixes_ he is at
his best--humorous, artistic, effective, and in addition he touches at
times the deeper strata of human life and becomes an interpreter and a
leader.
French in effect also is Ambrose Bierce, who in his earlier work
displayed a power to move his readers that is little found outside
of Poe. Reserve he has, a directness that at times is disconcerting,
originality of a peculiar type, and a command of many of the subtlest
elements of the story-telling art, but lacking sincerity, he fails
of permanent appeal. He writes for effect, for startling climax, for
an insidious attack upon his reader's nerves, and often, as in his
collection entitled _In the Midst of Life_, he works his will. But he
is not true, he works not in human life as it is actually lived, but in
a Poe-like life that exists only in his own imaginings. In his later
years journalism took the fine edge from his art and adverse criticism
of his work turned him into something like a literary anarchist who
criticized with bitterness all things established. A few of his
novels may be studied with profit as models of their kind, but the
greater part of his writings despite their brilliancy can not hope for
permanence.
One may close the survey with Richard Harding Davis, who may be taken
as the typical figure of the last years of the century. Davis was a
journalist, peculiarly and essentially a journalist. He began his
career in a newspaper office and all that he did was colored by the
newspaper atmosphere. Literature to him was a thing to be dashed off
with facility, to be read with excitement, and to be thrown aside. The
art of making it he learned as one learns any other profession, by
careful study and painstaking thoroughness, and having mastered it he
became a literary practitioner, expert in all branches.
"Gallagher" was his first story, and it was a brilliant production,
undoubtedly his best. Then followed the Van Bibber stories, facile
studies of the idle rich area of New York life of which the author was
a mere spectator, remarkable only for the influence they exerted on
younger writers. Of the rest of his voluminous output little need be
said. It is ephemeral, it was made to supply the demand of the time for
amusement. With O. Henry, Edward W. Townsend of the "Chimmie Fadden"
stories, and others, its author debauched the short story and made it
the mere thing of a day, a bit of journalism to be thrown aside with
the paper that contained it. On the mechanical side one may find but
little fault. As a performance it is often brilliant, full of dash and
spirit and excessive modernness, but it lacks all the elements that
make for permanence--beauty of style, distinction of phrase, and, most
of all, fidelity to the deeper truths of life. It imparts to its reader
little save a momentary titillation and the demand for more. It deals
only with the superficial and the coarsely attractive, and we feel it
is so because of its author's limitations, because he knows little of
the deeps of character, of sacrifice, of love in the genuine sense, of
the fundamental stuff of which all great literature has been woven.
He is the maker of extravaganzas, of Zenda romances, of preposterous
combinations like _A Soldier of Fortune_, which is true neither to
human nature nor to any possibility of terrestrial geography; he is a
special correspondent with facile pen who tells nothing new and nothing
authoritative--a man of the mere to-day, and with the mere to-day he
will be forgotten. Were he but an isolated case such criticism were
unnecessary; he might be omitted from our study; but he is the type
of a whole school, a school indeed that bids fair to exert enormous
influence upon the literature, especially upon the fiction, of the
period that is to come.
VIII
Thus the fiction of the period has expressed itself prevailingly in
short-breathed work. Compared with the fiction of France or England
or Russia, with the major work of Balzac or Thackeray or Tolstoy, it
has been a thing of seeming fragments. Instead of writing "the great
American novel," which was so eagerly looked for during all the period,
its novelists have preferred to cultivate small social areas and to
treat even these by means of brief sketches.
The reasons are obvious. American life during the period was so
heterogeneous, so scattered, that it has been impossible to comprehend
any large part of it in a single study. The novelist who would express
himself prevailingly in the larger units of fiction, like Henry James,
for instance, or F. Marion Crawford, has been forced to take his topics
from European life. The result has been narrowness, cameos instead
of canvases, short stories rather than novels. In a period that over
enormous areas was transforming thousands of discordant elements into
what was ultimately to be a unity, nothing else was possible. Short
stories were almost imperative. He who would deal with crude characters
in a bare environment can not prolong his story without danger of
attenuation. The failure of Miss Murfree, and indeed of nearly all of
the short story writers when they attempted to expand their compressed
and carefully wrought tales into novels, has already been dwelt upon.
But shortness of unit is not a fault. The brevity of the form,
revealing as it does with painful conspicuousness all inferior
elements, has resulted in an excellence of workmanship that has made
the American short story the best art form of its kind to be found in
any literature. The richness of the materials used has also raised
the quality of the output. The picturesqueness of American life
during the period has made possible themes of absorbing interest and
unusual vividness of picturing, and the elemental men and passions
found in new and isolated areas have furnished abundance of material
for characterization. Until the vast field of American life becomes
more unified and American society becomes less a matter of provincial
varieties, the short story will continue to be the unit of American
fiction.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
FRANK RICHARD STOCKTON. (1834-1902.) _Ting-a-ling Stories_,
1869; _Roundabout Papers_, 1872; _The Home_, 1872; _What Might
Have Been Expected_, 1874; _Tales Out of School_, 1875; _Rudder
Grange_, 1879; _A Jolly Fellowship_, 1880; _The Floating Prince_,
1881; _The Story of Viteau_, 1884; _The Lady, or the Tiger? and
Other Stories_, 1884; _The Casting Away of Mrs. Lecks and Mrs.
Aleshine_, 1886; _A Christmas Wreck and Other Stories_, 1886;
_The Late Mrs. Null_, 1886; _The Hundredth Man_, 1887; _The Bee
Man of Orne_, 1887; _The Dusantes_, 1888; _Amos Kilbright_,
1888; _Personally Conducted_, 1889; _The Great War Syndicate_,
1889; _Ardis Claverden_, 1890; _Stories of Three Burglars_,
1890; _The Merry Chanter_, 1890; _The Squirrel Inn_, 1891; _The
House of Martha_, 1891; _Rudder Grangers Abroad_, 1891; _The
Clocks of Rondaine_, 1892; _The Watch-Maker's Wife_, 1893;
_Pomona's Travels_, 1894; _The Adventures of Captain Horn_, 1895;
_Mrs. Cliff's Yacht_, 1896; _Stories of New Jersey_, 1896; _A
Story-Teller's Pack_, 1897; _The Great Stone of Sardis_, 1898;
_The Girl at Cobhurst_, 1898; _Buccaneers and Pirates of Our
Coast_, 1898; _The Vizier of the Two-Horned Alexander_, 1899;
_The Associate Hermits_, 1899; _A Bicycle of Cathay_, 1900;
_Afield and Afloat_, 1900; _The Novels and Stories of Frank R.
Stockton_, Shenandoah Edition, 18 vols., 1900; _Kate Bonnet_,
1902.
GRACE KING. (1852----.) _Monsieur Motte_, 1888; _Earthlings_ [in
_Lippincott's Magazine_]; _Tales of a Time and Place_, 1892;
_Jean Baptiste Le Moyne, 'Sieur de Bienville_ [Makers of American
Series], 1892; _Balcony Stories_, 1893; _History of Louisiana_
[with J. R. Ficklen], 1894; _New Orleans, the Place and the
People_, 1895; _De Soto and His Men in the Land of Florida_,
1898; _Stories from Louisiana History_ [with J. R. Ficklen], 1905.
KATE CHOPIN. (1801-1904.) _At Fault, a Novel_, 1890; _Bayou
Folk_, 1894; _A Night in Acadie and Other Stories_, 1897; _The
Awakening, a Novel_, 1899.
JAMES LANE ALLEN. (1849----.) _Flute and Violin, and Other
Kentucky Tales and Romances_, 1891; _The Blue-Grass Region of
Kentucky_, 1892; _John Gray: a Kentucky Tale of the Olden Time_,
1893; _A Kentucky Cardinal: a Story_, 1894; _Aftermath: Part
Two of a Kentucky Cardinal_, 1895; _Summer in Arcady: a Tale of
Nature_, 1896; _The Choir Invisible_, 1897; _The Reign of Law:
a Tale of the Kentucky Hemp Fields_, 1900; _The Mettle of the
Pasture_, 1903; _The Bride of the Mistletoe_, 1909; _The Doctor's
Christmas Eve_, 1910; _A Heroine in Bronze_, 1912.
HAMLIN GARLAND. (1860----.) _Main-Traveled Roads: Six Mississippi
Valley Stories_, 1891; _Jason Edwards: an Average Man_, 1892;
_Little Norsk; or, Ol' Pap's Flaxen_, 1892; _Member of the Third
House: a Dramatic Story_, 1892; _A Spoil of Office: a Story of
the Modern West_, 1892; _Prairie Folks: or, Pioneer Life on the
Western Prairies, in Nine Stories_, 1893; _Prairie Songs_, 1893;
_Crumbling Idols: Essays on Art, Dealing Chiefly with Literature,
Painting, and the Drama_, 1894; _Rose of Dutcher's Coolly_, 1895;
_Wayside Courtships_, 1897; _Ulysses S. Grant, His Life and
Character_, 1898; _The Spirit of Sweetwater_, 1898; _Boy Life
on the Prairie_, 1899; _The Trail of the Gold-Seekers: Record
of Travel in Prose and Verse_, 1899; _The Eagle's Heart_, 1900;
_Her Mountain Lover_, 1901; _The Captain of the Grayhorse Troop_,
1902; _Hesper_, 1903; _The Light of the Star_, 1904; _The Tyranny
of the Dark_, 1905; _Witch's Gold: New Version of the Spirit
of Stillwater_, 1906; _Money Magic_, 1907; _The Long Trail_,
1907; _The Shadow World_, 1908; _Moccasin Ranch, a Story of
Dakota_, 1909; collected edition, ten volumes, 1909; _Cavanagh,
Forest Ranger_, 1910; _Other Main-Traveled Roads_, 1910; _Victor
Ollnee's Discipline_, 1911.
ALICE FRENCH, "OCTAVE THANET." (1850----.) _Knitters in the Sun_,
1887; _Expiation_, 1890; _We All_, 1891; _Otto the Knight and
Other Trans-Mississippi Stories_, 1891; _Stories of a Western
Town_, 1892; _Adventures in Photography_, 1893; _The Missionary
Sheriff: Incidents in the Life of a Plain Man Who Tried to Do
His Duty_, 1897; _The Book of True Lovers_, 1897; _The Heart of
Toil_, 1898; _A Slave to Duty and Other Women_, 1898; _A Captured
Dream and Other Stories_, 1899; _The Man of the Hour_, 1905; _The
Lion's Share_, 1907; _By Inheritance_, 1910; _Stories That End
Well_, 1911; _A Step on the Stair_, 1913.
ROWLAND EVANS ROBINSON. (1833-1900.) _Uncle Lisha's Shop: Life
in a Corner of Yankeeland_, 1887; _Sam Lovel's Camp: Uncle
Lisha's Friends Under Bark and Canvas_, 1889; _Vermont: a Study
in Independence_, 1892; _Danvis Folks_, 1894; _In New England
Woods and Fields_, 1896; _Uncle Lisha's Outing_, 1897; _Hero of
Ticonderoga_, 1898; _A Danvis Pioneer_, 1900; _Sam Lovel's Boy_,
1901; _In the Greenwood_, 1904; _Hunting Without a Gun and Other
Papers_, 1905; _Out of Bondage and Other Stories_, 1905.
PHILANDER DEMING. (1829----.) _Adirondack Stories_, 1880,
1886; _Tompkins and Other Folks: Stories of the Hudson and the
Adirondacks_, 1885.
AMBROSE BIERCE. (1842-1914.) _Cobwebs from an Empty Skull_,
1874; _The Monk and the Hangman's Daughter_ [with Gustav Adolph
Danzinger], 1892; _Tales of Soldiers and Civilians_ [later
changed to _In the Midst of Life_], 1892; _Black Beetles in
Amber_, 1895; _Can Such Things Be?_ 1894; _Fantastic Fables_,
1899; _Shapes of Clay_, 1903; _The Cynic's Word Book_, 1906; _Son
of the Gods and a Horseman in the Sky_, 1907; _The Shadow on the
Dial and Other Essays_, 1909; _Write It Right: Little Blacklist
of Literary Faults_, 1909; Collected Works. Twelve Volumes.
1909-12.
RICHARD HARDING DAVIS. (1864-1916.) _Gallagher and Other
Stories_, 1891; _Stories for Boys_, 1891; _Van Bibber and
Others_, 1892; _The West from a Car Window_, 1892; _Rulers of
the Mediterranean_, 1894; _Exiles and Other Stories_, 1894; _Our
English Cousins_, 1894; _Princess Aline_, 1895; _About Paris_,
1895; _Cinderella and Other Stories_, 1896; _Three Gringos in
Venezuela and Central America_, 1896; _Cuba in War Time_, 1897;
_Soldiers of Fortune_, 1897; _A Year from a Reporter's Notebook_,
1898; _The King's Jackal_, 1898; _The Lion and the Unicorn_,
1899; _Novels and Stories_, six volumes, 1899; _With Both Armies
in South Africa_, 1900; _In the Fog_, 1901; _Captain Macklin_,
1902; _Ranson's Folly_, 1902; _The Bar Sinister_, 1904; _Miss
Civilization: a Comedy_, 1905; _Real Soldiers of Fortune_,
1906; _Farces_, 1906; _The Scarlet Car_, 1907; _The Congo and
Coasts of Africa_, 1907; _Vera, the Medium_, 1908; _White Mice_,
1909; _Once upon a Time_, 1910; _The Dictator, a Farce_, 1910;
_Galloper, a Comedy_, 1910; _The Consul_, 1911; _The Man Who
Could not Lose_, 1911; _The Red Cross Girl_, 1912; _The Lost
Road_, 1913; _With the Allies_, 1914.