CHAPTER XIV.

FIELD-ENGINEERING.

_Field-Engineering_ includes the making of military reconnaissances,

temporary fortifications, and military roads; the planning and

construction of military bridges; the attack and defence of military

works;--in fine, all the various duties of engineer troops, either in

the operations of a campaign, or in the dispositions on the

battle-field.

_Military reconnaissance._--By this term is meant an examination of a

portion of the theatre of war, to ascertain its military character and

resources. If the examination be made of a large district of country,

and for an entire campaign, the reconnaissance is _general_; if made for

collecting detailed information respecting a proposed line of march, the

passage of a river, the position of an enemy, &c., it is termed

_special_.

In making a general reconnaissance, great care should be taken to

collect accurate information respecting the general topography of the

country; the character of the mountains, forests, and water-courses; the

nature of the roads, canals, and railways; the quality of the soil, and

the amount of provisions and forage it produces; the population and

character of the cities, towns, and villages, the commercial and

manufacturing resources of every part of the country, and the means of

transportation to be found in each district. The plan of military

operations will be based on the information thus obtained, and any

serious error in the reconnaissance may involve the results of the

campaign, and even the fate of the war.

In a special reconnaissance, not only accurate but minute information

will be required: the character of the roads must be given in detail;

the nature of the water-courses, their depth and velocity; the position

and character of bridges, and fords;--in fine, a full description of all

obstacles to be encountered, and the means that can be made available

for overcoming these obstacles.

A reconnoitring officer may usually derive much valuable information

from the published maps and descriptions of the country to be examined;

additional matters of detail may be obtained from woodsmen, hunters, and

fishermen; and also from the innkeepers and local authorities of the

district. But the officer should always verify this information, so far

as practical, by personal examination. In making a reconnaissance in the

vicinity of an enemy, he must be supported by a strong escort of mounted

troops, and in all his operations the greatest precaution will be

requisite to ensure success.

Some simple instrument, such as a pocket sextant, or compass, will be

sufficient to enable the reconnoitring officer to measure, with

considerable accuracy, the height of mountains, the width of streams,

&c., and an ordinary scale and dividers will enable him to make a

suitable military sketch.

_Temporary Fortification._--It has been stated in the preceding chapter

that temporary fortifications are properly confined to the operations of

a single campaign, and are used to strengthen positions which are to be

occupied only for a short period; and that they are usually made of

earth, thrown up by the troops in a single day. Temporary

fortifications, as a part of field-engineering, may therefore be

regarded rather as an _arm_ than an _art_. The principles of their

construction are derived, of course, from the theory of permanent

fortification, but in applying these principles to practice in the

field, much greater latitude is allowed than in the exact scientific

arrangement of permanent works.

The purpose of field-works (or intrenchments, as they are commonly

called) is to arrest, or at least to impede, the march of the attacking

foe; to shelter the defensive troops from the missive weapons of the

assailants, and to detain them in a position where they will be exposed

to the fire of the defensive force. The numerical and positive strength

of the assailed may be much less than that of the assailant, and yet an

equilibrium exist; the material obstacles compensating for the

difference in numbers. Intrenchments, though inert masses, must

therefore be regarded as most valuable and important accessaries in the

defence of a position.

Intrenchments consist either of _lines_ of works made to cover extended

positions, or of _detached_ works designed simply to defend the ground

they occupy. The former generally present a front against the enemy in

but one direction, while the latter are usually closed on all their

sides.

The following figures have been employed for the plan of simple

intrenchments, viz.: the polygon, redan, lunette, mitre, star-fort, and

bastion.

_Square_ or _polygonal redoubts_ are the most common forms given to

field-works, on account of the ease of their construction. But they have

many defects. There is a sector without fire in front of each salient,

and the ditches are without protection. The latter objection also holds

good against all circular works.

The _redan_ (Fig. 45) is frequently used to cover a point in rear, as a

bridge, a ford, or a defile. When used alone, its gorge should be closed

by palisades. Its ditches are unprotected.

The _lunette_ (Fig. 46) has nearly the same defects as the redan.

The _mitre_, or _priest-cap,_ (Fig. 47,) may be employed with advantage

when a cross-fire is required on the capital of the work. The

_star-fort_ has all the defects, without the merit of simplicity, which

belong to the polygonal redoubt.

The _bastion-fort_ (Fig. 48) more fully satisfies the conditions of a

good defence than any other plan; but it is less simple and easy of

execution. It is usually composed of four or five fronts, but it may be

applied to a polygon of any number of sides.

For the details of the construction of these several works, we must

refer to the special treatises on field-fortification.

Lines of intrenchments may be made either continuous or with intervals.

In adopting either plan, the engineer should avail himself of all the

natural obstacles presented by the position, so as to diminish the labor

of erecting artificial means of defence.

The simplest arrangement for a continuous intrenchment is the

_cremaillière_ or indented line. When applied to an irregular site, or

used to connect together distant and detached works, the indented line

may be regarded as a good disposition. Mitres and redans, connected by

straight curtains, are sometimes employed, as also a combination of

large and small redans, forming alternate salient and re-entering

angles. A continuous line of bastions is preferable to any other

arrangement, when there is plenty of time for their construction.

Lines with intervals are frequently formed of alternate lunettes and

square redoubts. Other detached works may be employed in the same way.

This manner of intrenching a position has several advantages, with

disciplined troops. The first shock of the assailant is sustained by the

detached works, and when he attempts to penetrate in the intervals, his

flanks become exposed to a deadly cross fire. These intervals also allow

the assailed to act on the offensive, by charging the enemy at the

opportune moment. But with raw and militia forces it will be safer to

resort to continuous lines. If cavalry form any part of the defensive

force, it will be absolutely necessary to leave intervals through which

these troops may charge.

A vertical section of all intrenchments is of the same general form; the

dimensions will, of course, vary with the nature of the soil, and the

time and means employed in their construction. The minimum dimensions

that can be used with any considerable advantage are given in Fig. 49.

In laying out field-works advantage should be taken of all available

artificial obstacles, such as hedges, walls, houses, outbuildings, &c. A

thickset hedge may be rendered defensible by throwing up against it a

slight parapet of earth. Stone fences may be employed in the same way.

Walls of masonry may be pierced with loop-holes and arranged for one or

two tiers of fire. The walls of houses are pierced in the same manner,

and a projecting wooden structure, termed a _machicoulis gallery_, is

sometimes made from the floor of the second story, to enable the

assailed to fire down upon their opponents. This arrangement is

frequently employed to advantage in wooden blockhouses against a savage

foe; but it is of little avail when exposed to the fire of artillery.

Some have proposed galleries of this description in permanent works of

masonry, but the project is too obviously absurd to merit discussion.

In addition to the parapet of an intrenchment, a good engineer will

always find time and means for constructing other artificial obstacles,

such as trous-de-loup, abattis, palisades, stockades, fraises,

chevaux-de-frise, crows'-feet, mines, &c.

_Trous-de-loup_ are pits dug in the earth in the form of an inverted

truncated cone, some six feet in diameter, and about the same number of

feet in depth. They are usually placed a few yards in front of the

ditch, and concealed by some slight covering.

_Abattis_ are tops and large limbs of trees arranged along the glacis of

a work; the ends of the branches are lopped off and sharpened.

_Palisades_ are stakes some eight or ten feet long, with one end

fastened in the ground and the other made sharp. They are placed in

juxtaposition and connected together by horizontal riband-pieces. This

arrangement is frequently placed at the foot of the counterscarp. When

the timbers are large and the work is intended as a part of a primary

defence, it is called a _stockade_; when the stakes are placed at the

foot of the scarp, either horizontally or inclined, they receive the

name of _fraises_.

A _cheval-de-frise_ consists of a horizontal piece of timber armed with

wooden or iron lances, which project some eight or ten feet. It is much

employed against cavalry, and on rocky soils serves as a substitute for

palisades.

_Crows'-feet_ are small wooden or iron forms filled with sharp spikes.

They are thrown, with their points upward, on ground which is to be

passed over by cavalry.

_Mines_ are sometimes used in connection with intrenchments, but more

commonly in the attack and defence of permanent works. They will be

noticed further on.

Fieldworks which are to be occupied for a considerable length of time

will usually have their steeper slopes revetted, and be arranged with

scarp and counterscarp, galleries, traverses, blindages, &c. Such works

hold an intermediary rank between temporary and permanent fortification.

As examples of the importance of field fortifications and of the manner

of organizing them, the reader is referred to the celebrated battle of

Fontenoy, in 1745, where the carefully-arranged intrenchments of Marshal

Saxe enabled the French to repel, with immense destruction, the attacks

of greatly superior numbers; to the battle of Fleurus, in 1690, where

the Prince of Waldeck exposed himself to a most disastrous defeat "by

neglecting the resources of fortification and other indispensable

precautions;" to the battle of Malplaquet, in 1709, where Marshal

Villars, by neglecting to occupy and intrench the farm that closed the

passage between the woods of Sars and Lanière, exposed himself to a

disastrous defeat; to the operations of 1792, where General Custine, by

neglecting to intrench the heights that covered Bingen, as the engineers

had recommended, exposed himself to those terrible disasters which

forced him to a precipitate retreat; to the works of Wervike, which, by

a vigorous resistance on the 10th of September, 1793, saved the Dutch

army from total destruction; to the intrenched camp of Ulm, in 1800,

which for six weeks held in check the victorious army of Moreau; to the

intrenched lines of Torres Vedras, in 1810, which saved from destruction

the English army of Wellington; to the field-defences of Hougomont,

which contributed so much to the victory of Waterloo, &c.

_Military communications._--The movements of armies are always much

embarrassed by forests, marshes, and water-courses, and nothing

contributes more to the dispatch of military operations than the means

of opening practical and easy communication through these various

obstacles.

It is not necessary here to enter into any detailed discussion of the

manner of constructing military communications through forests or

marshes. In a new country like ours, where almost every one has had some

experience in road-making, no very great technical knowledge is required

for the construction of temporary works of this character; but much

professional skill and experience will be requisite for the engineers

who make the preliminary reconnaissances, and fix the location of these

roads.

Water-courses may be crossed by means of fords, on the ice, or by

ferries and bridges. When temporary bridges or ferries are constructed

by the army in the field, they are classed under the general head of

_military bridges_, or more properly, _pontoniering_.

Where the depth of the stream is not great, the current slight, and the

bottom smooth and hard, the passage may be effected by _fording_. If the

bottom be of mud, or large stones, the passage will be difficult and

dangerous, even where the depth and current are favorable. Under

favorable circumstances infantry can ford a stream where the depth is

not greater than four feet; cavalry to a depth of four or five feet; but

artillery, and engineer trains, cannot go to a depth of more than two

and a half feet, without greatly exposing their ammunition and military

stores The fords should be accurately staked out before the passage is

attempted, and ropes ought to be stretched across the stream, or cavalry

and small boats stationed below, to prevent the loss of life.

Ice may be crossed by infantry, in small detachments. Its strength may

be increased by covering it with boards, or straw, so as to distribute

the weight over a greater surface. By sprinkling water over the straw,

and allowing it to freeze, the mass may be made still more compact. But

large bodies of cavalry, and heavy artillery, cannot venture on the ice

unless it be of great thickness and strength. An army can never trust,

for any length of time, to either fords or ice; if it did a freshet or a

thaw would place it in a most critical state. Military bridges will,

therefore, become its only safe reliance for keeping open its

communications.

Military bridges are made with trestles, rafts, boats, and other

floating bodies. Rope bridges are also sometimes resorted to by troops

for passing rivers.

_Trestle bridges_ are principally used for crossing small streams not

more than seven or eight feet in depth: they also serve to connect

floating bridges with the shore, in shallow water. The form of the

trestle is much the same as that of an ordinary _carpenter's horse,_

i.e., a horizontal beam supported by four inclined legs. These trestles

are placed in the stream, from twelve to twenty feet apart, and

connected by string-pieces, (or _balks_ as they are termed in technical

language,) which are covered over with plank. The action of the current

against the bridge may be counteracted by anchors and cables, or by

means of boxes or baskets attached to the legs of the trestles, and

filled with stones. A more substantial form may be given to the bridge

by substituting for the trestles, piles, or the ordinary framed supports

so much used in the newer parts of our country.

For examples of the use of bridges of this description we would refer to

Caesar's celebrated bridge across the Rhine; the passage of the Scheldt

in 1588 by the Spaniards; the passage of the Lech in 1631 by Gustavus

Adolphus; the passage of the Danube in 1740 by Marshal Saxe; the great

bridge across the Var during Napoleon's Italian campaigns; the passage

of the Lech in 1800 by Lecourbe; the bridges across the Piava, the

Isonso, &c., in the subsequent operations of the army in Italy; the

celebrated passage of the Danube at the island of Lobau in 1809; the

passage of the Agueda in 1811 by the English; the passages of the Dwina,

the Moscowa, the Dneiper, the Beresina, &c., in the campaign of 1812;

the repairing of the bridge near Dresden, and the passage of the Elbe in

1813, &c.

_Rafts_ formed of timbers, casks, barrels, &c., are frequently used as

military bridges. They may be made to bear almost any weight, and will

answer for the passage of rivers of any depth and width, provided the

current be not rapid.

Where the bridge is to be supported by rafts made of solid timbers,

these timbers should be first placed in the water, to ascertain their

natural position of stability, and then the larger ends cut away on the

under side, so as to present the least possible resistance to the action

of the current. They are afterwards lashed together by strong rope or

withe lashing, or fastened by cross-pieces let into the timbers, and

held firm by bolts, or wooden pins. These rafts are kept in place by

anchors and cables placed up and down stream. The roadway is formed in

nearly the same manner as for a bridge supported on trestles. Empty

casks, and other floating bodies, may be substituted in place of logs in

the construction of rafts.

For examples of the use of rafts in the construction of military

bridges, we would refer to the passage of the Seine in 1465 by Count

Charolais; the passage of the Meuse in 1579, by Alexander Farnése; the

passage of the Vistula in 1704, the Borysthenese in 1709, and the Sound

in 1718, by Charles XII.; the passage of the Adige in 1796; the passage

of the Po in 1807; and the subsequent military operations in the Spanish

Peninsula.

Military bridges are frequently made of _boats_, and the ordinary

river-craft found in the vicinity of the intended passage. Flat-bottomed

boats are the most suitable for this purpose, but if these cannot be

obtained, keel boats will serve as a substitute. When these water-craft

are of very unequal sizes, (as is frequently the case,) two smaller

ones may be lashed together to form a single support; they can be

brought to the same level by means of stone ballast. The gunwales must

be suitably arranged for supporting the balks, or else frameworks should

be erected for this purpose from the centre of the boat. The arrangement

of the roadway, anchors, &c., is the same as before.

A _bridge-equipage_ made to follow an army in its movements in the

field, is generally composed of light skiffs or batteaux, and the

necessary timbers, planks, anchors, &c., for forming the roadway, and

keeping the bridge in its position. All these articles are constructed

especially for this purpose. All the wood-work should be of tough and

well-seasoned timber, so as to impose no unnecessary weight on the wagon

trains. The bateaux should also be made of strong and light materials.

For convenience in transportation, these boats are sometimes made with

hinges so as to fold up. The ribs are usually of oak, and the sides and

bottom of pine. Instead of plank, a covering of tin, copper,

India-rubber, &c., has sometimes been substituted. Floating supports of

this character are often made in compartments, so as to prevent their

sinking when injured by the enemy's projectiles. Indian-rubber pontons

may be folded up into a small space, and their slight weight renders

them convenient for transportation.

On navigable streams a part of the bridge resting on one or two bateaux

should be so arranged that it can be shipped out of its place, forming a

_draw_ for the passage of river-craft. Indeed, it would be well, even

where the river is not navigable, to form a draw for the passage of

trees, and other floating bodies, sent down by the enemy against the

bridge.

An ordinary bridge-equipage of bateaux, or light pontons, for crossing a

river of from three to four hundred yards in width, and of moderate

current, will require a train of from sixty to eighty wagons.[46] Under

favorable circumstances, and with a well-instructed corps of pontoniers,

the bridge may be thrown across the river, and prepared for the passage

of an army in a few hours at most.[47] After the troops have passed

over, the bridge may be taken up, and replaced on the wagons in from a

quarter to half an hour.

[Footnote 46: The number of wagons in a ponton train will be greatly

diminished if it be found that Indian-rubber boats may be used as

supports for the bridge. The engineer department of our army are making

experiments to determine this point.]

[Footnote 47: In 1746, three bridges of bateaux were thrown across the

Po, near Placentia, each fifteen hundred feet in length, and entirely

completed in eight hours. In 1757, two bridges of bateaux were thrown

across the Rhine, at Wesel, in half an hour; again, in the same year, a

third bridge was thrown across this river near Dusseldorf, in six hours.

In 1841, Col. Birago, of the Austrian army, arrived on the bank of the

Weisgerben arm of the Danube, with his bridge-equipage, at a round trot,

and immediately began the construction of his bridge, without any

previous preparation or examination. In less than three-quarters of an

hour the bridge was completed, and three loaded four-horse wagons passed

over on a trot, followed by a column of infantry.]

The following examples will serve to illustrate the use of different

kinds of boat-bridges in military operations:--the passage of the Rhine,

in 1702, by Villars; the passage of the Dnieper and the Bog, in 1739, by

the Russians; the passage of the Danube, in 1740, by Marshal Saxe; the

passage of the Rhine, near Cologne, in 1758, by the Prince of Clermont;

the passage of the Rhine, in 1795, by Jourdan; the passage of the Rhine,

at Kehl, in 1796, by Moreau; and again the same year, at Weissenthurn,

and at Neuwied, by Jourdan; the bridges across the Rhine, at the sieges

of Kehl and Huninguen, in 1797; the passage of the Limmat, in 1799, by

Massena; the passages of the Mincio, the Adige, the Brenta, the Piava,

&c., in 1800; the passages of these rivers again in 1805; the passages

of the Narew, in 1807, by the Russians; the several passages of the

Danube, in 1809, by the French and Austrian armies; the passages of the

Tagus and Douro, in 1810, by the English; the passages of the Niemen,

the Dwina, the Moskwa, and the Beresina, in 1812, by the French; and of

the great rivers of Germany and France, in 1813 and 1814.

A floating body, propelled from one bank to the other by the current of

the stream, is termed a _flying-bridge._ The usual mode of establishing

a ferry of this kind, is to attach the head of the boat by means of a

cable and anchor to some point near the middle of the stream. By

steering obliquely to the current, the boat may be made to cross and

recross at the same point. A single passage may be made in the same way,

by the action of the current without the cable and anchor, but the boat

in this case will be carried some distance down the stream. Rowboats are

employed for crossing over infantry by successive debarkations; but this

process is too slow for the passage of a large force; it may very well

be resorted to as auxiliary to other means.

Steam craft are so common at the present day on all navigable streams,

that an army in the field will frequently be able to avail itself of

this means of passing the larger rivers. But, in a hostile country, or

in one already passed over by the enemy, it will not be safe to rely

with confidence upon obtaining craft of this character. A well-organized

army will always carry in its train the means of effecting a certain and

speedy passage of all water-courses that may intercept its line of

march.

Flying-bridges or rowboats were employed in the passage of the Dwina, in

1701, by the Swedes; the passage of the Po, in 1701, by Prince Eugene;

the passage of the Rhine, at Huninguen, in 1704; Jourdan's passage of

the Rhine in 1795; Moreau's passage in 1796; the sieges of Kehl and

Huninguen in 1797; Massena's passage of the Limmat, and Soult's passage

of the Linth, in 1799; the passage of the Rhine, at Lucisteig in 1800;

the passage of the Po, by the French, just before the battle of Marengo;

and others in Italy, Germany, and Spain, in the subsequent campaigns of

Napoleon.

Military bridges have sometimes been formed of ropes, cables stretched

across the stream, and firmly attached at each end to trees, or posts

let into the earth. If the shore is of rock, rings with staples let into

the stone form the best means for securing the ends of the main ropes.

Plank are laid on these cables to form the roadway. The ropes forming

the "side-rail" of the bridge are passed over trestles at each shore,

and then fastened as before. Short vertical ropes attach the main

supports to these side ropes, in order that they may sustain a part of

the weight passing over the bridge. Constructions of this character are

fully described in Douglas's Essay on Military Bridges. For example, see

the passage of the Po, near Casal, in 1515, by the Swiss; the bridge

thrown over the Clain by Admiral Coligni, at the siege of Poitiers, in

1569; the operations of the Prince of Orange against Ghent and Bruges,

in 1631; the passage of the Tagus, at Alcantara, in 1810, by the

English; the bridge constructed across the Zezere, by the French, in

1810; the bridge thrown across the Scarpe, near Douai, in 1820; the

experiments made at Fêre in 1823, &c.

The passage of a river in the presence of an enemy, whether acting

offensively or in retreat, is an operation of great delicacy and danger.

In either case the army is called upon to show the coolest and most

determined courage, for its success will depend on its maintaining the

strictest discipline and good order.

In the case of a retreat the bridge should be covered by field

intrenchments, called a _tête de pont_, and defended by a strong guard.

If the river be of moderate width, the enemy may be kept at a distance

by heavy batteries on the opposite shore. As soon as the passage is

effected by the main body, the bridge, if permanent, will be blown up,

or otherwise destroyed by the miners, and if floating, will be swung

round to the other shore. The rear-guard will pass over in rowboats, or

the end pontons detached for that purpose. An army retreating in the

face of an enemy should never rely upon one single bridge, no matter

what may be its character: for the slightest accident happening to it

might expose the whole army to inevitable destruction.

The passage of a river by main force, against an enterprising and active

enemy on the opposite shore, is always an operation of the greatest

difficulty, and not unfrequently accompanied with the most bloody

results.

The most effectual method of accomplishing this object is by stratagem.

Demonstrations are made at several points at the same time: bodies of

troops are thrown across, after nightfall, in rowboats or by

flying-bridges, to get possession of the opposite bank. The vanguard of

light cavalry may cross by swimming. The pontoniers should have their

bridge equipage in readiness near the intended point of passage, so that

it can be thrown across with the greatest possible rapidity, while the

advanced guards are still able to keep the enemy at a distance. Under

favorable circumstances the pontoniers will have the bridge in readiness

for the passage of the army before the enemy can collect his troops upon

the threatened point.

Cannon-balls and hollow shot are the most effectual means for destroying

an enemy's bridge when our batteries can be planted within reach. When

this cannot be done, we must resort to fire-boats, floating rafts, &c.,

to accomplish our object. Operations of this kind carried on in the

night, are most likely to succeed.

To protect bridges from the action of these floating bodies, stockades,

or floating chevaux-de-frise are constructed across the stream at some

distance above the bridge; strong cables, or chains stretched directly

across the river, or with an angle up stream, may be used in place of

stockades, or in conjunction with them. Guards should be stationed above

the bridge, with boats, ropes, grapnels, &c., for the purpose of

arresting all floating bodies and drawing thorn ashore, or directing

them safely through the _draw_ in the bridge arrangement.

The troops especially charged with the construction and management of

the various kinds of military bridges, are denominated _pontoniers_. The

duties of these troops are arduous and important, and, in a country like

ours, intersected by numerous water-courses, the success of a campaign

will often depend upon their skill and efficiency.

_Sapping_.--This is a general term applied to the operations of forming

trenches, along which troops may approach a work without being exposed

to the fire of the besieged.

In addition to the ordinary sapping-tools, such as shovels, picks,

gabion-forks, &c., used in constructing trenches, there will also be

required a considerable amount of sapping materials, such as gabions,

fascines, sap-fagots, sandbags, &c.

The _gabion_ is a cylindrical basket of twigs, about two feet in

diameter, and some three feet in length, and without a bottom. It is

made by driving into the ground, in a circular form, a number of small

pickets about an inch in diameter, and of the length required for the

gabion. Twigs are wattled between the pickets like ordinary basket-work,

and fastened at the ends by withs or packthread. Gabions are used in

forming saps, batteries, blindages, powder-magazines, and in revetting

the steep slopes of field-works.

The _fascine_ is a bundle of twigs closely bound up, from nine to twelve

inches in diameter, and from ten to fifteen or twenty feet in length.

The largest are sometimes called _saucissons_. In making a fascine,

straight twigs about the thickness of a man's finger are laid side by

side, and firmly compressed together by a strong rope or chain attached

to the extremities of two levers. While held in this position the twigs

are firmly bound together by withs or cords. Fascines are used in

constructing trenches, batteries, &c., and for filling up wet ditches.

The _sap-fagot_ is a strong fascine about ten inches in diameter and two

feet in length, with a picket inserted through the middle. It is used in

the double sap in connection with gabions.

_Sand-bags_ are usually made of coarse canvass. When filled with earth

they are some six or eight inches in diameter, and from eighteen inches

to two feet in length. From their perishable nature, they are used only

when other materials cannot be procured, and where it is important to

place the troops speedily under cover from the enemy's fire.

Bales of wool, cotton, hay, straw, &c., may be employed in sapping for

the same purposes as the above materials, when they can be procured in

sufficient quantity. Pork and flour barrels, which are usually in

abundance in a camp, are frequently filled with sand and used for

forming magazines, blindages, &c., in field-works.

A trench constructed in ordinary soil beyond the range of the enemy's

grape, is called a _simple sap_, or ordinary trench. The earth is thrown

up on the side towards the place besieged, so as to form a kind of

parapet to cover the men in the trench. The labor is here executed under

the supervision of engineer soldiers, by working parties detached from

the other arms. Fig. 50 represents a vertical section of a simple sap.

When within range of the enemy's grape, the _flying sap_ is resorted to

in order to place the workmen speedily under cover. In this operation,

gabions are placed in juxtaposition on the side towards the besieged

work, and filled with all possible speed by the workmen. Three rows of

fascines are usually placed on the top of the gabions to increase the

height. The most difficult part of the flying sap is executed by

engineer troops, and the trench is completed by the ordinary working

parties. Fig. 51 represents a section of this sap.

The _full-sap_ is employed when the works of the besiegers are within

range of musketry, or when the grape fire of the besieged is so deadly

that the flying sap can no longer be used. This is a difficult

operation, and unless executed with great care and by well-instructed

engineer troops, the construction of the trench will be attended with an

immense loss of life. The work must be executed under cover of a

_sap-roller,_ which is a cylindrical mass of fascines, wool, or cotton,

some two feet in diameter. On very smooth ground a ball-proof shelter on

wheels might be used as a substitute. The sap-roller being placed along

the line of the trench so as to cover the sapper in front, who is armed

with a musket-proof headpiece and cuirass, this sapper commences the sap

by placing a gabion on the line of the proposed trench and fills it with

earth, working on his hands and knees. Having filled the first gabion,

he pushes forward the sap-roller and places a second one next the first,

stopping the open joint between the two with a stop-fagot. The second

gabion being filled in the same manner as the first, others are

successively established. When the first sapper has advanced a few feet,

he is followed by a second, also in defensive armor, who increases the

excavation and embankment; this sapper is then followed in the same way

by a third and a fourth, after which the trench will be sufficiently

advanced to be turned over to the ordinary workmen. The sap-fagots may

be removed when the embankment becomes thick enough to resist grape.

Fig. 52 represents a plan and section of a full-sap.

When the direction of the trench is such that the men are exposed on

both sides, it will be necessary to throw up an embankment both to the

right and left. This operation is called the _double sap,_ and is

executed by two parties of sappers, working side by side. In this sap it

will be necessary to frequently change the direction of the trench, or

to throw up traverses, in order to cover the men at a distance from the

sap-roller. Wing-traverses, on the side of the trench which is least

exposed, some times serve the same purpose as a double sap.

_Mines_.--By _mining_, as a military term, we understand the operations

resorted to for the demolition, with powder, of a military structure of

any description. The term _mine_ is applied both to the excavation

charged with powder for the purpose of producing an explosion, and to

the communications which lead to this excavation.

The place in which the charge of powder is lodged is called the

_chamber_, the communication by which this place is reached the

_gallery_, and the excavation made by the explosion is termed the

_crater_.

The form of the crater caused by an explosion in ordinary soils is

assumed to be a truncated cone, the diameter, _c d_, (Fig. 53,) of the

lower circle being one-half the diameter, _a b_, of the upper circle.

This form has never been ascertained to be exactly correct, but the

theoretical results deduced from a mathematical discussion of this

figure have been fully verified in practice. The radius, _p b_, of the

upper circle is termed the _crater radius_; the line _o p_, drawn from

the centre of the charge perpendicular to the surface where the

explosion takes place, is termed the _line of least resistance_; the

line _o b_, drawn from the centre of the powder to any point in the

circumference of the upper circle, is termed the _radius of explosion_.

When the crater radius is equal to the line of least resistance, the

mine is termed _common_; when this radius is greater than the line of

least resistance, the mine is termed _overcharged_; and when the radius

is less, _undercharged_. A mine of small dimensions, formed by sinking a

shaft in the ground, is termed a _fougasse_. The term _camouflet_ is

applied to a mine used to suffocate the enemy's miner, without producing

an explosion. Small mines made in rock or masonry, merely for the

purpose of excavation, without any considerable external explosion, are

called _blasts_.

From experiments made on common mines, whose line of least resistance

did not exceed fifteen feet, it has been ascertained that the tenacity

of the earth is completely destroyed around the crater to a distance

equal to the crater radius, and that empty galleries would be broken in

at once and a half that distance. It has also been proved by experiment,

that the crater radius in overcharged mines may be increased to six

times the line of least resistance, but not much beyond this; that

within this limit the diameter of the crater increases nearly in the

ratio of the square roots of the charge; and that empty galleries may be

destroyed by overcharged mines at the distance of four times the line of

least resistance.

By means of the deductions of physico-mathematical theory, and the

results of experiments, rules have been determined by which the miner

can calculate, with much accuracy, the charge necessary to produce a

required result in any given soil.

In the earlier stages of the history of this art, mines were only used

to open breaches and demolish masses of masonry; but in later times they

have been employed as important elements in the attack and defence of

places.

An isolated wall, only two or three feet thick, may readily be

demolished by exploding one or two casks of powder placed in contact

with its base. If the wall be five or six feet thick, the charges should

be placed under the foundation. For walls of still greater thickness it

will be best to open a gallery to the centre of the wall, a foot or two

above its base, and place the powder in chambers thus excavated.

Revetment walls may be overturned by placing the charges at the back of

the wall, about one-third or one-quarter of the way up from the base. If

placed too near the base, a breach will be made in the wall without

overturning it.

To demolish a bridge of masonry the powder should be lodged in chambers

excavated in the centre of the piers. When there is not time for

excavating these chambers in the piers, a trench may be cut over the key

of the arch, in which the powder is placed and exploded; or, the casks

of powder may be suspended immediately under the arch, with the same

results. Where a saving of powder is of consequence, small chambers may

be excavated in the haunches of the arch, and the mine carefully

_tamped_ before firing it.

Bridges of wood may be destroyed by suspending casks of powder under the

principal timbers, or attaching them to the supports.

Palisading, gates, doors, &c., may be destroyed in the same way, by

suspending casks or bags of powder against their sides; or still more

effectually, by burying the charges just beneath their base.

To demolish a tower, magazine, or house, of masonry, place charges of

powder under the piers and principal walls of the building. In wooden

structures the powder should be placed under, or attached to the

principal supports. Where time is wanting to effect these arrangements,

a building may be blown down by placing a large mass of powder in the

interior. The powder may be economized, in this case, by putting it in a

strong case, which should be connected with the walls of the building on

all sides by wooden props.

Special treatises on military mining contain full instructions for

regulating the size and position of the charge for the various cases

that may be met with in the practical operations of field-engineering.

As applied to the attack and defence of a fortified place, mines are

divided into two general classes--_offensive_ and _defensive_ mines. The

former are employed by the besiegers to overthrow the scarps and

counterscarps of the place, to demolish barriers, palisades, walls, and

other temporary means of defence, and to destroy the mines of the

besieged. The latter are employed by the opposite party to blow up the

besiegers' works of attack, and to defend the passage of ditches against

an assault. Small mines called _fougasses_ may be employed for the last

named object. The _shell-fougasse_ is composed of a wooden box filled

with one or more tiers of shells, and buried just below the surface of

the earth. Sometimes a quantity of powder is placed under the shells, so

as to project them into the air previous to their explosion. The _stone

fougasse_ is formed by making a funnel-shaped excavation, some five or

six feet deep, and placing at the bottom a charge of powder enclosed in

a box, and covered with a strong wooden shield; several cubic yards of

pebbles, broken stone, or brickbats, are placed against the shield, and

earth well rammed round, to prevent the explosion from taking place in

the wrong direction. These mines are fired by means of powder hose, or

by wires connected with a galvanic battery.

The defensive mines employed to blow up the besiegers' works, are

generally common mines with the lines of least resistance seldom greater

than fifteen feet. All the main galleries and principal branches of

mines for a permanent fortification are constructed at the same time

with the other portions of the work, leaving only the secondary

branches, chambers, &c., to be made during the siege. For the general

arrangement of these galleries, and the precautions necessary for their

protection from the operations of the besiegers, reference must be made

to treatises specially devoted to the discussion of this subject.

Mines can seldom be employed with advantage in works of slight relief,

and liable to an assault. But if judiciously arranged in the plan of

their construction, and well managed during the operations of the siege,

they contribute very materially to the length of the defence.

_Attack and defence_.--This subject admits of two natural divisions:

1st, of intrenchments, and 2d, of permanent works.

I. Intrenchments maybe attacked either by _surprise_, or by _open

force_. In either case the operations should be based on exact

information of the strength of the works and the number and character of

the garrison--information that can be obtained from spies, deserters,

and prisoners, and confirmed by examinations or reconnaissances made by

officers of engineers. By these means a pretty accurate knowledge may be

obtained of the natural features of the ground exterior to the works;

their weak and strong points; and their interior arrangements for

defence.

In an attack by surprise, the troops should consist of a storming party

and a reserve of picked men. The attacking column is preceded by a

company of sappers armed with axes, shovels, picks, crowbars, &c.; bags

of powder are also used for blowing down gates, palisades, &c. All the

operations must be carried on with the utmost dispatch. The time most

favorable for a surprise is an hour or two before day, as at this moment

the sentinels are generally less vigilant, and the garrison in a

profound sleep; moreover, the subsequent operations, after the first

surprise, will be facilitated by the approach of day. Under certain

circumstances, it may be advisable to make false attacks at the same

time with the true one, in order to distract the attention of the

garrison from the true point of danger. But false attacks have, in

general, the objection of dividing the forces of the assailants as well

as of the assailed. In all attacks by surprise, secrecy is the soul of

the enterprise.

In an open assault, if artillery be employed, the troops should be drawn

up in a sheltered position, until the fire of the works is silenced, and

breaches effected in the parapet. But if the bayonet alone be resorted

to, the troops are immediately brought forward at the beginning of the

assault. The attack is begun by a storming party of picked men: they are

preceded, as before, by a body of sappers, provided with necessary means

for removing obstacles, and followed by a second detachment of

engineers, who will widen the passages, and render them more accessible

to the main body of troops who now advance to the assistance of the

storming party. If the assailants should be arrested at the counterscarp

by obstacles which must be removed before any farther progress can be

made, the infantry troops of the detachment display and open a fire upon

the assailed, in order to divert their fire from the sappers. A few

pieces of light artillery, on the flanks of the column, may sometimes be

employed for this purpose with great advantage.

The storming party should always be provided with scaling-ladders,

planks, fascines, &c., for crossing the ditch, and mounting the scarp.

If the counterscarp be revetted with masonry, the troops must either

descend by ladders, or fill up the ditch with fascines, bales of straw,

bundles of wool, &c.: if not revetted, a passage for the troops into the

ditch will soon be formed by the shovels of the sappers. When the ditch

is gained, shelter is sought in a dead angle till the means are prepared

for mounting the scarp, and storming the work. If the scarp be of earth

only, the sappers will soon prepare a passage for the escalade; but if

revetted with masonry, the walls must be breached with hollow shot, or

scaled by means of ladders.

In the defence, the strictest vigilance should be at all times exerted

to guard against a surprise: sentinels are posted on all the most

commanding points of the work; all the avenues of approach are most

thoroughly guarded; and patroles are constantly scouring the ground in

all directions. At night all these precautions are redoubled. Light and

fire-balls are thrown out in front of the work to light up the ground,

and discover the movements and approach of the enemy. Each man should

have his particular post assigned to him, and be thoroughly instructed

in the duties he will have to perform. All auxiliary arrangements, such

as palisades, abattis, &c., should be defended with the utmost

obstinacy; the longer the enemy is held in check by these obstacles, the

longer will he be exposed to the grape and musketry of the main work.

When he assaults the parapet, he will be opposed by the bayonet in front

and a well-aimed fire in flank. While in the ditch, or as he mounts the

scarp, hollow projectiles, incendiary preparations, stones, logs, &c.,

will be rolled down upon his head. But when the assaulting column has

gained the top of the scarp, the bayonet forms the most effective means

of resistance.

The measures resorted to in the attack and defence of the larger class

of field-works, will necessarily partake much of the nature of the

operations employed in the attack and defence of permanent

fortifications.

II. The attack and defence of a fortress may be carried on either by a

regular siege, or by irregular operations and an assault. The latter

plan has sometimes been adopted when the works of the place were weak

and improperly defended; where the time and means were wanting for

conducting a regular siege; or where the assailants were ignorant of the

means proper to be resorted to for the reduction of the fortress. Such

operations, however, are usually attended by an immense sacrifice of

human life, and the general who neglects to employ all the resources of

the engineer's art in carrying on a siege, is justly chargeable with the

lives of his men. In the siege of Cambrai, Louis XIV., on the

solicitation of Du Metz, but contrary to the advice of Vauban, ordered

the demi-lune to be taken by assault, instead of waiting for the result

of a regular siege. The assault was made, but it was unsuccessful, and

the French sustained great losses. The king now directed Vauban to take

the demi-lune by regular approaches, which was done in a very short

time, and with a loss of _only five men!_ Again, at the siege of Ypres,

the generals advised an assault before the breaches were ready. "You

will gain a day by the assault," said Vauban, "but you will lose a

thousand men." The king directed the regular works to be continued, and

the next day the place was taken with but little loss to the besiegers.

But a work may be of such a character as to render it unnecessary to

resort to all the works of attack which would be required for the

reduction of a regular bastioned fort, on a horizontal site. For

example: the nature of the ground may be such as to enable the troops to

approach to the foot of the glacis, without erecting any works whatever;

of course, all the works up to the third parallel may in this case be

dispensed with without any violation of the rules of a siege. Again, the

point of attack may be such that the other parts of the place will not

flank the works of approach; here a single line of _boyaux_ and short

parallels may be all-sufficient.

But for the purpose of discussion, we will here suppose the place

besieged to be a regular bastioned work on a horizontal site, (Fig.

54.)

The operations of the siege may be divided into three distinct periods.

1st. The preliminary operations of the attack and defence previous to

the opening of the trenches.

2d. The operations of the two parties from the opening of the trenches

to the establishment of the third parallel.

3d. From the completion of the third parallel to the reduction of the

place.

_First period._ The object of the _investment of the place_ is to cut

off all communication between the work and the exterior, thus preventing

it from receiving succors, provisions, and military munitions, and also

to facilitate a close reconnoissance of the place by the engineers, who

should always accompany the investing corps, and pursue their labors

under its protection. This corps should be composed chiefly of light

troops--cavalry, light infantry, horse artillery, "brigades of engineers

and mounted sappers,"--who march in advance of the besieging army, and,

by a sudden movement, surround the work, seize upon all the avenues of

approach, and carry off every thing without the work that can be of

service either to the garrison or to the besiegers. To effect this

object, the enterprise must be conducted with secrecy and dispatch.

The investing corps is now distributed around the work in the most

favorable positions for cutting off all access to it, and also to

prevent any communication with the exterior by detachments from the

garrison, and even single individuals are sent out to give intelligence

to a succoring army or to reconnoitre the operations of the besieging

corps. These posts and sentinels, called the _daily cordon_, are placed

some mile or mile and a half from the work, and beyond the reach of the

guns. But in the night-time these posts are insufficient to accomplish

their object, and consequently as soon as it is dark the troops move up

as close to the work as possible without being exposed to the fire of

musketry. This arrangement constitutes the _nightly cordon_.

By the time the main army arrives the reconnoissance will be

sufficiently complete to enable the chief engineer to lay before the

general the outline of his plan of attack, so as to establish the

position of his depots and camp. These will be placed some two miles

from the work, according to the nature of the ground. As they occupy a

considerable extent of ground around the work, it will generally be

necessary to form intrenchments strong enough to prevent succors of

troops, provisions, &c., from being thrown into the place, and also to

restrain the excursions of the garrison. The works thrown up between the

camp and besieged place are termed the _line of countervallation_, and

those on the exterior side of the camp form the _line of

circumvallation_. These lines are generally about six hundred yards

apart. It is not unusual in modern warfare to dispense with lines of

circumvallation, (except a few detached works for covering the parks of

the engineers and artillery,) and to hold the succoring army in check by

means of an opposing force, called the _army of observation_.

The measures of defence resorted to by the garrison will, of course, be

subordinate, in some degree, to those of attack. As soon as any danger

of an investment is apprehended, the commanding general should collect

into the place all the necessary provisions, forage, military munitions,

&c., to be found in the surrounding country; all useless persons should

be expelled from the garrison; a supply of timber for the works of the

engineers and artillery, fascines, gabions, palisades, &c., prepared;

all ground within cannon range around the work levelled; hedges and

trees cut down; holes filled up; temporary buildings demolished or

burnt; and all obstacles capable of covering an enemy and interrupting

the fire of the work, removed.

During this period the engineer troops and working parties detached from

the other arms will be most actively employed. As soon as the investing

corps makes its appearance, bodies of light troops are thrown out to cut

off reconnoitring parties, and, if possible, to draw the enemy into

ambush. To facilitate these exterior operations, and to prevent a

surprise, several guns of long range are placed on the salients of the

bastions and demi-lunes, and others, loaded with grape, in the

embrasures of the flanks, so as to sweep the ditches. About one-third of

the garrison may be employed in exterior operations, and the other

two-thirds in arranging the means of defence in the interior.

_Second period._--As soon as the engineers have completed their

reconnaissances and determined on the front of attack, and all the other

preparations are made, the general will direct the opening of the

trenches. The ground being previously marked out, battalions of light

troops, termed _guards of the trenches_, as soon as it is dark, are

placed about thirty yards in front of the first parallel, (A. Fig. 54,)

with smaller sections, and sentinels about the same distance further in

advance. These guards lie down, or otherwise conceal themselves from the

fire of the work. The engineer troops and detachments of workmen being

first marched to the dépôts and supplied with all the necessary tools

for carrying on the work, now commence their labors under the protection

of these guards. By daybreak the construction of the first parallel, and

the trenches connecting it with the dépôts, will be sufficiently

advanced to cover the men from the fire of the place; the guards will

therefore be withdrawn, and the workmen continue their labors during the

day to give the trenches the proper size and form.

The _parallels_ are the long lines of trench which envelop the besieged

work, and serve both as covered ways for the circulation of the

besiegers, and as means of defence against sorties from the garrison;

they are therefore arranged with banquettes for musketry fire. The

boyaux are trenches run in a zigzag direction along the capitals of the

front of attack, and are intended exclusively for the circulation of the

troops; they have no banquettes. The first parallel is about six hundred

yards from the place, and consequently beyond the reach of grape. It is

constructed by the _simple sap_. After the first night, the guards,

instead of advancing in front of the work, are placed in the trenches.

The second parallel (B) is made some three hundred or three hundred and

fifty yards from the place, and being much exposed to grape, the

_flying-sap_ is employed in its construction. Batteries (H) are

established between the first and second parallels to silence the fire

of the demi-lunes of the collateral bastions, and others (I) near the

second parallel, to enfilade the faces of the front of attack. These are

armed in part with mortars and in part with heavy siege-pieces.

The works are now gradually pushed forward to the third parallel, (C),

which is constructed about sixty yards from the salients of the place.

As the operations of the besiegers are here greatly exposed to musketry

fire, the trenches are constructed by the _full-sap_. The third

parallel, having to contain the guards of the trenches, and being of

less development than the two preceding, is made much wider. The second

parallel now contains the reserve, and the first parallel becomes the

dépôt of materials. _Demi-parallels_ (G) are frequently established

between the second and third, to be occupied by detachments of guards.

The operations of defence during this period are so directed as to

harass the workmen in the trenches and retard the advance of the works

of attack. Garrison pieces of long range and large howitzers are brought

forward on the salients of the bastions and demi-lunes of attack, so as

to fire in ricochet along the capitals on which the boyaux must be

pushed: light and fire-balls are thrown out as soon as it becomes dark,

to light up the ground occupied by the besiegers, thus exposing them to

the fire of the work and to the attacks of the sortie parties. These

parties are composed of light troops who charge the guards and compel

the workmen to abandon their sapping tools and stand upon the defence.

They are most effective when the besiegers commence the second parallel,

as the guards in the first parallel are not so immediately at hand to

protect the workmen. When the sortie detachment has driven these workmen

from the trenches, instead of pursuing them into the first parallel, it

will display itself in battle order to cover the engineer troops, (who

should always accompany the detachment in this enterprise,) while they

fill up the trenches and destroy the implements of the besiegers. When

the guards of the trenches appear in force, the detachment will retire

in such a way, if possible, as to draw the enemy within range of the

grape and musketry of the collateral works. These sorties, if

successful, may be frequently repeated, for they tend very much to

prolong the siege. The best time for making them is an hour or two

before day, when the workmen and guards are fatigued with the labors of

the night. While the besiegers are establishing their enfilading

batteries, a strong fire of solid shot and shells will be concentrated

on the points selected for their construction. The garrison will also

labor during this period to put the work into a complete state of

defence: constructing all necessary palisadings, traverses, blindages,

barriers; and strengthening, if necessary, the covering of the

magazines.

_Third period._--After the completion of the third parallel, the

crowning of the covered way may be effected by storm, by regular

approaches, or (if the work is secured by defensive mines) by a

subterranean warfare.

In the first case stone mortar-batteries are established in front of the

third parallel, which, on a given signal, will open their fire in

concert with all the enfilading and mortar batteries. When this fire has

produced its effect in clearing the outworks, picked troops will sally

forth and carry the covered way with the bayonet, sheltering themselves

behind the traverses until the sappers throw up a trench some four or

five yards from the crest of the glacis, high enough to protect the

troops from the fire of the besieged. It may afterwards be connected

with the third parallel by boyaux.

When the covered way is to be crowned by regular approaches, a _double

sap_ is pushed forward from the third parallel to within thirty yards of

the salient of the covered way; the trench is then extended some fifteen

or twenty yards to the right or left, and the earth thrown up high

enough to enable the besiegers to obtain a plunging fire into the

covered way, and thus prevent the enemy from occupying it. This mound of

earth is termed a _trench cavalier_, (O). Boyaux are now pushed forward

to the crowning of the covered way and the establishing of breach

batteries, (J). Descents are then constructed into the ditches, and as

soon as these batteries have made a breach into the walls of the

bastions and outworks, the boyaux are pushed across the ditches and

lodgments effected in the breaches. The demi-lune is first carried; next

the demi-lune redoubt and bastion; and lastly, the interior

retrenchments and citadel. In some cases the breaches are carried by

assault, but the same objection is applicable here as in the storming of

the covered way; _time is gained, but at an immense expense of human

life._

If the place is defended by mines it will be necessary for the

besiegers to counteract the effects of these works by resorting to the

slow and tedious operations of a subterranean warfare. In this case a

fourth trench is formed in front of the third parallel; shafts are sunk

in this, about six yards apart, for establishing overcharged mines; as

soon as the galleries of the besieged are destroyed by the explosion of

these mines, the covered way is attacked by storm; other mines are

established on the _terre-plain_ of the covered way to destroy the

entrance to the galleries, and thus deprive the besieged of the use of

their entire system of mines.

The measures of defence during this period must embrace every thing

calculated to retard the works of the besiegers. This may be most

effectually accomplished by maintaining a constant fire of grape and

musketry on the heads of the sap, and throwing grenades, shells, &c.,

into the trenches, to harass and destroy the workmen. As the musketry

fire of the besiegers now becomes very destructive to the artillerists

at the guns, strong musket-proof blinds are arranged to mask the mouths

of the embrasures when the guns are not in battery, and also sloping

blindages to cover the men when serving at the pieces. The possession of

the outworks should be disputed inch by inch, and when the besiegers

have reached the ditch of the body of the place, sorties, and every

species of projectile, should be employed to drive off the sappers, and

to retard the construction of their works. In fine, all the resources of

the engineer's art should be put in requisition for the defence of the

breach, and the final assault should be vigorously resisted by the

bayonet, and by a well-sustained fire from all the collateral works.

With respect to the relative strength of the opposing forces it may be

well to remark, that if the fortress is properly constructed the

garrison will be able to resist a besieging army _six times_ as numerous

as itself. Such is the estimate of the best engineers.[48]

[Footnote 48: A good knowledge of the several subjects discussed in this

chapter may be derived from the writings of Vauban, Cormontaigne, and

Noizet de St. Paul, on the attack and defence of places and field

fortification; the several _manuels_ used in the French service on

sapping, mining, and pontoniering; Col. Pasley's experiments on the

operations of a siege, sapping, mining, &c.; Douglas's work on military

bridges; Macauley's work on field fortification; and Professor Mahan's

_Treatise on Field Fortification._ This last is undoubtedly the very

best work that has ever been written on field fortification, and every

officer going into the field should supply himself with a copy.

The following are recommended as books of reference on subjects

discussed in the three preceding chapters.

_Mémorial pour la fortification permanente et passagère._ Cormontaigne.

_Défense des places._ Cormontaigne.

_Attaque des places._ Cormontaigne.

_Attaque des places._ Vauban.

_Traité des mines._ Vauban.

_Mémorial pour la castrametation et la fortification passagère._

Lafitte-Clavé.

_Exercice sur les fortifications._ Davigneau.

_Mémorial de l'officier du genie._ A periodical of rare merit,

containing most valuable military and scientific matter. It is conducted

by officers of the French corps of engineers. It has already reached its

fourteenth number, each number forming a volume.

_Traité complet de fortification._ Noizet de St. Paul.

_Traité d'art militaire et de la fortification._ Gay de Vernon.

_Art de la guerre._ Rogniat.

_Essai général de fortification, &c._ Bousmard.

_Aide-mémoire portatif à l'usage des officiers du génie._ Laisné. A very

valuable and useful book.

_Aide-mémoire de l'ingénieur militaire._ Grivet.

_Cours d'art militaire._ Laurillard Fallot.

_Cours de fortification, &c._ Lavart.

_Le livre de la guerre._ Perrot.

_Journaux des siéges dans la péninsule._ Belmas.

_Journal of Sieges in Spain._ John Jones.

Both of the above are works of great value.

_Cours d'art militaire et de fortification militaire._ François.

_Architettura militare._ Marchi.

_Essai sur la fortification._ Baltard.

_La fortification._ Bar-le-Duc.

_Elémens de fortification._ Bellaire.

_La science des ingénieurs._ Bélidor.

_L'art universel des fortifications._ Bitainvieu.

_Nouvelle manière de fortifier les places._ Blondel.

_Les sept siéges de Lille._ Brun Lavaine.

_Défense des places fortes._ Carnot.

_Mémoire sur la fortification._ Carnot.

_Défense de Saragosse._ Cavallero.

_Mémoires sur la fortification._ Choumara.

_Nouvelle fortification._ Coehorn.

_Théorie de la fortification._ Cugnot.

_Des fortifications,_ &c. &c. Darçon.

_Relation de la defense de Dantzik._ D'Artois.

_Les fortifications._ Deville.

_Péribologie._ Dilich.

_De la fortification permanente._ Dufour. A work of merit.

_Essai sur la défense des états par les fortifications._ Duviviet.

_Attaque et défense des places du camp de St. Omer.

_L'école de la fortification._ Fallois.

_Introduction à la fortification._ De Fer.

_Précis de la défense de Valenciennes._ Ferrand.

_Traité théorique,_ &c. Foissac-Latour.

_Examen detaillé,_ &c. Foissac-Latour.

_Les ouvrages militaires de Fosse.

_Instruction sur la fortification,_ &c. Gaillard.

_Mémoires pour l'attaque et défense d'une place._ Goulon.

_Siége of Peschiera._ Henin.

_Journal du siége de Philisbourg.

_Précis du siége de Dantzick._ Kirgener.

_Deuxième défense de Badajos._ Lamare.

_Fortification, et l'attaque et défense des places._ Lebloud.

_OEuvres de Lefebvre.

_L'architecture des forteresses._ Mandar.

_Traité sur l'art des siéges._ Mazeroy.

_La sûreté des états par le moyen des forteresses._ Maigret.

_Défense d'Ancone._ Mangourit.

_Fortification._ Marolois.

_Siege de Turin._ Mengin.

_Recherches sur l'art défensif,_ &c. Michaloz.

_La fortification de campagne,_ &c. Miller.

_L'art défensif,_ &c. Montalembert.

_Journaux des siéges de Flandre.

_Relations des siéges en Europe,_ &c, Musset-Fathay. A very valuable and

interesting work.

_Relation du siége de Metz.

_Relation du siége d'Anvers.

_Les siéges de Jaffa et de St. Jean d'Acre.

_Les siéges de Saragosse et de Tortose._ Rogniat.

_Siége de Dantzick._ Sainte-Susanne.

_Mémoire sur la fortification permanente.--_Séa.

_Le siége de Constantine._

_Elémens de fortification._ Trincano.

_Des places fortes._ Valazé.

_Essay on Military Bridges._Douglas. A valuable work.

_Guide du pontonier._ Drieu.

_Mémoire sur la guerre souterraine._ Contèle.

_Traité des mines._ Etienne.

_Traité de l'art du mineur._ Geuss.

_Traité de fortification souterraine._ Gillot.

_Traité pratique et théorique des mines._ Lebrun.

_Nouveau traité des mines,_ &c. Prudhomme.

_Manuel du sapeur._ Used in the French service.

_Manuel du mineur._ " ""

_Manuel du pontonier. " ""

_Essay on Field Fortifications._ Pleydell.

_Elements of Field Fortifications._ Lochee.

_Rélation du siége de Grave et Mayence._

_Siéges de Génes._ Thiébault.

_Traité de fortification souterraine._ Mouze.

_Militairische Mittheilungen._ Xilander.

_Die Befestigung der Statten._ Hauser.

_Abhandlung über die Befestigungskunst,_&c. Hauser

_Versuch über die Verschanzungskunst._ Muller.

_Course of Elementary Fortification. _Pasley. This is a work of much

detail--useful, no doubt, to an uneducated engineer soldier, but to an

officer at all acquainted with his profession, it must seem ridiculously

minute.

To the above list might be added a long list of books on that branch of

the engineer's art called _constructions_; but as this part of the

profession is, in some degree, common both to the civil and military

engineer, it is not deemed necessary to include works of this character

in a list of books strictly military.]

Elements of Military Art and Science Or, Course Of Instruction In Strategy, Fortification, Tactics Of Battles, &C.; Embracing The Duties Of Staff, Infantry, Cavalry, Artillery, And Engineers; Adapted To The Use Of Volunteers And Militia; Third Edition; With Critical Notes On The Mexican And Crimean Wars. · 第 14 / 16 章