There are several portraits of the King of Rome, the son of Napoleon

and Louise, who was living, as one is apt to forget, as late as 1832.

The sisters of the Emperor, Pauline and Caroline, both are here, as are

his brothers Jérome and Louis. Finally, of the Emperor himself there

are over a dozen--as General Bonaparte in 1796; in Academic attire; and

in Court costume, wearing in his hat the golden laurels of victory.

Of this period of his career is the miniature by Isabey, in which

he is wearing the Imperial robes and emblems of victory as before.

This miniature by Isabey is a remarkable presentment of the man and a

masterpiece of the artist. I have described these numerous Napoleonic

portraits in some detail because many of them are not only remarkable

as specimens of French miniature painting of the period, but they also

bear out, I think, what I have said in the preceding pages as to the

value of such works and the instruction they afford.

But the interest of the Wallace Collection of Miniatures is not

confined to the personages who crossed the stage of French history

during the First Empire. Here we may see also Louis XV. and Marie

Leczinska, and two or three of their daughters, Louis XVI. and Marie

Antoinette, Louis XVII. and Louis XVIII. Of the latter there are three

or four portraits; of Madame de Pompadour one of exceptional beauty

(No. 89), signed F. Boucher. It need hardly be said that François

Boucher is not generally recognised as a miniaturist, the breadth and

purely decorative nature of much of his work being as far removed

as it is possible to imagine from the minute finish of a miniature.

This fact, it may be, has led Mr. Claude Phillips, the Curator of the

Gallery, to remark upon this example, and to surmise that it represents

"a wholly exceptional effort made for his (Boucher's) patroness."

Strange to say, Madame Du Barry is unrepresented; on the other hand,

Mlle. Du Thé and La Camargo, the famous dancer, whom Watteau painted,

will be found.

I have given this prominence to the French historical characters as

compared with English or other celebrities since, from this point

of view, there is no comparison to be made between the importance

of the two groups. A Cooper and a Flatman of Charles II., a copy by

Bone (after Lely probably), of Charles's sister-in-law, Anne Hyde; an

enamel by W. Grimaldi, copied from a contemporary portrait of John

Churchill, first Duke of Marlborough; Mrs. Fitzherbert, by R. Cosway;

and two portraits of Wellington by Isabey may be said to sum up the

most notable works coming under the category of English historical

characters.

In this connection there remains, however, one miniature of such

importance, if its ascription be correct, as to merit a special

reference. It is No. 93 described as a portrait of Hans Holbein the

Younger. It is inscribed "HH. A N O. 1543 _Etatis suæ_ 45." The Duke

of Buccleuch possesses a similar one, the only variation perceptible

being a subtle difference in the expression, and that in the Montagu

House example there is a little more seen of the painter's left hand.

Each is on a card; that at Hertford House may be thus described: Head

and bust of a man of middle age, in a black dress, open at the neck,

and a black cap. He holds a pencil in his right hand and looks with a

searching and rather sour expression at the spectator. The portrait is

about one and a half inches circular, and has a blue background. The

beard and moustache are dark and somewhat sparse, the flesh-tones flat,

and inclined to brickiness in colour.

But I am disposed to consider the distinguishing feature of the Wallace

Collection of Miniatures to be the number and importance of the works

of Isabey and of Hall shown therein. By Jean Baptiste Isabey there

are no less than twenty-seven examples, by Pierre Adolphe Hall nearly

a score, by the talented J. B. Augustin, and by the comparatively

little known Mansion, nine each; not to speak of Saint, Dumont, and of

Sicardi. There is one specimen which the Curator apparently does not

hesitate to ascribe to Fragonard, whose miniatures he justly says "are

of extreme rarity." Here, then, we have a feast both rich and varied.

Of the Isabeys we shall find that the most important pieces are dated

between 1811 and 1831. They are treated with a breadth and freedom

of handling which make them resemble water-colour sketches, but when

looked at closely they will be found to have careful detail in the

features, and to be miniatures strictly speaking.

The Halls are characteristic and good, the Mansions exceptionally

fine. I have dealt with both these artists in the final chapter of this

book.

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS.

PORTRAIT OF MIRABEAU.

(_M. Gabriel Marceau._)]

[Illustration: P. A. HALL.

PORTRAIT OF A LADY.

(_Mme. de B._)]

It would be impossible to examine here the hundreds of miniatures in

this collection. They deserve the closest attention, and should be

carefully studied with the aid of a magnifying glass.

THE VICTORIA AND ALBERT MUSEUM.

Having elsewhere in this volume expressed regret at the absence of

any national collection of miniatures in this country, I refrain from

giving utterance to disappointment again. But if there is one place

more than another where such feelings are aroused it is at South

Kensington. True there are miniatures there, but only in sufficient

numbers and, I may say, of sufficient quality, to whet the appetite for

more.

Apart from the Jones Collection, which may be dealt with separately,

the miniatures in the Victoria and Albert Museum are rather

disappointing, and that in spite of a few examples of interest. The

National Collection preserves all its riches of art of this nature in

four cases, which stand in the Sheepshanks Gallery. The catalogue has,

I believe, been out of print for years, certainly there is none now

obtainable, a circumstance very much to be deplored, to say the least

of it. Another matter of regret is that the miniatures cannot be seen

properly by the artificial light with which the galleries are provided;

seeing that the museum is open until ten p.m. three or four nights in

the week, many must feel it tantalising to have no catalogue, and

insufficient and unsatisfactory lighting.

Taking in a rough chronological order what is there shown, we shall

find a faded Queen Elizabeth or two, of the usual type, by Hilliard,

and a fine Oliver of unwonted freshness and brilliancy, due, no doubt,

to its having been preserved in a locket. It is dated 1619, and must

therefore have been painted by Peter Oliver, as his father died two

years earlier. The flesh-tones are particularly good and true to nature.

Of the Samuel Coopers, of which there are two or three examples, that

of Henry, Duke of Gloucester, the brother of Charles II., is the finest

and most noteworthy; it is somewhat faded, but the long, weak face and

melancholy expression, which seem typical of his race, are strikingly

rendered. To about this period belongs a very fine specimen of plumbago

work by David Loggan; it is a portrait of Sir Greville Verney, full

of life as to the character of the head, and of exquisite finish and

delicacy in execution. Near this hang two examples of similar work

by Thomas Forster, but of much inferior quality. They present John,

first Duke of Marlborough and his imperious wife, and are dated 1712.

Richard Cosway is not shown at his best, although the Earl of Carlisle

is a good and characteristic specimen of his somewhat effeminate

rendering of men's portraits. By his pupil, Andrew Plimer, are two very

indifferent portraits of ladies, but another of a young lady (given

by Miss Edmonstone Ashley) is a very charming work; the fair unknown

wears a huge white chin stay, and looks at the spectator with an

arch and vivacious expression. Mrs. Carruthers is a pleasing instance

of J. Meyer's sound and attractive method of painting, and there are

two excellent and characteristic Rosses, viz., Margaret, Duchess of

Somerset and Mrs. Dalton. There is also a very good specimen of Sir W.

J. Newton, an artist whose work is now perhaps somewhat underrated. In

the Plumley Collection of Enamels, shown in the same gallery, are some

examples of Essex which may please lovers of animals, and a number of

Bone's copies, which, skilful as they are, considering the scale on

which they are done and the difficulty in doing them, yet leave a good

deal to be desired when compared with the originals. A word may be

said as to the Barbor jewel which hangs in one of these cases, and is

reproduced in this book. It was made for a Mr. Barbor to commemorate

his deliverance from the stake in the reign of Mary Tudor by the timely

death of that sovereign just at the time fixed for his execution. It

is cut in a fine Oriental onyx, mounted in gold and enamelled, and was

bequeathed to the Museum by the Rev. E. E. Blencowe.

THE DYCE COLLECTION.

There are four small cases of miniatures pertaining to the Dyce

Collection which contain a few Coopers, and, notably, a portrait of the

artist himself, of which last an illustration is given. The pocket-book

and its contents attributed to Cooper I have already referred to in

Chapter VII. Some of these are thoroughly characteristic; others,

in their smoothness and in the nature of their colouring, are quite

unlike Cooper's ordinary manner; whilst in one instance at least the

drawing is so bad as to make one sceptical of its being the work of

such an artist as Samuel Cooper at all. Take for example the portrait

labelled Miss Pru Fillips (_sic_), or Mrs. Rosse, or Mrs. Priestman. On

the other hand, the preparatory sketches for the Duchess of Cleveland

and Mrs. Munday, and, above all, the Catherine of Braganza strike

one as being not only the work of the master but also as especially

characteristic. There is a very good Flatman in this collection, a

portrait of himself; there are also a number of miniatures in oil on

copper which, like most works of this nature, fail to interest us

very much; owing to their scale they have necessarily nothing of the

impressiveness of an oil portrait, whilst as miniatures they lack

delicacy and charm.

THE JONES COLLECTION.

As the Isabeys and Halls strike the dominant note of the Wallace

Collection of miniatures, so do the enamels by Petitot that of the

Jones Collection at the Victoria and Albert Museum. There are at

Kensington no less than 56 pieces attributed to Jean Petitot, besides

two others ascribed to Petitot the Younger.

I shall not re-enter upon a criticism of the great Genevese enameller

and his marvellous art, with its distinctive character, further than

to repeat that for minute delicacy, perfection of drawing, and

colouring it has never been excelled. I am speaking of course, of

genuine work by Petitot, for he has had numberless imitators and

copyists.

[Illustration: J. B. MASSÉ.

PORTRAIT OF THE PAINTER C. J. NATOIRE.

(_M. Ed. Taigny._)]

Upon examining the index of painters which is subjoined to this chapter

it will be seen that many of the names we have been discussing occur

therein, but the Jones Collection cannot be said to be a representative

one. There are but three or four Coopers, one each by Hilliard and

Hoskins, Zincke and Boit have five between them; there are three

attributed to Peter Oliver, and the like number to Isaac. In the case

of the last named, however, we have a _chef d'[oe]uvre_ in the shape of

the portrait of the Earl of Dorset already described in Chapter VI. By

Bernard Lens also we have an important example, namely, the full length

of Sarah Jennings, Duchess of Marlborough, in the blue robe affected by

artists of the period.

But it is the Petitots which in the eyes of students should give such

especial value to this collection, for nowhere else, so far as I have

seen or heard, can the like be found, certainly not at the Louvre.

Having previously enlarged fully upon the exquisite art of which Jean

Petitot was the greatest exponent, I need not recapitulate the charm

which attaches to these gems of miniature painting nor the difficulties

attending their production. But I have been at the pains to arrange

the Jones Collection alphabetically under painters and personages, to

facilitate reference. By the aid of this analysis I trust my readers

will be enabled to judge for themselves what there is to see at

Kensington in this way, and, if they have a genuine interest in the

subject, they may find the study of the collection facilitated by this

key to its contents.

INDEX TO THE NAMES OF PERSONS IN THE JONES COLLECTION.

A

Name.

Addison, Joseph, 305

Aiguillon, Duchesse de, 307

Alençon, Duc de, 553

Angoulême, Duchesse de, 502

Anjou, Duc de, 289

Antoinette, Marie, 347, 497, 502

Artois, Comte d', 502

Austria, Anne of, 312, 345

B

Berri, Duc de, 293

Berri, Duchesse de, 288

Bohemia, Elizabeth of, 257

Borgia, Cesare, 87

Bourgogne, Duchesse de, 292

Brissac, Duchesse de, 262

C

Catherine I., 282

Catinat, 524

Challace, Mlle. de, 290

Charles I., 349, 517

Charles II., 88, 304

Christine, Queen, 255

Corneille, 313

Condé, Le Grand, 272

Condé, Henri Prince de, 92, 277

Condé, Princesse de, 274

Condé, Sister of Le Grand, 280

Conti, Anne, Princesse de, 260, 263

D

Dauphin, the, 502

Dorset, Earl of, 357

Drake, Sir F., 297

E

Elizabeth, 350

Elizabeth, Mme., 502

Essex, R., Earl of, 301

Etampes, Duchesse de, 86

F

Fontanges, Mlle., 543

Fouquet, Nicholas, 279

François II., 421

G

George IV., 339

Grammont, Comtesse de, 287, 489

Granby, Marquis of, 506

Grignan, Comtesse de, 269, 543

Guise, Louis Jos., 320

Guise, Duc de, 266

H

Henry, Prince of Wales, 294

Henrietta Maria, Queen, 254, 521

Henry VIII., 85

J

James, Duke of York, 89

L

Lamballe, Princesse de, 348

L'Enclos, Ninon de 253, 489

Longueville, Duchesse de, 251

Lorraine, Duchesse de, 317

Lorraine, Cardinal, 424

Louis XIV., 246-8, 259, 270, 273, 275, 309, 359, 486 See also 539

Louis XV., 286, 352, 519

Louis XVI., 362

Louis XVIII., 502

Louvois, Marquis de, 264

Luxembourg, F. Duc de, 261, 267

M

Maintenon, Mme. de, 271, 479

Maine, Duc de, 249

Marlborough, Duchess of, 91, 364

Mary, Queen (of William III.), 356

Mary, Queen of Scots, 80, 299, 541

Marie Thérèse, Queen, 315

Mazarin, Cardinal, 247, 318

Mazarin, Duchesse de, 291, 308

Meilleraye, Duc de, 311

Milton, 351

Molière, 316

Montpensier, Duchesse de, 241

Montespan, Mme. de, 242, 252

N

Nôtre, André le, 278

O

Orléans, M. Louise, Duchesse d', 524

Orléans, Philippe d', 284

Orléans, Duchesse d', 265, 344, 488

Orléans, Duc d', 240

Ormonde, James, Duke of, 298

P

Pontchartreux, 525

Pembroke, Countess of, 365

Peter the Great, 363

Philip V., 283

Portsmouth, Duchess of, 285, 343

Pym, J., 84

R

Racine, 355

Richelieu, Duc de, 326, 346

Rochester, J. Wilmot, Earl of, 295

Rochefoucauld, 310

Rupert, Prince, 302

S

Sévigné, Mme. de, 245, 250, 482

Sidney, Sir Philip, 303

Sidney, Mary, Countess of Pembroke, 365

Soissons, Comtesse de, 276

Sully, Duc de, 314

T

Thurloe, John, 296

Turenne, Comte de, 90, 268

U

Unknown, 300, 319, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 358, 509

V

Vallière, Mlle. de la, 243, 258

Vendôme, Duc de, 256

Vendôme, Louis Joseph, Duc de, 281

Vermandois, Comte de, 244

W

Wales, Henry, Prince of, 294

Wellington, Duke of, 531

William III., 354

Y

York, James, Duke of, 89

INDEX TO PAINTERS.

Artaud, 289

Boit, C., 282, 288, 292

Boucher, 341, 347

Cooper, S., 295 (after) 296 (after) 302, 304, 351

Essex, William, 339

F. Hans, 344, 362

Gerbier, 349

Hilliard, N., 350

Holbein, H., 81 (after) 85

Hoskins, J., 365

Isabey, 531

Janet, 353

Janssen, C., 82, 83, 84

Lens, Bernard, 364, 541

Le Seuer, 506

Oliver, Isaac, 294, 303, 357

Oliver, Peter, 361, 517, 521

Parent, J., 486

Petitot, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 246, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 258, 259, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 273, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280?, 281, 285, 291, 293, 306, 307, 309, 310, 311, 312, 315, 316, 318, 320, 321, 323, 324?, 326, 328, 330, 331, 333, 336, 488, 543?

Petitot the Younger, 308, 327

P. W., 89

Seuin, P., 90

Titian, 87

Zincke, C. F., 300, 305

XIV

THE

FRENCH

SCHOOL

CHAPTER XIV

THE FRENCH SCHOOL

A study of French miniature painters has led the present writer to

place their work on a higher level than has heretofore, perhaps, been

generally assigned to it, and has shown him that there have been not

a few but many French miniaturists of remarkable excellence, and that

they practised their art during a period which we are accustomed to

look upon as one of anarchy, of tumult, and of bloodshed; a fact which

is not only interesting in itself, but has the advantage of throwing

light upon the period also; on its life, and on the men and women

who played prominent parts during that eventful period of modern

history, for we find ample evidence that even during the Terror itself

the miniature painter was busy at work. In this respect, as in many

others, a recent exhibition of eighteenth century French Art, at the

Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris, revealed much. Indeed, it may be said

that it was the most noteworthy event in connection with miniatures,

and the claims they have upon the notice of students of art, of

manners, and of costume, which has taken place for years.

It was recognised as a revelation by the learned authorities of the

French national library, who were responsible for its arrangement,

foremost amongst whom stood the late lamented Henri Bouchot, "Directeur

du département des Estampes," a gentleman to whose courtesy I have been

personally indebted, and whose critical acumen was well known.

It was, they said, a revelation; they spoke of it in relation to its

technical aspects more particularly. It brought to light a number of

French miniature painters whose ability was amply demonstrated, but

who were almost or quite unknown at the present day, even to their own

countrymen.

But the personality of these miniature painters and the remarkable

people who sat to them must not make us ignore some earlier men to whom

I shall now briefly refer.

In the first place I may call attention to the fact that, as might be

expected, a comparison between French painters-in-little and those of

Great Britain reveals some interesting differences, both technically

and in respect of the treatment of the subject. The latter differences,

which spring from national characteristics, will, I think, be brought

out as we come to deal with the work of the various artists, and I

shall not stop to enlarge upon them now.

At a time when we could boast in England of no native artist of

importance--hardly one, indeed, can be named, for Nicholas Hilliard was

not born until the middle of the sixteenth century--there was working

in France a family of artists known as the Clouets, who produced

portraiture of great excellence. What I have termed elsewhere the

tangled skein of the history of the Clouets would take a great deal of

unravelling. It is a subject to which foreign critics of eminence have

devoted much time and trouble. Without following all their researches

in detail, or professing to utter anything like the last word upon

an obscure and difficult subject, it may be said to have been proved

that the family was undoubtedly of Flemish extraction, and that they

were firmly established at the French Court at the beginning of the

sixteenth century. M. Laborde, in his "Renaissance des Arts à la Cour

de France," quotes a deed of gift of property which had escheated

to the Crown dated 1516, the second year of the reign of François

I., which shows that, at any rate, by that time the Clouets were

established in Royal favour.

[Illustration: L. SICARDI.

BENOIT BOULOUVARD DE SAINTE ALBINE AND SISTER.

(_M. le Comte Allard du Chollet._)]

The surname was probably originally Clouwet, and two members of the

family, father and son, have been commonly known as Janet. This

duplication of names, to say nothing of the varieties of spelling, has

led to a good deal of confusion in the attribution of works by these

artists. Among the latest authorities upon this subject I may quote my

friend M. Dimier, of Paris, who contributed a chapter to my book on the

portraiture of Mary Queen of Scots.[5]

[Footnote 5: "Concerning the True Portraiture of Mary Stuart."

Dickinsons, 1905.]

The subject has a significance of its own for French art critics as

throwing light upon the influences exerted upon French artists at the

period of the Renaissance--that is to say, whether the work by the

men of that time which has come down to us owes its highest artistic

qualities to Italian influence, to native genius, or to Flemish

influence. Critics are divided into two camps: those who stoutly

maintain the claims of the French artists to originality, and those who

are equally confident that it is to Italian influence we owe all that

is most attractive in French art of that period. M. Dimier has acutely

pointed out that whilst the Italian influence theory is anathema to

many, these same critics allow the assertion of Flemish influence to

pass without a protest.

Be all this as it may, it is quite clear that the vogue for portraiture

in France at the beginning of the sixteenth century was extraordinary.

Contemporary inventories show that drawings by the thousand must have

existed. They were kept in albums in the houses of the great, and many

collections are known. Catherine de Medici loved to have her children

painted, and M. Bonafflé has shown that her estate included more than

a hundred such portraits. There are numbers of these to be seen to-day

at Chantilly, the old home of the Condés, not the least interesting of

which is a series of eighty or ninety drawings in black and red chalk

that once belonged to the Earl of Carlisle and formed part of the

famous Castle Howard Collection.

Before leaving the Clouets, I may mention that a painting, measuring

sixty-one by fifty-three inches, of Henri II. was sold at Christie's

in January, 1905, for £2,500. Those who were fortunate enough to have

visited the Exhibition de Primitifs Français at Paris, in 1904, will

remember a number of interesting portraits attributed to the two

Clouets, of which they cannot have failed to admire the beautiful

portrait from the Louvre of Elizabeth of Austria. The original drawing

for this is in the Bibliothèque Nationale, and the existence of the two

works--that is, the crayon from nature and the beautifully finished

picture in oils--is interesting as showing the practice of the artist.

In the remarkable Exhibition just named the student will have made the

acquaintance of many names probably new to him, and can hardly have

failed to observe the number attributed to Corneille de Lyon, most of

them dated somewhere about 1548. This is an artist who has only of

late years won recognition. He, too, was a Fleming, but the only name

which can be assigned to him is Corneille. M. Dimier says he was a

native of the Hague who settled at Lyons. He surmises that the Royal

visits to Lyons in the year 1536 were productive of Royal patronage.

But M. Dimier appears to hold very conflicting views as to the merits

of this artist, and discovers great divergences in his style; thus he

says: "His [Corneille's] knowledge is so scanty that he can scarce fill

in his own feeble design; in the best of these pictures the bust and

shoulders are like students' work, and verge on the ridiculous"; yet

his texture, he says, elsewhere, "is delicate, limpid, and absolutely

fresh, the total effect the result of genius of a very small order."

But in a portrait of the Baron de Chateauneuf, which does, or did,

belong to Mr. Charles Butler, he finds work which he says is scarcely

unworthy of Holbein; "in depth of knowledge, boldness of execution,

and extreme beauty of colour this little work is a masterpiece, far and

away superior to anything which I have ascribed to the Janets," &c.

I have quoted these opinions at some length so that readers may judge

for themselves of the relative importance of this early artist, all of

whose work exhibited at the Exhibition de Primitifs was small in scale,

and most of it, I have reason to believe, new to some students of art.

When we leave the Court of the Valois we seem to come to a great gap in

our subject; and it is not until we arrive at the names of Petitot and

his followers, a subject which has already been dealt with in Chapter

VIII., that there is anything of importance to arrest our attention.

This book is in no sense a detailed history of miniature painting; it

merely aims at discussing some of the salient points of a wide subject;

and, therefore, I make no further apology for passing on to the work

which was executed in the eighteenth century, when several artists of

remarkable ability appear on the horizon. I propose to take a few of

the most eminent of these names, and to deal with them in chronological

order.

Following that classification, the amiable Rosalba Carriera will come

first. She was born in Venice in 1675; and though some would deny her

any extraordinary talent, certain it is that she achieved European

reputation. This lady must have possessed charming manners and very

endearing qualities, for she is reputed to have been plain in personal

appearance. Some ten or twelve years before her death, which

occurred in her native place in 1757, she became blind, and devoted

her means and the closing period of her life to works of charity.

She painted a good many miniatures, which are dispersed in various

collections, also landscapes. But probably her fame will rest most

securely upon her work in pastels, of which there are examples in the

Louvre; I recall two in the Salon des Pastels which are not unworthy

of the fine specimens of that kind of work which hang around them; and

that is high praise indeed, for, as every one knows, work in crayons

was carried by French artists of the eighteenth century to a pitch

of astonishing excellence; some of the portraits in that room by La

Tour, for example, can hardly be surpassed for truth to nature and

beauty of drawing; with almost the strength of oil paintings, they

have a character and charm peculiar to themselves. In landscape work

Rosalba earned great renown, though there are some who say that she was

over-praised in her day and by her generation.

[Illustration: P. P. PRUDHON.

MLLE. CONSTANCE MAYER.

(_Eudoxe-Marcille Collection._)]

Jean Baptiste Massé has been described as a link between seventeenth

and eighteenth century miniature painters. He was also an engraver, the

son of a Protestant goldsmith of Chateaudun, born in 1687. In spite

of his religion, the Regent obtained his admission to the Academy. He

worked in gouache and his style is said to have influenced Hall. The

portrait of Natoire here shown gives a good idea of his powers. He

lived till 1767.

In François Boucher, who was born just at the beginning of the century,

in 1704, and died in 1770, we have an artist of consummate ability,

whose renown does not depend upon his miniatures. He may be called

the decorative artist _par excellence_ of the century; but probably

many of the little nudities (of which there are a large collection

to be seen at Hertford House) which are attributed to Boucher are

really by Charlier and others of his followers. The learned editor

of the catalogue of the collection of French miniatures shown at the

Bibliothèque Nationale in 1906 is my authority for saying that some

of the miniatures which are signed Boucher are by Madame Boucher, not

the wife of our painter, but a lady bearing the same name. Thus the

connection of François Boucher with our subject appears to be slight,

and as his other work is so well known we need not stop to discuss him

further.

Jacques Charlier comes next to his master in point of date, having been

born in 1720. Very little biographical information is to be gleaned

about this artist; nevertheless he was extremely well known in his

time, and his genius, such as it was, appears to have been admirably

adapted to the taste of the day. Thus, the Comte de Caylus, the amateur

who has left us that valuable memoir of Watteau which the Goncourts

rescued from oblivion, is said to have possessed a hundred examples by

Charlier; and in 1772 the Prince de Conti commissioned him to paint a

dozen miniatures at 1,200 livres apiece. Louis XV. also extended his

patronage to Charlier, who painted upon boxes most of the members of

that monarch's family.

It would seem that after the death of Louis XV. Charlier's reputation

waned, and the value of his works diminished. He had a sale of his

productions which by no means answered his expectations, and shortly

afterwards he died. Hertford House can boast of a large number of works

attributed to Charlier; but, for the most part, they consist of the

familiar Toilet of Venus, nymphs bathing, and such-like subjects which

we are wont to associate with Boucher. But here and there will be found

a portrait--one of Madame Elizabeth of France, for instance.

The versatile Jean Honoré Fragonard, says M. Bouchot, painted

miniatures only for his amusement. This critic also attributes them

to Madame Fragonard. Be their authorship what it may, examples which

can be safely attributed to him are extremely rare and greatly sought

after. A representative one is to be seen in the Ashmolean Museum

at Oxford, and another is in the Wallace Collection.[6] Each may be

described as a portrait study of a young girl; in each the handling

is broad in the extreme, and resembles a freely painted water-colour

drawing in effect.

[Footnote 6: No. 183, in Gallery XI.]

I now come to a miniature painter proper, of the highest excellence,

viz., Pierre Adolphe Hall. He has been termed--and I, for one, should

agree with this verdict--the finest miniature painter of the eighteenth

century. The facility of his execution is simply marvellous; the

sweetness and tenderness of expression that he gives to his faces,

and the invariable refinement of his works, make them delightful. His

manner is entirely peculiar to himself, body colour being largely

used. The work is broad in style and effect, and yet the features are

often minute.

The career of this prolific artist was somewhat chequered; and although

he earned large sums of money by his brush--as much as twenty to thirty

thousand livres a year, it is said--he died in poverty, and left his

family in want. He was born at Stockholm, in 1736. When twenty-four

years of age he came to Paris to study; here he remained many years,

and married a Mlle. Godin, of Versailles, whose father was killed in

the Revolution. Gustavus III. wished Hall to return to Sweden; but he

had become so thoroughly French that he refused.

The Revolution sounded the knell of the artist's fortunes. Quitting

Paris, he started for the north, hoping to find employment and

commissions on the way; but at Liège he was seized with apoplexy, and

died there, in 1793.

In the Exhibition of Miniatures at the French National Library to

which I have several times referred, there were over fifty examples

attributed to Hall, many of superb quality and undoubted authenticity.

I do not mention the price obtained at auction as an infallible test of

the quality of a miniature, or of any other work of art--for fashion

reigns supreme in the sale-room as elsewhere; nevertheless, it is

perhaps worth recording that two miniatures by Hall, shown in this

collection, fetched the sum of 28,000 and 60,000 francs respectively,

one being a portrait of the Countess Helflinger, _née_ O'Dune--an

exquisitely soft and tender example, now belonging to M. Cognac; while

the other came from the Mülbacher Sale, and represented, not Louisa,

Queen of Prussia, as was wrongly stated in Swedish on the back of the

frame, but probably, since the portrait is entirely French in style,

that of Mlle. Dugazon in the character of _Nina_, as may be seen by a

comparison with an engraving of the subject by Janinet after Houin,

and the portrait by Mme. Vigée le Brun of the famous actress which now

belongs to the Comtesse de Pourtales.

[Illustration: J. B. AUGUSTIN.

PORTRAIT OF A LADY.

(_M. Ed. Taigny._)]

[Illustration: J. GUÉRIN.

PORTRAIT OF A YOUNG LADY.

(_Mme. de Sainte Martin Valogne._)]

The year after Hall, was born in Stockholm another Swedish artist,

destined to attain great popularity in France, and, like his greater

compatriot, to fall into neglect, was Nicolas Lavreince, or, to give

him his proper name, Nicolas Lanfransen.

When about thirty years of age he came to Paris to pursue his studies,

and the work of his dainty, minute, not always too decorous brush was

just suited to the taste of the people for whom he worked and amongst

whom he lived. He, too, like Hall, drew _Nina_, and the Dugazon in the

_rôle_ of _Babet_, and the Du Barry of course; all of whom were to be

seen in the Bibliothèque Nationale a year or two ago, each portrait

being marked by extreme delicacy of touch and minuteness of finish.

It must be owned that there is an extraordinary charm about the work

of this artist, apart from its merits of execution; but it is a charm

difficult to put into words. They have not the unreality of the _fêtes

galantes_, nor the domesticity of our Francis Wheatley, but something

between the two, something of the daintiness of Watteau combined with

the homeliness of the English artist.

He worked a good deal in body colour, and his gouaches have been

engraved in colour and in black and white by Janinet and Vidal. Many of

these, such as "La Comparaison," "L'Aveu Difficile," "L'Indiscrétion,"

are very celebrated, and now of extreme value; while another, "Le petit

Conseil," is a print of great rarity. Probably driven away by the

Revolution, Lavreince, like Hall, quitted Paris, and died at Stockholm,

in 1807, at which date, according to M. Bouchot, his art had fallen

into complete discredit.

Antoine Vestier, born in 1740, is recognised as an oil painter, and

was received into the French Academy in 1786. He is said to have

rivalled Mme. Vigée le Brun and Roslin, and loved to adorn his sitters

with ribbons and satins. Nevertheless, he was a miniature painter,

and exhibited in the Salon excellent work of the kind, marked by good

colour and careful execution. He lived on until the end of the first

quarter of the nineteenth century, and had a daughter, Nicole Vestier,

who was also a miniature painter. She married Dumont, himself a

distinguished artist, of whom I shall have something to say later on.

Another artist who devoted special pains to his draperies, and has been

called the Roslin of miniature painting, was Jean Laurent Mosnier, born

in Paris, in 1746. Mosnier was made an Academician two years after

Vestier, but did not long survive, dying in 1795. French critics place

his work on a level with that of Augustin or Dumont. His comparatively

early death may account for the rarity of his miniatures, which are

extremely scarce and much sought after nowadays, being distinguished

by excellent taste and brilliant finish, especially, as I have said, in

the painting of the draperies.

In the same year as the last-named artist, Luc Sicard, or, as he was

sometimes called, Sicardi, was born. He was a native of Avignon, and

one of the best miniature painters of his day. The delicacy of his

flesh tones, the precision of his execution, and his attention to the

most minute details made his work especially adapted for _boits aux

portraits_; and he was officially attached to the Ministry for Foreign

Affairs, to assist in the production of these _cadeaux diplomatiques_,

for which he was wont to be paid 300 livres apiece. Hence many

portraits of the French Royalty of his time were executed by him.

There is a lovely example of his delicate handling in the Wallace

Collection (reproduced in my "Miniature Painters"); and the fine

example given in this volume, the portraits of Benoit Boulouvard and

Françoise du Plain de Ste. Albine, gives a good idea of his style,

though it cannot convey the colouring which is especially charming

in the latter example. Thus, the girl wears a citron-coloured ribbon

in her beautifully painted hair, her dress is of a tender pale

greenish-blue, her lips fresh and red; her dark eyes contrast with a

pale complexion of the utmost purity, while the boy's deep blue eyes

contrast with his warm brown hair. Sicardi died in the same year as

Mosnier, namely 1825.

Another provincial artist of about this period was Claude Jean Baptiste

Houin, a native of Dijon, where he died, as Conservateur du Musée,

in 1817. His work, too, is much sought after now. He was a pupil of

Devosge and Greuze, and also painted in pastel.

M. Rouvier, who was born in 1750 and died in the year of Waterloo, is

a man whose work appears to have won recognition in his own time, a

contemporary writer speaking of it as possessing likeness, good colour,

and harmony; but, perhaps owing to the rarity of examples by him, he

may be said to be almost unknown to the present generation. There were

four notable miniatures by him in the Alphonse Kann Collection, dated

1780 and 1781. They are marked by beautiful handling and distinction of

style.

In François Dumont we have, it is generally allowed, one of the

foremost miniature painters that France can boast of, worthy of being

ranked with Isabey and Augustin, and, like both of them, a native of

Lorraine. In the Exhibition, which was so valuable as an exposition of

what the French school was capable of, there were a large number of

works by Dumont, comprising Marie Antoinette, painted in 1774, and many

portraits of the period of the Revolution. There is a certain sobriety

and moderation about the work of Dumont which conveys a sense of solid

value, sometimes rising to a height of character painting of extreme

vigour, and sometimes, in his women's portraits, marked by great

delicacy of face, hair and drapery painting.

The career of Dumont is a notable instance of the triumph of genius and

industry. He was left an orphan, with six brothers and sisters, and

when only eighteen years of age quitted his native place, Luneville,

and came to Paris as a portrait painter. After ten or twelve years'

work he had so far succeeded as to be able to go to Rome, in 1784,

where he established a reputation which led to his being appointed the

"miniaturiste attitré" of the Italian Court. He was made an Academician

when only thirty-seven, and the King gave him Cochin's rooms in the

Louvre. The year the Revolution broke out he married Nicole Vestier;

and from that time on till 1824 Dumont's contributions to the Salon

were regular and numerous.

[Illustration: L. F. AUBRY.

MME. HENRI BELMONT.

(_M. de Richter._)]

There is a comparatively large collection of his works to be seen at

the Louvre, bequeathed by Dr. Gillet. It may be noted that he had a

brother, Laurent Nicolas Antoine, called Tony, who painted miniatures,

signed "Dumont," at Paris. Some critics are inclined to attribute a

certain heaviness of style to Dumont, which may be the excess of the

solid qualities that I spoke of; and this charge is somewhat borne out

by the examples to be seen at the Louvre.

The _lourdeur_ of Dumont passes into leatheriness in the work of Louis

Lié Périn, his flesh painting being greatly inferior to that of his

master, Sicardi. Périn came to Paris to earn his living as a miniature

painter in 1778. Ruined by the Assignats in 1799, he returned to his

native place, Rheims, where he followed his father's trade of woollen

manufacturer; but he continued to paint during the Empire, and died in

1817.

In Pierre Paul Prudhon (1758-1823) we have an artist indeed, but not,

strictly speaking, a miniature painter, for his work in this manner

was but little. Nevertheless, there is one celebrated example of his

powers, viz., the portrait of Mlle. Constance Mayer, from the Eudoxe

Marcille Collection. The tragic end of this pupil and friend of Prudhon

is well known. The face is marked by the sensibility which was the

distinguishing charm of that ill-fated lady and artist. There is a

large drawing of the same subject in the Louvre (reproduced in my

recent work on "Eighteenth Century French Art"), remarkable for force

and character.

Jean Baptiste Jacques Augustin (1759-1832) has long enjoyed a

reputation as one of the greatest miniature painters produced by

France; but it was reserved for the Exhibition brought together at

the Bibliothèque Nationale in 1906 to show the extent and surpassing

quality of some of his work. From the collections of Baron Schlichting

and Alphonse Kann, from the Doistau Collection, and last, but not

least, from Mr. Pierpont Morgan, came nearly fifty works. The quality

of these varied a good deal, some being almost coarse and bricky in

colour, whilst others, notably some sketches, with small heads, which

came from Augustin's heirs, were amongst the most wonderful things I

have ever seen in art of this nature. It would be impossible to convey

an adequate idea of the marvellous expression, delicacy, and finish

combined in the heads in these sketches, which were not larger than a

pea. In another specimen of his powers in the same collection might

be seen the most delicate tones of flesh painting imaginable. In the

Wallace Collection are nine or ten Augustins, including Jérome and

Napoleon Bonaparte and Marie Louise. The most attractive of them all is

a young lady in a white bodice, with a leopard skin hanging round her

_décolleté_ figure. She has a most vivacious and winning expression. It

is dated 1824.

Augustin arrived in Paris some eight years before the outbreak of the

Revolution; he lived to paint Napoleon at the height of his greatness,

say, about 1810, Joséphine, Pauline, and others of the Bonaparte

family, and died of cholera in 1832. Between 1781 and 1800, when he was

married, he painted upwards of three hundred and sixty portraits, some

miniatures and some in oils. His wife became his pupil, and is said to

have almost equalled her husband. She lived till 1865, and her work is

often confounded with that of her husband, whose method of working and

artistic tendencies she thoroughly understood and embraced.

It has been said of Augustin that he was the traditional descendant

of the old missal painters; and a portrait by him of Denon in enamel

recalls, according to M. Bouchot, the best work of Fouquet, of Clouet,

or Nanteuil. I should have said that, compared with the two latter

painters, he was far their superior when at his best. For delineation

of character, minute detail, and brilliant, if somewhat hard, finish,

Augustin's work would hold its own in comparison with much of the

finest medieval missal-painting, which, indeed, it instinctively

recalls. Although, consciously or unconsciously, Augustin's work

may have been influenced by the study of medieval work, with its

brilliancy, formality, and patience, amongst the fifty pieces from his

hand shown in Paris a considerable variety of treatment might be found,

some of it being large and bold in style, as, for example, a portrait

of the sculptor Calamard.

J.-B. J. Augustin must not be confounded with that Augustin Dubourg who

signed his work "Augustin." Dubourg's work is not met with after 1800;

it is said that he was a cousin of the better-known man, and came from

the same town, namely St. Dié in the Vosges.

A contemporary of Augustin, born in the same year and dying in the

same year, was Charles Guillaume Alexandre Bourgeois. His effective

manner of rendering a portrait may be said to be peculiar to himself,

he treating them as medallions, and painting the head in profile on

a black ground, which greatly added to their effect. Although this

seems to have been Bourgeois's favourite method of portraiture, it was

not his invariable practice; and when, leaving the marble whiteness

and medal-like effect of his ordinary method, he set himself to

paint flesh tones and the fair skin and rounded contours of youth,

he was equally successful. He is said to have been very proficient

in practical chemistry, and published several works on the subject.

Although he exhibited in the Salon from 1800 to 1824, his work is

rare, and examples fetch a high price. A peculiarity I have noted in

his treatment is that the eyes in his women's portraits are invariably

large and the eyes lashes curled to an unnatural degree. I should

say that his men are not as well painted as his women. The medallion

style that he affects makes his work particularly suitable for

insertion in boxes.

[Illustration: J. B. ISABEY.

BY HIMSELF.

(_M. Ed. Taigny._)]

In concluding these remarks upon the French school of miniature

painters, I come to a very distinguished name, that of Isabey, with

which two other artists may be grouped as pupils or companions; and we

will take the latter first; they are Jean Guérin and Louis François

Aubry.

Guérin was born in 1760, and was a companion of Isabey in David's

studio. His abilities must have been early recognised at Court, as he

painted the King and Queen, and, later, many of the celebrities of the

Assemblée; he also lived to paint Joséphine Bonaparte in Court costume.

His portrait of General Kléber is perhaps the best known miniature

in the Louvre, and is a work of astonishing virility and force of

character. It was exhibited in the Salon of 1798, and he made many

copies of it. Although his men's portraits are remarkable for their

searching modelling, he was equally successful with the portraits of

women and children, which he painted with _naïveté_ and tenderness.

The other associate of Isabey was Louis François Aubry, a Parisian,

born in 1767, who lived till the middle of the nineteenth century.

Contemporary criticism assigned to this artist the ability to imitate

his master Isabey, and to rival him in delicacy of brush and fidelity

of likeness. Although he exhibited for over thirty years at the Salon,

there is nothing by him in the Wallace Collection, and I only recall

one in the Louvre, and that is a large miniature, painted with great

care, representing a lady playing a harp. It is highly finished

throughout, and recalls the best work of Augustin. I should say that he

excelled in what may be called full-dress pictures, somewhat conscious,

not to say affected, in pose, but excellent work of high technical

quality. Aubry was at his zenith during the Restoration; he lived till

1851, and for many years had an _atelier_ in Paris frequented by male

and female students.

In some respects Jean Baptiste Isabey is the most remarkable name in

the annals of French miniature painting. He was _persona grata_ to

successive monarchs, having been _peintre attitré_ to Napoleon, to the

Allies, to Louis XVIII., and to Charles X. But the commencement of this

artist's career can be taken much farther back, seeing that it was the

admiration of Marie Antoinette for his work upon _boites decorées_ that

led to his first royal patronage, and resulted in his being installed

at Versailles before he was of age. From that time, the very eve of the

Revolution, until 1855 he produced a long series of portraits of all

the most distinguished personages of his time.

The Wallace Collection is especially rich in his work, there being

nearly thirty examples by his hand. With Napoleon I. he was a special

favourite, and, as I have said, several of his portraits of the Emperor

may be seen at Hertford House, representing him in full Imperial

costume, in academic dress, with Joséphine, and otherwise. And there,

too, may be seen two portraits of the Duke of Wellington from his

hand. But this collection is especially rich in portraits of ladies of

the Empire and Restoration, to depict whose charms he adopted a style

of his own, known to French critics as _portraits sous voile_. These

ladies are touched in with a light hand and with the freedom of a

water-colour sketch.

This manner of painting, in which he may be said to have set the

fashion, is the very antithesis in style to that of his master David;

but the rigorous training of that severe draughtsman enabled Isabey,

when he chose, to paint with a precision and minute finish which is

the _ne plus ultra_ of such work. This was shown in a large piece,

twenty-three by seventeen centimetres, exhibited in Paris in 1906, and

representing the children of Joachim Murat, and Caroline of Naples

_déjeunant sur l'herbe_. This, I do not hesitate to say, is the most

extraordinary piece of work of its kind that I have ever seen. It is

a group of several children in velvet dresses of the period, and a

certain quality of velvety softness marks the execution. The attention

to detail is microscopic; all the accessories of the little picnic

party are painted with elaborate care; the stalk of the flowers in the

dessert dish, the tiny finger-nails of the children, are all treated

as if the artist's reputation depended upon the fidelity with which he

represented them. It is a veritable _tour de force_ of finish; but such

is the brilliant and luminous way in which he has handled it that there

is nothing hard or laboured in its effect, in spite of the immense

amount of work it must have entailed.

In this particular example there is a quality recalling the finest

Flemish work; and yet, as Isabey came to the capital, as we have seen,

before he was twenty-one years of age, he can hardly have been subject

to Flemish influences; I should attribute it to the influence of David

and the classical school. The group I have been describing is not

dated, but clearly belongs to the halcyon days of the Empire.

It may have been the demands made upon the time of Isabey, owing to his

numberless commissions, that made him adopt the less laboured style

of most of the portraits of ladies which may be seen at the Wallace

Collection--that is, his latest manner--which is so entirely different

from the group of Murat's children as to make one almost doubt at first

sight that it can have proceeded from the same hand.

I had intended to close this notice upon the French painters with

Isabey, who, as he lived to be nearly ninety, seems to be linked on

almost to our own times; but there are two or three others to whom I

must briefly refer, of whom the Italian Ferdinand Quaglia is one.

He was born in 1780, and was established in Paris in 1805, where,

having obtained the patronage of Joséphine Beauharnais, he became

a Court painter. A miniature of the Empress by him may be seen at

Hertford House; it is probably a replica, as it is dated 1814, and

she was divorced five years earlier. Quaglia's work is marked by high

finish, but it is uninteresting, and his style sometimes approaches the

smoothness of porcelain, which detracts from its artistic value.

Another artist who clearly enjoyed the French Imperial patronage was

C. Chatillon, as is shown by the beautiful portrait of Napoleon in his

coronation robe and wearing the laurel wreath of victory, which adorns

this volume. The original is in the collection of his Grace the Duke of

Wellington.

Daniel Saint was an excellent artist, though not, perhaps, of the first

rank; there are several examples of his work in the Wallace Collection,

and he may be regarded as the successor of Augustin and Dumont.

Lastly, I may mention J. Mansion, who painted many charming portraits

of the period of the Restoration, as may be seen at Hertford House.

He was associated with the Sèvres factory, but his quality as a

portrait painter is amply vindicated in the Wallace Collection. His

work was probably largely influenced by Isabey, whose style it closely

resembles.

CONCLUSION

The practice of the art of Miniature Painting has now been traced

through several centuries, from its origin in the cloister, to its

enthronement on the hearth and place of honour in mid-Victorian homes.

These pages will have been written to little purpose if they have not

amply demonstrated the truth of what Dr. Johnson has finely said of

the art, namely, that it is "so valuable in diffusing friendship, in

reviving tenderness, in awakening the affections of the absent, and

continuing the presence of the dead."

I have quoted these words elsewhere; but none that I am acquainted with

so aptly express the personal interest pertaining to miniatures, which

strikes a deep and vibrant note, one which, when joined to exquisite

work, as we have seen it to be in the case of so many examples of the

older masters, lends an indefinable charm to miniatures, and makes them

amongst the most cherished of human possessions.

Thus much, then, as regards the past. The future progress of this

fascinating art it will be for others to chronicle, if, and when, it

regains an importance which warrants a record.

At present all good judges agree that, in spite of the number of those

who are practising as miniature painters, the standard reached is most

disappointing. The reason for this unsatisfactory state of affairs I

shall leave my readers to determine for themselves, for I may be told

that in talking about old miniatures it is no concern of mine to point

out, and still less to dwell upon, the merits or otherwise of recent

examples. Nevertheless, as one who has studied the subject somewhat

closely for many years, I may be allowed to express the conviction that

the deficiencies so painfully apparent in modern work are mainly due to

the want of thorough artistic training.

Miniature painting is too often taken up much as ladies take up some

new kind of "fancy-work" (as they term it). Want of success--due to

lack of knowledge and lack of experience--soon leads to discouragement.

Thus the persistent practice which led to success in other days is

wanting, and the artist's powers never reach their full development.

If this be true, and I think it is, the remedy for it, as far as the

artists are concerned, may be found in more careful training and in

patient devotion to work.

But then, the public who employ them must play their part. They must

show greater refinement of taste, and learn to discriminate; to reject

what is bad or indifferent, and realise that good work cannot be cheap

work, that it demands and is entitled to adequate remuneration.

It should be the task of each successive generation to see that the

art of miniature painting is encouraged. Miniatures must be taken

seriously, not regarded as mere bric-à-brac or trifles. I repeat,

we must insist upon a high standard. We have a goodly heritage of

beautiful work of unique historical value handed down to us, and it is

a duty to perpetuate this series, so that the "fair women and brave

men" of our own days shall not go unrepresented; and thus shall we add

our share to the treasures of our national art and earn the gratitude

of posterity.

INDEX

A

Amber, Millicent, wife of William Cobden, 256, 257

Amsterdam, Liotards at, 218

Anglo-Celtic, _see_ Hibernian

_Arlaud_, 28

Ashmolean Museum, miniatures at, 83

_Aubrey, L. F._, 355

Audley, Lady, by Holbein, 286

_Augustin, J. B. J._, quality of his work, 350, 351;

examples of, in Wallace Collection, 310, 351;

his career, 351

_Augustin, J. B. J., Madame_, 351

B

Barbor jewel, the, 315

Battersea enamels, 89

Belvoir, miniatures at, 298

Bessborough family, owners of Liotards, 218

_Betts, J. & T._, 28, 105, 106, 109

Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris, Janets at, 288

_Biffin, Miss_, 35

_Boit, Charles_, 83

Bonaparte, Napoleon I., 308

Bonaparte, Caroline, 308

Bonaparte, Jerome, 308

Bonaparte, Louis, 308

Bonaparte, Pauline, 308

_Bone, Henry_, 30, 90

_Bone, Henry Pierce_, 30, 93

_Bone, W._, 30, 93

_Bone, C. R._, 30, 93

_Bone, P. J._, 31

_Bordier, Jacques_, 75, 198, 201

_Bordier, Pierre_, 76, 201

_Boucher, François_, 308, 337

_Boucher, Madame_, 338

_Bourgeois, C. G. A._, 352

Brandon, Alicia, wife of N. Hilliard, 297

Brandon, Charles and Henry, sons of the Duke of Suffolk, by Holbein, 282

British Museum, enamels at, 73

Buccleuch Collection of Miniatures, the, 22, 118, 122, 140, 143, 149, 160, 293-95, 300

Burdett-Coutts Collection, 298, 299

Byzantine work, 66, 69

C

Camargo, La, portrait of, 309

Canterbury Gospels, 53

Carlisle, Earl of, his collection, 206

Carlovingian school, 53

_Carriera, Rosalba_, 334;

her character, 334;

her pastels, 337

_Carter, W._, 35

Catherine of Braganza, by Cooper, at Victoria and Albert Museum, 316

_Chalon, A. E._, R.A., 31, 271

_Chalon, J. J._, R.A., 31

_Chalon, Miss M. A._, 31

_Chalon, H. B._, 31

Chantilly, works by Janet at, 110, 288;

reference to, 332

Charles I., his collection of miniatures, 22;

his miniature by Petitot, 206

Charles II., by Cooper, 183, 291, 309;

by Flatman, in the Wallace Collection, 309;

his miniature by Petitot, 206

Charlemagne, 53

_Charlier_, patronised by Louis XV., 338;

examples of, at Hertford House, 306, 339

Charlotte, Queen, by O. Humphrey, 252, 292

_Chatillon, C._, 359

_Chavant, Mlle._, imitator of Petitot, 202

_Chinnery, George_, 247

Claypole, Elizabeth, 294, 297

Clive, Lord and Lady, portraits of, 247

_Clouet_, works by, 333

Cobden family, miniatures of, 256

Cobden, William, 256

Cobden, Richard, 256

Cobden, Richard Brooks, 259

Cobden Unwin, Mrs., miniatures belonging to, 256-59

_Collins, Richard_, 31

_Collins, Samuel_, 31, 221, 251

_Constantin, Moïse_, imitator of Petitot, 202

_Cooper, Samuel_, 31, 57;

Evelyn's reference to, 50;

his birth and career, 175;

Pepys's admiration for him, 176;

money value attaching to his miniatures, 179;

his portraits of the Protector's family, 179, 180;

merits of his work criticised, 183;

examples in the Royal Collection, 186;

at Montague House, 294;

at Welbeck, 297;

at Kensington, 314;

at Victoria and Albert Museum, 315, 319

_Cooper, Alexander_, 31;

rarity of his work, 186;

his death, 186;

his inferiority to S. Cooper, 187

_Corneille de Lyon_, 333

_Cosway, Richard_, 31;

his reputation, 232;

his eccentricities, 232;

his career, 235;

his training and dexterity, 235;

the number of his works, 236;

and of forgeries of the same, 236;

a great collector, 238;

his marriage, 238;

his character, 242;

his technique, 245;

his portrait of the Duchess of Devonshire, 292;

his works at Victoria and Albert Museum, 314

_Cosway, Maria_, reference to, 31;

her parentage and marriage, 238;

her ability as a painter, 238, 241;

separates from her husband, 241;

retires to Italy and dies, 242

_Courtois, Jehan_, 70

Cromwell, Oliver, by S. Cooper, at Montague House, 294

_Crosse, Lawrence_, 31;

his style of painting, 218;

examples at Welbeck, 298

_Crosse, Richard_, 31

Cuper, Madeleine and Margaret, 79

D

Dartrey, Lord, collection of, 80, 201

Dauphin, Janet's portrait of, 287

Davis, Mary, by S. Cooper, 297

_Day, Alexander_, 31

_Day, Thomas_, 31

_Dayes, Edward_, 31

_de Court, Suzanne_, 70

_de Heere, Lucas_, 101

_de la Chana, Alexandre_, imitator of Petitot, 202

_Derby, Alfred_, 31

_Derby, William_, 31, 221

Devonshire, Duchess of, portrait of, 238

Dickinson Gallery, exhibitions of miniatures at, 264, 299

Digbys, the, portraits of, 150, 153, 154, 299

Dimier, M., on the Clouets, 331;

on Corneille de Lyon, 333

_Dixon, John_, 31;

engraver, 31;

examples of, in the Buccleuch Collection, 297

_Dixon, N._, 31, 32

_Downman, John_, A.R.A., 268

Drake, Admiral, by S. Cooper, 297

_Dubourg, Augustin_, 352

_Dudman, W._, miniature painter, 256

_Dufey_, copyist of Petitot, 202

_Dumont, F._, his career, 346;

character of his work, 349

_Dumont, Laurent N. A._, 349

Du Thé, Mlle., portrait of, 309

Dyce Collection at Victoria and Albert Museum, 315

E

_Edridge, Henry_, A.R.A., 268;

his copies of Reynolds and drawings, _ibid._

Edward VI., by Hilliard, 286

Enamels, early use of, 65;

_cloisonné_, 66;

_champlevé_, 69;

Limoges, 70

_Engleheart, George_, 32;

his origin, 255;

characteristics of his style, 255;

number of his works, 255;

their rarity in our public collections, 256

_Engleheart, J. C. D._, 37

_Essex, William_, 32, 93, 315

_Essex, William B._, 32

Ethelwald, Benedictional of, 56

F

_Felu, C. F._, 35

_Ferrier, F._, 32

_Ferrier, L._, 32

_Ferrand, J. P._, imitator of Petitot, 202

Fitzherbert, Mrs., by R. Cosway, 309

_Flatman, T._, example of, in Dyce Collection, 316

_Foldsome, Miss_, _see_ Mee

_Forster, Thomas_, portraits of Duke and Duchess of Marlborough, 314

_Fragonard, J. H._, examples of, 310, 339

_Fragonard, Madame_, works by, 310

French School, as shown at Hertford House, 307;

its excellence, 327

G

Gardiner Collection, 79

_Geddes_, portrait of A. Plimer by, 246

George III., patronises Humphrey, 252;

patronises Engleheart, 255

George IV., miniature of, 245

_Gibson, Richard_, 32

_Gibson, Penelope_, 32

_Gibson, William_, 32

_Goupey, Louis_, 32

_Goupey, Joseph_, 32

_Goupey, Bernard_, 32

_Green, Mrs. Mary_, 32

_Green, Robert_, 32

_Gribelin, Isaac_, 74

_Grimaldi, W._, copy by, 309

_Guérin, J._, 355;

his career, 355;

his portrait of Kléber, 355

Gunning, Elizabeth, Duchess of Hamilton, 222

Gunning, Maria, Countess of Coventry, 222

H

_Hall, P. A._, 80;

his portrait of Marie Antoinette, 205;

works by, 307;

at Hertford House, 310;

facility of his execution, 339;

characteristics of his work, 339;

his career, 340;

high price fetched by his work, 340

Hamilton, Lady Elizabeth, 222

_Hargreaves, Thomas_, 267

_Haughton_ (or _Houghton_), _Moses_, 32

_Hayter, Charles_, 32, 271

_Hayter, Sir George_, 32

_Hazlitt, William_, 242

_Heins, D._, 32

_Heins, John_, 32

_Henderson, R._, 57

Henrietta, Duchess of Orleans, by Petitot, 299

Henry VII., by Hilliard, 286

Henry VIII., by Holbein, 285;

by Hilliard, 286

Henry Frederick, Prince of Wales, miniature of, 36;

by I. Oliver, 288

Henry, Duke of Gloucester, by S. Cooper, 314

Hertford House Collection, _see_ Wallace

Hibernian School of Manuscript, 53

_Hiles, Bartram_, 35

_Hilliard, Nicholas_, 32;

his manner of painting, 39;

birth and parentage, 127;

employed by Elizabeth, _ibid._;

his death, 131;

examples of his work, _ibid._, 136-44, 286, 288, 297, 314;

his method of painting and merits, 132-36

_Hilliard, Lawrence_, 32, 128, 131

_Holbein, Hans, the Younger_, the founder of miniature painting in England, visits Sir Thomas More, 113;

portraits by him, 114;

taken into the service of Henry VIII., _ibid._;

collection of drawings and miniatures by, at Windsor, _ibid._, 118, 282;

at Hertford House, 309;

other works by, 121, 122

Holmes, Sir Richard, on the Royal Collection, 281, 282, 287

_Hone, Nathaniel_, R.A., 32, 84, 87

_Hone, Horace_, A.R.A., 32, 87

_Hopkins, Thomas_, 33

_Hopkins, William_, 33

_Horneband Family_, 102

_Hoskins, John_, 32;

his career, his pupils, 166;

examples of work, 167;

his merits as a miniature painter, 167, 168;

his death, 169

_Houin, C. J. B._, 345

Howard, Katherine, 282

_Hudson, Thomas_, Master of Cosway, 235

Hughes, Madame, by S. Cooper, 297

_Humphrey, Ozias_, R.A., his qualities as a miniature painter, 248;

compared with Plimer and Smart, 251;

his origin and career, a pupil of Collins, 251;

goes to Italy, 252;

and India, 251;

his prices, 251;

examples of his powers as a copyist at Knole, 255;

beauty of his work, 292;

his portrait of Queen Charlotte, 292

_Hurter, the Brothers_, 80

I

_Isabey, J. B._, his portrait of Napoleon I., 308;

painter to successive monarchs, 356;

examples at Hertford House, 310, 356;

diverse nature of his work, 357, 358

J

James II., by Cooper, 291;

by Petitot, 206, 299, 300

_Janet, François_, his family, 109, 331;

his work at Windsor, 287;

by members of his family, 333

_Jansen, S. J._, 89

Jennings, Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough, by B. Lens, 319

Jones Collection, 76-80, 148, 156, 193;

index of portraits in, 320-24

Joséphine, Empress, portraits of, 307

K

Kells, book of, 53

Kensington, Loan Collection at in 1865, 131, 143, 144

L

_Lambert_, imitator of Petitot, 202

_Laudin_, 70

_Lavreince, Nicholas_, 343;

his career and nature of his work, 344

Leczinska, Marie, portrait of, 308

_Legarré, Jules_, 207

_Lens, Bernard_, 32;

examples of, at Welbeck, 248

_Lens, Andrew B._, 32

_Lens, Peter P._, 32

_Lens_ family, 218

_Limousin, Lenard_, 70

_Limousin, Jean_, 70

_Limousin, Joseph_, 70

_Limousin, François_, 70

_Linnell, John_, 268

_Liotard, J. E._, his work criticised, examples at Amsterdam and Paris, 218

_Loggan, David_, portrait of Sir G. Verney, 314

Louis XV., portrait of, 308

Louis XVI., portrait of, 308

Louis XVII., portrait of, 308

Louis XVIII., portrait of, 308

Louvre, enamels at, 73, 206;

snuff-boxes, 80, 205;

Le Noir Collection, 205;

Liotards at, 218

M

_Mansion, J._, works by, 310;

at Hertford House, 313, 350

Marie Louise, portraits of, 307

Mary, Queen of Scots, portraits of, 109, 110, 143, 287

_Massé, J. B._, 337

Mayerne, Sir T. de, 75, 194

Medici, Catherine de, 332

_Mee, Mrs._, 268

_Meyer, Jeremiah_, R.A., 87, 88, 315

Milton, John, by S. Cooper, 297

Miniatures, on the collecting of, 22;

forgeries of, 27, 237;

on the care and preservation of, 36-42;

painted on several pieces of ivory, 41;

origin of the art, 45-57;

and of the term, 49;

method of painting, 58-62

Miniature painters, early, 97

Miniature painting, its long history, 363;

importance of perpetuating it, 364, 365

Monck, George, by Cooper, 183, 291

Monmouth, Duke of, by Cooper, 183, 291;

by Dixon, 297

_More, Sir A._, 105

_Moser, G. M._, R.A., 33, 87

_Moser, Joseph_, 33

_Moser, Mary_, 33, 88

_Mosnier, J. L._, 344

_Muss, Charles_, 84

N

Napoleonic period illustrated at Hertford House, 307

_Netscher, Gaspar_, 218

_Newton, Richard_, 33

_Newton, Sir William J._, 32, 41, 271;

the number of his works, _ibid._;

example at Victoria and Albert Museum, 315

_Nixon, James_, 221

O

_O'Keefe, Daniel_, 33

_O'Keefe, John_, 33

_Oliver, Isaac_, 33;

the Oliver family, 147;

examples of Isaac Oliver's work, 149-160

_Oliver, Peter_, 33;

his parentage and family, 161;

his copies ofold masters, 165;

his death, 161;

example at Victoria and Albert Museum, 314

Olivers, the, in Burdett-Coutts Collection, 298, 299

P

Pala d'oro, 69

_Périn, Louis L._, 349

_Perrot_, copyist of Petitot, 202

_Petitot, Jean_, 24, 74, 75, 79;

his origin, 194;

his arrival in England, _ibid_;

introduction to Charles I., and friendship with Van Dyck, 197;

takes refuge in Paris, _ibid._;

his numerous portraits of Louis XIV., 198;

quits France and settles at Geneva, _ibid._;

his death at Vevey, _ibid._;

his copyists, 202;

fine examples of his work, 206, 299;

number of, in Jones Collection, 316

_Petitot Fils_, 201;

inferiority of his work to that of the elder Petitot, _ibid._

_Plimer, Andrew_, 33, 245;

parentage, 33, 245;

death, 246;

his portrait in the Scottish National Gallery, 246;

his group of the Rushout girls, 246;

examples of, at Victoria and Albert Museum, 314

_Plimer, Nathaniel_, 33, 245;

exhibits at Royal Academy, 245

_Plott, John_, 87

Plumley Collection at Victoria and Albert Museum, 315

Pompadour, portrait of, 308

_Pope, Alexander_, miniature painter and poet, 33

Portland, Duke of, his collection, 297;

Coopers in, 298

Portsmouth, Duchess of, by Cooper, 297

Powis, earl of, collection of, 247

_Prewitt, W._, 84

Primitifs Français, Exhibition of, 332, 334

Propert, Dr., on forgeries, 236, 237

_Prudhon, P. P._, 350

Q

_Quaglia, F._, 358

R

Radnor, Earl of, collection of, 241

_Raeburn, Sir Henry_, 268

Raleigh, Sir Walter, and his son at Belvoir, 298

Ramolino, Madame, portrait of, 307

_Reymond, Pierre_, 70

_Reynolds, Sir Joshua_, P.R.A., referred to, 235, 251, 255

_Robertson, Andrew_, his origin, 33, 263;

his varied talents, 263;

comes to London and makes B. West his patron, 264;

characteristics of his work, 264;

his death and character, 264

_Robertson, Archibald_, 33

_Robertson, Alexander_, 33

_Robertson, Mrs. A._, 33

_Robertson, Walter_, 34

_Robertson, Charles_, 34

Rome, King of, portrait of, 308

_Romney, George_, goes to Italy with Humphrey, 252

_Ross, H._, 34, 276

_Ross, Mrs._, 34

_Ross, H., Junr._, 34

_Ross, Miss Maria_, 34

_Ross, Miss Magdalene_, 34

_Ross, Sir William Charles_, R.A., 34;

his birth and parentage, 275;

his precocity, 275;

is patronised by Royalty, 275;

the great number of his works, 275;

characteristics of his style, 276;

many examples in the Royal Collection, _ibid._, 292;

examples of, at Victoria and Albert Museum, 315

_Rouvier, M._, 346

Rouvigny, Rachel de, her portrait, 197

Rupert, Prince, by Dixon, 297

Rushout, the Misses, Plimer's miniature of, 246, 247

Rutland, Duke of, his collection, 298

S

_Sadler, Thomas_, 34

_Sadler, William_, 34

_Saint, D._, 359

_Saunders, George L._, 34

_Saunders, Joseph_, 34

_Saunders, R._, 34

Schreiber Collection, 89

Seymour, Jane, by Hilliard, 286

Sheepshanks Gallery, _see_ Victoria and Albert

_Shelley, Samuel_, 221

Sheridan, Mrs., 251

_Sherlock, William_, 34

Shipley's Drawing School, 235, 247

_Sicardi_, or _Sicard, L._, 345;

charm of his colouring, 345;

example at Hertford House, 345

Sidney, Sir Philip, by I. Oliver, 288

_Singleton, Joseph_, 34

_Singleton, William_, 34

_Smart, Anthony_, 35

_Smart, John_, 34;

his birth and career, 247;

goes to India, 247;

qualities of his art, 248

_Smart, John, junr._, 34, 247

_Smart, Samuel Paul_, 34

_Smith Thomas Correggio_, 34

_Smith, John Raphael_, 34

Snuff-boxes, 79;

their use in the eighteenth century, 205

_Soutter, J. G._, imitator of Petitot, 202

T

_Teerling, Levyn_, 102

_Thorburn, Robert_, A.R.A., his method of painting large works on ivory, 41;

his rapid rise, 271;

his method of making cabinet pictures, 275

_Toutin, Jean_, 74, 193

_Toutin, Henri_, 75

U

Unwin, Mrs., _see_ Cobden

Upsala, MSS. preserved at, 57

V

_Van Cleef, J._, 105

Van der Doort's catalogue, 285, 286, 288

_Van Dyck, Sir A._, his friendship with Petitot, 197

Victoria and Albert Museum, enamels at, 73, 74, 76, 93;

snuff-boxes at, 205;

miniatures at, 313

W

Waddesdon Collection, 73, 74

Wallace Collection, miniatures in, 304-313;

snuff-boxes, 79

Walpole, Horace, his criticisms, 183, 299

Welbeck Collection, 297

_West, Benjamin_, P.R.A., a patron of Robertson, 264;

his influence at Court, 264

Windsor, collection at, its extent, 282, 291;

Olivers at, 149, 150, 165, 288

_Wood, William_, 267

_Wright, Mrs._, _see_ Biffin

Z

_Zincke, C. F._, 83, 300

* * * * *

CHATS ON OLD FURNITURE

BY ARTHUR HAYDEN.

_Price_ =5s.= _net._

_With a Coloured Frontispiece and many Illustrations, a List of Sale

Prices, and a Full Index._

"Mr. Hayden knows his subject intimately."--_Pall Mall Gazette._

"The hints to collectors are the best and clearest we have seen; so

that altogether this is a model book of its kind."--_Athenæum._

"A useful and instructive volume."--_Spectator._

"An abundance of illustrations completes a well-written and

well-constructed history."--_Daily News._

"Mr. Hayden's taste is sound and his knowledge thorough."--_Scotsman._

"A book of more than usual comprehensiveness and more than usual

merit."--_Vanity Fair._

"Mr. Hayden has worked at his subject on systematic lines, and has

made his book what it purports to be--a practical guide for the

collector."--_Saturday Review._

CHATS ON OLD CHINA

BY ARTHUR HAYDEN.

_Price_ =5s.= _net._

_With Coloured Frontispiece and Reproductions of 156 Marks and 89

Specimens of China._

A List of SALE PRICES and a full INDEX increase the usefulness of the

Volume.

This is a handy book of reference to enable Amateur Collectors to

distinguish between the productions of the various factories.

"A handsome handbook that the amateur in doubt will find useful, and

the china-lover will enjoy for its illustrations, and for the author's

obvious love and understanding of his subject."--_St. James's Gazette._

"All lovers of china will find much entertainment in this

volume."--_Daily News._

"It gives in a few pithy chapters just what the beginner wants to know

about the principal varieties of English ware. We can warmly commend

the book to the china collector."--_Pall Mall Gazette._

"One of the best points about the book is the clear way in which the

characteristics of each factory are noted down separately, so that the

veriest tyro ought to be able to judge for himself if he has a piece

or pieces which would come under this heading, and the marks are very

accurately given."--_Queen._

CHATS ON OLD PRINTS

BY ARTHUR HAYDEN.

_Price_ =5s.= _net._

_With a Coloured Frontispiece and 110 Illustrations, a Table of

Engravers, a Bibliography, a Glossary, and a Full Index._

"Mr. Hayden writes at once with enthusiasm and discrimination on his

theme."--_Daily Telegraph._

"Any one who, having an initial interest in matters of art, wants to

form sound and intelligent opinions about engravings, will find this

book the very thing for him."--_Literary World._

"These 'Chats' comprise a full and admirably lucid description of

every branch of the engraver's art, with copious and suggestive

illustrations."--_Morning Leader._

In 2 vols., royal 4to, £5 5s. nett.

MINIATURE PAINTERS: British and Foreign.

Illustrated with numerous Examples selected from celebrated Collections.

AUTHOR'S EDITION, with all the Plates, many of them in the best style of

Photogravure, printed upon fine Plate Paper.

"Mr. Foster's experience makes him a safe guide, and leaves little

to be desired. Mr. Foster is more fortunate than some other writers

upon miniatures in possessing sound critical taste. The splendid

series of illustrations in photogravure which enrich the volumes

... form in themselves a gallery of miniature art ... admirably

chosen."--_Athenæum._

THE STUARTS

Illustrated by 16th, 17th, and 18th Century Art.

From the Collections of His Majesty the King, H.R.H. the Duchess of

Albany, the Duke of Bedford, the Duke of Rutland, K.G., Earl Spencer,

K.G., and many others.

Containing 13 Original Etchings, 150 Full-page Photogravures,

Illustrations in Colour, and various Facsimile Letters, Medals, Maps,

&c.

"The glory, pride, and beauty of three centuries of English history are

enshrined in these pages, reproduced and made alive again before our

eyes in all the glow of the best art of the past, and with a fidelity

of reproduction which it has been reserved for the modern world to

invent."--_Athenæum._

A POPULAR EDITION of the above with 30 Illustrations now

ready, £1 5s. nett.

CONCERNING THE TRUE PORTRAITURE OF

MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS.

Illustrated by Large Plates, many in Colour, from Authentic Originals in

the Collections of His Majesty the King, the Duke of Devonshire,

the Earl of Leven and Melville, the Earl of Denbigh,

the Duke of Portland, &c.

The Edition is EXTREMELY LIMITED, namely, 175 copies only of an

_EDITION DE LUXE_, at 10 guineas nett.

"Mr. Foster's sumptuous and remarkable volume.... A most exhaustive,

well-weighed, well-balanced study."--_Standard._

"The author is as careful and exhaustive as he is critical."--_Glasgow

Herald._

THE CENTENARY EDITION OF

THE LIFE OF GEORGE MORLAND.

BY GEORGE DAWE, R.A.

Illustrated by 56 Large Plates in the finest Photogravure.

AUTHOR'S EDITION strictly limited to 250 copies at 3 guineas nett each.

FRENCH ART FROM WATTEAU TO PRUDHON.

This sumptuous Work, illustrating French art of the Eighteenth Century,

upon a scale _never before attempted_, with Essays by eminent French

and English critics of the day, NOW READY.

_Prospectuses of this and other Volumes of the DICKINSON ART LIBRARY

may be had of all the important Booksellers, or post free on

application at 114, New Bond Street, London, W._

UNWIN BROTHERS, LIMITED, THE GRESHAM PRESS, WOKING AND LONDON

Chats on Old Miniatures · 第 16 / 16 章