CHAPTER XVII

AND IS THIS REALLY FREEDOM?

LONDON, _Nov.-Dec._ 1908.

About a week ago,[22] whilst you were writing your first letter to me

and speaking of the beautiful Eastern sun that was shining through your

latticed window, what a different experience was mine in London. I was

walking by myself in the West End, when suddenly, the whole city was

shrouded in one of those dense fogs to which you no doubt have become

accustomed. I could not see the name of the streets nor the path at the

opposite side, so I wandered on for a little while, only to discover

that I had arrived back at the same place.

There was no one to show me the way, and the English language that I

had spoken from infancy seemed of no use to me, since no one took any

notice of my questions.

I looked in vain for a policeman. Your London policemen are so amiable

and clever. Whatever difficulty I have, they seem to be able to help

me, and the most curious of all curious things is, they will not accept

tips! What wonderful men! and what a difference from our policemen in

Constantinople! In Constantinople, I trembled almost at the sight of a

policeman, but here I cannot imagine what I should do without them.

However, after losing myself and getting back always to the same point,

I finally struck out in a new direction, and walked on and on until,

when I was least expecting it, I found that just by chance I was safe

in front of my club. You can perhaps imagine my relief. It seemed to me

as if I had escaped from some terrible danger, and I wonder more and

more how you English people manage to find your way in one of these

dense fogs.

When I got into my club, I found your letter waiting me, and the

Turkish post-mark cheered me just a little, and made me forget for a

while the hideous black mantle in which London was wrapt.

On those evenings when I dine at “my club” (see how English I have

become!) I eat alone, studying all the time the people I see around me.

What a curious harem! and what a difference from the one in which you

are living at present.

The first time I dined there I ordered the vegetarian dinner, expecting

to have one of those delicious meals which you are enjoying (you lucky

woman!), which consists of everything that is good. But alas! the food

in this harem has been a disappointment to me. Surely I must not accept

this menu as a sample of what English food really is.

On a little table all to myself, I was served with, first of all, rice

which was cooked not as in Turkey, and as a second course I had carrots

cooked in water! After sprinkling on them quantities of salt and pepper

I could not even then swallow them, so I asked for pickles, but as

there were none, that dish was sent away almost untouched to join the

first. Next I was served with a compote of pears without sugar, but

that also did not come up to my expectations. I ate up, however, all

my bread and asked for more. Then the waiter kindly went from table

to table to see how much he could collect, brought just a handful, and

informed me he really could not give me any more. But I told him it was

not enough. “I want a very large piece,” I said, so finally he decided

to consult the butler, went to the kitchen, and brought me back a loaf

to myself.

All this while, the curious people around me had been staring at me

devouring my loaf, but after a while they wearied of that exciting

entertainment, their faces again resumed their usual calm expression,

and they went on once more talking to one another. Sometimes, but not

often, they almost got interested in their neighbour’s remark, but as

soon as the last words were uttered again they adopted a manner which

seemed to me one of absolute indifference.

As you know, I do not swear by everything Turkish, but you must now

admit from experience that when once the Danube is crossed the faces

to be seen do express some emotion, either love or hate, contentment

or disappointment, but not indifference. Since I left Belgrade, I have

tried, almost in vain, to find in the Western faces the reflection of

some personality, and so few examples have I found that their names

would not certainly fill this page. Here in London I met with the

same disappointment. Have these people really lost all interest in

life? They give me the impression that they all belong to the same

family, so much alike are they in appearance and in facial expression.

[Illustration: ZEYNEB WITH A BLACK FACE-VEIL THROWN BACK]

In the reading-room, where I spent my evening, I met those same people,

who spoke in whispers, wrote letters, and read the daily papers. The

silence of the room was restful, there was an atmosphere almost of

peace, but it is not the peace which follows strife, it is the peace

of apathy. Is this, then, what the Turkish women dream of becoming one

day? Is this their ideal of independence and liberty?

Were you to show my letter to one of my race she would think that I

had a distinct aversion for progress, or that I felt obliged to be

in opposition to everything in the countries where I was travelling.

You know enough of my life, however, to know that this is not the

case. What I do feel, though, is that a _Ladies’ Club_ is not a big

enough reward for having broken away from an Eastern harem and all the

suffering that has been the consequence of that action. A club, as I

said before, is after all another kind of harem, but it has none of

the mystery and charm of the Harem of the East.

How is one to learn and teach others what might perhaps be called “the

tact of evolution”—I mean the art of knowing when to stop even in the

realm of progress?

I cannot yet either analyse or classify in a satisfactory way your

methods of thinking, since in changing from country to country even the

words alter their meaning. In Servia, Liberal means Conservative, and

Freemason on the Continent has quite a different meaning from what it

has here; so that the interpretation I would give to an opinion might

fail to cover my real meaning.

Do not think that this evening’s pessimism is due to the fog nor to my

poor dinner. It is the outcome of disillusions which every day become

more complete. It seems to me that we Orientals are children to whom

fairy tales have been told for too long—fairy tales which have every

appearance of truth. You hear so much of the _mirage_ of the East,

but what is that compared to the _mirage_ of the West, to which all

Orientals are attracted?

They tell you fairy tales, too, you women of the West—fairy tales

which, like ours, have all the appearance of truth. I wonder, when the

Englishwomen have really won their vote and the right to exercise all

the tiring professions of men, what they will have gained? Their faces

will be a little sadder, a little more weary, and they will have become

wholly disillusioned.

Go to the root of things and you will find the more things change the

more they are the same; nothing really changes. Human nature is always

the same. We cannot stop the ebb or flow of Time, however much we try.

The great mass of mediocrity alone is happy, for it is content to swim

with the tide. Does it not seem to you, that each of us from the age

when we begin to reason feels more or less the futility and uselessness

of some of our efforts; the little good that struggling has brought

us, and the danger we necessarily run, in this awful desire to go full

speed ahead? And yet, this desire to go towards something, futile

though it be, is one of the most indestructible of Western sentiments.

When in Turkey we met together, and spoke of the Women of England, we

imagined that they had nothing more to wish for in this world. But

we had no idea of what the struggle for life meant to them, nor how

terrible was this eternal search after happiness. Which is the harder

struggle of the two? The latter is the only struggle we know in Turkey,

and the same futile struggle goes on all the world over.

Happiness—what a mirage! At best is it not a mere negation of pain, for

each one’s idea of happiness is so different? When I was fifteen years

old they made me a present of a little native from Central Africa. For

her there was no greater torture than to wear garments of any kind, and

her idea of happiness was to get back to the home on the borders of

Lake Chad and the possibility of eating another roasted European.

* * * * *

Last night I went to a banquet. It was the first time that I had ever

heard after-dinner speeches, and I admired the ease with which everyone

found something to say, and the women spoke quite as well as the men.

Afterwards I was told, however, that these speeches had all been

prepared beforehand.

The member of Parliament who sat on my right spoilt my evening’s

enjoyment by making me believe I had to speak, and all through the

dinner I tried to find something to say, and yet I knew that, were I

actually to rise, I could not utter a sound. What most astonished me

at that banquet, however, was that all those women, who made no secret

of wanting to direct the affairs of the nation, dared not take the

responsibility of smoking until they were told. What a contradiction!

Since I came here I have seen nothing but “Votes for Women” chalked all

over the pavements and walls of the town. These methods of propaganda

are all so new to me.

I went to a Suffrage street corner meeting the other night, and I can

assure you I never want to go again. The speaker carried her little

stool herself, another carried a flag, and yet a third woman a bundle

of leaflets and papers to distribute to the crowd. After walking

for a little while they placed the stool outside a dirty-looking

public-house, and the lady who carried the flag boldly got on to the

stool and began to shout, not waiting till the people came to hear her,

so anxious was she to begin. Although she did not look nervous in the

least she possibly was, for her speech came abruptly to an end, and my

heart began to beat in sympathy with her.

When the other lady began to speak quite a big crowd of men and women

assembled: degraded-looking ruffians they were, most of them, and a

class of man I had not yet seen. All the time they interrupted her, but

she went bravely on, returning their rudeness with sarcasm. What an

insult to womanhood it seemed to me, to have to bandy words with this

vulgar mob. One man told her that “she was ugly.” Another asked “if she

had done her washing,” but the most of their hateful remarks I could

not understand, so different was their English from the English I had

learned in Turkey.

Yet how I admired the courage of that woman! No physical pain could be

more awful to me than not to be taken for a lady, and this speaker of

such remarkable eloquence and culture was not taken for a lady by the

crowd, seeing she was supposed “to do her own washing” like any women

of the people.

The most pitiful part of it all to me is the blind faith these women

have in their cause, and the confidence they have that in explaining

their policy to the street ruffians, who cannot even understand that

they are ladies, they will further their cause by half an inch.

I was glad when the meeting was over, but sorry that such rhetoric

should have been wasted on the half-intoxicated loungers who deigned

to come out of the public-house and listen. If this is what the women

of your country have to bear in their fight for freedom, all honour to

them, but I would rather groan in bondage.

* * * * *

I have been to see your famous Houses of Parliament, both the Lords

and the Commons. Like all the architecture in London, these buildings

create such an atmosphere of kingly greatness in which I, the democrat

of my own country, am revelling. The Democracy of the East is so

different from that of the West, of which I had so pitiful an example

at the street corner.

I was invited to tea at the House of Commons, and to be invited to tea

there of all places seemed very strange to me. Is the drinking of tea

of such vital importance that the English can _never_ do without it?

I wonder if the Turks, now _their_ Parliament is opened, will drink

coffee with ladies instead of attending to the laws of the nation!

What a long, weary wait I had before they would let me into the Houses

of Parliament. Every time I asked the policeman where the member of

Parliament was who had invited me, he smilingly told me they had gone

to fetch him. I thought he was joking at first, and threatened to go,

but he only laughed, and said, “He will come in time.” Only when I

had made up my mind that the tea-party would never come off, and had

settled myself on an uncomfortable divan to study the curious people

passing in and out, did my host appear. I thought it was only in Turkey

that appointments were kept with such laxity, but I was reminded by the

M.P. who invited me that I was three-quarters of an hour late in the

first place.

[Illustration: A CORNER OF A TURKISH HAREM OF TO-DAY

This photograph was taken expressly for a London paper. It was returned

with this comment: “The British public would not accept this as a

picture of a Turkish Harem.” As a matter of fact, in the smartest

Turkish houses European furniture is much in evidence.]

[Illustration: TURKISH WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THE COUNTRY

They are accompanied by the negress.]

I was conducted through a long, handsome corridor to a lobby where

all sorts of men and women were assembled, pushing one another,

gesticulating and speaking in loud, disagreeable voices like those

outside of the Paris Bourse. Just then, however, a bell rang, and I was

conducted back past the policeman to my original seat. What curious

behaviour! What did it all mean? I spoke to the friendly policeman,

but his explanation that they were “dividing” did not convey much to

my mind. As I stood there, a stray member of Parliament came and looked

at me. He must have been a great admirer of Mr. Joseph Chamberlain, for

he wore a monocle and an orchid in his buttonhole.

“Are these suffragettes?” he asked the policeman, staring at me and the

other women.

“No, sir,” answered the policeman, “ladies.”

It was too late for tea when my host returned to fetch me, but the

loss of a cup of tea is no calamity to me, as I only drink it to

appear polite. I was next taken up to the Ladies’ Gallery, and was

sworn in as one of the relations of a member who had given up his

ladies’ tickets to my host. The funny part of it was, that I could

not understand the language my relation spoke, so different was his

English from the English I had learnt in Turkey. But what a fuss to

get into that Ladies’ Gallery! I had no idea of making a noise before

it was suggested to my mind by making me sign a book, and I certainly

wanted to afterwards. What unnecessary trouble! What do you call it?

Red tapeism! One might almost be in Turkey under Hamid and not in Free

England.

But, my dear, why have you never told me that the Ladies’ Gallery is a

harem? A harem with its latticed windows! The harem of the Government!

No wonder the women cried through the windows of that harem that

they wanted to be free! I felt inclined to shout out too. “Is it in

Free England that you dare to have a harem? How inconsistent are you

English! You send your women out unprotected all over the world, and

here in the workshop where your laws are made, you cover them with a

symbol of protection.”

The performance which I saw through the harem windows was boring

enough. The humbler members of the House had little respect for their

superiors, seeing they sat in their presence with their hats on, and

this I am told was the habit of a very ill-bred man. Still perhaps this

attitude does not astonish me since on all sides I hear complaints

of the Government. It is a bad sign for a country, my dear. Are you

following in Turkey’s footsteps? Hatred of the Government and prison an

honour! Poor England!

I was very anxious to see the notorious Mr. Lloyd George. Since I

have been in London his name is on everyone’s lips. I have heard

very little good of him except from the ruffians at the street corner

meeting, and yet like our Hamid he seems to be all-powerful. For a

long time, I could not distinguish him in the crowd below, although my

companion spared no pains in pointing him out. I was looking for some

one with a commanding presence, some one with an eagle eye and a wicked

face like our Sultan, some one before whom a whole nation was justified

in trembling. But I still wonder whether I am thinking of the right man

when I think of Mr. Lloyd George.

There is not much excitement in your House of Commons, is there? I

prefer the Chamber of Deputies, even though some one fired at M. Briand

the day I went there. There at least they are men of action. Here some

members were so weary of law-making, that they crossed their legs,

folded their arms, and went to sleep whilst their colleagues opposite

were speaking. I thought it would have been more polite to have gone

out and taken tea, as the other members seemed to be doing all the

time. It would have given them strength to listen to the tiresome

debate.

To me, perhaps, the speaking would have been less unbearable if the

harem windows had not deadened the sound, which, please notice, is my

polite Turkish way of saying, they all spoke so indistinctly.

The bell began to ring again. The members of Parliament all walked

towards the harem to this curious direction, “Eyes to the right and

nose to the left.”[23] And at last my friend took me away.

* * * * *

We went to see a performance of _Trilby_ at His Majesty’s Theatre the

other night. I liked the acting of the terrible Svengali, but not the

piece. As a great treat to me, my friend and her husband had us invited

to supper in the roof of the theatre with the famous Sir Herbert Tree.

I could not help saying, “I preferred not to go, for Sir Herbert Tree

frightened me.”

However, we went all the same, and had a delightful supper-party. For

some reason or other the manager was our host, and I was thankful not

to eat with Sir Herbert Tree. As we came away my friend asked if I was

still frightened now we had eaten with him.

“But we have not eaten with him,” I said.

“Indeed we have,” she said.

“Is the person with whom we had supper the horrid Svengali?” I asked.

“Why, of course,” she answered, laughing.

As you know, this is not my first experience of a theatre, so there is

no excuse for me. But I can assure you no one would ever dream that

Svengali was made up. What a pity it would have been for me to have

gone through life thinking of your famous actor as Svengali. I think

that when actors have to play such disagreeable parts, they should show

themselves to the public afterwards as they really are, or _not_ put

their names on the programme.

* * * * *

I saw another play at His Majesty’s in which the principal rôles were

played by children. You cannot imagine how delightful I found it, and

what a change it was from the eternal _pièce à thèse_ which I had

become accustomed to see in Paris. The scenery indeed was a fairy

panorama, and the piece charmingly interpreted. What astonished me was

to see that both men and women took as much delight in it as the young

folks. Only mothers in Paris would have brought their children to see

such a moral play.

Ah, but I must tell you I have at last seen an Englishwoman who does

not look weary of life. She is Miss Ellen Terry. How good it was to see

her act. She was so natural and so full of fun, and enjoyed all she

had to say and do, that her performance was a real joy to me. I wish I

could have thanked her.

* * * * *

I just love your hansom cabs. If I had money enough I would buy one

for myself and drive about seeing London. You get the best view of

everything in this way. When I first stepped into one I could not

imagine where the coachman sat; he called out to me from somewhere,

but I could not find his voice, until he popped his fingers through a

little trap door and knocked off my hat, for I cannot bear to pin on my

hat.

“Here I am,” he answered to my query, and he thought he had a mad-woman

for a fare.

* * * * *

One night when I returned to my club after the theatre, there was one

lonely woman seated in the reading-room near the fire. She seemed to

me to be the youngest of all the ladies, although you may say that was

no guarantee against middle age. I don’t know how it was we began

to speak, since no one had introduced us, but she imagined I was a

Frenchwoman, hence probably the explanation of the liberty she had

taken in addressing me. Yet she looked so sad.

“You French,” she said, “are used to sitting up a good deal later than

we do here.”

“I thought,” I said, “the protocol did not bother about such trifles.”

“Ah, now you are in the country of protocols and etiquette,” she

answered.

She must have been asking me questions only as an excuse to speak

herself, because she took really no interest in my answers, and she

kept on chattering and chattering because she did not want me to go

away. She spoke of America and India and China and Japan, all of which

countries she seemed to know as well as her own. Never have I met in

my travels anyone so fond of talking, and yet at the same time with a

_spleen_ which made me almost tired.

I concluded that she was an independent woman, whose weariness must

have been the result of constant struggling. She was all alone in the

world; one of those poor creatures who might die in a top back-room

without a soul belonging to her. Her mind must have been saturated

with theories, she must have known all the uncomfortable shocks which

come from a changed position, and yet she was British enough to tremble

before Public Opinion.

“But do you know why I travel so much?” at last I had the opportunity

of asking her. “Like Diogenes who tried to find a _Man_, I have been

trying to find a FREE woman, but have not been successful.”

I do not think she understood in the least what I meant.—Your

affectionate friend,

ZEYNEB.

A Turkish Woman's European Impressions · 第 17 / 20 章