RESOLUTION XI.

_Collects, Epistles, and Gospels_.

No department of liturgical revision calls for a nicer touch than

that which includes the Collects. That new collects for certain

unsupplied feasts and fasts would be a genuine enrichment of The

Book of Common Prayer, has long been generally acknowledged among

Anglican scholars. The most weighty fault to be found with the

collects added by the revisers is that in too large proportion

they are addressed to the second and third Persons of the Holy

Trinity. The Eucharist itself, as a whole, is properly conceived

of as addressed to the Eternal Father. The Collects, as forming

part of the Eucharistic Office, ought, strictly speaking, to be

also so addressed. It is true that there are exceptions to this

rule, and they are found, some of them, in the Prayer Book as it

is. But the revisers ought not to have altered the proportion so

markedly as they have done, for whereas in our present Book the

collects addressed to the Father are as eighty-three to three

compared with those not so addressed, the ratio in _The Book

Annexed_ is that of eleven to three.

Moreover, there would seem to be no good reason for reverting to

the usage of the First Book of Edward VI., which provides a second

Collect, Epistle, and Gospel for the two great feasts of Christmas

and Easter. A better way would be to take these additional collects,

which are among the most beautiful in the language, and assign them

respectively to the Sunday after Christmas, and the Monday in

Easter-week.

A Short History of the Book of Common Prayer · 第 48 / 61 题