35 [Compare with this account of the freedom of the Council the letters
of two French Bishops, published in the _Times_ of May 3, and the
_Journal des Débats_ of May 10.—TR.]
_ 36 Études de Théologie_, Janvier 1868, p. 26:—“Le Concile n’imposait
rien à notre foi, qui n’eût obtenu à peu près l’unanimité des votes.
L’obligation de croire est une chose si grave, le droit de lier les
intelligences est un droit si auguste et si important, que les pères
pensaient n’en devoir user qu’avec la plus grande réserve et la plus
extrême délicatesse.”
_ 37 Is Healthful Reunion Impossible?_ By E. B. Pusey, D.D. Rivingtons,
1870.
38 [Gratry’s four Letters have been translated by the Rev. T. J.
Bailey.—(Hayes).—TR.]
39 [Cf. _supr._ pp. 90, 91. The _Tablet_ made the same assertions in
both cases.—TR.]
_ 40 Adversus eos qui Sanctissimum R. Pontificis studium et Vaticani
Concilii celebrandi necessitatem vituperant._ Romæ.
41 [Some idea of it may be formed from the answer made some months ago
by a distinguished English Prelate at Rome to an Anglican friend,
who had quoted the words of one of the Opposition Bishops, “You need
not quote _them_ to me; _they are no more Catholics than you
are_,”—thus excommunicating at one swoop the very flower of the
hierarchy of his Church.—TR.]
42 [The _Curtisanen_ were clerical place-hunters, who came to Rome to
beg or traffic for benefices. Cf. “Janus,” p. 341.—TR.]