W. CRAMP.

_Handwriting._--In my last communication (Vol. v., p. 235.), in

consecutive lines, _when_ was printed _where_, and _second_ was printed

_record_. This is not wholly the printer's fault: in the common current

hands, _n_ and _re_ are much alike; and _n_ and _r_, _s_ and _r_, are

like enough to cause mistake. I have more than once got as far as a

second proof, containing what might, if it had been printed, have been

interpreted as a reflection on the dimensions of the clergy, which was

far from my intention; namely, allusion to the area of a circular

_rector_, in which the first _r_ should have been _s_. What I want to

make a note on, is this: no _current_ hand is taught at schools: the

so-called _small_ hand is nothing but the larger hand written smaller.

If any one would publish some specimens of current hand, in which all

the letters are perfectly distinguishable from each other, he would do

good service. And the (?) might go the length of a woodcut (which

imitates writing better than copper): for no persons write so badly as

writers. The task should not be undertaken by a writing-master: for

there are few who will go through thick and thin in their calligraphy.

What is wanted is a good _skewer-hand_, in which there are none of those

upstrokes and downstrokes which, in former days, used to subject boys to

certain other upstrokes and downstrokes, of which it can only be said

that the former were more bearable than the latter.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 128, April 10, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 48 / 161 题