BISHOP GARDINER "DE VERA OBEDIENTIA."

It is probable that others of your readers besides myself have had good

reason to complain that Dr. Maitland has cruelly raised the price of this

little book to a bibliomaniacal height, by his inimitable description of

its curious contents and history. (_Essays on Subjects connected with the

Reformation_, xvii. xviii. xix.)

{55}

Some of the things which seem to be indubitable respecting the original

work are these:--1. That it was first printed in 1535. 2. That,

consequently, Bishop Burnet (_Hist. of Ref._, Part I. b. iii. p. 166.:

Dublin, 1730) was mistaken in representing it as having been written in

reply to Cardinal Pole. 3. That there _was_ an octavo edition published at

Strasburg in 1536, and that Goldastus followed it. 4. That there was an

additional reprint of the tract at London in 1603. (Schelhornii, _Amoen.

Hist. Eccles._, tom. i. pp. 15. 849.) But I am anxious to make three

inquiries relative to this really important document and its fictitious

preface.

1. The Roane volume, certainly the earliest in English, professes to have

been printed by "Michal Wood" in 1553. Can we not determine the place of

its origin by the recollection of the fact, that Bishop Bale's _Mysterye of

Iniquyte, or Confutation of Ponce Pantolabus_, was printed at _Geneva_ by

"Mychael Woode" in 1545?

2. With regard to the typographical achievements of the Brocards, is it not

rather an _apropos_ circumstance, that "Biliosus Balaeus," as Fuller calls

him, was the author of a _Historia Divi Brocardi_? (Ware's _Works_, ii.

325.)

3. May not Bale (or _Baal_, according to Pits) be suspected to have been

the composer of the Bonnerian Preface? He might have reckoned it among the

many _Facetias et Jocos_ which he declares that he had put forth. It is

observable that, while the writer of this Preface designates Bishop

Gardiner as the "common cutthrot of Englande," the same title is bestowed

upon Bonner in the Foxian Letter addressed to him by "an unknown person"

(Strype's _Memor._ iii., Catal. p. 161.: London, 1721), and which, from

internal evidence taken from the part relating to Philpot, must be referred

to the year 1555. The style of these performances is similar; and let "gaie

Gardiner, blow-bole Boner, trusti Tonstal, and slow-bellie Samson" of the

Preface be compared with "glorious Gardiner, blow-bolle Bonner, tottering

Tunstal, wagtaile Weston, and carted Chicken." (Bale's _Declaration of

Bonner's Articles_, fol. 90. b., London, 1561.)

Notes and Queries, Number 194, July 16, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 24 / 116 题