CHAPTER V

INFECTIOUS DISEASES.--THE HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE OF EPIDEMICS OF

DISEASE.--THE LOSSES IN BATTLE CONTRASTED WITH THE LOSSES IN ARMIES

PRODUCED BY--INFECTIOUS DISEASES.--THE DEVELOPMENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF

EPIDEMICS.--THE VIEWS OF HIPPOCRATES AND ARISTOTLE.--SPORADIC AND

EPIDEMIC DISEASES.--THE THEORY OF THE EPIDEMIC CONSTITUTION.--THEORY

THAT THE CONTAGIOUS MATERIAL IS LIVING.--THE DISCOVERY OF BACTERIA BY

LOEWENHOECK IN 1675.--THE RELATION OF CONTAGION TO THE THEORY OF

SPONTANEOUS GENERATION.--NEEDHAM AND SPALLANZANI.--THE DISCOVERY OF

THE COMPOUND MICROSCOPE IN 1605.--THE PROOF THAT A LIVING ORGANISM IS

THE CAUSE OF A DISEASE.--ANTHRAX.--THE DISCOVERY OF THE ANTHRAX

BACILLUS IN 1851.--THE CULTIVATION OF THE BACILLUS BY KOCH.--THE MODE

OF INFECTION.--THE WORK OF PASTEUR ON ANTHRAX.--THE IMPORTANCE OF THE

DISEASE.

These are diseases which are caused by living things which enter the

tissues of the body and, living at the expense of the body, produce

injury. Such diseases play an important part in the life of man; the

majority of deaths are caused directly or indirectly by infection. No

other diseases have been so much studied, and in no other department

of science has knowledge been capable of such direct application in

promoting the health, the efficiency and the happiness of man. This

knowledge has added years to the average length of life, it has

rendered possible such great engineering works as the Panama Canal,

and has contributed to the food supply by making habitation possible

over large and productive regions of the earth, formerly uninhabitable

owing to the prevalence of disease. It is not too much to say that our

modern civilization is dependent upon this knowledge. The massing of

the people in large cities, the factory life, the much greater social

life, which are all prominent features of modern civilization, would

be difficult or impossible without control of the infectious diseases.

The rapidity of communication and the increased general movement of

people, which have developed in equal ratio with the massing, would

serve to extend widely every local outbreak of infection. The

principles underlying fermentation and putrefaction which have been

applied with great economic advantage to the preservation of food were

many of them developed in the course of the study of the infectious

diseases. Whether the development of the present civilization is for

the ultimate advantage of man may perhaps be disputed, but medicine

has made it possible.

The infectious diseases appearing in the form of great epidemics have

been important factors in determining historical events, for they have

led to the defeat of armies, the fall of cities and of nations. War is

properly regarded as one of the greatest evils that can afflict a

nation, since it destroys men in the bloom of youth, at the age of

greatest service, and brings sorrow and care and poverty to many. But

the most potent factor in the losses of war is not the deaths in

battle but the deaths from disease. If we designate the lives lost in

battle, the killed and the wounded who die, as 1, the loss of the

German army from disease in 1870-71 was 1.5, that of the Russians in

1877-78 was 2.7, that of the French in Mexico was 2.8, that of the

French in the Crimea 3.7, that of the English in Egypt 4.2. The total

loss of the German army in 1870-71 from wounds and disease was 43,182

officers and men, and this seems a small number compared with the

129,128 deaths from smallpox in the same period in Prussia alone. In

the Spanish American war there were 20,178 cases of typhoid fever with

1,580 deaths. In the South African war there were in the British

troops 31,118 cases of typhoid with 5,877 deaths, and 5,149 deaths

from other diseases while the loss in battle was 7,582. The Athenian

plague which prevailed during the Peloponnesian war, 431-405 B.C., not

only caused the death of Pericles, but according to Thucydides a loss

of 4,800 Athenian soldiers, and brought about the downfall of the

Athenian hegemony in Greece. In the Crimean war between 1853-56,

16,000 English, 80,000 French and 800,000 Russians died of typhus

fever. The plague contributed as much as did the arms of the Turks to

the downfall of Constantinople and the Eastern Empire in 1453. It was

the plague which in 1348 overthrew Siena from her proud position as

one of the first of the Italian cities and the rival of Florence, and

broke the city forever, leaving it as a phantom of its former glory

and prosperity. The work on the great cathedral which had progressed

for ten years was suspended, and when it was resumed it was upon a

scale adjusted to the diminished wealth of the city, and the plan

restricted to the present dimensions. As a little relief to the

darkness the same plague saw the birth of the novel in the tales of

Boccaccio, which were related to a delighted audience of the women who

had fled from the plague in Florence to a rural retreat.

The knowledge which has come from the study of infectious disease has

served also to broaden our conception of disease and has created

preventive medicine; it has linked more closely to medicine such

sciences as zoölogy and botany; it has given birth to the sciences of

bacteriology and protozoölogy and in a way has brought all sciences

more closely together. Above all it has made medicine scientific, and

never has knowledge obtained been more quickening and stimulating to

its pursuit.

Although the dimensions of this book forbid much reference to the

historical development of a subject, some mention must still be made

of the development of knowledge of the infectious diseases. It was

early recognized that there were diseases which differed in character

from those generally prevalent; large numbers of people were affected

in the same way; the disease beginning with a few cases gradually

increased in intensity until an acme was reached which prevailed for a

time and the disease gradually disappeared. Such diseases were

attributed to changes in the air, to the influence of planets or to

the action of offended gods. The priests and charlatans who sought to

excuse their inability to treat epidemics successfully were quick to

affirm supernatural causes. Hippocrates (400 B.C.), with whom medicine

may be said to begin, thought such diseases, even then called

epidemics, were caused by the air; he says, "When many individuals are

attacked by a disease at the same time, the cause must be sought in

some agent which is common to all, something which everyone uses, and

that is the air which must contain at this time something injurious."

Aristotle recognized that disease was often conveyed by contact, and

Varro (116-27 B.C.) advanced the idea that disease might be caused by

minute organisms. He says, "Certain minute organisms develop which the

eye cannot see, and which being disseminated in the air enter into the

body by means of the mouth and nostrils and give rise to serious

ailments." In spite of this hypothesis, which has proved to be

correct, the belief became general that epidemics were due to

putrefaction of the air brought about by decaying animal bodies, (this

explaining the frequent association of epidemics and wars,) by

emanations from swamps, by periods of unusual heat, etc.

With the continued study of epidemics the importance of contagion was

recognized; it was found that epidemics differed in character and in

the modes of extension. Some seemed to extend by contact with the

sick, and in others this seemed to play no part; it was further found

impossible in many cases to show evidence of air contamination, and

contamination of the air by putrefactive material did not always

produce disease. Most important was the recognition that single cases

of diseases which often occurred in epidemic form might be present and

no further extension follow; this led to the assumption in epidemics

of the existence of some condition in addition to the cause, and which

made the cause operative. In this way arose the theory of the epidemic

constitution, a supposed peculiar condition of the body due to changes

in the character of the air, or to the climate, or to changes in the

interior of the earth as shown by earthquakes, or to the movements of

planets; in consequence of this peculiar constitution there was a

greater susceptibility to disease, but the direct cause might arise in

the interior of the body or enter the body from without. The character

of the disease which appeared in epidemic form, the "Genius

epidemicus," was determined not by differences in the intrinsic cause,

but by the type of constitution which prevailed at that time. The

first epidemic of cholera which visited Europe in 1830-37 was for the

most part referred to the existence of a peculiar epidemic

constitution for which various causes were assigned. It was only when

the second epidemic of this disease appeared in 1840 that the

existence of some special virus or poison which entered the body was

assumed.

Meanwhile, by the study of the material of disease knowledge was being

slowly acquired which had much bearing on the causes. The first

observations which tended to show that the causes were living were

made by a learned Jesuit, Athanasius, in 1659. He found in milk,

cheese, vinegar, decayed vegetables, and in the blood and secretions

of cases of plague bodies, which he described as tiny worms and which

he thought were due to putrefaction. He studied these objects with the

simple lenses in use at that time, and there is little doubt that he

did see certain of the larger organisms which are present in vinegar,

cheese and decaying vegetables, and it is not impossible that he may

have seen the animal and vegetable cells.

The first description of bacteria with illustrations showing their

forms was given by Loewenhoeck, a linen dealer in Amsterdam in 1675.

The fineness of the linen being determined by the number of threads in

a given area, it is necessary to examine it with a magnifying lens,

and he succeeded in perfecting a simple lens with which objects

smaller than had been seen up to that time became visible. It must be

added that he was probably endowed with very unusual acuteness of

vision. He found in a drop of water, in the fluid in the intestines of

frogs and birds, and in his evacuations, objects of great minuteness

which differed from each other in form and size and in the peculiar

motion which some of them possessed. In the year 1683 he presented to

the Royal Society of London a paper describing a certain minute

organism which he found in the tartar of his teeth. After these

observations of Loewenhoeck became known to the world they quickly

found application in disease, although the author had expressed

himself very cautiously in this regard. The strongest exponent of the

view of a living contagion was Plenciz, 1762, a physician of Vienna,

basing his belief not only on the demonstration of minute organisms by

Loewenhoeck which he was able to verify, but on certain shrewdly

conceived theoretical considerations. He was the first to recognize

the specificity of the epidemic diseases, and argued from this that

each disease must have a specific cause. "Just as a certain plant

comes from the seed of the same plant and not from any plant at will,

so each contagious disease must be propagated from a similar disease

and cannot be the result of any other disease." Further he says, "It

is necessary to assume that during the prevalence of an epidemic the

contagious material undergoes an enormous increase, and this is

compatible only with the assumption that it is a living substance."

But as is so often the case, speculation ran far ahead of the

observations on which it is based. There was a long gap between the

observations of Loewenhoeck and the theories of Plenciz, justified as

these have been by present knowledge. In the spirit of speculation

which was dominant in Europe and particularly in Germany in the latter

half of the eighteenth and the first half of the nineteenth centuries,

hypotheses did not stimulate research, but led to further

speculations. As late as 1820 Ozanam expressed himself as follows:

"Many authors have written concerning the animal nature of the

contagion of disease; many have assumed it to be developed from animal

substance, and that it is itself animal and possesses the property of

life. I shall not waste time in refuting these absurd hypotheses." The

theory of a living contagion was too simple, and not sufficiently

related to the problems of the universe to serve the medical

philosophers.

Knowledge of the minute organisms was slowly accumulating. The first

questions to be determined were as to their nature and origin. How

were they produced? Did they come from bodies of the same sort

according to the general laws governing the production of living

things, or did they arise spontaneously? a question which could not be

solved by speculation but by experiment. The first experiments, by

Needham, 1745, pointed to the spontaneous origin of the organisms. He

enclosed various substances in carefully sealed watch crystals from

which the air was excluded, and found that animalculi appeared in the

substance, and argued from this that they developed spontaneously. In

1769, Spallanzani, a skilled experimental physiologist, in a brilliant

series of experiments showed the imperfect character of Needham's work

and the fallacy of his conclusions. Spallanzani placed fluids, which

easily became putrid, in glass tubes, which he then hermetically

sealed and boiled. He found that the fluid remained clear and

unchanged; if, however, he broke the sealed point of such a tube and

allowed the air to enter, putrefaction, or in some cases fermentation,

of the contents took place. He concluded that boiling the substances

destroyed the living germs which they contained, the sealed tubes

prevented the air from entering, and when putrefaction or fermentation

of the contents took place the organisms to which this was due, being

contained in the air, entered from without. Objection was made to the

conclusions of Spallanzani that heating the air in the closed tubes so

changed its character as to prevent development of organisms in the

contents. This objection was finally set aside by Pasteur, who showed

that it was not necessary to seal the end of the tube before boiling,

but it could be closed by a plug of cotton wool, which mechanically

removed the organisms from the air which entered the tube, or if the

tube were bent in the shape of a _U_ and the end left open,

organisms from the air could not pass into the tube against gravity

when air movement within the tube was prevented by bending. The

possibility of spontaneous generation cannot be denied, but that it

takes place is against all human experience.

It was not possible to attain any considerable knowledge of the

bacteria discovered by Loewenhoeck until more perfect instruments for

studying them were devised. Lenses for studying objects were used in

remote antiquity, but the compound microscope in which the image made

by the lens is further magnified was not discovered until 1605, and

when first made was so imperfect that the best simple lenses gave

clearer definition. With the betterment of the microscope, increasing

the magnifying power and the sharpness of the image of the object

seen, it became possible to classify the minute organisms according to

size and form and to study the separate species. The microscope has

now reached such a degree of perfection that objects smaller than one

one hundred thousandth of an inch in diameter can be clearly seen and

photographed.

Great impetus was given to the biological investigation of disease by

the discoveries which led to the formulation of the cell theory in

1840 and the brilliant work of Pasteur on fermentation,[1] but it was

not until 1878 that it was definitely proved that a disease of cattle

called anthrax was due to a species of bacteria. What should be

regarded as such proof had been formulated by Henle in 1840. To prove

that a certain sort of organism when found associated with a disease

is the cause of the disease, three things are necessary:

1. The organism must always be found in the diseased animal and

associated with the changes produced by the disease.

2. The organism so found must be grown outside of the body in what is

termed pure cultures, that is, not associated with any other

organisms, and for so long a time with constant transfers or new

seedings that there can be no admixture of other products of the

disease in the material in which it is grown.

3. The disease must be produced by inoculating a susceptible animal

with a small portion of such a culture, and the organism shown in

relation to the lesions so produced.

It is worth while to devote some attention to the disease anthrax.

This occupies a unique position, in that it was the first of the

infectious diseases to be scientifically investigated. In this

investigation one fact after another was discovered and confirmed;

some of these facts seemed to give clearer conceptions of the disease,

others served to make it more obscure; new questions arose with each

extension of knowledge; in the course of the work new methods of

investigation were discovered; the sides of the arch were slowly and

painfully erected by the work of many men, and finally one man placed

the keystone and anthrax was for a long time the best known of

diseases. Men whose reputation is now worldwide first became known by

their work in this disease. It was a favorable disease for

investigation, being a disease primarily of cattle, but occasionally

appearing in man, and the susceptibility of laboratory animals made

possible experimental study.

Anthrax is a disease of domestic cattle affecting particularly bovine

cattle, horses and sheep, swine more rarely. The disease exists in

practically all countries and has caused great economic losses. There

are no characteristic symptoms of the disease; the affected cattle

have high fever, refuse to eat, their pulse and respiration are rapid,

they become progressively weaker, unable to walk and finally fall. The

disease lasts a variable time; in the most acute cases animals may die

in less than twenty-four hours, or the disease may last ten or

fourteen days; recovery from the disease is rare and treatment has no

effect. It does not appear in the form of epidemics, but single cases

appear frequently or rarely, and there is seemingly no extension from

case to case, animals in adjoining stalls to the sick are not more

prone to infection than others of the herd. On examination after death

the blood is dark and fluid, the spleen is greatly enlarged (one of

the names of the disease "splenic fever" indicates the relation to the

spleen) and there is often bloody fluid in the tissues.

Where the disease is prevalent there are numbers of human cases. Only

those become infected who come into close relations with cattle, the

infection most commonly taking place from small wounds or scratches

made in skinning dead cattle or in handling hides. The wool of sheep

who die of the disease finds its way into commerce, and those employed

in handling the wool have a form of anthrax known as wool-sorters'

disease in which lesions are found in the lungs, the organisms being

mingled with the wool dust and inspired. In Boston occasional cases of

anthrax appear in teamsters who are employed in handling and carrying

hides. The disease in man is not so fatal as in cattle, for it remains

local for a time at the site of infection, and this local disease can

be successfully treated.

The beginning of our knowledge of the cause dates from 1851, when

small rod-shaped bodies (Fig. 17) were found in the blood of the

affected cattle, and by the work of a number of observers it was

established that these bodies were constantly present. Nothing was

known of their nature; some held that they were living organisms,

others that they were formed in the body as a result of the disease.

Next the causal relation of these bodies with the disease was shown

and in several ways. The disease could be caused in other cattle by

injecting blood containing the rods beneath the skin, certainly no

proof, for the blood might have contained in addition to the rods

something which was the real cause of the disease. Next it was shown

that the blood of the unborn calf of a cow who died of the disease did

not contain the rods, and the disease could not be produced by

inoculating with the calf's blood although the blood of the mother was

infectious. This was a very strong indication that the rods were the

cause; the maternal and foetal blood are separated by a membrane

through which fluids and substances in solution pass; but insoluble

substances, even when very minutely subdivided, do not pass the

membrane. If the cause were a poison in solution, the foetal blood

would have been as toxic as the maternal. The blood of infected cattle

was filtered through filters made of unbaked porcelain and having very

fine pores which allowed only the blood fluid to pass, holding back

both the blood corpuscles and the rods, and such filtered blood was

found to be innocuous. It was further shown that the rods increased

enormously in number in the infected animal, for the blood contained

them in great numbers when but a fraction of a drop was used for

inoculation. Attempts were also made with a greater or less degree of

success to grow the rod shaped organisms or bacilli in various fluids,

and the characteristic disease was produced by inoculating animals

with these cultures; but it remained for Koch, 1878, who was at that

time an obscure young country physician, to show the life history of

the organism and to clear up the obscurity of the disease. Up to that

time, although it had been shown that the rods or bacilli contained in

the blood were living organisms and the cause of the disease, this did

not explain the mode of infection; how the organisms contained in the

blood passed to another animal, why the disease occurred on certain

farms and the adjoining farms, particularly if they lay higher, were

free. Koch showed that in the cultures the organisms grew out into

long interlacing threads, and that in these threads spores which were

very difficult to destroy developed at intervals; that the organisms

grew easily in bouillon, in milk, in blood, and even in an infusion of

hay made by soaking this in water. This explained, what had been an

enigma before, how the fields became sources of infection. The

infection did not spread from animal to animal by contact, but

infection took place from eating grass or hay which contained either

the bacilli or their spores. When a dead animal was skinned on the

field, the bacilli contained in the blood escaped and became mingled

with the various fluids which flowed from the body and in which they

grew and developed spores. It was shown by Pasteur that even when a

carcass was buried the earthworms brought spores developed in the body

to the surface and deposited them in their casts, and in this way also

the fields became infected. From such a spot of infected earth the

spores could be washed by the rains over greater areas and would find

opportunity to develop further and form new spores in puddles of water

left on the fields, which became a culture medium by the soaking of

the dead grass. The contamination of the fields was also brought about

by spreading over them the accumulations of stable manure which

contained the discharges of the sick cattle. The tendency of the

disease to extend to lower-lying adjacent fields was due to the spores

being washed from the upper fields to the lower by the spring

freshets. Meanwhile Pasteur had discovered that by growing the

organisms at higher temperatures than the animal body, it was possible

to attenuate the virulence of the bacilli so that inoculations with

these produced a mild form of the disease which rendered the

inoculated animals immune to the fatal disease. The description of

Pasteur's work on the disease as given in the account of his life by

his son-in-law is fascinating.

Hides and wool taken from dead animals invariably contained the spores

which could pass unharmed through some of the curing processes, and

were responsible for some of the cases in man. Owing to the

introduction of regulations which were based on the knowledge of the

cause of the disease and the life history of the organism, together

with the prophylactic inoculation devised by Pasteur, the incidence of

the disease has been very greatly lessened. Looking at the matter from

the lowest point of view, the money which has been saved by the

control of the disease, as shown in its decline, has been many times

the cost of all the work of the investigations which made the control

possible. It is a greater satisfaction to know that many human lives

have been saved, and that small farmers and shepherds have been the

chief sharers in the economic benefits. The indirect benefits,

however, which have resulted from the application of the knowledge of

this disease, and the methods of investigation developed here, to the

study of the infections more peculiar to man, are very much greater.

FOOTNOTE:

[1] The interesting analogy between fermentation and infectious

disease did not escape attention. A clear fluid containing in solution

sugar and other constituents necessary for the life of the yeast cells

will remain clear provided all living things within it have been

destroyed and those in the air prevented from entering. If it be

inoculated with a minute fragment of yeast culture containing a few

yeast cells, for a time no change takes place; but gradually the fluid

becomes cloudy, bubbles of gas appear in it and its taste changes.

Finally it again becomes clear, a sediment forms at the bottom, and on

re-inoculating it with yeast culture no fermentation takes place. The

analogy is obvious, the fluid in the first instance corresponds with

an individual susceptible to the disease, the inoculated yeast to the

contagion from a case of transmissible disease, the fermentation to

the illness with fever, etc., which constitutes the disease, the

returning clearness of the fluid to the recovery, and like the

fermenting fluid the individual is not susceptible to a new attack of

the disease. It will be observed that during the process both the

yeast and the material which produced the disease have enormously

increased. Fermentation of immense quantities of fluid could be

produced by the sediment of yeast cells at the bottom of the vessel

and a single case of smallpox would be capable of infecting

multitudes.

Disease and Its Causes · 第 5 / 12 章