REPLIES TO MINOR QUERIES.

_Coleridge's Christabel and Byron's Lara_ (No. 17. p. 262.).--What

Christabel saw is plain enough. The lady was a being like Duessa, a

Spenser; a horrible-looking witch, who could, to a certain degree, put

on an appearance of beauty. The difference is, that this lady had both

forms at once; the one in her face, the other concealed. This is quite

plain from the very words of Coleridge.

The lifting her over the sill seems to be something like the same

superstition that we have in Scott's _Eve of St. John_:--

"But I had not had pow'r to come to thy bow'r,

If Though had'st not charm'd me so."

I have no doubt that Lara is the Corsair; and Kaled Gulnare, from the

Corsair: the least inspection is enough to show this. Ezzelin must also

be Seyd; but that does not answer quite so well. All that there is to

prepare it is, that Seyd is only left for dead, in a great hurry, and

therefore might recover; and that he drank wine, and therefore might be

of Christian extraction. In Lara he is described as dark; but his

appearance is rather confusedly related, as if he never appeared but

once, and yet Otho knows him, and he has a dwelling. The shriek is more

difficult. There could be no meeting, then, between Ezzelin and Lara,

because Ezzelin is surprised by meeting him at Otho's. Whether the

shriek may not be owing to a meeting between Kaled and Ezzelin, is in

not so clear. From the splendid description of her looking down upon

him, it is not proved that she there saw him first; and Ezzelin never

sees her at all there.

Nothing is more interesting than these mysteries left in narrative

fictions. The story of Gertude, in that first of romances, the _Promessi

Sposi_, is a very great instance; and the bad taste, of bringing her up

again to the subject of a story by another writer, is so extreme, that I

never could look into the book. That Mazoni has left the character, whom

he calls the _Innominato_, in mystery, is historical, and not of his own

contrivance.

I used to think that Scott had left the part of Clara, in _St. Ronan's

Well_, intentionally mysterious, as to a most important circumstance;

but we learn, from his _Life_, that he meant to have made that

circumstance a part of the story, but was prevented by the publisher. It

is natural that the altered novel, therefore, should retain some

impressions of it. I refer particularly to the latter part of the

communications between her and her brother. But the meeting between her

and Tyrell in the woods, and their conversation there, I now think,

forbid the reader to suspect any thing like what I speak of. In such

cases I do not myself wish to know too much about the matter. Sometimes

the author wishes you to have the pleasure of guessing, as I think, in

Lara; sometimes he means to be more mysterious; sometimes he does not

know himself. It would have been idle to have asked Johnson where Ajeet

went to.

Notes and Queries, Number 20, March 16, 1850 · 第 61 / 79 题