CHAPTER VII

ADVICE FROM ENGLAND

The year 1860 was on the whole a happy one for the Princess Royal. It

brought her a long visit from her parents and the birth of her eldest

daughter, but on the other side of the account the relations between her

two countries, England and Prussia, became perceptibly worse.

For the New Year her father sent her one of his customary letters of

sagacious counsel, in which may be detected a certain note of uneasiness

as to the development of his daughter's powers of self-control:

"You enter upon the New Year with hopes, which God will surely

graciously suffer to be fulfilled, but you do also with good

resolutions, whose fulfilment lies within your own hand and must

necessarily contribute to your success, also happiness, in this

suffering and difficult world. Hold firmly by these resolutions, and

evermore cherish the determination, with which comes also strength, to

exercise unlimited control over yourself, that the moral law may govern

and the propensity obey,--the end and aim of all education and culture,

as we long ago discovered and reasoned out together."

It is remarkable that early in this year Prince Frederick William

appears to have been for a time the centre of the hopes of the

reactionary party. The Junkers actually planned to bring about the

resignation of the Prince Regent, and to induce Prince Frederick William

to assume the supreme power and govern without a constitution, which

formed the great obstacle to their military ambitions. This scheme

argued an extraordinary misapprehension, not only of Prince Frederick

William's honest, straightforward character, but also of all his

political ideals. He was, especially at this period of his life, a pure

Constitutionalist, with a profound admiration for the free polity of

England, and it would be difficult to imagine any form of government

which would have seemed both to him and to his wife more immoral, as

well as more certain to entail a counter-revolution, than a military

dictatorship. It is perhaps not without significance that in March a

British warship was launched at Portsmouth and was named _Frederick

William_ by way of compliment to the husband of the Princess Royal.

In June there was a parade at the Königsberg garrison, at which the

Prince Regent said to his son, "Fritz, I appoint you to the First

Infantry Regiment, the oldest Corps in the service," and about a month

afterwards the young commander was promoted to the rank of

Lieutenant-General.

The Princess Royal's eldest daughter was born on July 24, and was

christened Victoria Augusta Charlotte, being known as Princess

Charlotte till her marriage in 1878 to the Hereditary Prince of

Saxe-Meiningen. Queen Victoria records the news of the baby's birth in

her usual vivid style:

"Soon after we sat down to breakfast came a telegram from Fritz--Vicky

had got a daughter at 8.10, and both were well! What joy! Children

jumping about--everyone delighted--so thankful and relieved."

Only the day before there had come a letter from the Princess Royal

containing the intelligence that Prince Louis of Hesse was ardently

desirous of paying his addresses to Princess Alice, the Princess Royal's

much-loved sister and companion of her childhood. To this Prince Albert

refers in writing to his daughter:

"Only two words of hearty joy can I offer to the dear newly-made mother,

and these come from an overflowing heart. The little daughter is a

kindly gift from heaven, that will (as I trust) procure for you many a

happy hour in the days to come. The telegraph speaks only of your doing

well; may this be so in the fullest sense!

"Upon the subject of your last interesting and most important letter, I

have replied to Fritz, who will communicate to you as much of my answer

as is good for you under present circumstances. Alice is very grateful

for your love and kindness to her, and the young man behaves in a manner

truly admirable."

A few days later the anxious father writes to the young mother one of

his curious medical homilies:

"I hope you are very quiet, and keep this well in mind, that although

you are well, and feel yourself well, the body has to take on a new

conformation, and the nervous system a new life. Only rest of brain,

heart, and body, along with good nourishment, and its assimilation by

regular undisturbed digestion, can restore the animal forces. My

physiological treatise should not bore you, for it is always good to

keep the GREAT PRINCIPLES in view, in accordance with which we have to

regulate our actions."

But it was not all physiological treatise that was despatched from

Osborne to Berlin. The Prince has an amusing reference to the busy

importance with which the little Princess Beatrice, who was then three

and a quarter years old, regarded the arrival of her first niece:

"The little girl must be a darling. Little maidens are much prettier

than boys. I advise her to model herself after her Aunt Beatrice. That

excellent lady has now not a moment to spare. 'I have no time,' she

says, when she is asked for anything, 'I must write letters to my

niece.'

"It will make you laugh, if I tell you that I have christened a black

mare Ayah (as black nurse). I lately asked the groom what was the

horse's name, which I had forgotten. 'Haya,' was the answer. 'What?' I

asked. 'We spell it Hay, Why, Hay.' You should call your Westphalian

nurse, 'Hay, Why, Hay!'"

It had been arranged that the Queen and Prince Albert should pay their

visit to their daughter and son-in-law at Coburg at the end of

September. By a most unfortunate chance there had occurred about the

middle of the month one of those "incidents" which are sometimes, when

mishandled by officialdom and magnified by offended national pride,

allowed to exercise an influence ludicrously disproportionate to their

real triviality. The Macdonald affair, as it was called, at one moment

threatened to bring about a serious breach between England and Prussia,

and as it was unquestionably one of the causes of the dislike and

suspicion with which the Princess Royal was to be regarded by a section

of the Prussians, it is worth while to record it in some detail.

A Scottish gentleman, a certain Captain Macdonald, had a dispute about a

seat in a railway carriage at Bonn. He knew no German, was ignorant of

Prussian law, and very likely behaved, or was considered by the

authorities to have behaved, in an autocratic manner. However that may

be, he was not only ejected from the carriage but was committed to

prison, where he remained from September 12 to 18. On the 18th he was

tried and fined twenty thalers and costs. The English residents at Bonn

warmly espoused his cause, and Captain Macdonald seems, apart from the

original dispute, to have had reason to complain of violence used to him

and also of his treatment while in prison. It was also particularly

unfortunate that at the trial the Staatsprocurator, or public

prosecutor, should have denounced the behaviour when abroad of English

people generally. "The English residing and travelling," he said, "are

notorious for the rudeness, impudence, and boorish arrogance of their

conduct."

This accusation, whether well founded or not, naturally seemed to

English lawyers and the English public a piece of gratuitous

irrelevance, intended merely to excite prejudice against Captain

Macdonald. It is impossible now to apportion the blame for the way in

which the incident was allowed to embitter public opinion in both

countries. The affair dragged on for months--indeed, it was not finally

disposed of till the following May. There were questions in Parliament,

Lord Palmerston was extremely angry, and an article in the _Times_

served to pour oil on the flame.

In the circumstances the incident inevitably rather dashed the joy of

the happy family party at Coburg. The Queen conferred with Lord John

Russell, then Foreign Secretary, whom she had brought with her, and she

alludes in her journal to "the ejection and imprisonment (unfairly, it

seems) of a Captain Macdonald, and the subsequent offensive behaviour of

the authorities. It has led to ill blood, and much correspondence, but

Lord John is very reasonable about it, and not inclined to do anything

rash. These foreign governments are very arbitrary and violent, and our

people apt to give offence, and to pay no regard to the laws of the

country."

The Queen and Prince Albert arrived at Coburg on September 25, and the

Princess Royal delighted in visiting with her father the scenes of his

boyhood. She went with the guns to a drive of wild boars, and almost

every day there was an expedition to some interesting place in all the

relief of _incognito_. One day Prince Albert had a narrow escape. He was

alone in an open carriage when the horses ran away. With great presence

of mind, he jumped out, and happily got off with nothing worse than a

few cuts and bruises. Gustav Freytag, the distinguished German novelist

and dramatist, was received, and the Queen records that there was much

conversation with him after dinner. As we shall see later, Freytag was

admitted to the confidence of the Princess Royal and her husband, and he

repaid their kindness in strange fashion.

It was on this visit that the Queen saw her eldest grandchild for the

first time. Writing on September 25, she says:

"Our darling grandchild was brought. Such a little love! He came walking

in at Mrs. Hobbs's [his nurse's] hand, in a little white dress with

black bows, and was so good. He is a fine, fat child, with a beautiful

white soft skin, very fine shoulders and limbs, and a very dear face,

like Vicky and Fritz, and also Louise of Baden. He has Fritz's eyes and

Vicky's mouth, and very fair curly hair. We felt so happy to see him at

last!"

This was the beginning of an enduring friendship between grandmother and

grandson, and no one with any historical imagination can help recalling

the last scene of that friendship, when this fine little boy, grown to

be a mighty Emperor, hastened to share the grief of the English people

at the death-bed of their great Queen.

The Queen was evidently much attracted by the already characteristic

energy of the little Prince, for there are references to him all through

her records of this visit:

"Dear little William came to me as he does every morning. He is such a

darling, so intelligent." "Dear little Wilhelm as usual with me before

dinner--a darling child." "The dear little boy is so intelligent and

pretty, so good and affectionate." "Had a last visit from dear Stockmar.

Towards the end of his stay, dear little William came in and played

about the room." "The darling little boy with us for nearly an hour,

running about so dearly and merrily." "At Cologne our darling little

William was brought into our carriage to bid good-bye. I felt the

parting deeply."

Prince Albert wrote to the Duchess of Kent: "Your great-grandson is a

very pretty, clever child--a compound of both parents, just as it should

be."

Mrs. Georgina Hobbs, the nurse mentioned above, first went to Germany as

a maid in the service of the Princess Royal on her marriage, and was

afterwards promoted to be chief nurse to the Royal children. Prince

William and his brother and sisters were devotedly attached to "Hobbsy,"

as they called her, and it was from "Hobbsy" that they learnt English,

for their parents always talked German to one another.

The Princess Royal, perhaps naturally, preferred to have her children's

nursery arranged and conducted on the English rather than on the German

model, but who can doubt that in this, as in other matters of even less

importance, she would have done better to have studied the

susceptibilities of her adopted country? Indeed, Dr. Hinzpeter, who was

afterwards appointed the tutor of her sons, bears witness that her

nursery management became a great subject of gossip among the Berliners,

and stories were even current of corporal punishment administered before

the Court to princes with dirty faces. It is true that Dr. Hinzpeter

describes these stories as mythical, but the fact that they were

circulated and believed helps to account for the Princess's growing

unpopularity.

At this period Prince Albert was seriously disturbed by the attacks

which the _Times_ was constantly making on Prussia and everything

Prussian. In an article in the _Saturday Review_, recommended by him to

his daughter, it was said: "The only reason the _Times_ ever gives for

its dislike of Prussia, is that the Prussian and English Courts are

connected by personal ties, and that British independence demands that

everything proceeding from the Court should be watched with the most

jealous suspicion."

The Prince was honestly indifferent to the insinuations against himself

by which these attacks were frequently pointed, but he was reasonably

anxious about the bad effect they would have in Germany. Writing to his

daughter on October 24, after his return to England, he refers to the

Macdonald affair, which had already become acute:

"What abominable articles the _Times_ has against Prussia! That of

yesterday upon Warsaw and Schleinitz is positively too wicked. It is the

Bonn story which continues to operate, and a total estrangement between

the two countries may ensue, if a newspaper war be kept up for some time

between the two nations. Feelings, and not arguments, constitute the

basis for actions. An embitterment of feeling between England and

Prussia would be a great misfortune, and yet they are content in Berlin

to make no move in the Bonn affair."

It was only too true that the Prussian Government was in no hurry to

settle the Macdonald affair. The bitterness which it engendered did not

die out till long after its formal termination in May of the following

year, and undoubtedly it contributed far more than was suspected at the

time to increase the delicacy and difficulty of the Princess Royal's

position. It was actually thought in Germany that she inspired the

attacks in the British Press. "This attitude of the English newspapers

preys upon the Princess Royal's spirits and materially affects her

position in Prussia," so wrote Lord Clarendon.

This autumn and winter Prince Albert, in spite of many political and

other anxieties and a sharp attack of illness, faithfully continued to

instruct his daughter in the art of government.

It does not seem ever to have crossed his mind that such instruction,

though admirable in itself, was ill-advised in view of his pupil's

position. The ideal woman in Prussia was then, and still is to a large

extent, one who, conscious of her intellectual inferiority, contents

herself with managing her household and children. If this view obtained

with regard to women in private stations, much more was it considered to

be the duty of princesses of the Royal House to abstain from any active

interest in public affairs. But either Prince Albert did not appreciate

this, or it is possible that he thought his daughter to be freed by her

exceptional ability from the ordinary restrictions and limitations of

her rank. There is yet a third possibility--that he did not altogether

trust his son-in-law's political judgment, and was anxious to give him,

in the troublous times that seemed impending, an help-meet who could

influence him in the right, that is in the Coburg, direction. Whatever

may have been the reason, the Prince certainly continued to the end of

his life to cultivate his daughter's knowledge and grasp of public

affairs.

In December, 1860, the Prince Consort received from Berlin a memorandum

upon the advantages of a law of Ministerial responsibility. Its object

was to remove the apprehensions entertained in high quarters at the

Prussian Court as to the expediency of a measure of this kind. This

memorandum was the work of the Princess Royal, and it is easy to imagine

what a storm of indignation would have arisen in Prussia if by any

accident or indiscretion the knowledge that the Princess had written

such a paper had leaked out.

Still, it was undoubtedly an able piece of work. Sir Theodore Martin

says that it would have been remarkable as the work of an experienced

statesman; and, as the fruit of the liberal political views in which the

Prince had been at pains to train its author, it must have filled his

mind with the happiest auguries for her fulfilment of the great career

which lay before her. "It would have delighted your heart to read it,"

were his words in writing to Baron Stockmar.

To his daughter he sent a long and flattering reply beginning: "It is

remarkably clear and complete, and does you the greatest credit. I agree

with every word of it, and feel sure it must convince everyone who is

open to conviction from sound logic, and prepared to follow what sound

logic dictates."

This pathetic faith in the potency of logic in political affairs is hard

to reconcile with the Prince Consort's earlier and sounder dictum that

feelings, not arguments, constitute the basis for actions. It is evident

from the rest of the letter that the Princess had laid it down that the

responsibility of his advisers does not in fact impair the monarch's

dignity and importance, but is really for him the best of safeguards.

She had gone on to discuss the proposition that the patriarchal relation

in which the monarchs of old were supposed to stand towards their people

was preferable to the constitutional system which interposes the

Minister between the sovereign and his subjects. Her father's comments

on this would have seemed to many Prussians most heretical doctrine to

be imparted to their future Queen.

The patriarchal relation, he says, is pretty much like the idyllic life

of the Arcadian shepherds--a figure of speech, and not much more. It was

the fashionable phrase of an historical transition-period. Monarchy in

the days of Attila, of Charlemagne, of the Hohenstaufen, of the Austrian

Emperors, of Louis XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, &c., was as little like a

patriarchal relation as anything could be. On the contrary it was

sovereignty based upon spoliation, war, murder, oppression, and

massacre. That relation was sedulously developed in the small German

States, whose rulers were little more than great landed proprietors,

during a short period in the eighteenth century, and was cherished out

of a sentimental feeling. It then gave way before the Voltairean

philosophy during the reigns of Frederick II, Joseph II, Louis XVI, &c.,

was turned topsy-turvy by the French Revolution, and finally

extinguished in the military despotism of Napoleon.

The Prince went on to say that in the great war of liberation the people

and their princes stood by one another in struggling for the

establishment of civic freedom, first against the foreign oppressor, and

then as citizens in their own country; and the treaties of 1815, as well

as the appeal to the people in 1813, decreed constitutional government

in every country. The charter was granted in France, and special

constitutions were promised in all the States; even to Poland the

promise of one was made, although there, as well as in Prussia and

Austria, that promise was not kept. Then came the Holy Alliance and

introduced reaction into Germany, France, Spain, and Italy, by dint of

sword and Congress (in 1817-1823). Once more the patriarchal relation

was fostered with the sentimentalism of the Kotzebue school, and the

betrayed peoples were required to become good children, because the

Princes styled themselves good fathers! The July Revolution, and all

that has taken place since then, sufficiently demonstrate that the

peoples neither will nor can play the part of children.

As for the personal government of absolute Sovereigns, Prince Albert

declared that to be a pure illusion. Nowhere does history present us

with such cases of government by Ministers and favourites as in the most

absolute monarchies, because nowhere can the Minister play so safe a

game. A Court cabal is the only thing he has to fear, and he is well

skilled in the ways by which this is to be strangled. History is full of

examples. Recent instances have occurred where the personal discredit

into which the Sovereign has fallen makes the maintenance of the

monarchy, not as a form of government, but as an effective State

machine, all but impossible. When, as in the case of the King of Naples,

this result has arisen, all that people are able to say in defence is,

"He was surrounded by a bad set, he was badly advised, he did not know

the state the country was in." To what purpose, then, is personal

government, if a man in his own person knows nothing and learns nothing?

The Sovereign should give himself no trouble, said the Prince in

conclusion, about details, but exercise a broad and general

supervision, and see to the settlement of the principles on which action

is to be based. This he can, nay, must do, where he has responsible

Ministers, who are under the necessity of obtaining his sanction to the

system which they pursue and intend to uphold in Parliament. This the

personally ruling Sovereign cannot do, because he is smothered in

details, does not see the wood for the trees, and has no occasion to

come to an agreement with his Ministers about principles and systems,

which to both him and them can only appear to be a great burden and

superfluous nuisance.

How these doctrines would have been regarded by probably the majority of

Prussians appears from another letter which the Prince wrote a fortnight

later. His daughter had sent him an article from the Conservative

_Kreuz-Zeitung_, and on it he comments:

"The article expresses in plain terms the view that _Monarchy_ as an

institution has for that party a value only so long as it is based upon

arbitrary will; and so these people arrive at precisely the same

confession of faith as the Red democrats, by reason of which a Republic

is certain to prove neither more nor less than an arbitrary despotism.

Freedom and order, which are set up as political antitheses, are, on the

contrary, in fact, synonymous, and the necessary consequences of

_legality_. 'The majesty of the law' is an idea which upon the

Continent is not yet comprehended, probably because people cannot

realise to themselves a dead thing as the supreme power, and seek for

_personal_ power in government or people. And yet virtue and morality

are also dead things, which nevertheless have a prerogative and a

vocation to govern living men--_divine laws_, upon which our human laws

ought to be moulded."

Christmas brought the customary exchange of loving gifts. Prince Louis

of Hesse, now the betrothed of Princess Alice, joined the family circle

in England, and Prince Albert writes to his daughter in Berlin:

"Oh! if you, with Fritz and the children, were only with us! Louis was

an accession. He is a very dear good fellow, who pleases us better and

better daily. In my abstraction I call him 'Fritz.' _Your Fritz_ must

not take it amiss, for it is only the personification of a beloved,

newly-bestowed, full-grown son.

"But to return to the dear Christmas festival! Your gifts which were

there have caused the highest delight, and those we have yet to expect

will be looked for with impatience. To the latter belong Wilhelm's bust,

Fritz's boar's head--for which in the meantime I beg you will give the

lucky huntsman my hearty thanks. Wilhelm shall be placed in the light

you wish when he issues (I hope unbroken) from his dusty box. The album,

which arrived yesterday morning, is very precious to us, as it enables

us to live altogether beside you--in imagination.

"Prejudice walking to and fro in flesh and blood is my horror, and,

alas, a phenomenon so common; and people plume themselves so much upon

their prejudices, as signs of decision of character and greatness of

mind, nay of true patriotism; and all the while they are simply the

product of narrowness of intellect and narrowness of heart."

The Empress Frederick: a memoir · 第 7 / 21 章