4, I E k-atwar; Iowa towa; Dak S topa; Y tom; T tol.
5, I E kankan, kwankwan; Mand kikhun; Dak zaptan?
6, I E kswakswa; Win hakwa; Iowa shagwa; Dak shakpe.
7, A S seowon; Dak shakowin.
8, I E aktu, Gk hokto; Dak Y sh-akdo-ghan; Sant sh-ahdo-ghan.
9, I E nawan; Dak na (pchi) wan-ka.
10, I E dwakan; Lat decem; Dak wikchem-na.
5, I E k = Dak z otherwise sustained but not proved. Kw = kp = tp = pt,
t and k being interchangeable before labials in Dak.
7, Neither A S seowon nor Dak shakowin are legitimately deducible from
saptan. Perhaps sakan, sakwan was the true base.
8, Either Gk h or Dak sh may equal I E s. Dak d for I E t is rare but S.
hd, Y. kd is a favorite combination.
9, I cannot explain inserted pchi.
10, In Dak m and n are interchangeable before labials, but m for I E n
is here unsupported.[I] D cannot stand before w in Dak.