[232] Cicero received the news of his sentence when he was near Vibo, a

town in the country of the Brutii, now Bivona, on the gulf of Sta.

Eufemia. He had written to Atticus (iii. 3) to meet him at Vibo, but his

next letter informed Atticus that he had set out to Brundusium. Cicero

names the person, Sica, who had shown him hospitality near Vibo.

Plutarch calls him [Greek: Ouibios Sikelos anêr], as if he had mistaken

the name Sica.

[233] Cicero mentions this circumstance in his oration for Cn. Plancius,

c. 40 (ed. Wunder, and the Notes). He was well received by the municipia

which lay between Vibo and Brundusium. He did not enter the city of

Brundusium, but lodged in the gardens of M. Lænus Flaccus.

[234] Cicero did not remain at Dyrrachium. His movements are described

in his own letters, and in his oration for Cn. Plancius. He went to

Thessalonica in Macedonia, where Plancius then was in the capacity of

quæstor to L. Apuleius, Prætor of Macedonia. He reached Thessalonica on

the 23rd of May (x. Kal. Jun.), and there is a letter extant addressed

to Atticus (ii. 8), which is dated from Thessalonica on the 29th of May

(Dat. iiii. Kal. Jun. Thessalonicæ).

[235] His unmanly lamentations are recorded in his own letters and in

his own speech for Cn. Plancius, c. 42.

[236] Cicero was not a practical philosopher. Like most persons who have

been much engaged in public life, he lived in the opinion of others. He

did not follow the maxim of the Emperor Antoninus, who bids us "Look

within; for within is the source of good, and it sends up a continuous

stream to those who will always dig there" (vii. 59). Cicero did not

reverence his own soul, but he placed his happiness "in the opinion of

others" (i. 6). Perhaps however he was not weaker than most active

politicians, whose letters would be as dolorous and lachrymose as his,

if they were banished to a distant colony.

[237] This is not obscure, if it is properly considered, and it contains

a serious truth. A man must view things as they are, and he must not

take his notions of them from the affects of the many. "Things touch not

the soul, but they are out of it, and passive; perturbations come only

from the opinion that is within a man" (M. Antoninus, iv. 3).

The philosophic emperor and the unphilosophic statesman were very

different persons. The emperor both preached and practised. The

statesman showed his feebleness by his arrogance in prosperity and his

abjectness in adversity.

[238] These proceedings are described by Cicero in his oration (_Pro

Domo_, c. 24). The marble columns were removed from his house on the

Palatine to the premises of the father-in-law of the consul Piso, in the

presence of the people. Gabinius, the other consul, who was Cicero's

neighbour at Tusculum, removed to his own land the stock that was on

Cicero's estate and the ornaments of the house, and even the trees.

[239] In B.C. 57, P. Cornelius Lentulus Spinther and Q. Cæcilius

Metellus Nepos were consuls. Cicero alludes to the disturbance which

preceded his recall in his oration for P. Sextius, c. 35: "Caedem in

foro maximam faciunt, universique destrictis gladiis et cruentis in

omnibus fori partibus fratrem meum, virum optimum, fortissimum, meique

amantissimum oculis quaerebant, voce poscebant." Cicero adds that his

brother being driven from the Rostra lay down in the Comitium, and

protected himself "with the bodies of slaves and freedmen;" by which

Cicero seems to mean that his slaves and freedmen kept watch over him

till he made his escape at night. Plutarch appears to have misunderstood

the passage or to have had some other authority. In this dreadful tumult

"the Tiber was filled with the dead bodies of the citizens, the drains

were choaked, and the blood was wiped up from the Forum with sponges."

This looks somewhat like rhetorical embellishment.

[240] Cicero in a letter to Atticus (iv. 2) gives an account of the

compensation which he received. The valuation of his house at Rome

(superficies aedium) was fixed at HS. vicies, or two million sesterces.

He seems not to have objected to this, but he complains of the valuation

of his Tusculanum and Formianum.

[241] In the seventeenth month according to Clinton (_Fasti Hellen._

B.C. 57). The passage that Plutarch refers to is in the Oration to the

Senate after his return (c. 15): "Cum me vestra auctoritas arcessierit,

Populus Romanus revocarit, Respublica implorarit, Italia cuncta paene

suis humeris reportarit."

[242] See the Life of Cato, c. 40, and Dion Cassius, 39, c. 21.

[243] Clodius was killed B.C. 52, the year in which Pompeius was chosen

sole consul. Cicero's speech for Milo is extant, or at least a speech

which he wrote after the trial. Milo was condemned and went an exile to

Massilia. His property was sold and it went cheap. Cicero was under some

suspicion of being a purchaser; but the matter is quite unintelligible

(Drumann, _Annii_, p. 49, and the references). There could be no reason

why Cicero should write in such obscure terms to Atticus, if his conduct

in this matter was fair.

[244] Crassus perished B.C. 54. See the Life of Crassus.

[245] His province also comprehended Pisidia, Pamphylia, and Cyprus. The

proconsulship of Cicero was in B.C. 51, though he had been consul in

B.C. 63. Cicero went to Cilicia against his will (_Ad Diversos_, iii.

2). Pompeius had got the Senate (B.C. 52) to pass an order that no

person should hold a province within five years after being consul or

prætor. This was aimed at Cæsar, if he should get a second consulship.

Pompeius also wished to have Cicero out of the way, and the provinces

were to be supplied with governors from among those who did not come

within the terms of the new rule: and Cicero was one of them (Cicero,

_Ad Diversos_, iii. 2; _Ad Attic._ vi. 6).

[246] He was the third Cappadocian king of this name. This unlucky king

was a debtor of Cn. Pompeius and M. Junius Brutus, the most

distinguished Roman money-lender of his day (Cicero, _Ad Attic._ vi.

1-3). Both Pompeius and Brutus were pressing the king for money.

Deiotarus also sent to Ariobarzanes to try to get some money out of him

for Brutus. The king's answer was that he had none, and Cicero says that

he believed he told the truth, for that no country was in a more

impoverished state and nobody more beggared than the king. Cicero dunned

the king continually with letters, but he was not particularly well

pleased with his commission (_Ad Attic._ vi. 2). The end was that the

king provided for the payment of about one hundred talents to Brutus

during Cicero's year of government. He had promised Pompeius two hundred

in six months, which, as a judicious commentator remarks, is not worth

so much as a security for one hundred. These money doings of the

supposed patriot Brutus should be well examined by those who still

retain an opinion of the virtues of this Republican hero.

[247] There seems no reason to doubt that Cicero's administration of his

province was just and mild. Plutarch has apparently derived some of the

facts here mentioned from Cicero himself (_Ad Attic._ vi. 2): "Aditus

autem ad me minime provinciales; nihil per cubicularium: ante lucem

inambulabam domi, ut olim candidatus."

[248] Cicero's exploits were such as would not have been recorded, if he

had not been his own historian. In a letter to Cato (_Ad Diversos_, xv.

4), he gives a pretty full account of his operations; and he asks Cato

to use his influence to get him the honour of a Supplicatio or Public

Thanksgiving. Cato's short reply, which he says is longer than his

letters usually are, is a model in its way.

[249] So it is in Plutarch's text: it may be the blunder of Plutarch, or

the blunder of his copyists. The true name is M. Cælius (Cic. _Ad

Diversos_, ii. 11), who was curule ædile B.C. 51. The saying about the

panthers is in this letter of Cicero, who had set the panther-hunters to

work.

Cicero returned to Rome in B.C. 50. He mentions (_Ad Attic._ vi. 7) his

intention to call at Rhodes.

[250] The events of this chapter, which belong to B.C. 49, are told at

length in the Lives of Pompeius and Cæsar. Cicero's irresolution is well

marked in his own letters; in one of which (_Ad Attic._ viii. 7,

referred to by Kaltwasser) he says:--"Ego quem fugiam habeo, quem sequar

non habeo."

There are no letters extant of Trebatius to the purport which Plutarch

states, but Cæsar wrote to Cicero and begged him to stay at Rome. Cicero

(_Ad Attic._ ix. 16) has given a copy of Cæsar's letter; and a copy of

another letter from Cæsar (_Ad Attic._ x. 8), in which he urges Cicero

to keep quiet. There seems to be no doubt that Trebatius had been

employed by Cæsar to write to Cicero and speak to him about remaining

neutral at least. Cicero had an interview with Cæsar at Formiæ, after

Cæsar's return from Brundusium (_Ad Atticum_, ix. 18, 19; _Ad Diversos_,

iv. 1). The letter last referred to is addressed to Servius Sulpicius.

[251] L. Domitius Ahenobarbus. See the Life of Cæsar, c. 34.

[252] See the Life of Pompeius, c. 37, notes.

[253] Smart sayings are not generally improved by explanation, and they

ought not to require it. Cicero apparently meant to say that it was as

absurd to talk of men being dispirited after a victory, as if one were

to say that Cæsar's friends disliked him.

[254] After defeating Pharnaces Cæsar landed in Italy, in September,

B.C. 47, of the unreformed calendar. Cicero had received a letter from

Cæsar before Cæsar's arrival in Italy. The letter was written in Egypt

(Cicero, _Ad Diversos_, xiv. 23; _Pro Q. Ligario_, c. 3). Compare Dion

Cassius, 46, c. 12, 22, as to the conduct of Cicero to Cæsar. Before the

end of the year Cicero was in Rome.

[255] It is difficult to see what was the resemblance between Perikles

and Cicero. Theramenes was somewhat more like him, for he tried to be on

more sides than one, and met with the usual fate of such people. He was

one of the so-called Thirty Tyrants of Athens, and he was sacrificed by

his colleagues.

[256] The speech of Cicero is extant. The allusion of Plutarch is

particularly to the third chapter.

[257] Cicero in a letter to L. Papirius Pætus (_Ad Diversos_, ix. 18)

alludes to his occupations at Tusculum. He compares himself to

Dionysius, who after being driven from Syracuse is said to have opened a

school at Corinth. Cicero's literary activity after B.C. 47 is the most

remarkable passage in his life. He required to be doing something.

[258] The allusion is to the story of Laertes in the Odyssey, i. 190,

and xxiv. 226.

[259] She was divorced some time in B.C. 46. The latest extant letter to

Terentia is dated on the first of October, B.C. 47, from Venusia. Cicero

was then on his road from Brundusium to Tusculanum. He orders his wife

to have everything ready for him; some friends would probably be with

him, and they might stay some time. The bath was to be got ready, and

eatables, and everything else. A gentleman would write a more civil

letter to his housekeeper.

In a letter to Cn. Plancius (_Ad Diversos_, ix. 14), who congratulates

Cicero on his new marriage, he says that nothing would have induced him

to take such a step at such a time, if he had not found on his return

his domestic affairs even worse than public affairs. According to his

own account he was hardly safe in his own house, and it was necessary to

strengthen himself by new alliances against the perfidy of old ones.

Terentia may have been a bad housekeeper, and her temper was not the

sweetest. She could not have any feeling for her husband except

contempt, and he repaid it by getting rid of her. Cicero had to repay

the Dos of Terentia, but she never got it back, so far as we can learn.

It is not known what was the age of Terentia when she was divorced, but

she could not be young. Yet there are stories of her marrying

Sallustius, the historian, and after him Messala Corvinus, but the

authority for these marriages is weak. She is said to have attained the

age of one hundred and three. Terentia had a large property of her own.

There is no imputation on her character, which, for those times, is much

in her favour. She had courage in danger and firmness of purpose, both

of which her husband wanted. "Her husband," says Drumann, "who always

looked for and needed some support, must often have acted under her

influence: for him it was a fortunate thing to have such a woman by his

side, and a scandal that he put her away."

[260] Her name was Publilia. Cicero was now sixty years of age. Various

ladies had been recommended to Cicero. He would not marry the daughter

of Pompeius Magnus, the widow of Faustus Sulla, perhaps for fear that it

might displease Cæsar; another who was recommended to him was too ugly

(_Ad Attic._ xiv. 11). Publilia was young and rich: her father had left

her a large fortune, but in order to evade the Lex Voconia, which

limited the amount that a woman could take by testament, the property

was given to Cicero in trust to give it to her. The marriage turned out

unhappy. In a letter to Atticus (xiv. 32), written when Cicero was alone

in the country, he says that Publilia had written to pray that she might

come to him with her mother; but he had told her that he preferred being

alone, and he begs Atticus to let him know how long he could safely stay

in the country without a visit from his young wife. Tullia died in B.C.

45, and Cicero had now no relief except in his studies; his new wife was

a burden to him, and he divorced her. He had the Dos of Publilia now to

repay, and Terentia was not settled with; thus, in addition to his other

troubles, he was troubled about money (_Ad Attic._, xiv. 34, 47).

Dion Cassius (57. 15) says that Vibius Rufus, who was consul A.D. 22, in

the time of Tiberius, married Cicero's widow, and Middleton supposes

that Terentia is meant, but this is very unlikely; Dion must mean

Publilia.

[261] Tiro was a freedman of Cicero, and had been brought up in his

house. He had a good capacity and his master was strongly attached to

him. Cicero's letters to him are in the sixteenth book of the

Miscellaneous Collection. It is said that Tiro collected the letters of

Cicero after Cicero's death, by doing which he has rendered a great

service to history, and little to his master.

[262] Tullia's first husband was C. Calpurnius Piso Frugi, who died

probably early in B.C. 57. In B.C. 56 Tullia married Furius Crassipes,

from whom she was divorced, but the circumstances are not known. Her

third husband was P. Cornelius Dolabella, a patrician. It seems that she

was separated from Dolabella before she died. Tullia did not die in

Rome, but at her father's house at Tusculum, in February, B.C. 45.

Tullia left one son by Dolabella, who was named Lentulus. His father,

Dolabella, is also named Lentulus, whence it is concluded that he had

been adopted by a Lentulus. The Lentuli were Cornelii.

[263] Cæsar was murdered on the Ides of March, B.C. 44. The

circumstances of Cæsar's death, and the events which follow, are told in

the Lives of Cæsar and Antonius. Cicero saw Cæsar fall (_Ad Attic._ xiv.

14), and he rejoiced.

[264] An "oblivion" or "non-remembrance" is a declaration of those who

have the sovereign power in a state, that certain persons shall be

excused for their political acts. It implies that those who grant the

amnesty have the power, and that those to whom it is granted are in

subjection to them, or have not the political power which the authors of

the amnesty assume. After Thrasybulus at Athens had overthrown the

Thirty Tyrants as they are called, an amnesty was declared, but the

Thirty and some few others were excluded from it (Xenophon, _Hellen._

ii. 4, 38).

Cicero in his first Philippic (c. 1) alludes to his attempt to bring

about a settlement. The senate met on the eighteenth of March in the

temple of Tellus: "In quo templo quantum in me fuit jeci fundamenta

pacis, Atheniensiumque renovavi vetus exemplum: Græcum etiam verbum

usurpavi quo tum in sedandis discordiis erat usa civitas illa, atque

omnem memoriam discordiarum oblivione sempiterna delendam censui."

[265] P. Cornelius Dolabella, once the husband of Tullia, Cicero's

daughter. He was consul, after Cæsar's death, with M. Antonius, and in

the next year, B.C. 43, he was in Syria as governor. Cassius, who was

also in Syria, attacked Dolabella and took Laodicea, where Dolabella

was. To avoid falling into the hands of his enemy, Dolabella ordered a

soldier to kill him.

[266] A. Hirtius, or as Plutarch writes the name Irtius, and C. Vibius

Pansa were the consuls of B.C. 53. Cicero set out from Rome soon after

Cæsar's death with the intention of going to Greece (_Ad Attic._ xiv.).

He went as far as Syracuse, whence he returned to Rome, which he reached

on the last day of August (_Ad Diversos_, xii. 25; _Ad Attic._ xvi. 7;

_Philipp._ i. 5; v. 7). Cicero in the passage last referred to speaks of

the violent measures of Antonius; "huc etiam nisi venirem Kal. Sept.

fabros se missurum et domum meam disturbaturum esse dixit." On the

second of September he delivered his first Philippic in the Senate. It

is an evidence of Cicero's great mental activity that he wrote his

Topica, addressed to Trebatius, on shipboard after he had set sail from

Velia with the intention of going to Greece. He says that he had no

books with him (_Topica_, c. 1, &c.).

[267] C. Octavius, the grandson of Cæsar's younger sister Julia, and the

son of C. Octavius, prætor B.C. 61, by Atia, the daughter of M. Atius

Balbus and Julia. C. Octavius, the young Cæsar, was born B.C. 63, in the

consulship of Cicero. The dictator by his testament left him a large

property and his name. Accordingly he is henceforth called C. Julius

Cæsar Octavianus, but he is better known as the future Emperor Augustus.

At the time of the Dictator's assassination he was at Apollonia, a town

on the coast of Illyricum. He came to Rome on the news of Cæsar's death

with his friend M. Vipsanius Agrippa. Cicero saw him at his Cuman villa

on his way to Rome (_Ad. Attic._ xiv. 11, 12).

[268] Plutarch probably means Greek drachmæ, for he states the sum in

his Life of Antonius, c. 15, in round numbers at 4000 talents. The

Septies Millies which Cicero speaks of (_Philipp._ ii. 37) is a

different sum of money.

[269] Cæsar's mother had taken for her second husband L. Marcius

Philippus. She just lived to see her youthful son consul in B.C. 43.

Octavia, the younger sister of Cæsar, was now the wife of C. Marcellus,

who had been consul B.C. 50. After the death of Marcellus, she married

M. Antonius (B.C. 40), being then with child by her deceased husband.

The Roman law did not allow a woman to marry till ten months after her

husband's death; the object of the rule was to prevent the paternity of

a child from being doubtful. Plutarch correctly states the time at ten

months (Life of Antonius, c. 31). If Octavia was then with child, as

Dion Cassius says (48. c. 3), the reason for the rule did not exist. In

later times, at least, the rule was dispensed with when the reason for

it ceased, as when a pregnant widow was delivered of a child before the

end of the ten months. Ten months was the assumed time of complete

gestation (Savigny, _System_, &c. ii. 181).

[270] Young Cæsar had raised troops in Campania, and chiefly at Capua

among the veteran soldiers of the dictator, who had been settled on

lands there (Dion Cassius, 45. c. 12; Cicero, _Ad Atticum_, xvi. 8). He

gave the men five hundred denarii apiece, about eighteen pounds

sterling, by way of bounty, and led them to Rome. These men were old

soldiers, well trained to their work. The youth who did this was

nineteen years of age, a boy, as Cicero calls him; but a boy who

outwitted him and everybody else, and maintained for more than half a

century the power which he now seized.

[271] Dreams were viewed in a sort as manifestations of the will of the

gods. This dream happened, as Dion Cassius tells (45. c. 2), to Catulus;

and he makes Cicero dream another dream. Cicero dreamed that Octavius

was let down from heaven by a chain of gold, and was presented with a

whip by Jupiter. Suetonius (_Octav. Cæsar_, c. 94) agrees with Dion

Cassius. The whip was significant. Jupiter meant that somebody required

whipping, and he put the whip in the hands of a youth who knew how to

use it.

[272] The young man cajoled the old one and made a tool of him. Like all

vain men, Cicero was ready to be used by those who knew how to handle

him. There is a letter from Brutus to Cicero (_Ad Brutum_, 16), and one

of Brutus to Atticus (_Ad Brutum_, 17), to the purport here stated by

Plutarch. But these letters may be spurious.

[273] He was at Athens in B.C. 44, when Cicero addressed to him his

Officia. He had been a year there (_De Offic._ i. 1) at the time when

the first chapter was written. The poet Horatius was there at the same

time. When M. Brutus came to Athens in the autumn of B.C. 44, Cicero

joined Brutus, who gave him a command in his cavalry (Plutarch,

_Brutus_, c. 24, 26).

[274] The consuls were sent to relieve Mutina (Modena), in which Decimus

Brutus, the governor of Cisalpine Gaul, was besieged by Antonius. Cicero

had recommended the Senate to give Cæsar the authority of a commander.

Cæsar received a command with the insignia of a prætor. There were two

battles at Mutina, in April, B.C. 43, in which the two consuls fell.

[275] It is stated by various authorities that Cicero was cajoled with

the hopes of the consulship (Dion Cassius, 46. c. 42; Appian, _Civil

Wars_, iii. 82). The testimony of the tenth letter to Brutus (Cicero _Ad

Brutum_, 10) is not decisive against other evidence. Cæsar came to Rome

in August, B.C. 43, with his army, and through the alarm which he

created, was elected consul with Q. Pedius (Dion Cassius, 16. c. 43,

&c.; Appian, _Civil Wars_, iii. 94).

[276] After he was elected consul, Cæsar left the city for North Italy,

and was joined by Antonius and Lepidus (Appian, _Civil War_, iii. 96,

&c.). M. Æmilius Lepidus, son of M. Lepidus, consul B.C. 78, was consul

in B.C. 46, with C. Julius Cæsar. He was elected Pontifex Maximus after

Cæsar's death: he had been declared an enemy of the State by the Senate,

but Cæsar had compelled the Senate to annul their declaration against

Antonius and Lepidus, as a preparatory step to the union with them which

he meditated. Lepidus is painted to the life by Shakespeare (_Julius

Cæsar_, iv. 2):

"_Ant._ This is a slight unmeritable man,

Meet to be sent on errands."

[277] Now Bologna. They met in a small island of the Rhenus, or

Lavinius, as the name is in Appian (_Civil Wars_, iv. 2). The meeting is

also described by Dion Cassius (46. c. 45), and here they formed a

triumvirate for five years. The number of the proscribed, according to

Appian, was three hundred senators and two thousand equites. The power

of the triumvirate was confirmed at Rome in legal form (Appian, _Civil

Wars_, iv. 7).

[278] L. Æmilius Paulus, consul B.C. 50, who is said to have sold

himself to the Dictator Cæsar (_Life of Cæsar_, c. 29). As to his name

Paulus, see Drumann (_Æmilii_). Paulus was allowed to escape to M.

Brutus, by the favour of some soldiers. He was as insignificant as his

brother the Triumvir. L. Cæsar, consul B.C. 64, was the brother of

Julia, the mother of M. Antonius. Julia saved her brother's life. Lucius

was a man of no mark.

[279] The circumstances of Cicero's death are told more minutely by

Plutarch than by any other writer. He left the city before the arrival

of the Triumviri in November, and apparently when the bloody work of the

proscription had commenced. He had probably heard of his fate before he

reached Tusculum.

[280] Astura was a small place on the coast of Latium, a little south of

Antium. Near Astura a small stream, Fiume Astura, flows into the sea.

Cicero had a villa here. The country at the back was a forest.

(Westphal, _Die Römische Kampagne_, and his maps.)

[281] Appian (_Civil Wars_, iv. 20) says that the father told his

murderers to kill him first, his son did the same, on which they were

parted and murdered at the same time. Dion Cassius (47, c. 10) gives a

different story. The main fact that they were murdered is not doubtful,

but, as is usual, the circumstances are uncertain.

[282] Or Circeii, now Monte Circello, that remarkable mountain

promontory which is the only striking feature on the coast of Latium.

The agony of Cicero's mind is powerfully depicted in his irresolution.

The times were such as to make even a brave man timid, but a true

philosopher would have shown more resolution. His turning his steps

towards Rome and his return are not improbable. He had been doing the

same kind of thing all his life.

Plutarch's Lives, Volume 4 (of 4) · 第 49 / 66 段