VII. SUPERSTITIOUS DEALINGS WITH WILD ANIMALS

In encountering a wild animal, the ancients deemed it a matter of great

importance that a man should see the beast before the latter was aware of

a human presence. If a wolf, for example, first perceived the man, the

brute was master of the situation, and the man was bereft alike of speech

and strength; whereas the wolf, if first seen by the man, became an easy

prey. The side from which a wild beast approached was also of moment.

Thus the “Geoponica” warned its readers not to allow a hyena to approach

from the right side, lest one be rendered motionless by the fascination

of its presence; but if it appeared on the left side, the animal might be

attacked with confidence.

Various wonderful tales are current among the natives of Senegambia, and

other districts of western Africa, regarding the lion. This noble animal,

it is said, forbears to attack a man who salutes him with a respectful

gesture, and the same gallant instinct restrains the beast from harming

a woman.[503] In most lion-haunted regions, however, the natives do not

have such implicit confidence in the courtesy and forbearance of wild

animals, but trust rather to the efficacy of various amulets. The Kaffirs

of southeastern Africa, for example, on encountering a lion or leopard in

the forest, proceed at once to nibble a so-called lion-charm, which is

merely a small bit of wood or root. And if the animal moves away without

molesting him, the Kaffir attributes his security to the magic power of

the charm, not realizing that his escape is due to the natural dread of

man which is characteristic of animals generally.[504]

So, too, the priests of Mexico were accustomed to rub their bodies with

a certain ointment which they believed to be an efficient protection

against wild beasts, its pungent odor acting as a charm, so that they

were enabled to wander unmolested amid the wildest solitudes.[505] The

skilled hunter, however, confident in his own prowess, depends neither

upon the alleged gallantry of lions nor the potency of amulets, but

rather on his trusty rifle.

The belief in charms against noxious animals is widespread; for not

alone in African jungles does this form of superstition prevail: it is

found among civilized people as well, and more particularly in southern

lands; indeed, wherever venomous creatures abound. In a collection of

amulets belonging to Professor Joseph Belucci, of Perugia, Italy, which

was exhibited at the Paris Exposition, 1891, were a number of perforated

stones and other objects used by Italians as charms to protect the bearer

against the bite of serpents and reptiles.[506]

The Magic of the Horse-shoe, with other folk-lore notes · 第 96 / 107 题