I Tim. v. 23.

So says St. Paul--and this seems to have been the opinion of the most

ancient philosophers and physicians. A moderate use of it has been

sanctioned by the wise and good in all ages. Those who have denied its

virtues are those who have not been able to drink it. Asclepiades wrote

upon wine, the use of which he introduced with almost every remedy,

observing, that the gods had bestowed no more valuable gift on man: even

the surly Diogenes drank it; for it is said of him, that he liked that

wine best, which he drank at other people's cost--a notion adopted by

the oinopholous Mosely, who, when asked, "What wine do you drink,

doctor?" answered, "Port at home--claret abroad!"

Hippocrates, the father of physic, recommends a cheerful glass; and

Rhases, an ancient Arabian physician, says, no liquor is equal to good

wine. Reineck wrote a dissertation "De Potu Vinoso;" and the learned Dr.

Shaw lauded the "juice of the grape." But the stoutest of its medical

advocates was Tobias Whitaker, physician to Charles II., who undertook

to prove the possibility of maintaining life, from infancy to old age,

without sickness, by the use of wine!

It must, however, be remembered, that Whitaker was cordially attached to

wine, and a greater friend to the vintner than to the apothecary, having

as utter a dislike to unpalatable medicines, as the most squeamish of

his patients; therefore, Dr. Toby's evidence must be taken with caution,

independently of the courtly spirit that might have led him to adapt his

theories to the times.

It has been questioned whether the use of wine was known to the

antediluvian world; but there can be do doubt, in the corrupt state of

man, that wine would have its share in his debasement, and it may be

very strongly inferred, from the circumstance that Noah planted a

vineyard, and, moreover, "that he drank of the wine, and was drunken,"

(Gen, ix. 20.)--a sad stain in the character of a man who was "perfect

in his generation;" and which also proves that, in the earliest period

of the world, the very best of men were liable to fall into error and

excess.

But the antiquity and propriety of wine-drinking is not matter of

question. The archbishop of Seville, Antonio de Solis, who lived to be

110 years old, drank wine; and even that wonderful pattern of propriety,

Cornaro, did the same: but the question is about quantity. Sir William

Temple was pleased to lay down a rule, and limit propriety to three

glasses. "I drink one glass," says he, "for health, a second for

refreshment, a third for a friend; but he that offers a fourth is an

enemy."

As in eating, so in drinking, in the question of quantity--much depends

on the capacity of the stomach. A very abstemious friend of mine, not

long since, dined tete-a-tete with a gentleman well known for his

kindness and hospitality, and not less so for his powers of bibulation.

After dinner, at which a fair share of many excellent wines was taken,

Port and Madeira were put on the table, and before the host, a _magnum_

of Claret. My friend drank his usual quantum, three glasses of Madeira,

during which time a great portion of the magnum had disappeared; and

soon afterwards, being emptied, the host said, "I think we can just

manage a bottle between us." The bottle was brought, and very shortly

disappeared, without the aid of the visiter.

The same gentleman and Lord ----, at the Angel at Bury, fell in with

some excellent Claret. They had disposed of six bottles, when the

landlord, who did not guess or _gauge_ the _quality_ of his customers

(the bell being rung for a fresh supply,) begged very gently to hint

that it was expensive stuff, being fifteen shillings a bottle! "Oh! is

it so? then bring up two bottles directly!"

We have nothing, however, in modern times, at all equal to the account

given of some of the ancients. The elder Cato, we are told, warmed good

principles with a considerable quantity of good wine.[5] But Cicero's

son exceeds all others; so much so, that he got the name of _Bicongius_,

because he was accustomed to drink two congii[6] at a sitting. Pliny,

and others, abound in grand examples, that prove we have degenerated at

any rate in this respect, for these convivials were neither sick nor

sorry. Even that eminent debauchee, Nero, was only three times sick in

fourteen years. "Nam qui luxuriae immoderatissimae esset, ter omnino per

xiv. annos languit; atque ita, ut neque _vino_, neque consuetudine

_reliqua_ abstineret."

The Abbé de Voisenon, a very diminutive man, said to his physician, who

ordered him a quart of ptisan per hour, "Ah! my friend, how can you

desire me to swallow a quart an hour? I hold only a pint."

Wine has not only been considered good for the body, but has, from the

earliest period, been thought invigorating to the mind. Thus we find it

a constant theme of praise with poets. Martial says--

Regnat nocte calix, volvuntur biblia mane,

Cum Phoebo Bacchus dividit imperium.

All night I drink, and study hard all day;

Bacchus and Phoebus hold divided sway.

The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction. Volume 13, No. 352, January 17, 1829 · 第 21 / 32 题