SWINBURNE

[Sidenote:_22 Apr. '09_]

On Good Friday night I was out in the High Street, at the cross-roads,

where the warp and the woof of the traffic assault each other under a

great glare of lamps. The shops were closed and black, except where a

tobacconist kept the tobacconist's bright and everlasting vigil; but above

the shops occasional rare windows were illuminated, giving

hints--dressing-tables, pictures, gas-globes--of intimate private lives. I

don't know why such hints should always seem to me pathetic, saddening;

but they do. And beneath them, through the dark defile of shutters,

motor-omnibuses roared and swayed and curved, too big for the street, and

dwarfing it. And automobiles threaded between them, and bicycles dared the

spaces that were left. From afar off there came a flying light, like a

shot out of a gun, and it grew into a man perched on a shuddering

contrivance that might have been invented by H.G. Wells, and swept

perilously into the contending currents, and by miracles emerged

untouched, and was gone, driven by the desire of the immortal soul within

the man. This strange thing happened again and again. The pavements were

crowded with hurrying or loitering souls, and the omnibuses and autos were

full of them: hundreds passed before the vision every moment. And they

were all preoccupied; they nearly all bore the weary, egotistic melancholy

that spreads like an infection at the close of a fête day in London; the

lights of a motor-omnibus would show the rapt faces of sixteen souls at

once in their glass cage, driving the vehicle on by their desires. The

policeman and the loafers in the ring of fire made by the public-houses at

the cross-roads--even these were grave with the universal affliction of

life, and grim with the relentless universal egotism. Lovers walked as

though there were no heaven and no earth, but only themselves in space.

Nobody but me seemed to guess that the road to Delhi could be as naught to

this road, with its dark, fleeing shapes, its shifting beams, its black

brick precipices, and its thousand pale, flitting faces of a gloomy and

decadent race. As says the Indian proverb, I met ten thousand men on the

Putney High Street, and they were all my brothers. But I alone was aware

of it. As I stood watching autobus after autobus swing round in a fearful

semi-circle to begin a new journey, I gazed myself into a mystic

comprehension of the significance of what I saw. A few yards beyond where

the autobuses turned was a certain house with lighted upper windows, and

in that house the greatest lyric versifier that England ever had, and one

of the great poets of the whole world and of all the ages, was dying: a

name immortal. But nobody looked; nobody seemed to care; I doubt if any

one thought of it. This enormous negligence appeared to me to be fine, to

be magnificently human.

* * * * *

The next day all the shops were open, and hundreds of fatigued assistants

were pouring out their exhaustless patience on thousands of urgent and

bright women; and flags waved on high, and the gutters were banked with

yellow and white flowers, and the air was brisk and the roadways were

clean. The very vital spirit of energy seemed to have scattered the breath

of life generously, so that all were intoxicated by it in the gay

sunshine. He was dead then. The waving posters said it. When Tennyson died

I felt less hurt; for I had serious charges to bring against Tennyson,

which impaired my affection for him. But I was more shocked. When Tennyson

died, everybody knew it, and imaginatively realized it. Everybody was

touched. I was saddened then as much by the contagion of a general grief

as by a sorrow of my own. But there was no general grief on Saturday.

Swinburne had written for fifty years, and never once moved the nation,

save inimically, when "Poems and Ballads" came near to being burnt

publicly by the hangman. (By "the nation," I mean newspaper readers. The

real nation, busy with the problem of eating, dying, and being born all in

one room, has never heard of either Tennyson or Swinburne or George R.

Sims.) There are poems of Tennyson, of Wordsworth, even of the speciously

recondite Browning, that have entered into the general consciousness. But

nothing of Swinburne's! Swinburne had no moral ideas to impart. Swinburne

never publicly yearned to meet his Pilot face to face. He never galloped

on one of Lord George Sanger's horses from Aix to Ghent. He was interested

only in ideal manifestations of beauty and force. Except when he grieved

the judicious by the expression of political crudities, he never connected

art with any form of morals that the British public could understand. He

sang. He sang supremely. And it wasn't enough for the British public. The

consequence was that his fame spread out as far as under-graduates, and

the tiny mob of under-graduates was the largest mob that ever worried

itself about Swinburne. Their shouts showed the high-water mark of his

popularity. When one of them wrote in a facetious ecstasy over "Dolores,"

_But you came, O you procuratores_

_And ran us all in!_

that moment was the crown of Swinburne's career as a popular author. With

its incomparable finger on the public pulse the _Daily Mail_, on the day

when it announced Swinburne's death, devoted one of its placards to the

performances of a lady and a dog on a wrecked liner, and another to the

antics of a lunatic with a revolver. The _Daily Mail_ knew what it was

about. Do not imagine that I am trying to be sardonic about the English

race and its organs. Not at all. The English race is all right, though

ageing now. The English race has committed no crime in demanding from its

poets something that Swinburne could not give. I am merely trying to make

clear the exceeding strangeness of the apparition of a poet like Swinburne

in a place like England.

Last year I was walking down Putney Hill, and I saw Swinburne for the

first and last time. I could see nothing but his face and head. I did not

notice those ridiculously short trousers that Putney people invariably

mention when mentioning Swinburne. Never have I seen a man's life more

clearly written in his eyes and mouth and forehead. The face of a man who

had lived with fine, austere, passionate thoughts of his own! By the

heavens, it was a noble sight. I have not seen a nobler. Now, I knew by

hearsay every crease in his trousers, but nobody had told me that his face

was a vision that would never fade from my memory. And nobody, I found

afterwards by inquiry, had "noticed anything particular" about his face. I

don't mind, either for Swinburne or for Putney. I reflect that if Putney

ignored Swinburne, he ignored Putney. And I reflect that there is great

stuff in Putney for a poet, and marvel that Swinburne never perceived it

and used it. He must have been born English, and in the nineteenth

century, by accident. He was misprized while living. That is nothing. What

does annoy me is that critics who know better are pandering to the

national hypocrisy after his death. In a dozen columns he has been sped

into the unknown as "a great Victorian"! Miserable dishonesty! Nobody was

ever less Victorian than Swinburne. And then when these critics have to

skate over the "Poems and Ballads" episode--thin, cracking ice!--how they

repeat delicately the word "sensuous," "sensuous." Out with it, tailorish

and craven minds, and say "sensual"! For sensual the book is. It is fine

in sensuality, and no talking will ever get you away from that. Villiers

de l'Isle-Adam once wrote an essay on "Le Sadisme anglais," and supported

it with a translation of a large part of "Anactoria." And even Paris was

startled. A rare trick for a supreme genius to play on the country of his

birth, enshrining in the topmost heights of its literature a lovely poem

that cannot be discussed!... Well, Swinburne has got the better of us

there. He has simply knocked to pieces the theory that great art is

inseparable from the Ten Commandments. His greatest poem was written in

honour of a poet whom any English Vigilance Society would have crucified.

"Sane" critics will naturally observe, in their quiet manner, that

"Anactoria" and similar feats were "so unnecessary." Would it were true!

Books and Persons; Being Comments on a Past Epoch, 1908-1911 · 第 34 / 76 题