CHAPTER VI

ARCHITECTURE OF THE MOSQUES

Gothic architecture is expressive of much that a mixed or transitory

style lacks, but again the Roman, or Lombard, or the later architecture

of the Renaissance, have their own particular cachet quite as

recognizable and quite as well defined.

Mohammedan architecture, so different in motif and treatment, is quite

as expressive and, in many ways, quite as civilized as the architectural

forms of Europe, and possesses in addition a certain feeling which baked

clay and plaster suggests better than all other materials. A feeling

which is often entirely wanting in cut stone when used to reproduce

animal and plant forms.

Saracenic, Assyrian, Persian and Byzantine architectural details are all

of them beautiful, if bizarre, but the Mohammedan architecture of the

Moors outranks them all for sheer appeal, fantastic and less consistent

though it be. Fantastic it is, but often in a simple, suggestive way,

depending upon design and proportion rather than profuse decoration.

This is why the mosques of Kairouan in Tunisia, or those of Tlemcen in

Algeria are even more interesting than the great Mosque of Saint Sophia,

or the palace corridors of the Alhambra itself, which are, in fact, but

a mixture of several styles. Terra-cotta and baked clay are all right in

their way, but their way is the Mohammedan builders' way, not that of

the modern school architects who simulate cut stone in the same plastic

products, and build up Turkish baths in palatial twenty-story Broadway

hotels with the pagan decorations of ancient Rome, when what they had in

mind all the time was the fountained courtyard of a Mohammedan

mosque--not by any means a symbolism of paganism. Our new-school

architects of the Western world sadly muddle things at times. Moorish

arabesques do not mingle well with the palmer's shells of the Italian

Renaissance and the English fan-lights of the brothers Adam.

The word mosque comes properly from the word _mesgid_, signifying place

of adoration. The Italians make of the word, _moscheta_; the Spaniards,

_meschita_; and the French, _mosquée_. All these variations are met with

in North Africa. It is well to recognize them, for both Algeria and

Tunisia are more "mixed" in their language and institutions than any

other lands yet become affected of twentieth-century tourists. The

mixture is perhaps the more likable because of its catholicity. It is

certainly more interesting; but school-board and self-taught linguists

will need all their wits about them to make the most of the soft, sweet

tongue of a desert Arab who lisps first in French, then in Spanish and

then in Italian, with perhaps an "_Oh, yes!_" or an "_All right!_" here

and there. He modestly reserves his own Arabic for an exclusive harangue

among his intimates.

The conventional type of mosque is undoubtedly reminiscent of the Greek

basilica, but in every way more amply disposed. The plan herewith is the

accepted conventional type of great mosque before it got crowded up in

the cities. To-day in most large towns and cities the mosque has been

shorn of many of its attributes, leaving only the inner sanctuaries

remaining.

The plainness of the exterior of the mosques of North Africa is no

indication of the gorgeousness of their interiors. An imposing sobriety

of exterior, of all the mosques of Islam

[Illustration: _Ground Plan of a Mosque_

A Outer Court. B Inner Court or Sahn. C Pulpits on which the Koran is

placed. D Fountain. E Tribune from which the Muezzin calls to prayer. F

Three praying-niches. G Horses and camels. H Strangers. I Bath. J

Drinking-fountain. K Well.]

in the Moghreb, from Tlemcen to Kairouan, invariably clothes dentelled

sculpture and mouldings, fine rugs and hangings, and a labyrinth of

architectural fantasies possessed by no other class of civil or

religious edifices extant.

The architecture of the mosques of Algeria and Tunisia, as of those of

Constantinople and Cairo, is the apotheosis of a mysterious symbolism,

at which the infidel can but wonder and speculate. He will never

understand it, at least he will never feel it as does the Mussulman

himself. It is unfortunate that we outsiders are thought of as

unbelievers, but so it is. One does not forget that even

twentieth-century Arab gamins at Suez and Port Saïd revile the Christian

with their guttural:

"_Ya Nasrani

Kalb awani!_"

This venerable abuse means nothing more or less than:

"O Nazarene

O dog obscene!"

This comes down from tradition, for the same thing is recounted in

Percy's "Reliques." There, in a certain anecdote, a knight calls his

Mussulman opponent "_unchristian hound_," to which the retort courteous

was given as, "christen dogge."

Of all the dainty features of a Moorish mosque none appeals to the

artist as does the minaret. Minaret is the Arab name for a chandelier,

lantern, signal fire, and finally the slim, graceful tower of purely

Arab origin. Properly speaking it is in the application to the Mussulman

place of worship, the mosque, that we know the minaret in its most

poetic form. In its architectural sense, however, it is that slim,

graceful, arrow-like tower which is so frequently a component part of a

Moorish or Byzantine structure.

The Hebrews had a similar word for a tower which performed similar

functions--_menorah_; and the Chaldeans the word _menora_; while,

finally, the Syrians adopted _menortho_. Of the exotic origin of the

word there is no doubt, but a minaret is first of all something more

than a mere tower. It must be of special proportions, and it must be an

adjunct to a more pretentious structure. Never is a minaret a thing

apart.

For a comparison between the Byzantine minaret and that born of the

ingenuity of the Moorish builder, the words of Théophile Gautier must be

accepted as final: "The minarets of Saint Sophia (Constantinople) have

not the elegance nor _sveltesse_ of those of the Moor."

The minaret of the mosque of the Sultan Kalaûn at Cairo is perhaps the

most splendid of all contemporary works. Its height approximates two

hundred feet, and though the mosque itself is ruined, its firm, square

minaret, brilliant with all the fantasy of the best of Mussulman art, is

to-day quite the most splendid example of its class above ground.

The minaret of El Bardenei, also at Cairo, runs the former a close

second.

The square, dazzling white and more severe, though none less beautiful,

minarets of Tunis and Algiers seem almost as if they were another

species from the Cairene type. In reality they are not. They are one and

the same thing, differing in no essential constructive element, but only

in detail of decoration.

The Arabs, seemingly, have a horror of symmetry. No two structures in

one street are on the same building line or at the same angle, and the

sky-lines of even the Frenchified cities of Algiers and Tunis are as

bizarre as that of lower New York, though not as elevated.

The Arab's idea of a street building line is most rudimentary, but

French engineers are helping him out, and boulevards, avenues and

streets are being laid out, and roads and alleys straightened as

opportunity offers. The Arab looks on stolidly and doesn't in the least

seem to object, though it answered him well enough previously that the

doorway of his favourite mosque should be half-hidden and almost

obstructed by the jutting veranda of a Moorish café, a sheep butcher's,

a silversmith's, or a red and yellow awninged bath-house, and these, be

it noted, were all set at varying angles and inclinations.

A _moucharabia_ is a component of every Arab, Moorish or Turkish

structure of any pretence. Its name sounds as though it might have some

relation to a fly-screen, and in a certain sense it is that, though not

an impenetrable one. It is more like the choir-screen of a Renaissance

church.

In reality the _moucharabia_ is a lattice or _grille_ of wood or even

iron, sometimes ornate and finely carved, and sometimes merely a barred

gate or door.

When these fine latticed _grilles_ are taken away by the housebreaker,

and offered the dealer in curios, they take on an exalted value that

the original owners never knew. It is difficult to buy old-time woodwork

anywhere, whether one is searching out Chippendale chairs in Yorkshire,

_panétiers_ in Provence, or _moucharabias_ in the Mitidja; but the Arab

curio dealer can give the Christian or Hebrew antique dealer of other

lands a good fair start and then beat him as to the profits he can draw

from the inexperienced tourist collector. One thing you may be sure of,

Arab or Moorish antiques are seldom imitations, and though the "asking

price" of a _moucharabia_ may (at first) be excessive, and the "talking

points" of dubious value, the article in question is probably authentic,

and actually could not be duplicated by the workmen of to-day for a

similar price.

[Illustration]

The native dealer of Tunis or Algiers will ask two or three hundred

francs for a fine example of a _moucharabia_, all green and red and

gold, but he will probably take seventy-five if you will spend the day

with him arguing it out.

The little temples or shrines called _koubas_ scattered all over Algeria

are not unlike the pagan temples of the Greeks in their general

proportions. Literally the word in Arabic means a square house, though

indeed it was the patriarch Abraham who supposedly set the conventional

design upon which all others have since been built. Two workmen, one a

Greek and another a Copt, built the first _kouba_ at Mecca, and it was

out of this that the typical Arab mosque grew, as distinct from the

frequently more splendid mosques of the Byzants.

The Arabs had no religious art previous to their adoption of the faith

of Mahomet. The true Mussulman thinks that the form and style of the

mosque and all its dependencies was preconceived in the heavens, before

even the creation of man, and that that poor mortal was only formed in

the image of God when everything was ready and in place. With what

success man has made use of his opportunities each must judge for

himself.

The _mosque-marabout_ is often a monument which marks a holy place, the

tomb, for instance, of a celebrated marabout or holy man. That erected

at Algiers, above the remains of the Marabout Sidi-Brahim, famous

because of

[Illustration]

his defence of a French captain and his soldiers in the Algerian warfare

of 1845, is as admirable and worthy a sepulchral monument as one will

find in any land.

The religious architecture of Islam, as far as its symbolism is

concerned, is a thing that will never be understood by the Christian. A

mosque to most people is simply a public monument, a thing of domes and

minarets and many columns. The winter bird of passage at Cairo thinks it

a great inconvenience that he should be made to put on a pair of

_babouches_ over his shoes in order to enter, forgetting that it is a

Holy Place and that one of the tenets of the Mussulman religion forbids

walking rough-shod over the rugs and carpets of a place of worship. In

Algeria the practice is similar, except that the "infidel" simply

removes his shoes and enters stocking-footed. In Tunisia, with the

exception of the mosques at Kairouan, none but the Mussulman may pass

their thresholds.

The fine Moorish architecture which radiated from Granada in the golden

days of its best epoch has in our day sadly degenerated. The primitive

Arab of Africa intermingled with the Moors and absorbed to a certain

degree the pure fundamental principles of Moorish architecture. The

town-dwelling Arab built his mosques and his houses, during the last two

centuries, less luxuriously perhaps than his predecessors (and often

with the aid of Italian workmen), but he did not debase the Moorish

formulæ. What he kept of constructive elements was pure, the debasement

has only come in later years with the additions and reconstructions

incident to keeping pace with the times. This is where the Arab

architect beats the European at the same game.

The religious edifices of Islam, whether the simple _kouba_ of a saint,

or the elaborate mosque of the city, possess always a certain infallible

form. The fundamental principles are the same, whether one takes an

example from the Holy Land, or from one within sight of Gibraltar.

In Arabia, in Syria, Egypt, Tunisia and Algeria this Arab expression of

the architecture of the Moors predominates, but in Persia, Turkestan and

in the Ottoman Empire there is a certain specious Byzantine cachet,

which, if not actually a debasement, is a qualifying note which

differentiates the two varieties. The Arab variety has always been,

however, the pattern-mould from which has sprung forth the Islamic

religious architecture of to-day.

Before the birth of Islamism, Arabia, properly called, had no great

artistic monuments. The first mosque of magnificent proportions was

erected in the year 20 of the Hegira (642 A.D.) under the Khalifat of

Omar--this was the mosque of Hmrou at Cairo.

On this model many others were afterwards constructed, with variations

of little importance. These comprise for the most part the mosques of

the Arabian peninsula, of Egypt, of Africa, and of Andalusia. The most

famous of this class are those at Mecca and Medina; that of Iba Touloum

at Cairo; that of Djama Ez-Zitouna at Tunis; those at Mahdia and Gafsa;

of Okba Ibm Maffî at Kairouan; and El Mansourah at Tlemcen. Besides

these most of the mosques of Morocco are in the same style, as is also

the grand mosque of Cordova in Spain.

Omar's great mosque at Jerusalem was built at the inspiration of that

Kalif. He said to the Patriarch of Jerusalem after one of the periodical

religious quarrels of the time: "Show me a place, then, where I may

build a mosque, where Mussulmans may henceforth assemble for their

prayers without coming into contact with those of the Christian cult."

Then finally grew up the mosque of Omar, the Khalif himself working

with the common labourers. Thus came into being the mosque commonly

reputed to be the most beautiful in existence to-day.

We know that the minarets of the mosques were primarily instituted that

the _muezzins_ might make their call to prayer in full view and hearing

of the faithful. It is to the honour of the Khalif el-Walid that the

first of these svelt, sky-piercing towers was raised, and its name

derived from the Arab _menora_.

The minaret plays a preponderant role in all Arab art, and is the

distinguishing characteristic between Arab and Moorish architecture. In

the Moghreb (that is the Barbary States and Spain, bordering on the

western Mediterranean) the form of the minaret is nearly always

quadrangular, and the tiny terrace or platform high above supports,

invariably, a smaller pavilion whose roof is usually composed of four

sloping sides which, in turn, is surmounted by the conventional three

balls and crescent of copper, silver or even gold. The four sides

forming the base of this square tower are sometimes of carved stone, or

faïence, or of rough-hewn stone covered with plaster, which is

afterwards carved or gilded.

Amongst the most beautiful of these minarets of the Moghreb there is an

exquisite delicacy of design, a remarkable warmth of colour and an

elegant, piquant suggestion of daintiness as they rise up into the

unalterable azure of the African skies. Of this class are those of

Ez-Zitouna and the Kasba at Tunis; of Sidi-bou-Medine and Mansourah at

Tlemcen; those at Tangier and Fez; and of course that of the Giralda at

Seville. The Giralda is assuredly one of the most beautiful types of

Arabic-Andalusian architecture, and was built in the twelfth century

during the reign of the Sultan Yacoub-el-Nansourd.

In Egypt, quaint and mysterious as the roof-tops and minarets are to the

untrained eye, they possess no systematic regularity of form or feature.

They are of all dimensions and proportions. The gamut runs from the

square to the hexagon, to the octagon, and to the circle even, with

always numerous openings too small to be called windows, and above all a

plethora of finely chiselled stone.

This résumé outlines the brilliant art of the builder of the Arab

mosque, beginning with the twelfth century in Spain, the thirteenth in

the Moghreb, and finally the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth in

Egypt and Syria.

Beyond the pale of these perfect types are the Perso-Byzantine varieties

of the Ottoman Empire; and still farther east, types which are quite

beyond the scope of these pages.

In the Land of Mosques & Minarets · 第 6 / 26 章