THEODORA’S DOOM.
Try not to get weary, respected reader, of so much of what I am afraid
most people will call tiresome preaching. But I know if you get anything
practicable out of it, you will not be so soon tired of it. I promise
you more story by and by. Only an old man, like an old horse, must be
allowed to take very much his own way--go his own pace, I should have
said. I am afraid there must be a little more of a similar sort in this
chapter.
On the Monday morning I set out to visit one or two people whom the
severity of the weather had kept from church on the Sunday. The last
severe frost, as it turned out, of the season, was possessing the earth.
The sun was low in the wintry sky, and what seemed a very cold mist up
in the air hid him from the earth. I was walking along a path in a field
close by a hedge. A tree had been cut down, and lay upon the grass.
A short distance from it lay its own figure marked out in hoar-frost.
There alone was there any hoar-frost on the field; the rest was all of
the loveliest tenderest green. I will not say the figure was such an
exact resemblance as a photograph would have been; still it was an
indubitable likeness. It appeared to the hasty glance that not a branch
not a knot of the upper side of the tree at least was left unrepresented
in shining and glittering whiteness upon the green grass. It was very
pretty, and, I confess, at first, very puzzling. I walked on, meditating
on the phenomenon, till at length I found out its cause. The hoar-frost
had been all over the field in the morning. The sun had been shining for
a time, and had melted the frost away, except where he could only cast
a shadow. As he rose and rose, the shadow of the tree had shortened and
come nearer and nearer to its original, growing more and more like as
it came nearer, while the frost kept disappearing as the shadow withdrew
its protection. When the shadow extended only to a little way from
the tree, the clouds came and covered the sun, and there were no more
shadows, only one great one of the clouds. Then the frost shone out in
the shape of the vanished shadow. It lay at a little distance from the
tree, because the tree having been only partially lopped, some great
stumps of boughs held it up from the ground, and thus, when the sun was
low, his light had shone a little way through beneath, as well as over
the trunk.
My reader needs not be afraid; I am not going to “moralise this
spectacle with a thousand similes.” I only tell it him as a very pretty
phenomenon. But I confess I walked on moralising it. Any new thing in
nature--I mean new in regard to my knowledge, of course--always made me
happy; and I was full of the quiet pleasure it had given me and of the
thoughts it had brought me, when, as I was getting over a stile, whom
should I see in the next field, coming along the footpath, but the
lady who had made herself so disagreeable about Theodora. The sight was
rather a discord in my feeling at that moment; perhaps it would have
been so at any moment. But I prepared myself to meet her in the strength
of the good humour which nature had just bestowed upon me. For I fear
the failing will go with me to the grave that I am very ready to be
annoyed, even to the loss of my temper, at the urgings of ignoble
prudence.
“Good-morning, Miss Bowdler,” I said.
“Good-morning, Mr. Walton,” she returned “I am afraid you thought me
impertinent the other week; but you know by this time it is only my
way.”
“As such I take it,” I answered with a smile.
She did not seem quite satisfied that I did not defend her from her own
accusation; but as it was a just one, I could not do so. Therefore she
went on to repeat the offence by way of justification.
“It was all for Mrs. Walton’s sake. You ought to consider her, Mr.
Walton. She has quite enough to do with that dear Connie, who is
likely to be an invalid all her days--too much to take the trouble of a
beggar’s brat as well.”
“Has Mrs. Walton been complaining to you about it, Miss Bowdler?” I
asked.
“O dear, no!” she answered. “She is far too good to complain of
anything. That’s just why her friends must look after her a bit, Mr.
Walton.”
“Then I beg you won’t speak disrespectfully of my little Theodora.”
“O dear me! no. Not at all. I don’t speak disrespectfully of her.”
“Even amongst the class of which she comes, ‘a beggar’s brat’ would be
regarded as bad language.”
“I beg your pardon, I’m sure, Mr. Walton! If you _will_ take offence--”
“I do take offence. And you know there is One who has given especial
warning against offending the little ones.”
Miss Bowdler walked away in high displeasure--let me hope in conviction
of sin as well. She did not appear in church for the next two Sundays.
Then she came again. But she called very seldom at the Hall after this,
and I believe my wife was not sorry.
Now whether it came in any way from what that lady had said as to my
wife’s trouble with Constance and Theodora together, I can hardly tell;
but, before I had reached home, I had at last got a glimpse of something
like the right way, as it appeared to me, of bringing up Theodora. When
I went into the house, I looked for my wife to have a talk with her
about it; but, indeed, it always necessary to find her every time I got
home. I found her in Connie’s room as I had expected. Now although we
were never in the habit of making mysteries of things in which there was
no mystery, and talked openly before our children, and the more openly
the older they grew, yet there were times when we wanted to have our
talks quite alone, especially when we had not made up our minds about
something. So I asked Ethelwyn to walk out with me.
“I’m afraid I can’t just this moment, husband,” she answered. She was in
the way of using that form of address, for she said it meant everything
without saying it aloud. “I can’t just this moment, for there is no one
at liberty to stay with Connie.”
“O, never mind me, mamma,” said Connie cheerfully. “Theodora will take
care of me,” and she looked fondly at the child, who was lying by her
side fast asleep.
“There!” I said. And both, looked up surprised, for neither knew what
I meant. “I will tell you afterwards,” I said, laughing. “Come along,
Ethel.”
“You can ring the bell, you know, Connie, if you should want anything,
or your baby should wake up and be troublesome. You won’t want me long,
will you, husband?”
“I’m not sure about that. You must tell Susan to watch for the bell.”
Susan was the old nurse.
Ethel put on her hooded cloak, and we went out together. I took her
across to the field where I had seen the hoary shadow. The sun had not
shone out, and I hoped it would be there to gladden her dear eyes as it
had gladdened mine; but it was gone. The warmth of the sun, without his
direct rays, had melted it away, as sacred influences will sometimes do
with other shadows, without the mind knowing any more than the grass how
the shadow departed. There, reader! I have got a bit of a moral in about
it before you knew what I was doing. But I was sorry my wife could see
it only through my eyes and words. Then I told her about Miss Bowdler,
and what she had said. Ethel was very angry at her impertinence in
speaking so to me. That was a wife’s feeling, you know, and perhaps
excusable in the first impression of the thing.
“She seems to think,” she said, “that she was sent into the world to
keep other people right instead of herself. I am very glad you set her
down, as the maids say.”
“O, I don’t think there’s much harm in her,” I returned, which was easy
generosity, seeing my wife was taking my part. “Indeed, I am not sure
that we are not both considerably indebted to her; for it was after I
met her that a thought came into my head as to how we ought to do with
Theodora.”
“Still troubling yourself about that, husband?”
“The longer the difficulty lasts, the more necessary is it that it
should be met,” I answered. “Our measures must begin sometime, and when,
who can tell? We ought to have them in our heads, or they will never
begin at all.”
“Well, I confess they are rather of a general nature at
present--belonging to humanity rather than the individual, as you would
say--consisting chiefly in washing, dressing, feeding, and apostrophe,
varied with lullabying. But our hearts are a better place for our
measures than our heads, aren’t they?”
“Certainly; I walk corrected. Only there’s no fear about your heart. I’m
not quite so sure about your head.”
“Thank you, husband. But with you for a head it doesn’t matter, does
it?”
“I don’t know that. People should always strengthen the weaker part, for
no chain is stronger than its weakest link; no fortification stronger
than its most assailable point. But, seriously, wife, I trust your head
nearly, though not quite, as much as your heart. Now to go to business.
There’s one thing we have both made up our minds about--that there is
to be no concealment with the child. God’s fact must be known by her. It
would be cruel to keep the truth from her, even if it were not sure to
come upon her with a terrible shock some day. She must know from
the first, by hearing it talked of--not by solemn and private
communication--that she came out of the shrubbery. That’s settled, is it
not?”
“Certainly. I see that to be the right way,” responded Ethelwyn.
“Now, are we bound to bring her up exactly as our own, or are we not?”
“We are bound to do as well for her as for our own.”
“Assuredly. But if we brought her up just as our own, would that, the
facts being as they are, be to do as well for her as for our own?”
“I doubt it; for other people would not choose to receive her as we have
done.”
“That is true. She would be continually reminded of her origin. Not that
that in itself would be any evil; but as they would do it by excluding
or neglecting her, or, still worse, by taking liberties with her, it
would be a great pain. But keeping that out of view, would it be good
for herself, knowing what she will know, to be thus brought up? Would it
not be kinder to bring her up in a way that would make it easier for
her to relieve the gratitude which I trust she will feel, not for our
sakes--I hope we are above doing anything for the sake of the gratitude
which will be given for it, and which is so often far beyond the worth
of the thing done--”
“Alas! the gratitude of men
Hath oftener left me mourning,”
said Ethel.
“Ah! you understand that now, my Ethel!”
“Yes, thank you, I do.”
“But we must wish for gratitude for others’ sake, though we may be
willing to go without it for our own. Indeed, gratitude is often just as
painful as Wordsworth there represents it. It makes us so ashamed; makes
us think how much more we _might_ have done; how lovely a thing it is to
give in return for such common gifts as ours; how needy the man or woman
must be in whom a trifle awakes so much emotion.”
“Yes; but we must not in justice think that it is merely that our little
doing seems great to them: it is the kindness shown them therein, for
which, often, they are more grateful than for the gift, though they
can’t show the difference in their thanks.”
“And, indeed, are not aware of it themselves, though it is so. And yet,
the same remarks hold good about the kindness as about the gift. But
to return to Theodora. If we put her in a way of life that would be
recognisant of whence she came, and how she had been brought thence,
might it not be better for her? Would it not be building on the truth?
Would she not be happier for it?”
“You are putting general propositions, while all the time you have
something particular and definite in your own mind; and that is not fair
to my place in the conference,” said Ethel. “In fact, you think you
are trying to approach me wisely, in order to persuade, I will not
say _wheedle_, me into something. It’s a good thing you have the
harmlessness of the dove, Harry, for you’ve got the other thing.”
“Well, then, I will be as plain as ever I can be, only premising that
what you call the cunning of the serpent--”
“Wisdom, Harry, not cunning.”
“Is only that I like to give my arguments before my proposition. But
here it is--bare and defenceless, only--let me warn you--with a whole
battery behind it: it is, to bring up little Theodora as a servant to
Constance.”
My wife laughed.
“Well,” she said, “for one who says so much about not thinking of the
morrow, you do look rather far forward.”
“Not with any anxiety, however, if only I know that I am doing right.”
“But just think: the child is about three months old.”
“Well; Connie will be none the worse that she is being trained for her.
I don’t say that she is to commence her duties at once.”
“But Connie may be at the head of a house of her own long before that.”
“The training won’t be lost to the child though. But I much fear, my
love, that Connie will never be herself again. There is no sign of it.
And Turner does not give much hope.”
“O Harry, Harry, don’t say so! I can’t bear it. To think of the darling
child lying like that all her life!”
“It is sad, indeed; but no such awful misfortune surely, Ethel. Haven’t
you seen, as well as I, that the growth of that child’s nature since her
accident has been marvellous? Ten times rather would I have her lying
there such as she is, than have her well and strong and silly, with her
bonnets inside instead of outside her head.”
“Yes, but she needn’t have been like that. Wynnie never will.”
“Well, but God does all things not only well, but best, absolutely best.
But just think what it would be in any circumstances to have a maid
that had begun to wait upon her from the first days that she was able to
toddle after something to fetch it for her.”
“Won’t it be like making a slave of her?”
“Won’t it be like giving her a divine freedom from the first? The lack
of service is the ruin of humanity.”
“But we can’t train her then like one of our own.”
“Why not? Could we not give her all the love and all the teaching?”
“Because it would not be fair to give her the education of a lady, and
then make a servant of her.”
“You forget that the service would be part of her training from the
first; and she would know no change of position in it. When we tell her
that she was found in the shrubbery, we will add that we think God sent
her to take care of Constance. I do not believe myself that you can have
perfect service except from a lady. Do not forget the true notion of
service as the essence of Christianity, yea, of divinity. It is not
education that unfits for service: it is the want of it.”
“Well, I know that the reading girls I have had, have, as a rule, served
me worse than the rest.”
“Would you have called one of those girls educated? Or even if they
had been educated, as any of them might well have been, better than
nine-tenths of the girls that go to boarding-schools, you must remember
that they had never been taught service--the highest accomplishment of
all. To that everything aids, when any true feeling of it is there.
But for service of this high sort, the education must begin with the
beginning of the dawn of will. How often have you wished that you had
servants who would believe in you, and serve you with the same truth
with which you regarded them! The servants born in a man’s house in
the old times were more like his children than his servants. Here is a
chance for you, as it were of a servant born in your own house. Connie
loves the child: the child will love Connie, and find her delight in
serving her like a little cherub. Not one of the maids to whom you have
referred had ever been taught to think service other than an unavoidable
necessity, the end of life being to serve yourself, not to serve others;
and hence most of them would escape from it by any marriage almost that
they had a chance of making. I don’t say all servants are like that; but
I do think that most of them are. I know very well that most mistresses
are as much to blame for this result as the servants are; but we are not
talking about them. Servants nowadays despise work, and yet are forced
to do it--a most degrading condition to be in. But they would not be in
any better condition if delivered from the work. The lady who despises
work is in as bad a condition as they are. The only way to set them
free is to get them to regard service not only as their duty, but as
therefore honourable, and besides and beyond this, in its own
nature divine. In America, the very name of servant is repudiated as
inconsistent with human dignity. There is _no_ dignity but of service.
How different the whole notion of training is now from what it was in
the middle ages! Service was honourable then. No doubt we have made
progress as a whole, but in some things we have degenerated sadly.
The first thing taught then was how to serve. No man could rise to the
honour of knighthood without service. A nobleman’s son even had to wait
on his father, or to go into the family of another nobleman, and wait
upon him as a page, standing behind his chair at dinner. This was an
honour. No notion of degradation was in it. It was a necessary step to
higher honour. And what was the next higher honour? To be set free from
service? No. To serve in the harder service of the field; to be a squire
to some noble knight; to tend his horse, to clean his armour, to see
that every rivet was sound, every buckle true, every strap strong; to
ride behind him, and carry his spear, and if more than one attacked him,
to rush to his aid. This service was the more honourable because it was
harder, and was the next step to higher honour yet. And what was this
higher honour? That of knighthood. Wherein did this knighthood consist?
The very word means simply _service_. And for what was the knight thus
waited upon by his squire? That he might be free to do as he pleased?
No, but that he might be free to be the servant of all. By being a
squire first, the servant of one, he learned to rise to the higher rank,
that of servant of all. His horse was tended, this armour observed,
his sword and spear and shield held to his hand, that he might have no
trouble looking after himself, but might be free, strong, unwearied, to
shoot like an arrow to the rescue of any and every one who needed his
ready aid. There was a grand heart of Christianity in that old chivalry,
notwithstanding all its abuses which must be no more laid to its charge
than the burning of Jews and heretics to Christianity. It was the lack
of it, not the presence of it that occasioned the abuses that coexisted
with it. Train our Theodora as a holy child-servant, and there will be
no need to restrain any impulse of wise affection from pouring itself
forth upon her. My firm belief is that we should then love and honour
her far more than if we made her just like one of our own.”
“But what if she should turn out utterly unfit for it?”
“Ah! then would come an obstacle. But it will not come till that
discovery is made.”
“But if we should be going wrong all the time?”
“Now, there comes the kind of care that never troubles me, and which I
so strongly object to. It won’t hurt her anyhow. And we ought always
to act upon the ideal; it is the only safe ground of action. When that
which contradicts and resists, and would ruin our ideal, opposes us,
then we must take measures; but not till then can we take measures, or
know what measures it may be necessary to take. But the ideal itself
is the only thing worth striving after. Remember what our Lord himself
said: ‘Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven
is perfect.’”
“Well, I will think about it, Harry. There is time enough.”
“Plenty. No time only not to think about it. The more you think about it
the better. If a thing be a good thing, the more you think about it
the better it will look; for its real nature will go on coming out and
showing itself. I cannot doubt that you will soon see how good it is.”
We then went home. It was only two days after that my wife said to me--
“I am more than reconciled to your plan, husband. It seems to me
delightful.”
When we reentered Connie’s room, we found that her baby had just waked,
and she had managed to get one arm under her, and was trying to comfort
her, for she was crying.