AFTERWORD

Although these pages have been published serially, it is with a feeling

of reluctance that I send them out into the world, for better or worse,

between the covers of a book. They have been written with reverence, and

the reading of the proofs has brought back to me vividly the long winters

in which I pondered over the matter they contain, and wrote and rewrote

the chapters.

I had not thought to add anything to them by way of an afterword.

Nothing could be farther from my mind than to pose as a theologian; and,

were it not for one or two of the letters I have received, I should have

supposed that no reader could have thought of making the accusation that

I presumed to speak for any one except myself. In a book of this kind,

the setting forth of a personal view of religion is not only unavoidable,

but necessary; since, if I wrote sincerely, Mr. Hodder's solution must

coincide with my own--so far as I have been able to work one out. Such

as it is, it represents many years of experience and reflection. And I

can only crave the leniency of any trained theologian who may happen to

peruse it.

No one realizes, perhaps, the incompleteness of the religious

interpretations here presented more keenly than I. More significant,

more vital elements of the truth are the rewards of a mind which searches

and craves, especially in these days when the fruit of so many able minds

lies on the shelves of library and bookshop. Since the last chapter was

written, many suggestions have come to me which I should like to have the

time to develop for this volume. But the nature of these elements is

positive,--I can think of nothing I should care to subtract.

Here, then, so far as what may be called religious doctrine is concerned,

is merely a personal solution. We are in an age when the truth is being

worked out through many minds, a process which seems to me both Christian

and Democratic. Yet a gentleman has so far misunderstood this that he

has already accused me, in a newspaper, of committing all the heresies

condemned by the Council of Chalcedon,--and more!

I have no doubt that he is right. My consolation must be that I have as

company--in some of my heresies, at least--a goodly array of gentlemen

who wear the cloth of the orthodox churches whose doctrines he accuses me

of denying. The published writings of these clergymen are accessible to

all. The same critic declares that my interpretations are without

"authority." This depends, of course; on one's view of "authority." But

his accusation is true equally against many men who--if my observation be

correct--are doing an incalculable service for religion by giving to the

world their own personal solutions, interpreting Christianity in terms of

modern thought. No doubt these, too, are offending the champions of the

Council of Chalcedon.

And does the gentleman, may I ask, ever read the pages of the Hibbert

Journal?

Finally, I have to meet a more serious charge, that Mr. Hodder remains

in the Church because of "the dread of parting with the old, strong

anchorage, the fear of anathema and criticism, the thought of sorrowing

and disapproving friends." Or perhaps he infers that it is I who keep

Mr. Hodder in the Church for these personal reasons. Alas, the concern

of society is now for those upon whom the Church has lost her hold, who

are seeking for a solution they can accept. And the danger to-day is not

from the side of heresy. The rector of St. John's, as a result of his

struggle, gained what I believe to be a higher and surer faith than that

which he formerly held, and in addition to this the realization of the

presence of a condition which was paralyzing the Church's influence.

One thing I had hoped to make clear, that if Mr. Hodder had left the

Church under these circumstances he would have made the Great Refusal.

The situation which he faced demanded something of the sublime courage

of his Master.

Lastly, may I be permitted to add that it is far from my intention to

reflect upon any particular denomination. The instance which I have

taken is perhaps a pronounced rather than a particular case of the

problem to which I have referred, and which is causing the gravest

concern to thoughtful clergymen and laymen of all denominations.

The Inside of the Cup — Volume 08 · 第 16 / 17 题