To her listener what a panorama in those two words: "Faculty meeting!"

Every professor's daughter, every woman from a university family, can

see it all. The whole scholastic and domestic, studious and tender

life comes back. Faculty meeting! We wait for the tired professor who

had the latest difference to settle with his colleagues, or the newest

breach to soothe, or the favorite move to push; how late he is! He

comes in softly, haggard and spent, closing the door so quietly that

no one shall be wakened by this midnight dissipation. The woman who

loves him most anxiously--be it wife or be it daughter--is waiting for

him. Perhaps there is a little whispered sympathy for the trouble

in the faculty which he does not tell. Perhaps there is a little

expedition to the pantry for a midnight lunch.

My first recollections of Professor Park give me his tall, gaunt,

but well-proportioned figure striding up and down the gravel walks

in front of the house, two hours before time for faculty meeting, in

solemn conclave with my father. The two were friends--barring those

interludes common to all faculties, when professional differences are

in the foreground--and the pacing of their united feet might have worn

Andover Hill through to the central fires. For years I cultivated an

objection to Professor Park as being the chief visible reason why we

had to wait for supper.

I remember his celebrated sermons quite well. The chapel was always

thronged, and--as there were no particular fire-laws in those days on

Andover Hill--the aisles brimmed over when it was known that Professor

Park or Professor Phelps was to preach. I think I usually began with

a little jealous counting of the audience, lest it should prove bigger

than my father's; but even a child could not long listen to Professor

Park and not forget her small affairs, and all affairs except the

eloquence of the man.

Great, I believe it was. Certain distinguished sermons had their

popular names, as "The Judas Sermon," or "The Peter Sermon," and drew

their admirers accordingly. He was a man of marked emotional nature,

which he often found it hard to control. A skeptical critic might have

wondered whether the tears welled, or the face broke, or the voice

trembled, always just at the right moment, from pure spontaneity. But

those who knew the preacher personally never doubted the genuineness

of the feeling that swept and carried orator and hearers down. We do

not hear such sermons now.

Professor Park has always been a man of social ease and wit. The last

time I saw him, at the age of eighty-five, in his house in Andover,

I thought, one need not say, "has been;" and to recall his brilliant

talk that day gives me hesitation over the past tense of this

reminiscence. On the whole, with the exception of Doctor Holmes, I

think I should call Professor Park the best converser--at least among

eminent _men_--whom I have ever met.

He has always been a man very sensitive to the intellectual values

of life, and fully inclined perhaps to approach the spiritual through

those. It is easy to misunderstand a religious teacher of this

temperament, and his admiring students may have sometimes done so.

One in particular I remember to have heard of who neglected the

lecture-room to cultivate upon his own responsibility the misson work

of what was known as Abbott Village. To the Christian socialism of our

day, the misery of factory life might seem as important for the

future clergyman as the system of theology regnant in his particular

seminary--but that was not the fashion of the time; at all events, the

man was a student under the Professor's orders, and the orders were:

keep to the curriculum; and I can but think that the Professor was

right when he caustically said:

"That ---- is wasting his seminary course in what _he calls doing

good_!"

Sometimes, too, the students used to beg off to go on book-agencies,

or to prosecute other forms of money-making; and of one such Professor

Park was heard to say that he "sacrificed his education to get the

means of paying for it."

I am indebted to Professor Park for this: "Professor Stuart and myself

were reluctant to release them from their studies. Professor Stuart

remarked of one student that he got excused _every_ Saturday for the

purpose of going home for a _week_, and always stayed a _fortnight_."

The last time that I saw Professor Park he told me a good story.

It concerned the days of his prime, when he had been preaching

somewhere--in Boston or New York, I think--and after the audience was

dismissed a man lingered and approached him.

"Sir," said the stranger, "I am under great obligations to you. Your

discourse has moved me greatly. I can truly say that I believe I shall

owe the salvation of my soul to you. I wish to offer, sir, to

the seminary with which you are connected, a slight tribute of my

admiration for and indebtedness to you." The gentleman drew out his

purse.

"I waited, breathless," said Professor Park, with his own tremendous

solemnity of manner; "I awaited the tribute of that grateful man. At

what price did he value his soul? I anticipated a contribution for the

seminary which it would be a privilege to offer. At what rate did

my converted hearer price his soul?--Hundreds? Thousands? Tens

of thousands? With indescribable dignity the man handed to me--a

five-dollar bill!"

McClure's Magazine, Vol. 6, No. 2, January, 1896 · 第 77 / 89 题