HANDEL IN DUBLIN.

If biographers will occasionally make assertions at random, and pass

lightly over important events, because their records are not at hand,

while they give ample development to others, just because the

materials for doing so are more abundant, it is well that there is to

be found here and there an industrious _littérateur_, who will leave

no leaf unturned, and no corner unexplored, if he suspects that any

error has been committed, or any passage of interest slighted, in the

memoirs of a favourite author.

Mr Mainwaring, the earliest biographer of Handel, and, on his

authority, a host of subsequent writers, took upon them to assert,

without any apparent foundation, that the oratorio of the _Messiah_

was performed in London in the year 1741, previously to Handel's visit

to Ireland; but that it met with a cold reception, and this was one

cause of his leaving England. Dr Burney, when composing his _History

of Music_, examined all the London newspapers where public amusements

were advertised during 1741 and for several previous years, but found

no mention whatever of this oratorio. He remembered, too, being a

school-boy at Chester when Handel spent a week there, waiting for fair

winds to carry him across the Channel, and taking advantage of the

delay 'to prove some books that had been hastily transcribed, by

trying the choruses which he intended to perform in Ireland.' An

amateur band was mustered for him, and the manuscript choruses thus

verified were those of the _Messiah_. In the absence, therefore, of

stronger evidence to the contrary, Dr Burney believed that Dublin had

the honour of its first performance. An Irish barrister has now proved

this, we think, beyond dispute.[1] His evidence has been drawn from

the newspaper tomes of 1741, preserved in the public libraries of

Dublin, confirmed by the records of the cathedrals and some of the

charitable institutions, and yet more emphatically from some original

letters of this date. He has thus succeeded in doing 'justice to

Ireland,' by securing for it, in all time to come, the distinguished

place which it is entitled to occupy in the history of this great man.

Perhaps we should rather say, he has done justice to England, by

clearing it of the imputation of having 'coldly received' a musical

production to which immortal fame has since been decreed. While the

musical world will thank our author for several new facts particularly

interesting to them, the main attraction for general readers will

probably be found in the glimpses which this volume affords of a _beau

monde_ which has passed away.

In 1720, a royal academy for the promotion of Italian operas was

founded in London by some of the nobility and gentry under royal

auspices. Handel, Bononcini, and Areosti, were engaged as a

triumvirate of composers; and to Handel was committed the charge of

engaging the singers. But the rivalry between him and Bononcini rose

to strife; the aristocratic patrons took nearly equal sides; and a

furious controversy on their respective merits was carried on for

years. Hence the epigram of Dean Swift--

Some say that Signor Bononcini,

Compared to Handel, is a ninny;

Others aver that to him Handel

Is scarcely fit to hold the candle.

Strange that such difference should be

'Twixt tweedledum and tweedledee!

When the withdrawal of both his rivals left Handel in sole possession

of the field, he quarrelled with some of his principal performers, and

thereupon ensued new scenes of discord. Ladies of the highest rank

entered with enthusiasm into the strife; and while some flourished

their fans aloft on the side of Faustina, whom Handel had introduced

in order to supersede Cuzzoni, another party, headed by the Countess

of Pembroke, espoused the cause of the depressed songstress, and made

her take an oath on the Holy Gospels, that she would never submit to

accept a lower salary than her rival. The humorous poets of the day

took up the theme, Pope introduced it into his _Dunciad_, and

Arbuthnot published two witty brochures, entitled _Harmony in an

Uproar_, and _The Devil to Pay at St James's_. The result of these and

other contests, in which Handel gradually lost ground, was the

establishment of a rival Opera at Lincoln's Inn Fields. It was

patronised by the Prince of Wales and most of the nobles; and not even

the presence of the king and queen, who continued the steady friends

of Handel, could attract for him an audience at the Haymarket. It

became quite fashionable to decry his compositions as beneath the

notice of musical connoisseurs. Politics, it is said, came to mingle

in the controversy; and those who held by the king's Opera were as

certainly Tories, as those who went to the nobility's were Whigs. Of

course all this was very foolish, and very wrong; yet in our days of

stately conventionality, when perfect impassibility is deemed the

highest style of breeding, there is something refreshing in reading of

such animated scenes in high life. The crowning act of hostility to

Handel, was when the Earl of Middlesex himself assumed the profession

of manager of Italian operas, and engaged the king's theatre, with a

new composer, and a new company.

Handel had, for some time, been meditating a withdrawal from the

Opera, in order to devote himself exclusively to the composition of

sacred music, of which he had already produced several fine specimens.

He was wont to say, that this was an occupation 'better suited to the

circumstances of a man advancing in years, than that of adapting music

to such vain and trivial words as the musical drama generally consists

of.' The truth was, he had discovered his forte. But the tide of

fashionable feeling ran so strongly against him, that even the

performance of the oratorios of _Saul_ and _Israel in Egypt_ scarcely

paid expenses. Unwilling to submit his forthcoming _Messiah_ also to

the caprices of fashion, and the malignity of party, he wisely

embraced an opportunity which was opened to him of bringing out this

great work in Dublin, under singularly favourable auspices, and

crossed the Channel in November 1741.

Those who are acquainted with the Irish metropolis--not merely with

the handsome streets and squares eastward, which are now the abodes of

gentility, but with the dirty thoroughfares about the cathedrals--have

observed the large houses which some of them contain, now let in

single rooms to a wretched population, and need scarcely be told that

they were once the abodes of wealth and luxury. Fishamble Street, in

this quarter of the town, is one of the oldest streets in Dublin.

'Under the eastern gable of the ancient cathedral of Christ's Church,

separated and hidden from it by a row of houses, it winds its crooked

course down the hill from Castle Street to the Liffey, as forlorn and

neglected as other old streets in its vicinity. A number of

trunkmakers' shops give it an aspect somewhat peculiar; miserable

alleys open from it on the right and left; a barber's pole or two

overhang the footway; and huxters' shops are frequent, with their

wonted array of articles more useful than ornamental. One would never

guess, looking at this old street, that it was once the festive resort

of the wealthy and refined. It needs an effort of imagination to

conceive of it as having witnessed the gay throng of fashion and

aristocracy; the vice-regal _cortège_; ladies, in hoops and feathers;

and "white-gloved beaux," in bag, and sword, and chapeau; with scores

of liveried footmen and pages; and the press of coaches, and chariots,

and sedan-chairs. Yet such was the scene often presented here in the

eighteenth century.' For see, in an oblique angle of the street, and

somewhat retired from the other houses, is a mean, neglected old

building, with a wooden porch, still known by name as the Fishamble

Street Theatre. This is the remaining part of what was originally 'the

great music-hall,' built by a charitable musical society, 'finished in

the most elegant manner, under the direction of Captain Castell,' and

opened to the public on the 2d October 1741. It was within these walls

that the notes of the _Messiah_ first sounded in the ears of an

enraptured audience, and here that its author entered on a new career

of fame.

To prepare for the reception of this, his master-work, Handel first

gave a series of musical entertainments, consisting of some of his

earlier oratorios, and other kindred compositions. They commanded a

most distinguished auditory, including the Lord-Lieutenant and his

family, and were crowned with success in a pecuniary point of view,

answering, and indeed exceeding, the composer's highest expectations.

In a letter written at this time to Mr C. Jennens, who had selected

the words of the _Messiah_, and composed those of a cantata which had

been much admired, he describes, in glowing colours, his happy

position, and informs him that he had set the _Messiah_ to music

before he left England--thus inferentially affording additional

evidence that it had not been performed there. Moreover, the

advertisements call it Handel's _new_ oratorio, and boast that it was

composed expressly for the charitable purpose to which the proceeds of

its first performance were consecrated. This is confirmed by reference

to the minutes of one at least of these institutions, in which it

appears that Handel was in correspondence with them before he had

completed his composition.

The people of Dublin are passionately fond of music, and charitable

musical societies form a peculiar and interesting feature of its

society during the last century. These were academies or clubs, each

of which was attached in the way of patronage to some particular

charity, to which its revenues were consecrated. Whitelaw, in his

_History of Dublin_ (1758), mentions a very aristocratic musical

academy, which held its meetings in the Fishamble Street Hall, under

the presidency of the Earl of Mornington--the Duke of Wellington's

father. His lordship was himself the leader of the band; among the

violoncellos were Lord Bellamont, Sir John Dillon, and Dean Burke;

among the flutes, Lord Lucan; at the harpsichord, Lady Freke; and so

on. Their meetings, we are told, were private, except once a year,

when they performed in public for a charitable purpose, and admitted

all who chose to buy tickets. It does not appear, however, that this

academy was identical with the association that built the hall, and

whose concerts seem to have been much more frequent, as well as its

benevolent designs more extensive. It was called, _par eminence_, The

Charitable Musical Society; the others having distinctive designations

besides. The objects of its benevolence were the prisoners of the

Marshalseas, who were in circumstances similar to those which, many

years afterwards, elicited the benevolent labours of John Howard:

confined often for trifling debts, pining in hopeless misery, and

without food, save that received from the casual hand of charity. This

society made a daily distribution of bread among some of these, while

others were released through their humane exertions. On the 17th of

March 1741, they report, that 'the Committee of the Charitable Musical

Society appointed for this year to visit the Marshalseas in this city,

and release the prisoners confined therein for debt, have already

released 188 miserable persons of both sexes. They offered a

reasonable composition to the creditors, and many of the creditors

being in circumstances almost equally miserable with their debtors,

due regard was paid by the committee to this circumstance.' Their

funds must have improved considerably after the erection of their

Music Hall, which seems to have been the largest room of the kind in

Dublin, and in frequent requisition for public concerts, balls, and

other reunions where it was desirable to assemble a numerous company,

or employ a large orchestra. The hire of the hall on such occasions

would form a handsome addition to the proceeds of their own concerts.

It was to these funds that the proceeds of the first performance of

the _Messiah_ were devoted, in connection with those of Mercer's

Hospital, an old and still eminent school of surgery--and the Royal

Infirmary, which still exists in Jervis Street as a place for the

immediate reception of persons meeting with sudden accidents. The

performance was duly advertised in _Faulkner's Journal_, with the

additional announcement, that 'many ladies and gentlemen who are

well-wishers to this noble and grand charity, for which this oratorio

was composed, request it as a favour that the ladies who honour this

performance with their presence would be pleased to come without

hoops, as it will greatly increase the charity by making room for more

company.' In another advertisement it is added, that 'the gentlemen

are desired to come without their swords.'

On the ensuing Saturday, the following account was given of this

memorable festival: 'On Tuesday last (April 13, 1742), Mr Handel's

sacred grand oratorio, the _Messiah_, was performed in the New Musick

Hall in Fishamble Street; the best judges allowed it to be the most

finished piece of musick. Words are wanting to express the exquisite

delight it afforded to the admiring, crowded audience. The sublime,

the grand, and the tender, adapted to the most elevated, majestick,

and moving words, conspired to transport and charm the ravished heart

and ear. It is but just to Mr Handel, that the world should know he

generously gave the money arising from this grand performance to be

equally shared by the Society for Relieving Prisoners, the Charitable

Infirmary, and Mercer's Hospital, for which they will ever gratefully

remember his name; and that the gentlemen of the two choirs, Mr

Dubourg, Mrs Avolio, and Mrs Cibber, who all performed their parts to

admiration, acted also on the same disinterested principle, satisfied

with the deserved applause of the publick, and the conscious pleasure

of promoting such useful and extensive charity. There were above 700

people in the room, and the sum collected for that noble and pious

charity amounted to about L.400, out of which L.127 goes to each of

the three great and pious charities.'

Handel remained five months longer in the Irish metropolis, during

which period it is recorded that 'he diverted the thoughts of the

people from every other pursuit.' On his return to London in August

1742, he was warmly received by his former friends; his enemies, too,

were greatly conciliated. His having relinquished all concern with

operatic affairs, and opened for himself a new and undisputed sphere,

removed the old grounds of hostility; while the enthusiastic reception

which he had met in Dublin, had served as an effectual reproach to

those whose malignity had forced him to seek for justice there.

Notwithstanding some difficulties at the outset of his new career at

home, he lived to realise an income of above L.2000 a year, and never

found it necessary or convenient to revisit Ireland; but the custom of

performing his oratorios and cantatas for the benefit of medical

charities was maintained for many years; and it is believed that the

works of no other composer have so largely contributed to the relief

of human suffering.

Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 455 Volume 18, New Series, September 18, 1852 · 第 10 / 15 题