CHAPTER V.

1682-1684.

LeFebvre de la Barre.

His Arrival at Quebec • The Great Fire • A Coming Storm • Iroquois

Policy • The Danger imminent • Indian Allies of France • Frontenac and

the Iroquois • Boasts of La Barre • His Past Life • His Speculations •

He takes Alarm • His Dealings with the Iroquois • His Illegal Trade •

His Colleague denounces him • Fruits of his Schemes • His Anger and his

Fears.

When the new governor, La Barre, and the new intendant, Meules, arrived

at Quebec, a dismal greeting waited them. All the Lower Town was in

ashes, except the house of the merchant Aubert de la Chesnaye, standing

alone amid the wreck. On a Tuesday, the fourth of August, at ten o'clock

in the evening, the nuns of the Hôtel-Dieu were roused from their early

slumbers by shouts, outcries, and the ringing of bells; "and," writes

one of them, "what was our terror to find it as light as noonday, the

flames burned so fiercely and rose so high." Half an hour before,

Chartier de Lotbinière, judge of the king's court, heard the first

alarm, ran down the descent now called Mountain Street, and found every

thing in confusion in the town below. The house of Etienne Planchon was

in a blaze; the fire was spreading to those of his neighbors, and had

just leaped the narrow street to the storehouse of the Jesuits. The

season was excessively dry; there were no means of throwing water except

kettles and buckets, and the crowd was bewildered with excitement and

fright. Men were ordered to tear off roofs and pull down houses; but the

flames drove them from their work, and at four o'clock in the morning

fifty-five buildings were burnt to the ground. They were all of wood,

but many of them were storehouses filled with goods; and the property

consumed was more in value than all that remained in Canada. [1]

[1] Chartier de Lotbinière, Procès-verbal sur l'Incendie de la Basse

Ville; Meules au Ministre, 6 Oct., 1682; Juchereau, Histoire de

l'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, 256.

Under these gloomy auspices, Le Febvre de la Barre began his reign. He

was an old officer who had achieved notable exploits against the English

in the West Indies, but who was now to be put to a test far more severe.

He made his lodging in the château; while his colleague, Meules, could

hardly find a shelter. The buildings of the Upper Town were filled with

those whom the fire had made roofless, and the intendant was obliged to

content himself with a house in the neighboring woods. Here he was ill

at ease, for he dreaded an Indian war and the scalping-knives of the

Iroquois. [2]

[2] Meules au Ministre, 6 Oct., 1682.

So far as his own safety was concerned, his alarm was needless; but not

so as regarded the colony with whose affairs he was charged. For those

who had eyes to see it, a terror and a woe lowered in the future of

Canada. In an evil hour for her, the Iroquois had conquered their

southern neighbors, the Andastes, who had long held their ground against

them, and at one time threatened them with ruin. The hands of the

confederates were now free; their arrogance was redoubled by victory,

and, having long before destroyed all the adjacent tribes on the north

and west, [3] they looked for fresh victims in the wilderness beyond.

Their most easterly tribe, the Mohawks, had not forgotten the

chastisement they had received from Tracy and Courcelle. They had

learned to fear the French, and were cautious in offending them; but it

was not so with the remoter Iroquois. Of these, the Senecas at the

western end of the "Long House," as they called their fivefold league,

were by far the most powerful, for they could muster as many warriors as

all the four remaining tribes together; and they now sought to draw the

confederacy into a series of wars, which, though not directed against

the French, threatened soon to involve them. Their first movement

westward was against the tribes of the Illinois. I have already

described their bloody inroad in the summer of 1680. [4] They made the

valley of the Illinois a desert, and returned with several hundred

prisoners, of whom they burned those that were useless, and incorporated

the young and strong into their own tribe.

[3] Jesuits in North America.

[4] Discovery of the Great West.

This movement of the western Iroquois had a double incentive, their love

of fighting and their love of gain. It was a war of conquest and of

trade. All the five tribes of the league had become dependent on the

English and Dutch of Albany for guns, powder, lead, brandy, and many

other things that they had learned to regard as necessities. Beaver

skins alone could buy them, but to the Iroquois the supply of beaver

skins was limited. The regions of the west and north-west, the upper

Mississippi with its tributaries, and, above all, the forests of the

upper lakes, were occupied by tribes in the interest of the French,

whose missionaries and explorers had been the first to visit them, and

whose traders controlled their immense annual product of furs. La Salle,

by his newly built fort of St. Louis, engrossed the trade of the

Illinois and Miami tribes; while the Hurons and Ottawas, gathered about

the old mission of Michillimackinac, acted as factors for the Sioux, the

Winnebagoes, and many other remote hordes. Every summer they brought

down their accumulated beaver skins to the fair at Montreal; while

French bush-rangers roving through the wilderness, with or without

licenses, collected many more. [5]

[5] Duchesneau, Memoir on Western Indians in N. Y. Colonial Docs., IX.

160.

It was the purpose of the Iroquois to master all this traffic, conquer

the tribes who had possession of it, and divert the entire supply of

furs to themselves, and through themselves to the English and Dutch.

That English and Dutch traders urged them on is affirmed by the French,

and is very likely. The accomplishment of the scheme would have ruined

Canada. Moreover, the Illinois, the Hurons, the Ottawas, and all the

other tribes threatened by the Iroquois, were the allies and "children"

of the French, who in honor as in interest were bound to protect them.

Hence, when the Seneca invasion of the Illinois became known, there was

deep anxiety in the colony, except only among those in whom hatred of

the monopolist La Salle had overborne every consideration of the public

good. La Salle's new establishment of St. Louis was in the path of the

invaders; and, if he could be crushed, there was wherewith to console

his enemies for all else that might ensue.

Bad as was the posture of affairs, it was made far worse by an incident

that took place soon after the invasion of the Illinois. A Seneca chief

engaged in it, who had left the main body of his countrymen, was

captured by a party of Winnebagoes to serve as a hostage for some of

their tribe whom the Senecas had lately seized. They carried him to

Michillimackinac, where there chanced to be a number of Illinois,

married to Indian women of that neighborhood. A quarrel ensued between

them and the Seneca, whom they stabbed to death in a lodge of the

Kiskakons, one of the tribes of the Ottawas. Here was a casus belli

likely to precipitate a war fatal to all the tribes about

Michillimackinac, and equally fatal to the trade of Canada. Frontenac

set himself to conjure the rising storm, and sent a messenger to the

Iroquois to invite them to a conference.

He found them unusually arrogant. Instead of coming to him, they

demanded that he should come to them, and many of the French wished him

to comply; but Frontenac refused, on the ground that such a concession

would add to their insolence, and he declined to go farther than

Montreal, or at the utmost Fort Frontenac, the usual place of meeting

with them. Early in August he was at Montreal, expecting the arrival of

the Ottawas and Hurons on their yearly descent from the lakes. They soon

appeared, and he called them to a solemn council. Terror had seized them

all. "Father, take pity on us," said the Ottawa orator, "for we are like

dead men." A Huron chief, named the Rat, declared that the world was

turned upside down, and implored the protection of Onontio, "who is

master of the whole earth." These tribes were far from harmony among

themselves. Each was jealous of the other, and the Ottawas charged the

Hurons with trying to make favor with the common enemy at their expense.

Frontenac told them that they were all his children alike, and advised

them to live together as brothers, and make treaties of alliance with

all the tribes of the lakes. At the same time, he urged them to make

full atonement for the death of the Seneca murdered in their country,

and carefully to refrain from any new offence.

Soon after there was another arrival. La Forêt, the officer in command

at Fort Frontenac, appeared, bringing with him a famous Iroquois chief

called Decanisora or Tegannisorens, attended by a number of warriors.

They came to invite Frontenac to meet the deputies of the five tribes at

Oswego, within their own limits. Frontenac's reply was characteristic.

"It is for the father to tell the children where to hold council, not

for the children to tell the father. Fort Frontenac is the proper place,

and you should thank me for going so far every summer to meet you." The

Iroquois had expressed pacific intentions towards the Hurons and

Ottawas. For this Frontenac commended him, but added: "The Illinois also

are children of Onontio, and hence brethren of the Iroquois. Therefore

they, too, should be left in peace; for Onontio wishes that all his

family should live together in union." He confirmed his words with a

huge belt of wampum. Then, addressing the flattered deputy as a great

chief, he desired him to use his influence in behalf of peace, and gave

him a jacket and a silk cravat, both trimmed with gold, a hat, a scarlet

ribbon, and a gun, with beads for his wife, and red cloth for his

daughter. The Iroquois went home delighted. [6]

[6] For the papers on this affair, see N. Y. Colonial Docs., IX.

Perhaps on this occasion Frontenac was too confident of his influence

over the savage confederates. Such at least was the opinion of

Lamberville, Jesuit missionary at Onondaga, the Iroquois capital. From

what he daily saw around him, he thought the peril so imminent that

concession on the part of the French was absolutely necessary, since not

only the Illinois, but some of the tribes of the lakes, were in danger

of speedy and complete destruction. "Tegannisorens loves the French," he

wrote to Frontenac, "but neither he nor any other of the upper Iroquois

fear them in the least. They annihilate our allies, whom by adoption of

prisoners they convert into Iroquois; and they do not hesitate to avow

that after enriching themselves by our plunder, and strengthening

themselves by those who might have aided us, they will pounce all at

once upon Canada, and overwhelm it in a single campaign." He adds that

within the past two years they have reinforced themselves by more than

nine hundred warriors, adopted into their tribes. [7]

[7] P. Jean de Lamberville à Frontenac, 20 Sept., 1682.

Such was the crisis when Frontenac left Canada at the moment when he was

needed most, and Le Febvre de la Barre came to supplant him. The new

governor introduces himself with a burst of rhodomontade. "The

Iroquois," he writes to the king, "have twenty-six hundred warriors. I

will attack them with twelve hundred men. They know me before seeing me,

for they have been told by the English how roughly I handled them in the

West Indies." This bold note closes rather tamely; for the governor

adds, "I think that if the Iroquois believe that your Majesty would have

the goodness to give me some help, they will make peace, and let our

allies alone, which would save the trouble and expense of an arduous

war." [8] He then begs hard for troops, and in fact there was great need

of them, for there were none in Canada; and even Frontenac had been

compelled in the last year of his government to leave unpunished various

acts of violence and plunder committed by the Iroquois. La Barre painted

the situation in its blackest colors, declared that war was imminent,

and wrote to the minister, "We shall lose half our trade and all our

reputation, if we do not oppose these haughty conquerors." [9]

[8] La Barre au Roy, (4 Oct.?) 1682.

[9] La Barre à Seignelay, 1682.

A vein of gasconade appears in most of his letters, not however

accompanied with any conclusive evidence of a real wish to fight. His

best fighting days were past, for he was sixty years old; nor had he

always been a man of the sword. His early life was spent in the law; he

had held a judicial post, and had been intendant of several French

provinces. Even the military and naval employments, in which he

afterwards acquitted himself with credit, were due to the part he took

in forming a joint-stock company for colonizing Cayenne. [10] In fact,

he was but half a soldier; and it was perhaps for this reason that he

insisted on being called, not Monsieur le Gouverneur, but Monsieur le

Général. He was equal to Frontenac neither in vigor nor in rank, but he

far surpassed him in avidity. Soon after his arrival, he wrote to the

minister that he should not follow the example of his predecessors in

making money out of his government by trade; and in consideration of

these good intentions he asked for an addition to his pay. [11] He then

immediately made alliances with certain merchants of Quebec for carrying

on an extensive illicit trade, backed by all the power of his office.

Now ensued a strange and miserable complication. Questions of war

mingled with questions of personal gain. There was a commercial

revolution in the colony. The merchants whom Frontenac excluded from his

ring now had their turn. It was they who, jointly with the intendant and

the ecclesiastics, had procured the removal of the old governor; and it

was they who gained the ear of the new one. Aubert de la Chesnaye,

Jacques Le Ber, and the rest of their faction, now basked in official

favor; and La Salle, La Forêt, and the other friends of Frontenac, were

cast out. There was one exception. Greysolon Du Lhut, leader of coureurs

de bois, was too important to be thus set aside. He was now as usual in

the wilderness of the north, the roving chief of a half savage crew,

trading, exploring, fighting, and laboring with persistent hardihood to

foil the rival English traders of Hudson's Bay. Inducements to gain his

adhesion were probably held out to him by La Barre and his allies: be

this as it may, it is certain that he acted in harmony with the faction

of the new governor. With La Forêt it was widely different. He commanded

Fort Frontenac, which belonged to La Salle, when La Barre's associates,

La Chesnaye and Le Ber, armed with an order from the governor, came up

from Montreal, and seized upon the place with all that it contained. The

pretext for this outrage was the false one that La Salle had not

fulfilled the conditions under which the fort had been granted to him.

La Forêt was told that he might retain his command, if he would join the

faction of La Barre; but he refused, stood true to his chief, and soon

after sailed for France.

[10] He was made governor of Cayenne, and went thither with Tracy in

1664. Two years later, he gained several victories over the English, and

recaptured Cayenne, which they had taken in his absence. He wrote a book

concerning this colony, called Description de la France Équinoctiale.

Another volume, called Journal du Voyage du Sieur de la Barre en la

Terre Ferme et Isle de Cayenne, was printed at Paris in 1671.

[11] La Barre à Seignelay, 1682.

La Barre summoned the most able and experienced persons in the colony to

discuss the state of affairs. Their conclusion was that the Iroquois

would attack and destroy the Illinois, and, this accomplished, turn upon

the tribes of the lakes, conquer or destroy them also, and ruin the

trade of Canada. [12] Dark as was the prospect, La Barre and his

fellow-speculators flattered themselves that the war could be averted

for a year at least. The Iroquois owed their triumphs as much to their

sagacity and craft as to their extraordinary boldness and ferocity. It

had always been their policy to attack their enemies in detail, and

while destroying one to cajole the rest. There seemed little doubt that

they would leave the tribes of the lakes in peace till they had finished

the ruin of the Illinois; so that if these, the allies of the colony,

were abandoned to their fate, there would be time for a profitable trade

in the direction of Michillimackinac.

[12] Conference on the State of Affairs with the Iroquois, Oct., 1682,

in N. Y. Colonial Docs., IX. 194.

But hopes seemed vain and prognostics illusory, when, early in spring, a

report came that the Seneca Iroquois were preparing to attack, in force,

not only the Illinois, but the Hurons and Ottawas of the lakes. La Barre

and his confederates were in dismay. They already had large quantities

of goods at Michillimackinac, the point immediately threatened; and an

officer was hastily despatched, with men and munitions, to strengthen

the defences of the place. [13] A small vessel was sent to France with

letters begging for troops. "I will perish at their head," wrote La

Barre to the king, "or destroy your enemies;" [14] and he assures the

minister that the Senecas must be attacked or the country abandoned.

[15] The intendant, Meules, shared something of his alarm, and informed

the king that "the Iroquois are the only people on earth who do not know

the grandeur of your Majesty." [16]

[13] La Barre au Ministre, 4 Nov., 1683.

[14] La Barre au Roy, 30 Mai, 1683.

[15] La Barre au Ministre, 30 Mai, 1683.

[16] Meules au Roy, 2 Juin, 1683.

While thus appealing to the king, La Barre sent Charles le Moyne as

envoy to Onondaga. Through his influence, a deputation of forty-three

Iroquois chiefs was sent to meet the governor at Montreal. Here a grand

council was held in the newly built church. Presents were given the

deputies to the value of more than two thousand crowns. Soothing

speeches were made them; and they were urged not to attack the tribes of

the lakes, nor to plunder French traders, without permission. [17] They

assented; and La Barre then asked, timidly, why they made war on the

Illinois. "Because they deserve to die," haughtily returned the Iroquois

orator. La Barre dared not answer. They complained that La Salle had

given guns, powder, and lead to the Illinois; or, in other words, that

he had helped the allies of the colony to defend themselves. La Barre,

who hated La Salle and his monopolies, assured them that he should be

punished. [17] It is affirmed, on good authority, that he said more than

this, and told them they were welcome to plunder and kill him. [18] The

rapacious old man was playing with a two-edged sword.

[17] Soon after La Barre's arrival, La Chesnaye is said to have induced

him to urge the Iroquois to plunder all traders who were not provided

with passports from the governor. The Iroquois complied so promptly,

that they stopped and pillaged, at Niagara, two canoes belonging to La

Chesnaye himself, which had gone up the lakes in Frontenac's time, and

therefore were without passports. Recueil de ce qui s'est passé en

Canada au Sujet de la Guerre, etc., depuis l'année 1682. (Published by

the Historical Society of Quebec.) This was not the only case in which

the weapons of La Barre and his partisans recoiled against themselves.

[18] Belmont, Histoire du Canada (a contemporary chronicle).

[19] See Discovery of the Great West. La Barre denies the assertion, and

says that he merely told the Iroquois that La Salle should be sent home.

Thus the Illinois, with the few Frenchmen who had tried to defend them,

were left to perish; and, in return, a brief and doubtful respite was

gained for the tribes of the lakes. La Barre and his confederates took

heart again. Merchandise, in abundance, was sent to Michillimackinac,

and thence to the remoter tribes of the north and west. The governor and

his partner, La Chesnaye, sent up a fleet of thirty canoes; [20] and, a

little later, they are reported to have sent more than a hundred. This

forest trade robbed the colonists, by forestalling the annual market of

Montreal; while a considerable part of the furs acquired by it were

secretly sent to the English and Dutch of New York. Thus the heavy

duties of the custom-house at Quebec were evaded; and silver coin was

received in payment, instead of questionable bills of exchange. [21]

Frontenac had not been faithful to his trust; but, compared to his

successor, he was a model of official virtue.

[20] Mémoire adressé a MM. les Intéressés en la Société de la Ferme et

Commerce du Canada, 1683.

[21] These statements are made in a memorial of the agents of the

custom-house, in letters of Meules, and in several other quarters. La

Barre is accused of sending furs to Albany under pretext of official

communication with the governor of New York.

La Barre busied himself with ostentatious preparation for war; built

vessels at Fort Frontenac, and sent up fleets of canoes, laden or partly

laden with munitions. But his accusers say that the king's canoes were

used to transport the governor's goods, and that the men sent to

garrison Fort Frontenac were destined, not to fight the Iroquois, but to

sell them brandy. "Last year," writes the intendant, "Monsieur de la

Barre had a vessel built, for which he made his Majesty pay heavily;"

and he proceeds to say that it was built for trade, and was used for no

other purpose. "If," he continues, "the two (king's) vessels now at Fort

Frontenac had not been used for trading, they would have saved us half

the expense we have been forced to incur in transporting munitions and

supplies. The pretended necessity of having vessels at this fort, and

the consequent employing of carpenters, and sending up of iron, cordage,

sails, and many other things, at his Majesty's charge, was simply in the

view of carrying on trade." He says, farther, that in May last, the

vessels, canoes, and men being nearly all absent on this errand, the

fort was left in so defenceless a state that a party of Senecas,

returning from their winter hunt, took from it a quantity of goods, and

drank as much brandy as they wanted. "In short," he concludes, "it is

plain that Monsieur de la Barre uses this fort only as a depot for the

trade of Lake Ontario." [22]

[22] Meules à Seignelay, 8 July, 1684. This accords perfectly with

statements made in several memorials of La Salle and his friends.

In the spring of 1683, La Barre had taken a step as rash as it was

lawless and unjust. He sent the Chevalier de Baugis, lieutenant of his

guard, with a considerable number of canoes and men, to seize La Salle's

fort of St. Louis on the river Illinois; a measure which, while

gratifying the passions and the greed of himself and his allies, would

greatly increase he danger of rupture with the Iroquois. Late in the

season, he despatched seven canoes and fourteen men, with goods to the

value of fifteen or sixteen thousand livres, to trade with the tribes of

the Mississippi. As he had sown, so he reaped. The seven canoes passed

through the country of the Illinois. A large war party of Senecas and

Cayugas invaded it in February. La Barre had told their chiefs that they

were welcome to plunder the canoes of La Salle. The Iroquois were not

discriminating. They fell upon the governor's canoes, seized all the

goods, and captured the men. [23] Then they attacked Baugis at Fort St.

Louis. The place, perched on a rock, was strong, and they were beaten

off; but the act was one of open war.

[23] There appears no doubt that La Barre brought this upon himself. His

successor, Denonville, writes that the Iroquois declared that, in

plundering the canoes, they thought they were executing the orders they

had received to plunder La Salle's people. Denonville, Mémoire adressé

ou Ministre sur les Affaires de la Nouvelle France, 10 Août, 1688. The

Iroquois told Dongan, in 1684, "that they had not don any thing to the

French but what Monsr. delaBarr Ordered them, which was that if they

mett with any French hunting without his passe to take what they had

from them." Dongan to Denonville, 9 Sept., 1687.

When La Barre heard the news, he was furious. [24] He trembled for the

vast amount of goods which he and his fellow-speculators had sent to

Michillimackinac and the lakes. There was but one resource: to call out

the militia, muster the Indian allies, advance to Lake Ontario, and

dictate peace to the Senecas, at the head of an imposing force; or,

failing in this, to attack and crush them. A small vessel lying at

Quebec was despatched to France, with urgent appeals for immediate aid,

though there was little hope that it could arrive in time. She bore a

long letter, half piteous, half bombastic, from La Barre to the king. He

declared that extreme necessity and the despair of the people had forced

him into war, and protested that he should always think it a privilege

to lay down life for his Majesty. "I cannot refuse to your country of

Canada, and your faithful subjects, to throw myself, with unequal

forces, against the foe, while at the same time begging your aid for a

poor, unhappy people on the point of falling victims to a nation of

barbarians." He says that the total number of men in Canada capable of

bearing arms is about two thousand; that he received last year a hundred

and fifty raw recruits; and that he wants, in addition, seven or eight

hundred good soldiers. "Recall me," he concludes, "if you will not help

me, for I cannot bear to see the country perish in my hands." At the

same time, he declares his intention to attack the Senecas, with or

without help, about the middle of August. [25]

Here we leave him, for a while, scared, excited, and blustering.

[24] "Ce qui mit M. de la Barre en fureur." Belmont, Histoire du Canada.

[25] La Barre au Roy, 5 Juin, 1684.

France and England in North America, Part V: Count Frontenac, New France, Louis XIV · 第 5 / 21 章